北京奥运会的合作伙伴之一Adidas的广告语是"Impossible is nothing"。这句广告语貌似与"Nothing is impossible"一样,只是"nothing"与"impossible"的位置颠倒了而已。那么,"Impossible i...北京奥运会的合作伙伴之一Adidas的广告语是"Impossible is nothing"。这句广告语貌似与"Nothing is impossible"一样,只是"nothing"与"impossible"的位置颠倒了而已。那么,"Impossible is nothing"是否为"Nothing is impossible"的倒装句?两者是否传递着同样的意思?这句广告语有语法错误?通过对比研究"Impossible is nothing"与"Nothing is impossible"的信息结构和论题结构后发现,这两个句子是存在明显差别的,并且传达着不同的信息。展开更多
北京奥运会的合作伙伴之一Adidas的广告语是"Impossible is nothing"。这句广告语貌似与"Nothing is impossi-ble"一样,只是"nothing"与"impossible"的位置颠倒了而已。那么,"Impossible ...北京奥运会的合作伙伴之一Adidas的广告语是"Impossible is nothing"。这句广告语貌似与"Nothing is impossi-ble"一样,只是"nothing"与"impossible"的位置颠倒了而已。那么,"Impossible is nothing"是否真的为"Nothing is im-possible"的倒装句吗?两者是否传递着同样的意思呢?另外,一部分英语学习者怀疑"Impossible is nothing"本身就是有语病的,因为在他们所学的英语语法系统里面,impossible是个形容词,不单独做名词,也就是说不能做主语。这句广告语真的是有语法错误吗?作者通过对比研究"Impossible is nothing"与"Nothing is impossible"的信息结构和论题结构后发现,这两个句子是存在明显差别的,并且传达着不同的信息。展开更多
Predicate-Argument （PA） structure anal- ysis is often divided into three subtasks： predicate sense disambiguation, argument identification and argument classification mostly been modeled in To date, they have isol...Predicate-Argument （PA） structure anal- ysis is often divided into three subtasks： predicate sense disambiguation, argument identification and argument classification mostly been modeled in To date, they have isolation. However, this approach neglects logical constraints between them. We therefore exploite integrating predicate sense disambiguation with the latter two subtasks respectively, which verifies that the automatic predicate sense disambiguation could help the se- mantic role labeling task. In addition, a dual de- composition algorithm is used to alleviate the er- ror propagation between argument identification subtask and argument classification subtask by benefitting the argument identification subtask greatly. Experiment results show that our ap- proach leads to a better performance with PA a- nalysis than other pipeline approaches.展开更多
文摘北京奥运会的合作伙伴之一Adidas的广告语是"Impossible is nothing"。这句广告语貌似与"Nothing is impossible"一样,只是"nothing"与"impossible"的位置颠倒了而已。那么,"Impossible is nothing"是否为"Nothing is impossible"的倒装句?两者是否传递着同样的意思?这句广告语有语法错误?通过对比研究"Impossible is nothing"与"Nothing is impossible"的信息结构和论题结构后发现,这两个句子是存在明显差别的,并且传达着不同的信息。
文摘北京奥运会的合作伙伴之一Adidas的广告语是"Impossible is nothing"。这句广告语貌似与"Nothing is impossi-ble"一样,只是"nothing"与"impossible"的位置颠倒了而已。那么,"Impossible is nothing"是否真的为"Nothing is im-possible"的倒装句吗?两者是否传递着同样的意思呢?另外,一部分英语学习者怀疑"Impossible is nothing"本身就是有语病的,因为在他们所学的英语语法系统里面,impossible是个形容词,不单独做名词,也就是说不能做主语。这句广告语真的是有语法错误吗?作者通过对比研究"Impossible is nothing"与"Nothing is impossible"的信息结构和论题结构后发现,这两个句子是存在明显差别的,并且传达着不同的信息。
文摘Predicate-Argument （PA） structure anal- ysis is often divided into three subtasks： predicate sense disambiguation, argument identification and argument classification mostly been modeled in To date, they have isolation. However, this approach neglects logical constraints between them. We therefore exploite integrating predicate sense disambiguation with the latter two subtasks respectively, which verifies that the automatic predicate sense disambiguation could help the se- mantic role labeling task. In addition, a dual de- composition algorithm is used to alleviate the er- ror propagation between argument identification subtask and argument classification subtask by benefitting the argument identification subtask greatly. Experiment results show that our ap- proach leads to a better performance with PA a- nalysis than other pipeline approaches.
