期刊文献+
共找到6篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
雷贝拉唑、莫沙必利联合铝镁加治疗反流性食管炎的临床疗效 被引量:7
1
作者 徐宏骏 杨小东 杜学厂 《中国医学工程》 2015年第2期55-55,57,共2页
目的探讨雷贝拉唑、莫沙必利和铝镁加联合治疗反流性食管炎的效果。方法对选择的76例反流性食管炎患者进行随机分组,观察组和对照组各38例,对照组患者服用雷贝拉唑和莫沙必利,观察组患者在对照组基础上加服铝镁加,观察统计两组患者的临... 目的探讨雷贝拉唑、莫沙必利和铝镁加联合治疗反流性食管炎的效果。方法对选择的76例反流性食管炎患者进行随机分组,观察组和对照组各38例,对照组患者服用雷贝拉唑和莫沙必利,观察组患者在对照组基础上加服铝镁加,观察统计两组患者的临床疗程和不良反应情况。结果治疗前,两组患者临床资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,观察组疗效明显优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组不良反应差异无统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论通过雷贝拉唑、莫沙必利和铝镁加联合治疗反流性食管炎,临床疗效确切,患者不良反应小,值得应用推广。 展开更多
关键词 贝雷拉唑 莫沙必利 铝镁加 反流性食管炎
下载PDF
内镜观察半夏泻心汤合雷贝拉唑对消化性溃疡溃疡面影响的研究 被引量:4
2
作者 苏正活 《泰山医学院学报》 CAS 2018年第6期619-620,共2页
目的探讨半夏泻心汤、雷贝拉唑联合治疗消化性溃疡对内镜观察溃疡面的影响情况。方法对照组给予雷贝拉唑四联疗法治疗,研究组给予雷贝拉唑四联疗法、半夏泻心汤联合治疗。两组消化性溃疡患者均连续治疗4周为宜,记录其治疗后内镜检查溃... 目的探讨半夏泻心汤、雷贝拉唑联合治疗消化性溃疡对内镜观察溃疡面的影响情况。方法对照组给予雷贝拉唑四联疗法治疗,研究组给予雷贝拉唑四联疗法、半夏泻心汤联合治疗。两组消化性溃疡患者均连续治疗4周为宜,记录其治疗后内镜检查溃疡面愈合情况。结果研究组治疗后内镜下检查溃疡面到达Sc期所占比例(75.56%)显著高于对照组(44.44%),P<0.05。结论应用雷贝拉唑、半夏泻心汤联合治疗消化性溃疡可显著提高患者内镜检查下溃疡面愈合效果,有利于保障其疗效及生活质量。 展开更多
关键词 消化性溃疡 半夏泻心汤 贝雷拉唑 内镜检查 溃疡面愈合情况
下载PDF
用三联疗法治疗152例消化性溃疡患者的疗效观察 被引量:1
3
作者 周慧明 《当代医药论丛》 2014年第15期203-203,共1页
目的:探讨用三联疗法治疗消化性溃疡的临床效果。方法:对2011年2月~2014年2月期间我院收治的304例消化性溃疡患者的临床资料进行回顾性研究。我们将这304例患者随机分为观察组和对照组,每组各有152例患者。为对照组患者联合使用奥美拉... 目的:探讨用三联疗法治疗消化性溃疡的临床效果。方法:对2011年2月~2014年2月期间我院收治的304例消化性溃疡患者的临床资料进行回顾性研究。我们将这304例患者随机分为观察组和对照组,每组各有152例患者。为对照组患者联合使用奥美拉唑、阿莫西林、克拉霉素进行治疗,为观察组患者联合使用雷贝拉唑、阿莫西林、克拉霉素进行治疗。治疗结束后,比较两组患者消化性溃疡的愈合率、Hp(幽门螺杆菌)的根除率及不良反应的发生情况。结果:治疗结束后,观察组患者消化性溃疡的愈合率为89.47%,对照组患者消化性溃疡的愈合率为59.87%。观察组患者溃疡的愈合率明显高于对照组患者,二者相比差异具有显著性(P<0.05)。观察组患者Hp的根除率为90.79%,对照组患者Hp的根除率为88.81%。观察组患者Hp的根除率明显高于对照组患者,但二者相比差异不显著,不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者均未发生严重的不良反应,对发生不良反应的患者进行对症处理后,其不良反应消失。结论:联合使用雷贝拉唑、阿莫西林、克拉霉素治疗消化性溃疡的临床效果更好,安全性高。此治疗方法值得在临床上推广应用。 展开更多
关键词 贝雷拉唑、三联疗法 消化性溃疡
下载PDF
Furazolidone,amoxicillin,bismuth and rabeprazole quadruple rescue therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori 被引量:26
4
作者 Hong Cheng Fu-Lian Hu 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2009年第7期860-864,共5页
AIM: To compare the efficacy and side effect profiles of three furazolidone and amoxicillin-based quadruple rescue therapies for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H pylonS. METHODS: Patients who failed in the... AIM: To compare the efficacy and side effect profiles of three furazolidone and amoxicillin-based quadruple rescue therapies for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H pylonS. METHODS: Patients who failed in the Hpylori eradication therapy for at least one course were randomly allocated into three groups. Group A received rebaprazole 10 mg+ amoxicillin 1 g + furazolidone 100 mg, and bismuth subcitrate 220 mg, twice daily for 1 wk; group B received the same regimen of group A but for 2 wk; and group C received the same regimen of group B, but furazolidone was replaced by furazolidone 100 mg three times daily. To record the side effect profiles at the end of the treatment, Hpylori eradication was assessed with 13C-urea breath test 4 wk after therapy. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled including 28 males, and 20 patients in each group. The average age of the patients was 49.2 years, ranging from 18 to 84 years. H pylori eradication rates with per-protocol analysis were 82%, 89% and 90% in the three groups, respectively. Side effects were found in 11 patients, including mild dizziness, nausea, diarrhea and increased bowel movement. None of the 11 patients needed treatment for their side effects. CONCLUSION: One- or two-week furazolidone and amoxicillin-based quadruple rescue therapy with a low dose furazolidone (100 mg bid) for the eradication of Hpylori is effective. Extending the antibiotic course to 14 d could improve the eradication rates. 展开更多
关键词 Helicobacter pylori Rescue therapy Quadruple therapy FURAZOLIDONE Low dose
下载PDF
Sofalcone, a mucoprotective agent, increases the cure rate of Helicobacter pylori infection when combined with rabeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin 被引量:7
5
作者 HajimeIsomoto HisashiFurusu +3 位作者 KenOhnita Chun-YangWen KenichiroInoue ShigeruKohno 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2005年第11期1629-1633,共5页
AIM: The mucoprotective agents, sofalcone and polaprezinc have anti-Helicobacter pylori ( H pylori)activities. We determined the therapeutic effects of sofalcone and polaprezinc when combined with rabeprazole,amoxicil... AIM: The mucoprotective agents, sofalcone and polaprezinc have anti-Helicobacter pylori ( H pylori)activities. We determined the therapeutic effects of sofalcone and polaprezinc when combined with rabeprazole,amoxicillin and clarithromycin for Helicobacter pylori infection.METHODS: One hundred and sixty-five consecutive outpatients with peptic ulcer and H pylori infection were randomly assigned to one of the following three groups and medicated for 7 d. Group A: triple therapy with rabeprazole (10 mg twice daily), clarithromycin (200 mg twice daily) and amoxicillin (750 mg twice daily). Group B: sofalcone (100 mg thrice daily) plus the triple therapy.Group C: polaprezinc (150 mg twice daily) plus the triple therapy. Eradication was considered successful if 13C-urea breath test was negative at least 4 wk after cessation of eradication regimens or successive famotidine in the cases of active peptic ulcer.RESULTS: On intention-to-treat basis, H pyloricure wasachieved in 43 of 55 (78.2%) patients, 47 of 54 (87.0%)and 45 of 56 (80.4%) for the groups A, B and Crespectively. Using per protocol analysis, the eradication rates were 81.1% (43/53), 94.0% (47/50) and 84.9% (45/53) respectively. There was a significant difference in the cure rates between group A and B. Adverse events occurred in 10, 12 and 11 patients, from groups A, B and C respectively, but the events were generally mild.CONCLUSION: The addition of sofalcone, but not polaprezinc, significantly increased the cure rate of H pylori infection when combined with the rabeprazole-amoxicillinclarithromycin regimen. 展开更多
关键词 Helicobacter pylori Sofalcone Mucoprotective agents
下载PDF
Rabeprazole vs esomeprazole in non-erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease: A randomized, double-blind study in urban Asia 被引量:8
6
作者 KM Fock EK Teo +3 位作者 TL Ang TS Chua TM Ng YL Tan 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2005年第20期3091-3098,共8页
AIM:Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is becoming increasingly common in Asia. Data on the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in patients with non-erosive GERD (NERD)in Asia is lacking. This double-blind study ... AIM:Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is becoming increasingly common in Asia. Data on the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in patients with non-erosive GERD (NERD)in Asia is lacking. This double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of rabeprazole with esomeprazole in relief of symptoms in patients with NERD.METHODS: One hundred and thirty-four patients with reflux symptoms of NERD and normal endoscopy were randomized to receive rabeprazole 10 mg or esomeprazole 20 mg once daily for 4 wk. Symptoms were recorded in a diary and changes in severity of symptoms noted.RESULTS: At 4 wk of treatment, rabeprazole 10 mg and esomeprazole 20 mg were comparable with regards to the primary endpoint of time to achieve 24-h symptomfree interval for heartburn 8.5 d vs9 d and regurgitation 6 d vs 7.5 d. Rabeprazole and esomeprazole were also similarly efficacious in term of patient's global evaluation with 96% of patients on rabeprazole and 87.9% of patients on esomeprazole, reporting that symptoms improved(P=NS). Satisfactory relief of day- and night-time symptoms was achieved in 98% of patients receiving rabeprazole and 81.4% of patients receiving esomeprazole. Adverse events were comparable in both groups (P = NS).CONCLUSION: Rabeprazole 10 mg has a similar efficacy and safety profile in Asians with NERD as esomeprazole 20 mg. Further study is necessary to investigate whether the small differences between the two drugs seen in this study are related to the improved pharmacodynamicpro perties of rabeprazole. Both drugs were well tolerated. 展开更多
关键词 Non-erosive esophageal reflux disease New proton pump inhibitors
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部