自由概念不仅是资产阶级革命理念的核心理念之一,也是马克思所追求的未来社会主义与共产主义社会的核心价值观的重要组成部分。黑格尔从自由意志出发的推论为个人私有财产权的合法性提供了理论依据,而马克思则从现实社会的经济关系出发...自由概念不仅是资产阶级革命理念的核心理念之一,也是马克思所追求的未来社会主义与共产主义社会的核心价值观的重要组成部分。黑格尔从自由意志出发的推论为个人私有财产权的合法性提供了理论依据,而马克思则从现实社会的经济关系出发对自由的内涵进行了阐释。由于研究方法的不同,马克思与黑格尔在关于人的自由与其私有财产所有权之间关系的理解上存在分歧。尽管如此,两位思想家都对私有财产的结构及其合法性进行了深刻探讨。本文旨在依托黑格尔的《权利哲学要素》与马克思的《1844年经济学哲学手稿》两部著作,分析黑格尔对私有财产的论证逻辑,并探讨马克思对此提出的批判性见解。The concept of freedom is not only one of the core concepts of the bourgeois revolutionary philosophy, but also an important part of the core values of the future socialist and communist societies pursued by Marx. Hegel’s inference from free will provides a theoretical basis for the legitimacy of individual private property rights, while Marx elaborates on the connotation of freedom from the economic relations of the real society. Due to differences in research methodology, Marx and Hegel diverged in their understanding of the relationship between human freedom and private property ownership. Nevertheless, both thinkers have deeply explored the structure of private property and its legitimacy. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the logic of Hegel’s argument for private property and to explore the critical insights that Marx offers about it, relying on both Hegel’s Elements of the Philosophy of Right and Marx’s Philosophical Manuscripts of Economics of 1844.展开更多
以私有财产为切入点,基于《1844年经济学哲学手稿》,从资本的角度出发对私有财产进行深刻的批判。首先,先阐释了劳动作为资本主体本质,而资本是私有财产的客观形式,体现了财产关系的集中化和积累过程。其次,资本的统治逻辑体现在劳动与...以私有财产为切入点,基于《1844年经济学哲学手稿》,从资本的角度出发对私有财产进行深刻的批判。首先,先阐释了劳动作为资本主体本质,而资本是私有财产的客观形式,体现了财产关系的集中化和积累过程。其次,资本的统治逻辑体现在劳动与资本之间的矛盾运动,通过对劳动的剥削和支配实现资本的增值。最后,对作为资本的私有财产的批判,意在探索扬弃私有财产的新道路,旨在构建一个超越私有财产的社会结构,实现真正的社会解放和人的全面发展。马克思也实现了其哲学任务的最终转向——政治经济学的批判。《手稿》为实现共产主义提供了深刻的理论依据。Taking private property as the starting point, based on the Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, this article deeply criticizes private property from the perspective of capital. Firstly, the essence of labor as the subject of capital was explained, and capital is the objective form of private property, reflecting the centralization and accumulation of property relations. Secondly, the ruling logic of capital is reflected in the contradictory movement between labor and capital, achieving capital appreciation through the exploitation and domination of labor. Finally, the criticism of private property as capital aims to explore a new path of abandoning private property, constructing a social structure that transcends private property, and achieving true social liberation and comprehensive human development. Marx also achieved the ultimate turn of his philosophical task—the critique of political economy. The manuscript provides a profound theoretical basis for the realization of communism.展开更多
文摘自由概念不仅是资产阶级革命理念的核心理念之一,也是马克思所追求的未来社会主义与共产主义社会的核心价值观的重要组成部分。黑格尔从自由意志出发的推论为个人私有财产权的合法性提供了理论依据,而马克思则从现实社会的经济关系出发对自由的内涵进行了阐释。由于研究方法的不同,马克思与黑格尔在关于人的自由与其私有财产所有权之间关系的理解上存在分歧。尽管如此,两位思想家都对私有财产的结构及其合法性进行了深刻探讨。本文旨在依托黑格尔的《权利哲学要素》与马克思的《1844年经济学哲学手稿》两部著作,分析黑格尔对私有财产的论证逻辑,并探讨马克思对此提出的批判性见解。The concept of freedom is not only one of the core concepts of the bourgeois revolutionary philosophy, but also an important part of the core values of the future socialist and communist societies pursued by Marx. Hegel’s inference from free will provides a theoretical basis for the legitimacy of individual private property rights, while Marx elaborates on the connotation of freedom from the economic relations of the real society. Due to differences in research methodology, Marx and Hegel diverged in their understanding of the relationship between human freedom and private property ownership. Nevertheless, both thinkers have deeply explored the structure of private property and its legitimacy. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the logic of Hegel’s argument for private property and to explore the critical insights that Marx offers about it, relying on both Hegel’s Elements of the Philosophy of Right and Marx’s Philosophical Manuscripts of Economics of 1844.
文摘以私有财产为切入点,基于《1844年经济学哲学手稿》,从资本的角度出发对私有财产进行深刻的批判。首先,先阐释了劳动作为资本主体本质,而资本是私有财产的客观形式,体现了财产关系的集中化和积累过程。其次,资本的统治逻辑体现在劳动与资本之间的矛盾运动,通过对劳动的剥削和支配实现资本的增值。最后,对作为资本的私有财产的批判,意在探索扬弃私有财产的新道路,旨在构建一个超越私有财产的社会结构,实现真正的社会解放和人的全面发展。马克思也实现了其哲学任务的最终转向——政治经济学的批判。《手稿》为实现共产主义提供了深刻的理论依据。Taking private property as the starting point, based on the Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, this article deeply criticizes private property from the perspective of capital. Firstly, the essence of labor as the subject of capital was explained, and capital is the objective form of private property, reflecting the centralization and accumulation of property relations. Secondly, the ruling logic of capital is reflected in the contradictory movement between labor and capital, achieving capital appreciation through the exploitation and domination of labor. Finally, the criticism of private property as capital aims to explore a new path of abandoning private property, constructing a social structure that transcends private property, and achieving true social liberation and comprehensive human development. Marx also achieved the ultimate turn of his philosophical task—the critique of political economy. The manuscript provides a profound theoretical basis for the realization of communism.
