期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
关于农业发展问题的资源因素分析 被引量:3
1
作者 李云海 陈为毅 《商场现代化》 北大核心 2006年第02X期205-206,共2页
本文针对我国农业发展的现状,采用生产资源因素分析法对农业问题进行分析,并提出解决我国农业发展问题的基本措施。
关键词 中国农业发展的现状 资源因素分析 基本措施
下载PDF
Annual Discharge and Sediment Load Variation in Jialing River During the Past 50 Years 被引量:3
2
作者 DING Wenfeng Hany EI Kateb 《Journal of Mountain Science》 SCIE CSCD 2011年第5期664-676,共13页
Annual discharge and annual suspended sediment loads of Beipei Hydrological Station of the Jialing River catchment were analyzed to describe the trend of Jialing River over the last five decades (1956-2006). These loa... Annual discharge and annual suspended sediment loads of Beipei Hydrological Station of the Jialing River catchment were analyzed to describe the trend of Jialing River over the last five decades (1956-2006). These loads were also analyzed to ascertain the influential factors associated with its variation with the help of Kendall's Tau-b correlation analysis and regression analysis. The results indicated that the Jialing River annual discharge showed no significant trend at >95% confidence level while the annual sediment load appeared to have a significant decrease trend over the last 50 years. A decrease in the annual sediment load was particularly apparent after the year 1985, at which a substantial shift in the sediment level occurred. This shift is attributed to the construction of numerous dams in 1980s. However, after the year of 1985, two periodical stages (1986-1991 and 1992-2006) with distinct sediment load and sediment-runoff ratio were identified. The period 1992-2006 is characterised by low sediment load, which is most probably due to the impact of large scale of soil and water conservation, which took place at the end of the 1980s. Last, models describing the relationship between the discharge and the sediment load, discharge and sediment-runoff ratio as well as between the sediment load and sediment-runoff ratio were constructed. 展开更多
关键词 Jialing River DISCHARGE Sediment variation
下载PDF
Novel prognostic score for patients with gastric carcinoma
3
作者 Baihong Zhang Hongyun Yue +3 位作者 Long Chen Haizhong Wang Jiawei Xu Xianghui Wang 《The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology》 CAS 2011年第12期699-704,共6页
Objective:The lack of a simple criterion for gastric carcinoma creates a persistent challenge for clinicians trying to provide patients with useful prognostic information.The aim of this study was to identify baseline... Objective:The lack of a simple criterion for gastric carcinoma creates a persistent challenge for clinicians trying to provide patients with useful prognostic information.The aim of this study was to identify baseline prognostic factors,and use this information to establish a simple criterion to predict outcome in gastric carcinoma.Methods:Between 2005 and 2010, 155 patients with gastric carcinoma,were enrolled.Clinicopathologic prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis.Results:Of the 155 patients,48(30.9%)died.Three independent poor prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis:gross type>or=3(hazard ratio[HR],1.564;95%CI,1.067 to 2.294),peritoneal dissemination (HR,3.750;95%CI,1.760 to 7.989)and lymphatic duct invasion(HR,3.578;95%CI,1.422 to 9.004).One point was added for each category among three independent prognostic factors.Prognostic score(PS)was determined by an aggregate of these points for each category.There existed a significant difference between survival of patients with PS 0 or 1 and 2(P< 0.0001).Conclusion:Three poor prognostic factors were identified and a simple criteria was devised.Information from this analysis can be used to predict prognosis of gastric carcinoma with a strict stratification. 展开更多
关键词 gastric carcinoma prognostic score SURVIVAL
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部