Knowledge of the culture difference in inter-cultural communicative is of primary importance. It is so in Sino-American communication, especially in speech, one of the two means of communication through language, with...Knowledge of the culture difference in inter-cultural communicative is of primary importance. It is so in Sino-American communication, especially in speech, one of the two means of communication through language, with the other being writing. American and Chinese, brought up in different cultures, have different speech styles. Diversity in speech styles not only involves communication through verbal speech, but also through such non-verbal acts as kinesics, proxemics, and paralinguistic elements. Here the speech styles in the two cultures, American and Chinese, are contrasted with examples from a cultural perspective.展开更多
19世纪末现代西学东渐,系列关键词汇("Key Term s")如人种、文明、社会、民族等陆续传入中国,并对以民族-国家建构为主旨的中国政治、学术和社会思潮产生了很大的影响。其中,法国汉学家拉克伯里所倡导的中国人种、文明自巴比...19世纪末现代西学东渐,系列关键词汇("Key Term s")如人种、文明、社会、民族等陆续传入中国,并对以民族-国家建构为主旨的中国政治、学术和社会思潮产生了很大的影响。其中,法国汉学家拉克伯里所倡导的中国人种、文明自巴比伦而来的学说尤得时人青睐,为当时的"国学大师"、国粹派领袖刘师培、章太炎所推崇和阐发。本文拟就拉氏学说的本来面貌、日本知识界对它的介绍以及中国学者对它的"求证"作一梳理;从文化交流史、近代思想史和学术史的角度,对特定时段中西视野之间的"跨语际实践"(translingual practice)过程作一探索。展开更多
文摘Knowledge of the culture difference in inter-cultural communicative is of primary importance. It is so in Sino-American communication, especially in speech, one of the two means of communication through language, with the other being writing. American and Chinese, brought up in different cultures, have different speech styles. Diversity in speech styles not only involves communication through verbal speech, but also through such non-verbal acts as kinesics, proxemics, and paralinguistic elements. Here the speech styles in the two cultures, American and Chinese, are contrasted with examples from a cultural perspective.
文摘19世纪末现代西学东渐,系列关键词汇("Key Term s")如人种、文明、社会、民族等陆续传入中国,并对以民族-国家建构为主旨的中国政治、学术和社会思潮产生了很大的影响。其中,法国汉学家拉克伯里所倡导的中国人种、文明自巴比伦而来的学说尤得时人青睐,为当时的"国学大师"、国粹派领袖刘师培、章太炎所推崇和阐发。本文拟就拉氏学说的本来面貌、日本知识界对它的介绍以及中国学者对它的"求证"作一梳理;从文化交流史、近代思想史和学术史的角度,对特定时段中西视野之间的"跨语际实践"(translingual practice)过程作一探索。
