A special cloth for keeping LiF(Mg,Cu,P)TL dosimetry elements is worn by examinees. The exposures of 128 examinees .received upper G.I.T (gastro-intestinal tram) X-ray examination are measured. The reference point of ...A special cloth for keeping LiF(Mg,Cu,P)TL dosimetry elements is worn by examinees. The exposures of 128 examinees .received upper G.I.T (gastro-intestinal tram) X-ray examination are measured. The reference point of the maximum body surface exposure given is at the middle of stomach. The average of this point is (4.97±1.94) × 10-4C.kg-1 person-1 examination-1 and (1.33±0.28)×10-4C.kg-1.min-1.展开更多
Using the relation of radial dose distribution which is inverse proportion to square of radial distance, and considering angular distribution of secondary electrons, an analytical formula of mean dose deposited in ext...Using the relation of radial dose distribution which is inverse proportion to square of radial distance, and considering angular distribution of secondary electrons, an analytical formula of mean dose deposited in extended volume around an ion is given and the inactivation cross sections of heavy ions are calculated. The results are in reasonable agreement with experimental data. Compared to the numerical integral methods, the method using analytical formulae is straightforward and simple.展开更多
文摘A special cloth for keeping LiF(Mg,Cu,P)TL dosimetry elements is worn by examinees. The exposures of 128 examinees .received upper G.I.T (gastro-intestinal tram) X-ray examination are measured. The reference point of the maximum body surface exposure given is at the middle of stomach. The average of this point is (4.97±1.94) × 10-4C.kg-1 person-1 examination-1 and (1.33±0.28)×10-4C.kg-1.min-1.
文摘Using the relation of radial dose distribution which is inverse proportion to square of radial distance, and considering angular distribution of secondary electrons, an analytical formula of mean dose deposited in extended volume around an ion is given and the inactivation cross sections of heavy ions are calculated. The results are in reasonable agreement with experimental data. Compared to the numerical integral methods, the method using analytical formulae is straightforward and simple.