1案例1.1简要案情案例1原告于1991年7月入住被告肿瘤外科,于全麻下行胃癌根治性胃大部切除术,术中输入B型血400 m L,术后三次输入血浆各200 m L,后2008年2月经检查患有丙型肝炎,原、被告之间发生医疗纠纷。鉴定情况如下:(1)2011年10...1案例1.1简要案情案例1原告于1991年7月入住被告肿瘤外科,于全麻下行胃癌根治性胃大部切除术,术中输入B型血400 m L,术后三次输入血浆各200 m L,后2008年2月经检查患有丙型肝炎,原、被告之间发生医疗纠纷。鉴定情况如下:(1)2011年10月26日,A市医学会作出医疗事故技术鉴定,认为依据当时(1991年)卫生管理法律被告无违规操作,再者我国在1992年6月后才开展HCV检测,展开更多
Compared with western medicine with objective and standardized theories,traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)places more emphasis on subjective thinking.Moreover,there are several academic schools under TCM,and ancient se...Compared with western medicine with objective and standardized theories,traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)places more emphasis on subjective thinking.Moreover,there are several academic schools under TCM,and ancient secret prescriptions and proven prescriptions play important roles in TCM treatments.However,the drugs used by some academic schools and some ancient secret prescriptions and proven prescriptions often contradict mainstream theories,and some TCM treatment methods do not significantly conform to the methods that are considered safe by the Chinese Pharmacopoeia(2015 edition),medical textbooks and other canonical books.Despite the long history and abundant successful experiences of TCM treatments,controversies regarding these unconventional treatment technologies,specifically when these breach the safety standards of treatment,exist considering that several medical adverse effects are observed when performing these unconventional treatments.In view of this,distinguishing“welldefined technological breakthrough”from“medical fault”is considered necessary.This study discusses the issue and raises constructive suggestions on the corresponding identification standards for unconventional treatment strategies in TCM.展开更多
文摘1案例1.1简要案情案例1原告于1991年7月入住被告肿瘤外科,于全麻下行胃癌根治性胃大部切除术,术中输入B型血400 m L,术后三次输入血浆各200 m L,后2008年2月经检查患有丙型肝炎,原、被告之间发生医疗纠纷。鉴定情况如下:(1)2011年10月26日,A市医学会作出医疗事故技术鉴定,认为依据当时(1991年)卫生管理法律被告无违规操作,再者我国在1992年6月后才开展HCV检测,
基金We thank for the funding support from the Hunan Provincial Situation Advisory Project(No.2013ZZ5).
文摘Compared with western medicine with objective and standardized theories,traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)places more emphasis on subjective thinking.Moreover,there are several academic schools under TCM,and ancient secret prescriptions and proven prescriptions play important roles in TCM treatments.However,the drugs used by some academic schools and some ancient secret prescriptions and proven prescriptions often contradict mainstream theories,and some TCM treatment methods do not significantly conform to the methods that are considered safe by the Chinese Pharmacopoeia(2015 edition),medical textbooks and other canonical books.Despite the long history and abundant successful experiences of TCM treatments,controversies regarding these unconventional treatment technologies,specifically when these breach the safety standards of treatment,exist considering that several medical adverse effects are observed when performing these unconventional treatments.In view of this,distinguishing“welldefined technological breakthrough”from“medical fault”is considered necessary.This study discusses the issue and raises constructive suggestions on the corresponding identification standards for unconventional treatment strategies in TCM.