期刊文献+
共找到5篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
保留脾脏的远端胰切除术治疗外伤性胰损伤 被引量:1
1
作者 张跃 顾汝军 涂传全 《临床外科杂志》 1998年第4期217-218,共2页
采用保留脾脏的远端胰切除术治疗12例外伤性胰损伤。全组病人均保脾成功(100%)。结果表明,在选择的创伤性胰损伤病人,保脾性远端胰切除是安全可行的。
关键词 远端胰切除术 损伤 脾脏保留 治疗
下载PDF
机器人远端胰脾切除术的现状与展望
2
作者 徐慕森 莫绍剑 付西峰 《中国临床研究》 CAS 2024年第4期596-600,共5页
机器人远端胰脾切除术(RDPS)是胰腺体尾部肿瘤的手术切除方式之一。本文概述RDPS的发展历程、手术适应证、切除范围、术后并发症;同时将RDPS与传统手术方式进行对比;明确RDPS具有创伤小、恢复快、住院时间短、学习曲线短、安全性高、淋... 机器人远端胰脾切除术(RDPS)是胰腺体尾部肿瘤的手术切除方式之一。本文概述RDPS的发展历程、手术适应证、切除范围、术后并发症;同时将RDPS与传统手术方式进行对比;明确RDPS具有创伤小、恢复快、住院时间短、学习曲线短、安全性高、淋巴结清扫彻底等优势,以期为临床医生针对胰腺体尾部肿瘤选择合理的手术方式提供科学指导。 展开更多
关键词 切除 机器人手 腹腔镜手 腺肿瘤 根治性顺行模块化切除
原文传递
腹腔镜胰体尾切除术与开腹胰体尾切除术的短期临床疗效比较 被引量:4
3
作者 李维坤 马福海 +6 位作者 刘昊 李洋 马帅 康文哲 钟宇新 解亦斌 田艳涛 《中华肿瘤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第6期495-500,共6页
目的比较腹腔镜胰体尾切除术(LDP)与开腹胰体尾切除术(ODP)的短期临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2017年9月至2018年12月在中国医学科学院肿瘤医院胰胃外科行胰体尾切除术的161例胰体尾肿瘤患者的临床病理资料,根据手术方式将患者分为LDP组(43... 目的比较腹腔镜胰体尾切除术(LDP)与开腹胰体尾切除术(ODP)的短期临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2017年9月至2018年12月在中国医学科学院肿瘤医院胰胃外科行胰体尾切除术的161例胰体尾肿瘤患者的临床病理资料,根据手术方式将患者分为LDP组(43例)和ODP组(118例)。对比LDP组和ODP组患者的术前临床资料、术中相关指标、术后并发症、术后恢复指标、术前和术后炎症指标,分析短期临床疗效和安全性。结果LDP组和ODP组患者的术前临床特征差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。LDP组患者的术中出血量为(194.19±241.83)ml,明显少于ODP组[(315.17±295.94)ml,P<0.05];LDP组患者的术后排气时间为(3.00±0.72)d,明显短于OPD组[(4.05±0.97)d,P<0.001];LDP组患者的下床活动时间为(3.14±1.01)d,明显短于OPD组[(3.55±1.05)d,P<0.05];LDP组患者的术后进食时间为(3.88±1.61)d,明显短于OPD组[(5.11±1.56)d,P<0.001];LDP组患者的拔除引流管时间为(8.44±1.93)d,明显短于ODP组[(9.82±3.70)d,P<0.05];LDP组患者的术后住院时间为(9.65±3.57)d,明显短于ODP组[(11.99±6.57)d,P<0.05];LDP组患者的手术时间为(168.65±55.45)min,虽短于ODP组[(171.23±65.61)min],但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。LDP组患者非胰瘘相关并发症的发生率为16.3%,与ODP组患者的差异无统计学意义(11.0%,P>0.05);LDP组患者胰瘘的发生率为16.3%,与ODP组患者的差异无统计学意义(19.5%,P>0.05);LDP组总并发症的发生率为32.6%,与ODP组的差异无统计学意义(30.5%,P>0.05)。LDP组和ODP组患者术前和术后相关炎症指标的差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论与ODP手术比较,LDP手术具有术中出血量少、术后恢复快、术后住院时间短等优势,并且不增加术后并发症的发生率和延长手术时间。LDP是安全、可行的手术方式,其短期临床效果优于ODP。 展开更多
关键词 体尾肿瘤 腹腔镜 体尾切除 短期临床效果
原文传递
Successful en bloc resection of primary hepatocellular carcinoma directly invading the stomach and pancreas 被引量:1
4
作者 Dimitris P Korkolis Chrysanthi Aggeli +6 位作者 George D Plataniotis Emmanuel Gontikakis Helen Zerbinis Nikitas Papantoniou Dimitris Xinopoulos Nikiforos Apostolikas Perikles P Vassilopoulos 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2009年第9期1134-1137,共4页
Multivisceral surgical resection for cure was successfully performed in a 70-year-old man suffering from a primary hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)associated with direct invasion to the stomach and pancreas.The patient p... Multivisceral surgical resection for cure was successfully performed in a 70-year-old man suffering from a primary hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)associated with direct invasion to the stomach and pancreas.The patient presented with gastric outlet obstruction,upper abdominal pain and a history of chronic liver disease due to hepatitis B virus(HBV)infection.Upper gastro-intestinal(GI)endoscopy revealed an infiltrating tumor protruding through the gastric wall and obliterating the lumen.Computer tomograghy(CT)and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)scan demonstrated a 15-cm tumor in the left lateral segment of the liver with invasion to the stomach and pancreas.Alpha-foetoprotein (AFP)levels and liver function tests were normal.The patient underwent an en bloc left hepatectomy,total gastrectomy,distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy and radical lymphadenectomy.Pathology revealed a poorly differentiated,giant cell HCC involving the stom-ach and pancreas.Disease-free margins of resection were achieved.The patient's postoperative course was uneventful.Sixteen months after surgery,he has norecurrence or distal metastasis.Direct invasion of HCC into the GI tract is rarely encountered.Complete surgical resection should be considered in selected patients with an appropriate hepatic functional reserve. 展开更多
关键词 Hepatocellular carcinoma SURGERY STOMACH PANCREAS Multivisceral resection
下载PDF
National trends in resection of the distal pancreas 被引量:8
5
作者 Armando Rosales-Velderrain Steven P Bowers +4 位作者 Ross F Goldberg Tatyan M Clarke Mauricia A Buchanan John A Stauffer Horacio J Asbun 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第32期4342-4349,共8页
AIM:To investigate national trends in distal pancreatectomy(DP) through query of three national patient care databases.METHODS:From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample(NIS,2003-2009),the National Surgical Quality Improvem... AIM:To investigate national trends in distal pancreatectomy(DP) through query of three national patient care databases.METHODS:From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample(NIS,2003-2009),the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project(NSQIP,2005-2010),and the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results(SEER,2003-2009) databases using appropriate diagnostic and procedural codes we identified all patients with a diagnosis of a benign or malignant lesion of the body and/or tail of the pancreas that had undergone a partial or distal pancreatectomy.Utilization of laparoscopy was defined in NIS by the International Classification of Diseases,Ninth Revision correspondent procedure code;and in NSQIP by the exploratory laparoscopy or unlisted procedure current procedural terminology codes.In SEER,patients were identified by the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology,Third Edition diagnosis codes and the SEER Program Code Manual,third edition procedure codes.We analyzed the databases with respect to trends of inpatient outcome metrics,oncologic outcomes,and hospital volumes in patients with lesions of the neck and body of the pancreas that underwent operative resection.RESULTS:NIS,NSQIP and SEER identified 4242,2681 and 11 082 DP resections,respectively.Overall,laparoscopy was utilized in 15%(NIS) and 27%(NSQIP).No significant increase was seen over the course of the study.Resection was performed for malignancy in 59%(NIS) and 66%(NSQIP).Neither patient Body mass index nor comorbidities were associated with operative approach(P = 0.95 and P = 0.96,respectively).Mortality(3% vs 2%,P = 0.05) and reoperation(4% vs 4%,P = 1.0) was not different between laparoscopy and open groups.Overall complications(10% vs 15%,P < 0.001),hospital costs [44 741 dollars,interquartile range(IQR) 28 347-74 114 dollars vs 49 792 dollars,IQR 13 299-73 463,P = 0.02] and hospital length of stay(7 d,IQR 4-11 d vs 7 d,IQR 6-10,P < 0.001) were less when laparoscopy was utilized.One and two year survival after resection for malignancy were unchanged over the course of the study(ductal adenocarinoma 1-year 63.6% and 2-year 35.1%,P = 0.53;intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and nueroendocrine 1-year 90% and 2-year 84%,P = 0.25).The majority of resections were performed in teaching hospitals(77% NIS and 85% NSQIP),but minimally invasive surgery(MIS) was not more likely to be used in teaching hospitals(15% vs 14%,P = 0.26).Hospitals in the top decile for volume were more likely to be teaching hospitals than lower volume deciles(88% vs 43%,P < 0.001),but were no more likely to utilize MIS at resection.Complication rate in teaching and the top decile hospitals was not significantly decreased when compared to non-teaching(15% vs 14%,P = 0.72) and lower volume hospitals(14% vs 15%,P = 0.99).No difference was seen in the median number of lymph nodes and lymph node ratio in N1 disease when compared by year(P = 0.17 and P = 0.96,respectively).CONCLUSION:There appears to be an overall underutilization of laparoscopy for DP.Centralization does not appear to be occurring.Survival and lymph node harvest have not changed. 展开更多
关键词 Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy Trends Nationwide Inpatient Sample National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Surveillance epidemiology and end results
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部