目的对照评价骨髓增生异常综合征伴单系病态造血(myelodysplastic syndromes with single lineage dysplasia,MDS⁃SLD)和难治性血细胞减少伴单系病态造血(refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia,RCUD)的临床特征。方法收集201...目的对照评价骨髓增生异常综合征伴单系病态造血(myelodysplastic syndromes with single lineage dysplasia,MDS⁃SLD)和难治性血细胞减少伴单系病态造血(refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia,RCUD)的临床特征。方法收集2012年至2017年于苏州弘慈血液病医院及张家港市第一人民医院就诊的MDS⁃SLD和RCUD病人病例资料,分析外周血象、骨髓病态造血、染色体异常、预后分组及随访结果。结果共66例MDS⁃SLD,58例符合RCUD分型,另8例无法按照RCUD分型。所有病人外周血均未见原始细胞。MDS⁃SLD和RCUD外周血单系减少分别为27例、25例,两系减少39例、33例。分别有20例、18例合并染色体异常,以预后良好及中等为主。IPSS预后分组中,MDS⁃SLD仅有1例为较高危组,RCUD均属较低危。国际预后积分系统(IPSS⁃R)预后分组中,两组病人均仅有1例为较高危组。6例病人随访期内出现疾病进展,其中1例转为急性髓系白血病(AML)。MDS⁃SLD与RCUD间染色体异常比例、IPSS及IPSS⁃R预后分组各组间差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论MDS⁃SLD和RCUD病人外周血表现为单系或两系减少均常见,但部分病例血细胞减少与骨髓病态造血不完全一致,按照RCUD标准无法分组,但能够符合修订后的MDS⁃SLD标准。MDS⁃SLD和RCUD临床特征、预后类似,RCUD和无法按照RCUD分类的单系病态造血或单系/两系血细胞减少的MDS可以归为MDS⁃SLD。展开更多
Background To investigate the long-term results of global coronary and peripheral interventional treatment of diabetic foot patients. Methods We retrospectively included 220 diabetic patients (78.5 ±15.8 years, ...Background To investigate the long-term results of global coronary and peripheral interventional treatment of diabetic foot patients. Methods We retrospectively included 220 diabetic patients (78.5 ±15.8 years, 107 females, all with Fontaine Ⅲor Ⅳclass) who were referred to our centre for diabetic foot syndrome and severe limb ischemia from January 2006 to December 2010. Patients were evaluated by a team of interventional cardiologists and diabetologists in order to assess presence of concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) and eventual need for coronary revascularization. Stress-echo was performed in all patients before diagnostic peripheral angiography. Patients with indications for coronary angiography were submitted to combined diagnostic angiography and then to eventual staged peripheral and coronary interventions. Doppler ultrasonography and foot transcutaneous oximetry of transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) before and after the procedure were performed as well as stress-echocardiography and combined cardiologic and diabetic examination at 1 and 6 month and yearly. Results Stress-echocardiography was performed in 94/220 patients and resulted positive in 56 patients who underwent combined coronary and peripheral angiography. In the rest of 126 patients, combined coronary and peripheral angiography was performed directly for concomitant signs and symptoms of coronary heart disease in 35 patients. Coronary revascularization was judged necessary in 85/129 patients and was performed percutaneously after peripheral interventions in 72 patients and surgically in 13 patients. For Diabetic foot interventions the preferred approach was ipsilateral femoral antegrade in 170/220 patients (77.7%) and contralateral cross-over in 40/220 patients (18.8%) and popliteal retrograde + femoral antegrade in 10/220 patients (4.5%). Balloon angioplasty was performed in 252 legs (32 patients had bilateral disease): the procedure was successful in 239/252 legs with an immediate success rate of 94.8% and a significant improvement in TcPO2 and ABI with ulcer healing in 233/252 legs (92.4%). Freedom from major amputation was 82.8% at a mean follow-up of 3.1 ±1.8 years (range 1 to 5 years) whereas survival was 88%. Conclusions Global coronary and peripheral endovascular management of diabetic foot syndrome patients seems to lead to an high immediate success and limb salvage rates and increasing survival compared to historical series.展开更多
文摘目的对照评价骨髓增生异常综合征伴单系病态造血(myelodysplastic syndromes with single lineage dysplasia,MDS⁃SLD)和难治性血细胞减少伴单系病态造血(refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia,RCUD)的临床特征。方法收集2012年至2017年于苏州弘慈血液病医院及张家港市第一人民医院就诊的MDS⁃SLD和RCUD病人病例资料,分析外周血象、骨髓病态造血、染色体异常、预后分组及随访结果。结果共66例MDS⁃SLD,58例符合RCUD分型,另8例无法按照RCUD分型。所有病人外周血均未见原始细胞。MDS⁃SLD和RCUD外周血单系减少分别为27例、25例,两系减少39例、33例。分别有20例、18例合并染色体异常,以预后良好及中等为主。IPSS预后分组中,MDS⁃SLD仅有1例为较高危组,RCUD均属较低危。国际预后积分系统(IPSS⁃R)预后分组中,两组病人均仅有1例为较高危组。6例病人随访期内出现疾病进展,其中1例转为急性髓系白血病(AML)。MDS⁃SLD与RCUD间染色体异常比例、IPSS及IPSS⁃R预后分组各组间差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论MDS⁃SLD和RCUD病人外周血表现为单系或两系减少均常见,但部分病例血细胞减少与骨髓病态造血不完全一致,按照RCUD标准无法分组,但能够符合修订后的MDS⁃SLD标准。MDS⁃SLD和RCUD临床特征、预后类似,RCUD和无法按照RCUD分类的单系病态造血或单系/两系血细胞减少的MDS可以归为MDS⁃SLD。
文摘Background To investigate the long-term results of global coronary and peripheral interventional treatment of diabetic foot patients. Methods We retrospectively included 220 diabetic patients (78.5 ±15.8 years, 107 females, all with Fontaine Ⅲor Ⅳclass) who were referred to our centre for diabetic foot syndrome and severe limb ischemia from January 2006 to December 2010. Patients were evaluated by a team of interventional cardiologists and diabetologists in order to assess presence of concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) and eventual need for coronary revascularization. Stress-echo was performed in all patients before diagnostic peripheral angiography. Patients with indications for coronary angiography were submitted to combined diagnostic angiography and then to eventual staged peripheral and coronary interventions. Doppler ultrasonography and foot transcutaneous oximetry of transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) before and after the procedure were performed as well as stress-echocardiography and combined cardiologic and diabetic examination at 1 and 6 month and yearly. Results Stress-echocardiography was performed in 94/220 patients and resulted positive in 56 patients who underwent combined coronary and peripheral angiography. In the rest of 126 patients, combined coronary and peripheral angiography was performed directly for concomitant signs and symptoms of coronary heart disease in 35 patients. Coronary revascularization was judged necessary in 85/129 patients and was performed percutaneously after peripheral interventions in 72 patients and surgically in 13 patients. For Diabetic foot interventions the preferred approach was ipsilateral femoral antegrade in 170/220 patients (77.7%) and contralateral cross-over in 40/220 patients (18.8%) and popliteal retrograde + femoral antegrade in 10/220 patients (4.5%). Balloon angioplasty was performed in 252 legs (32 patients had bilateral disease): the procedure was successful in 239/252 legs with an immediate success rate of 94.8% and a significant improvement in TcPO2 and ABI with ulcer healing in 233/252 legs (92.4%). Freedom from major amputation was 82.8% at a mean follow-up of 3.1 ±1.8 years (range 1 to 5 years) whereas survival was 88%. Conclusions Global coronary and peripheral endovascular management of diabetic foot syndrome patients seems to lead to an high immediate success and limb salvage rates and increasing survival compared to historical series.