期刊文献+
共找到6篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
规范叙写与逻辑推证并重——基于一道经典几何证明题的分析与思考
1
作者 王杰 《数学之友》 2023年第1期89-91,共3页
几何是一门结构严谨的学科,几何证明大题也是当前中考的必考题.然而不少一线数学教师总是抱怨学生在做这一类题时出现“会而不对,对而不全”的现象,学生对此也很苦恼.究其原因,主要是在答题过程中:几何语言书写不规范、逻辑推理不严谨等... 几何是一门结构严谨的学科,几何证明大题也是当前中考的必考题.然而不少一线数学教师总是抱怨学生在做这一类题时出现“会而不对,对而不全”的现象,学生对此也很苦恼.究其原因,主要是在答题过程中:几何语言书写不规范、逻辑推理不严谨等.针对这一现象,本文谈谈如何帮助学生提高几何证明大题的正确率. 展开更多
关键词 几何 规范叙写 逻辑推证
下载PDF
一种混合的安全协议形式化分析技术 被引量:1
2
作者 范红 冯登国 《中国科学院研究生院学报》 CAS CSCD 2002年第3期240-245,共6页
分析了模型检测技术和逻辑推证技术的优点与不足,并在此基础上提出了一种混合的形式化分析技术的说明,该技术可提供更为完全的安全协议形式化分析.
关键词 模型检测 逻辑推证 混合分析技术 安全协议 形式化分析 网络安全
下载PDF
“天鹅”说与城市之根的再发现
3
作者 刘啸霆 《哈尔滨学院学报》 1999年第4期76-76,共1页
关键词 城市之根 哈尔滨 天鹅 心理分析 再发现 新时代 哲学视角 城市形象 城市精神 逻辑推证
下载PDF
Some Insights in Novel Risk Modeling of Liquefied Natural Gas Carrier Maintenance Operations 被引量:1
4
作者 T. C. Nwaoha Andrew John 《Journal of Marine Science and Application》 CSCD 2016年第2期144-156,共13页
This study discusses the analysis of various modeling approaches such as genetic algorithms, fuzzy logic and evidential reasoning, and maintenance techniques applicable to the liquefied natural gas (LNG) carrier ope... This study discusses the analysis of various modeling approaches such as genetic algorithms, fuzzy logic and evidential reasoning, and maintenance techniques applicable to the liquefied natural gas (LNG) carrier operations in the maritime environment. The usefulness of these algorithms in the LNG carrier industry in the areas of risk assessment and maintenance modeling as a standalone or hybrid algorithm are identified. This is evidenced with illustrative case studies. 展开更多
关键词 safety risk modeling maintenance LNG carrier fuzzylogic genetic algorithm evidential reasoning
下载PDF
Logical thinking in pattern differentiation of Traditional Chinese Medicine 被引量:1
5
作者 Jing Zhou Jiankun Zhu +4 位作者 Meijuan Chen Miao Jiang Zongming Zhang Zhen Zhan Xu Zhang 《Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2013年第1期137-140,共4页
OBJECTIVE: To discuss the application of logic to pattern differentiation for treatment in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). METHODS: Comparing logic reasoning of syllogism with the logical thinking ofTCM pattern di... OBJECTIVE: To discuss the application of logic to pattern differentiation for treatment in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). METHODS: Comparing logic reasoning of syllogism with the logical thinking ofTCM pattern differentiation for treatment. RESULTS:TCM logical thinking depends on symbolic and intuitive judgment with abstractive reasoning integrated into the process. Although it lacks quantitative measurement, it pays great attention to the comprehensive analysis of a disease's cause and its development patterns to get insight into the essence of illness. CONCLUSION: TCM diagnosis reasoning methodmay lack rigorousness, continuity, systematic induction and deduction, but its logical thinking still can attain its goal following a process with rigorous, regulated and scientific formal logic. 展开更多
关键词 LOGIC Traditional Chinese Medicine Pattern differentiation SYLLOGISM
原文传递
On the inference rules in legal logic
6
作者 Xiong Minghui 《Social Sciences in China》 2009年第3期58-74,共17页
Inference rules are at the heart of studies of logic. Although legal logic is an applied logic, it is not a simple application of the inference rules of formal logic in the legal domain, but the outcome of a combinati... Inference rules are at the heart of studies of logic. Although legal logic is an applied logic, it is not a simple application of the inference rules of formal logic in the legal domain, but the outcome of a combination of the inference rules of formal logic and inference rules peculiar to the legal domain. Therefore, although legal inference rules have some features in common with the inference rules of formal logic, they also have a distinctive character. Their common features are to be found in the fact that the basic inference rules of formal logic are an indispensable part of the inference rules of legal logic, while their distinctiveness lies in the fact that legal inference rules contain a special inference rule that does not exist in formal logic, the rule of burden of proof. 展开更多
关键词 legal logic inference rules rule of burden of proof
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部