With two-year-old Amorpha fruticosa L. cv. Jinye and A. fruticosa as the research objects, the relative conductivity, MDA content, soluble sugar content, solu- ble protein content and proline content in leaf were dete...With two-year-old Amorpha fruticosa L. cv. Jinye and A. fruticosa as the research objects, the relative conductivity, MDA content, soluble sugar content, solu- ble protein content and proline content in leaf were determined during natural drop in temperature, and the SOD, POD and COD activity in leaf were determined under artificial low temperature to explore the adaptability of A. fruticosa L. cv. Jinye to low temperature. The results showed that with the decrease in natural temperature, the content of MDA in A. fruticosa L. cv. Jinye was lower than that in the control, and the contents of osmotic adjustment substances (soluble sugar, soluble protein and proline) increased, indicating that A. fruticosa L. cv. Jinye had a stronger toler- ance to low temperature compared with A. fruticosa. The activity of SOD, POD and CAT in A. fruticosa L. cv. Jinye increased continuously, higher than that in the con- trol, indicating that the resisting ability of A. fruticosa L. cv. Jinye against low tem- perature was superior to that of the control. There was no significant difference in relative conductivity between A. fruticosa L. cv. Jinye and A. fruticosa.展开更多
文摘With two-year-old Amorpha fruticosa L. cv. Jinye and A. fruticosa as the research objects, the relative conductivity, MDA content, soluble sugar content, solu- ble protein content and proline content in leaf were determined during natural drop in temperature, and the SOD, POD and COD activity in leaf were determined under artificial low temperature to explore the adaptability of A. fruticosa L. cv. Jinye to low temperature. The results showed that with the decrease in natural temperature, the content of MDA in A. fruticosa L. cv. Jinye was lower than that in the control, and the contents of osmotic adjustment substances (soluble sugar, soluble protein and proline) increased, indicating that A. fruticosa L. cv. Jinye had a stronger toler- ance to low temperature compared with A. fruticosa. The activity of SOD, POD and CAT in A. fruticosa L. cv. Jinye increased continuously, higher than that in the con- trol, indicating that the resisting ability of A. fruticosa L. cv. Jinye against low tem- perature was superior to that of the control. There was no significant difference in relative conductivity between A. fruticosa L. cv. Jinye and A. fruticosa.