目的提出了一种新型的设计方法论——动机设计理论,该理论能够被用来解决“以用户为中心的设计”中的超用户期望的需求(Requirements Beyond User Expectation,RBUE)问题。方法为了获取RBUE,在动机心理学、计划行为理论、镜子理论等前...目的提出了一种新型的设计方法论——动机设计理论,该理论能够被用来解决“以用户为中心的设计”中的超用户期望的需求(Requirements Beyond User Expectation,RBUE)问题。方法为了获取RBUE,在动机心理学、计划行为理论、镜子理论等前人研究基础上,提出动机设计理论;动机设计理论通过“从末端的需求满足,转向初端的起心动念”的设计逻辑;构建了整个动机设计理论的内环机制及其方法流程。结果动机设计理论的内环机制,尤其是内环机制里面的诱因因素能够被用来获得RBUE,最后通过珠宝展的案例来证明了这一点。结论跟以往的设计方法相比,本文所提的理论与方法可为设计提供更为精确的指导,尤其在驱动型设计方面具有先天优势。展开更多
Coal and shale are both unconventional gas reservoirs. Comparison of pore characteristics in shale and coal would help understand organic pore structure in shale and investigate co-exploration of shale gas and coalbed...Coal and shale are both unconventional gas reservoirs. Comparison of pore characteristics in shale and coal would help understand organic pore structure in shale and investigate co-exploration of shale gas and coalbed methane in coal bearing strata. In this study, five shale samples and three coal samples of Taiyuan Formation were collected from Qinshui Basin, China. High pressure mercury injection, scanning electronic microscopy, and fractal theory have been used to compare pore characteristics in shale and coal. The results show that pore volumes in coal are much larger than that in shale, especially pores 3-100 nm. In coal, there are many semi-closed pores in micro pores （〈10 nm） and transition pores （10-100 nm）. On the contrary, micro pores and transition pores are mainly with open pores in shale. The fractal curves show that pores larger than 65 nm in coal and shale reservoir both have obvious self-similarity and the fractal dimension values in shale and coal are similar. But the fractal characteristics of pores smaller than 65 nm in shale reservoir are quite different from that in coal.展开更多
文摘目的提出了一种新型的设计方法论——动机设计理论,该理论能够被用来解决“以用户为中心的设计”中的超用户期望的需求(Requirements Beyond User Expectation,RBUE)问题。方法为了获取RBUE,在动机心理学、计划行为理论、镜子理论等前人研究基础上,提出动机设计理论;动机设计理论通过“从末端的需求满足,转向初端的起心动念”的设计逻辑;构建了整个动机设计理论的内环机制及其方法流程。结果动机设计理论的内环机制,尤其是内环机制里面的诱因因素能够被用来获得RBUE,最后通过珠宝展的案例来证明了这一点。结论跟以往的设计方法相比,本文所提的理论与方法可为设计提供更为精确的指导,尤其在驱动型设计方面具有先天优势。
基金The authors thank the National Science Foundation of China （41472135）, the Research and Innovation Project for College Graduates of Jiangsu Province （KYLX15-1396）, the Scientific Research Foundation of the Key Laboratory of Coalbed Methane Resources and Reservoir Formation Process, Ministry of Education （China University of Mining and Technology） （No. 2015-04） for the support of the research.
文摘Coal and shale are both unconventional gas reservoirs. Comparison of pore characteristics in shale and coal would help understand organic pore structure in shale and investigate co-exploration of shale gas and coalbed methane in coal bearing strata. In this study, five shale samples and three coal samples of Taiyuan Formation were collected from Qinshui Basin, China. High pressure mercury injection, scanning electronic microscopy, and fractal theory have been used to compare pore characteristics in shale and coal. The results show that pore volumes in coal are much larger than that in shale, especially pores 3-100 nm. In coal, there are many semi-closed pores in micro pores （〈10 nm） and transition pores （10-100 nm）. On the contrary, micro pores and transition pores are mainly with open pores in shale. The fractal curves show that pores larger than 65 nm in coal and shale reservoir both have obvious self-similarity and the fractal dimension values in shale and coal are similar. But the fractal characteristics of pores smaller than 65 nm in shale reservoir are quite different from that in coal.
