大学“课桌文化”调查问卷的编制及信效度分析

'课桌文化'是常见的高校亚文化现象,其创作者的心理成因应从实证的角度加以探析。从心理学的角度建构了创作成因的4个维度,幸福感指数、情绪表达类型、面众恐惧程度以及压力值,并对154名在校大学生进行问卷调查,结果表明:4个维度与'课桌文化'创作频率之间有着或强或弱的相关性,问卷具有合格的信效度。

自主在线案例学习体验的构念模型研究——基于结构方程模型的探索

网络学习环境能够将多媒体、超媒体以及各种交互功能有机地整合在案例的设计开发中,为自主在线案例学习提供可能。在线案例因其真实性、趣味性、交互性和启发性,近年来受到越来越多的关注,然而目前针对其学习体验的问卷工具比较匮乏,亦缺少对其核心构念的深入探索。针对该研究需求,根据案例教学的相关理论以及问卷信效度检验结果,设计并完善了一份测量学习者自主在线案例学习体验的问卷工具。通过对问卷结果的探索性因子分析,最终确定了"案例情境性""媒体交互性""开放探索性""自主学习特性"和"学习感知效果"五个核心构念,并利用结构方程模型对这些构念之间的关系进行了探索与检验。研究结果对深入理解自主在线案例学习的核心构念和指导在线案例的设计、开发与评估具有一定理论价值。

Development and validation of a self-management behavior questionnaire for Chinese enterostomy patients

Objectives:This study aimed to develop a self-management behavior questionnaire for Chinese enter-ostomy patients and examine its reliability and validity.Methods:Guided by the theory of self-management,an initial questionnaire was generated through literature review,group meetings,and two rounds of an expert consultation.Finally,the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were validated through a questionnaire survey of 200 enterostomy patients were selected from the Affiliated Hospital of Medical University from June 2016 to March 2017.Results:The content validity index was 0.80e1.00.The exploratory factor analysis yielded a five-factor(dietary behavior,psychosocial behavior,symptom management behavior,medical compliance behavior,information management behavior),consisting of 40 items.The cumulative variance contri-bution rate was 65.42%.The Cronbach’s a coefficient for the total questionnaire was 0.972,and for the five factors ranged from 0.797 to 0.939,indicating a good internal consistency.The test-retest reliability was 0.867(P<0.01).The self-management behavior questionnaire score was negatively related to the Ostomy Skin Tool score(r=-0.800,P<0.01).Conclusions:The self-management behavior questionnaire developed in this study showed good reli-ability and validity and can be used to assess the self-management behavior of Chinese enterostomy patients.

Development and validation of the Nurse’s Workplace Mental Health Questionnaire

Objectives:This study aimed to develop and validate the Nurse’sWorkplace Mental Health Questionnaire(NWMHQ).Methods:The questionnaire was developed based on the two continua model of mental illness and health proposed by Keyes.The initial questionnaire was generated through literature review,two rounds of Delphi expert consultation,followed by a pilot survey.Finally,the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were validated through an online survey of 2,815 registered nurses selected from the public hospitals in 11 provinces from June to July 2020.Results:The item-content validity index(I-CVI)of the questionnaire ranged from 0.750 to 1.000 and the average scale-level content validity index(S-CVI/Ave)was 0.906.Cronbach’s a coefficient was 0.948 and test-retest reliability was 0.850.The self-rating depression scale score was negatively related to the NWMHQ score(r=0.664,P<0.01).The exploratory factor analysis(EFA)yielded six factors(emotional status,psychological security,positive relationship,resilience,self-efficacy,and subjective well-being),consisting of 32 items.The cumulative variance contribution rate was 65.58%.Confirmatory factor analysis(CFA)showed an acceptable fit.Conclusion:The NWMHQ developed in this study showed good reliability and validity.This questionnaire may help assess the mental health status of nurses and help nursing managers to develop appropriate targeted psychological interventions.

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Head and Neck Information Needs Questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer and their caregivers

Objectives:This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Head and Neck Information Needs Questionnaire(HaNiQ).Methods:The HaNiQ was translated into a Chinese version using internationally recognized forwardand back-translation procedures.The reliability and validity of the HaNiQ were measured using Cronbach’s a coefficient,split-half reliability,exploratory factor analysis,and Pearson correlation analysis.Results:A total of 207 patients in different head and neck cancer(HNC)stages and 174 caregivers completed the Chinese version of the HaNiQ.Internal consistencies varied between good and very well(Cronbach’s α coefficient 0.74-0.90);the split-half coefficient and the content validity index(CVI)of the questionnaire were 83.5%and 83.33%,respectively.The cumulative contribution rates of the 5 subscales in patients with HNCand their caregivers were 62.41%and 61.19%,respectively.However,there are some differences between the Chinese questionnaire for caregiver and the original questionnaire regarding the attribution of items.Items 22,23,and 27 in the Psychosocial subscale of the English version were assigned to the Survivorship subscale in the Chinese version for caregivers.Conclusions:The results demonstrated that the Chinese version of the HaNiQ is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring the information needs of patients with HNC and that of their caregivers.Though the structure of the Chinese versionwas different from the English version for caregivers of HNC patients,the Chinese version of the HaNiQ appears to be reliable and would benefit from further testing.

Psychometric evaluation of the Thai translation of the Diabetes Self-management Questionnaire in type 2 diabetes

Objectives:To explore the content validity and the internal consistency of the diabetes Self-management Questionnaire(DSMQ)for persons with T2DM in Thailand.Methods:Diabetes Self-management Questionnaire(DSMQ)was developed in English.The translation of DSMQ into Thai language was performed by native Thai translators.A panel of five experts in Thailand evaluated the translation.Content validity was quantified by the content validity index(CVI).A crosssectional design was used to test internal consistency by calculating Cronbach's alpha.Results:The DSMQ contains 16 items.There are eleven items(69%)which showed excellent CVI;two items(12.5%)showed good CVI and three items showed acceptable CVI.The average scale of CVI was 0.90.The internal consistency of the DSMQ was 0.73.Conclusion:The Thai version of DSMQ showed excellent content validity;good internal consistency.The instruments can be used among Thai adults with DM in future research studies.

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire

Objective To study the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire(LYMQOL)in lymphedema patients.Methods LYMQOL was translated into Chinese.The Chinese version of the LYMQOL was distributed with the official Wechat account"Lymphedema Channel"to lymphedema patients who were recruited from October 28^(th),2020 to February 23^(rd),2021.Patients with upper limb lymphedema and lower limb lymphedema completed the LYMQOL-ARM subscale and the LYMQOL-LEG subscale separately,at enrollment,1 week later,and 1 month later.Reliability,validity,feasibility,responsiveness and average time required for completing the questionnaire were assessed.Results A total of 195 patients participated in the study.The Chinese questionnaire showed high reliability with Cronbach’sαcoefficients of 0.849-0.902 for the LYMQOL-ARM and intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC)of 0.848-0.884 and Cronbach’sαcoefficients of 0.726-0.902 for the LYMQOL-LEG and ICC of 0.863-0.900.The LYMQOL showed moderate to good correlations with the EQ-5 D(0.4<r<0.6,P<0.01;for the LYMQOLARM,n=95,for the LYMQOL-LEG,n=102).Responsiveness analysis suggested that quality of life of upper limb lymphedema patients decreased after 1 month(P<0.05).The average time of patients to finish the questionnaire was approximately 12 minutes.Conclusions The Chinese version of the LYMQOL is easy to answer,comprehensive and appropriate in length,and has good reliability and validity.It may be utilized to assist treatment decision-making and track changes in clinical setting or research for lymphedema.

Adaptation of the Turkish version of Nurses' Self Concept Questionnaire

Objectives:Nurse's self-concept is significant for professionalism.We aimed to determine the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of a Nurses'Self Concept Questionnaire.Methods:A methodological study was conducted with the participation of a group of nursing students and nurses.For the statistical analysis,structural equation models,convergent validity analyses,discriminate validity analyses,internal consistency analysis,and test-retest reliability analyses were used.Results:Correlation-coefficient for the test-retest reliability of the Turkish version of Nurses'SelfConcept Questionnaire was 0.87.The internal consistency of this questionnaire was calculated with Cronbach'sαcoefficient and it was found high across the six subscales from 0.83 to 0.91.The goodness of fit indices was determined as acceptable.Conclusions:According to results,this Nurses'Self-Concept Questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing nurses'and nursing students'self-concept in Turkey.