表达自由是资产阶级自由观的重要内容之一。表达自由(freedom of expression),是指公民依照宪法所享有的言论、出版自由的合称,包括公民有通过口头、书面或音像设备发表关于事实的观点或关于历史的、科学的、宗教的、哲学的、政治的或...表达自由是资产阶级自由观的重要内容之一。表达自由(freedom of expression),是指公民依照宪法所享有的言论、出版自由的合称,包括公民有通过口头、书面或音像设备发表关于事实的观点或关于历史的、科学的、宗教的、哲学的、政治的或道德的观点的自由。表达自由是资本主义国家的自由体系中最基本的自由。在资产阶级的理论家看来,表达自由一面与精神(信仰、思想)自由相连,另一面与其他政治权利(请愿权、集会权、结社权)展开更多
This article is a part of a descriptive survey which aims to characterize, classify, and compare the household production in the Municipality of Itapuranga, State of Goias, Brazil, considering the access to the Nation...This article is a part of a descriptive survey which aims to characterize, classify, and compare the household production in the Municipality of Itapuranga, State of Goias, Brazil, considering the access to the National Program for Strengthening Family Agriculture （PRONAF） and its respective differentiation between beneficiary and non-beneficiary groups by the program. It applied the technique of group comparison analysis and frequency inquiry, taking into consideration several variables. Information about the origin, distribution and total income, food safety, land property, production diversification, expenditures and participation in social organizations were collected. The sample consisted of 70 producers, the calculation sample was defined by determined value at the confidence level of 90% whereas the sampling error of 7%. The results allowed describing, classifying, characterizing, and comparing the socio-economic and productive profile of farmers from that area and their access to PRONAF.展开更多
文摘表达自由是资产阶级自由观的重要内容之一。表达自由(freedom of expression),是指公民依照宪法所享有的言论、出版自由的合称,包括公民有通过口头、书面或音像设备发表关于事实的观点或关于历史的、科学的、宗教的、哲学的、政治的或道德的观点的自由。表达自由是资本主义国家的自由体系中最基本的自由。在资产阶级的理论家看来,表达自由一面与精神(信仰、思想)自由相连,另一面与其他政治权利(请愿权、集会权、结社权)
文摘This article is a part of a descriptive survey which aims to characterize, classify, and compare the household production in the Municipality of Itapuranga, State of Goias, Brazil, considering the access to the National Program for Strengthening Family Agriculture （PRONAF） and its respective differentiation between beneficiary and non-beneficiary groups by the program. It applied the technique of group comparison analysis and frequency inquiry, taking into consideration several variables. Information about the origin, distribution and total income, food safety, land property, production diversification, expenditures and participation in social organizations were collected. The sample consisted of 70 producers, the calculation sample was defined by determined value at the confidence level of 90% whereas the sampling error of 7%. The results allowed describing, classifying, characterizing, and comparing the socio-economic and productive profile of farmers from that area and their access to PRONAF.
