目的探讨血清8-羟基脱氧鸟苷酸(8-OHdG)、锰超氧化物歧化酶(MnSOD)水平与急性缺血性脑卒中患者(AIS)经重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)静脉溶栓治疗后认知功能恢复情况的相关性。方法选取2016年3月至2018年10月在本院进行rt-PA静脉溶...目的探讨血清8-羟基脱氧鸟苷酸(8-OHdG)、锰超氧化物歧化酶(MnSOD)水平与急性缺血性脑卒中患者(AIS)经重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)静脉溶栓治疗后认知功能恢复情况的相关性。方法选取2016年3月至2018年10月在本院进行rt-PA静脉溶栓治疗的112例AIS患者,根据患者溶栓治疗后7 d蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)评分分为2组:MoCA≥26分的为认知功能恢复良好组(52例),MoCA<26分的为认知功能恢复不良组(60例)。比较两组一般资料及实验室指标的差异,分析可能影响AIS患者rt-PA静脉溶栓后认知功能恢复的因素。结果认知功能恢复良好组与认知功能恢复不良组相比,房纤颤史、美国国立卫生院神经功能缺损(NIHSS)评分、高血脂史、糖尿病史、发病到溶栓时间、8-OHdG、MnSOD、空腹血糖(FPG)、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);Pearson相关分析结果显示,认知功能恢复不良组血清8-OHdG与溶栓治疗后7 d MoCA评分呈负相关(P<0.05),MnSOD与溶栓治疗后7 d MoCA评分呈正相关(P<0.05);多因素Logistic回归分析表明,8-OHdG、FPG、TC、LDL-C、发病到溶栓时间均是AIS患者rt-PA静脉溶栓后认知功能恢复的危险因素(P<0.05),MnSOD是保护因素(P<0.05)。结论8-OHdG、MnSOD、房纤颤史、NIHSS评分、高血脂史、糖尿病史、发病到溶栓时间、FPG、TC、LDL-C均与AIS患者rt-PA静脉溶栓后认知功能恢复情况密切相关,可为预测临床预后提供参考依据。展开更多
OBJECTIVES: To compare primary stenting in the infarct-related coronary artery with intravenous rt-PA therapy plus rescue intracoronary stenting. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with a first acute myocardial infarction...OBJECTIVES: To compare primary stenting in the infarct-related coronary artery with intravenous rt-PA therapy plus rescue intracoronary stenting. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with a first acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were randomly treated with primary intracoronary stenting (primary stenting group) or with intravenous rt-PA therapy plus rescue intracoronary stenting (thrombolysis plus stenting group). Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade was assessed by angiography in emergency, and cardiac function (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF) was calculated by echocardiography before discharge between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 47 patients (97.91%) in primary stenting group and 50 patients (100%) in thrombolysis plus stenting group had achieved TIMI grade 2 - 3 flow after the procedure. But the former had more cases (93.8%) of TIMI 3 flow than that of latter (60.0%, P = 0.0001). There was no difference between the two groups in cardiac events during hospitalization. But the patients in primary stenting group had better cardiac function (LVEF 0.62 +/- 0.14 vs. 0.50 +/- 0.12, respectively, P = 0.0001) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Primary intracoronary stenting may improve myocardial reperfusion in emergency and inhibit the decline of cardiac function after AMI in comparison with intravenous rt-PA thrombolysis plus rescue intracoronary stenting.展开更多
文摘目的探讨血清8-羟基脱氧鸟苷酸(8-OHdG)、锰超氧化物歧化酶(MnSOD)水平与急性缺血性脑卒中患者(AIS)经重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)静脉溶栓治疗后认知功能恢复情况的相关性。方法选取2016年3月至2018年10月在本院进行rt-PA静脉溶栓治疗的112例AIS患者,根据患者溶栓治疗后7 d蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)评分分为2组:MoCA≥26分的为认知功能恢复良好组(52例),MoCA<26分的为认知功能恢复不良组(60例)。比较两组一般资料及实验室指标的差异,分析可能影响AIS患者rt-PA静脉溶栓后认知功能恢复的因素。结果认知功能恢复良好组与认知功能恢复不良组相比,房纤颤史、美国国立卫生院神经功能缺损(NIHSS)评分、高血脂史、糖尿病史、发病到溶栓时间、8-OHdG、MnSOD、空腹血糖(FPG)、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);Pearson相关分析结果显示,认知功能恢复不良组血清8-OHdG与溶栓治疗后7 d MoCA评分呈负相关(P<0.05),MnSOD与溶栓治疗后7 d MoCA评分呈正相关(P<0.05);多因素Logistic回归分析表明,8-OHdG、FPG、TC、LDL-C、发病到溶栓时间均是AIS患者rt-PA静脉溶栓后认知功能恢复的危险因素(P<0.05),MnSOD是保护因素(P<0.05)。结论8-OHdG、MnSOD、房纤颤史、NIHSS评分、高血脂史、糖尿病史、发病到溶栓时间、FPG、TC、LDL-C均与AIS患者rt-PA静脉溶栓后认知功能恢复情况密切相关,可为预测临床预后提供参考依据。
文摘OBJECTIVES: To compare primary stenting in the infarct-related coronary artery with intravenous rt-PA therapy plus rescue intracoronary stenting. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with a first acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were randomly treated with primary intracoronary stenting (primary stenting group) or with intravenous rt-PA therapy plus rescue intracoronary stenting (thrombolysis plus stenting group). Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade was assessed by angiography in emergency, and cardiac function (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF) was calculated by echocardiography before discharge between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 47 patients (97.91%) in primary stenting group and 50 patients (100%) in thrombolysis plus stenting group had achieved TIMI grade 2 - 3 flow after the procedure. But the former had more cases (93.8%) of TIMI 3 flow than that of latter (60.0%, P = 0.0001). There was no difference between the two groups in cardiac events during hospitalization. But the patients in primary stenting group had better cardiac function (LVEF 0.62 +/- 0.14 vs. 0.50 +/- 0.12, respectively, P = 0.0001) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Primary intracoronary stenting may improve myocardial reperfusion in emergency and inhibit the decline of cardiac function after AMI in comparison with intravenous rt-PA thrombolysis plus rescue intracoronary stenting.
