期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
儒学的伦理—非伦理“悖论”与人的全面发展 被引量:3
1
作者 涂可国 《山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 北大核心 2004年第6期72-77,共6页
 儒学是以性善论为滥殇,片面凸现人格系统中的伦理因素,偏重于从伦理视角进行理想人格设计,在人生价值取向上强调重义轻利、重理轻欲等道德价值,从而被赋予伦理主义乃至泛伦理主义特质。儒学也将非伦理因素视为人的本质规定性,强调人...  儒学是以性善论为滥殇,片面凸现人格系统中的伦理因素,偏重于从伦理视角进行理想人格设计,在人生价值取向上强调重义轻利、重理轻欲等道德价值,从而被赋予伦理主义乃至泛伦理主义特质。儒学也将非伦理因素视为人的本质规定性,强调人的智、志、美在人格结构中的地位,它所推崇的圣贤人格也具有非伦理品格,因而它也注意到了人的非道德品性、修养和境界。儒学的伦理—非伦理"悖论"特质在一定程度上有助于人的全面发展,但它过于偏重于人的道德层面,也会压抑人多方面才能和个性的展现,不利于培养德、智、体、美全面发展的"新人"。 展开更多
关键词 儒学 人学 伦理主义 非伦理主义 人的全面发展 悖论 人格系统 人生价值
下载PDF
About the Nature of Ecological Ethics Debates and the Relationship between Human and Nature
2
作者 Chuanyue JIANG 《International Journal of Technology Management》 2015年第2期81-83,共3页
There are natural ethical debates in ecological ethics, namely whether nature has intrinsic value, whether the nature has its rights. Theoretical basis of argument is the opposite of anthropocentrism and non- anthropo... There are natural ethical debates in ecological ethics, namely whether nature has intrinsic value, whether the nature has its rights. Theoretical basis of argument is the opposite of anthropocentrism and non- anthropocentrism. Ecological ethics controversy concerns the core issue of the relationship between human and nature of the ecological ethics about nature, to correctly understand and deal with the relationship between mankind and nature, ecological ethics and ecological ethics is the starting point and destination debates. 展开更多
关键词 Ecological Ethics HUMAN NATURE
下载PDF
Narrative Environmental Ethics, Nature Writing, and Ecological Science as Tradition: Towards a Sponsoring Ground of Concern
3
作者 John Charles Ryan 《Journal of Philosophy Study》 2012年第11期822-834,共13页
Over the last 30 years, environmental philosophers and ecological researchers have turned their attention to the possibilities of narratives: the stories people tell about their lives in conjunction with the human an... Over the last 30 years, environmental philosophers and ecological researchers have turned their attention to the possibilities of narratives: the stories people tell about their lives in conjunction with the human and non-human agents they live with. An interest in narrative environmental ethics reflects a re-evaluation of canonical ecophilosophical texts. Works such as Paul W. Taylor's Respect for Nature suggest an essentialist view of environmental ethics in which predetermined principles are imposed on places and situations. On the other hand, Aldo Leopold's A Sand County Almanac combines first-person prose with science-based explanations of the "biotic pyramid" towards the development of a land ethic. Examples, such as Leopold's, of narrative ethics are thought to offer relational, place-based, non-authoritative, and non-anthropocentric models. This article examines three critical components of environmental narratives: self, context, and tradition. In order for environmental narratives to advance ecological ethics, they must be accompanied by the tradition of natural science (geology, ecology, and evolution) to provide the "sponsoring ground" for ethical concern and action. The role of natural science as a tradition--and indeed one of many--in narrative ethics provides the basis for ecological selfhood in the context of place. These assertions will be supported by an analysis of the environmental narratives of Karen Warren and Jim Cheney. However, in the temporally expansive and ecologically conscious poetic narratives of John Kinsella we find an environmental ethics deeply rooted in the material realities of place. 展开更多
关键词 narratives ecopoetics environmental ethics ecological science
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部