AIM：To investigate the association of variations in the cyclooxygenase-2 （COX2） and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A6 （UGTIA6） genes and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs （NSAIDs） use with ris...AIM：To investigate the association of variations in the cyclooxygenase-2 （COX2） and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A6 （UGTIA6） genes and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs （NSAIDs） use with risk of colon cancer.METHODS： NSAIDs, which are known to reduce the risk of colon cancer, act directly on COX2 and reduce its activity. Epidemiological studies have associated variations in the COX2 gene with colon cancer risk, but others were unable to replicate this finding. Similarly,enzymes in the UGT1A6 gene have been demonstrated to modify the therapeutic effect of NSAIDs on colon adenomas. Polymorphisms in the UGTIA6 gene have been statistically shown to interact with NSAID intake to influence risk of developing colon adenomas, but not colon cancer. Here we examined the association of tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms （SNPs） in the COX2 and UGTIA6 genes, and their interaction with NSAID consumption, on risk of colon cancer in a population of 422 colon cancer cases and 481 population controls.RESULTS： No SNP in either gene was individually statistically significantly associated with colon cancer, nor did they statistically significantly change the protective effect of NSAID consumption in our sample. Like others, we were unable to replicate the association of variants in the COX2 gene with colon cancer risk （P 〉 0.05）,and we did not observe that these variants modify the protective effect of NSAIDs （P 〉 0.05）. We were able to confirm the lack of association of variants in UGT1A6 with colon cancer risk, although further studies will have to be conducted to confirm the association of these variants with colon adenomas.CONCLUSION： Our study does not support a role of COX2 and UGTIA6 genetic variations in the development of colon cancer.展开更多
AIM： To investigate the association between individual or combined use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs （NSAIDs） or statins and colorectal cancer risk.METHODS： In a population-based case-control study in w...AIM： To investigate the association between individual or combined use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs （NSAIDs） or statins and colorectal cancer risk.METHODS： In a population-based case-control study in women, we examined the association between NSAIDs and statin use and the risk of colorectal cancers. We further investigated whether the use of statins modifies the protective effect of NSAIDs. Female cases （n = 669）of colorectal cancer aged 50-74 years were identified from a storewide registry in Wisconsin during 1999-2001. Community control women （n = 1375） were randomly selected from lists of licensed drivers and Medicare beneficiaries. Medication use and risk factor information were gathered during a structured telephone interview. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to calculate odds ratio （OR） and 95% confidence interval （CI）.RESULTS： Overall, NSAIDs users had a 30% reduction in risk of colorectal cancer （95% CI： 0.56-0.88）. Statin use was not associated with colorectal cancer risk （OR = 1.17, 95% CI： 0.74-1.85）, regardless of structural type （lipophilic or hydrophilic）, duration of use, or recency. There was no evidence of an interaction between NSAIDs and statins and colorectal cancer risk （P-interaction = 0.28）.CONCLUSION： Although our results confirm the inverse association between NSAIDs use and colorectal cancer risk, they do not support a risk reduction in statin users, or an interaction effect of combined NSAIDs and statin use.展开更多
Objective： To discuss the difference between multi-drug resistant cell line H460/Gem and its parental cell NCl-H460 on the basis of establishment of human gemcitabine-resistant cell line H460/Gem so as to elaborate t...Objective： To discuss the difference between multi-drug resistant cell line H460/Gem and its parental cell NCl-H460 on the basis of establishment of human gemcitabine-resistant cell line H460/Gem so as to elaborate the possible mechanisms of gemcitabine resistance. Methods： Human gemcitabine-resistant non-small cell lung cancer cell line H460/Gem was established by 2/3 clinical serous peak concentration gemcitabine intermittent selection from its parental cell human large cell lung carcinoma cell line NCl-H460 which was sensitive to gemcitabine. During the course of inducement, we had monitored their morphology, checked their resistance indexes and resistant pedigree by MTT method, gathered their growth curves and calculated their doubling time, examined their DNA contents and cell cycles by FCM; at the same time, we had measured its expressions of P53, EGFR, c-erb-B-2, PTEN, PCNA, c-myc, VEGF, MDR-1, Bcl-2, nm23, MMP-9, TIMP-1, CD44v6 proteins via immunocytochemistry staining, RRM1 and ERCC1 mRNA by real-time fluorescent quantitative-PCR. Results： The resistance index of H460/Gem＇ cells （the deputy of cells in the process of inducement） to gemcitabine was 1.201, and the cell line also exhibited cross-resistance to paclitaxol, fluorouraci, etoposide, cisplatin and oxaliplatin, but kept sensitivity to vinorelbine and taxotere. The doubling time of H460/Gem＇ cells was longer and figures in G0-G1 phase was decreased than that of NCl-H460 cells. Compared with NCl-H460 cells, H460/Gem＇ cells had achieved TIMP-1 protein expression emerged, nm23 protein expression enhanced, VEGF and MMP-9 protein expressions reduced, and CD44v6, P53 protein expressions vanished, but expressions of EGFR, c-erb-B-2, PTEN, PCNA, c-myc, MDR-1, Bcl-2 proteins and RRM1, ERCC1 mRNA changed trivially. The resistance index of H460/Gem cells to gemcitabine was 1.644, and the ceil line also exhibited cross-resistance to fluorouraci, cisplatin and oxaliplatin, but kept sensitivity to paclitaxol, vinorelbine, taxotere, and etoposide. The doubling time of H460/Gem cells was longer and figures in G0-G1 phase was decreased than those of NCl-H460 cells. The farther studies indicated that, compared with NCl-H460 cells, the expressions of MDR-1, nm23 and Bcl-2 proteins in H460/Gem cells had been enhanced, c-erb-B-2 protein expression emerged, P53, MMP-9 and VEGR protein expression had been weakened, but the changes of PTEN, PCNA, c-myc, TIMP-1, EGFR, CD44v6 protein, RRM1 mRNA and ERCC1 mRNA expressions were trivial. Furthermore, compared with its parental cells, H460/Gem cells were mixed with giant cells of different sizes that were larger and more irregular. Conclusion： The human gemcitabine-resistant non-small cell lung cancer cell line H460/Gem had achieved multi-drug resistance and great changes of biological characters compared with its parental cells. And these changes possibly participated in the formation of multidrug resistance.展开更多
基金Supported by A Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation Clinical Investigator Award,CI-8An R25 training grant from the National Cancer Institute,R25T CA094186+1 种基金The Case Center for Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer,1U54 CA-116867-01A National Cancer Institute K22 Award,1K22 CA120545-01
文摘AIM：To investigate the association of variations in the cyclooxygenase-2 （COX2） and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A6 （UGTIA6） genes and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs （NSAIDs） use with risk of colon cancer.METHODS： NSAIDs, which are known to reduce the risk of colon cancer, act directly on COX2 and reduce its activity. Epidemiological studies have associated variations in the COX2 gene with colon cancer risk, but others were unable to replicate this finding. Similarly,enzymes in the UGT1A6 gene have been demonstrated to modify the therapeutic effect of NSAIDs on colon adenomas. Polymorphisms in the UGTIA6 gene have been statistically shown to interact with NSAID intake to influence risk of developing colon adenomas, but not colon cancer. Here we examined the association of tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms （SNPs） in the COX2 and UGTIA6 genes, and their interaction with NSAID consumption, on risk of colon cancer in a population of 422 colon cancer cases and 481 population controls.RESULTS： No SNP in either gene was individually statistically significantly associated with colon cancer, nor did they statistically significantly change the protective effect of NSAID consumption in our sample. Like others, we were unable to replicate the association of variants in the COX2 gene with colon cancer risk （P 〉 0.05）,and we did not observe that these variants modify the protective effect of NSAIDs （P 〉 0.05）. We were able to confirm the lack of association of variants in UGT1A6 with colon cancer risk, although further studies will have to be conducted to confirm the association of these variants with colon adenomas.CONCLUSION： Our study does not support a role of COX2 and UGTIA6 genetic variations in the development of colon cancer.
文摘AIM： To investigate the association between individual or combined use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs （NSAIDs） or statins and colorectal cancer risk.METHODS： In a population-based case-control study in women, we examined the association between NSAIDs and statin use and the risk of colorectal cancers. We further investigated whether the use of statins modifies the protective effect of NSAIDs. Female cases （n = 669）of colorectal cancer aged 50-74 years were identified from a storewide registry in Wisconsin during 1999-2001. Community control women （n = 1375） were randomly selected from lists of licensed drivers and Medicare beneficiaries. Medication use and risk factor information were gathered during a structured telephone interview. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to calculate odds ratio （OR） and 95% confidence interval （CI）.RESULTS： Overall, NSAIDs users had a 30% reduction in risk of colorectal cancer （95% CI： 0.56-0.88）. Statin use was not associated with colorectal cancer risk （OR = 1.17, 95% CI： 0.74-1.85）, regardless of structural type （lipophilic or hydrophilic）, duration of use, or recency. There was no evidence of an interaction between NSAIDs and statins and colorectal cancer risk （P-interaction = 0.28）.CONCLUSION： Although our results confirm the inverse association between NSAIDs use and colorectal cancer risk, they do not support a risk reduction in statin users, or an interaction effect of combined NSAIDs and statin use.
基金Capital Medical Developmental Foundation (No. 2003-3028)
文摘Objective： To discuss the difference between multi-drug resistant cell line H460/Gem and its parental cell NCl-H460 on the basis of establishment of human gemcitabine-resistant cell line H460/Gem so as to elaborate the possible mechanisms of gemcitabine resistance. Methods： Human gemcitabine-resistant non-small cell lung cancer cell line H460/Gem was established by 2/3 clinical serous peak concentration gemcitabine intermittent selection from its parental cell human large cell lung carcinoma cell line NCl-H460 which was sensitive to gemcitabine. During the course of inducement, we had monitored their morphology, checked their resistance indexes and resistant pedigree by MTT method, gathered their growth curves and calculated their doubling time, examined their DNA contents and cell cycles by FCM; at the same time, we had measured its expressions of P53, EGFR, c-erb-B-2, PTEN, PCNA, c-myc, VEGF, MDR-1, Bcl-2, nm23, MMP-9, TIMP-1, CD44v6 proteins via immunocytochemistry staining, RRM1 and ERCC1 mRNA by real-time fluorescent quantitative-PCR. Results： The resistance index of H460/Gem＇ cells （the deputy of cells in the process of inducement） to gemcitabine was 1.201, and the cell line also exhibited cross-resistance to paclitaxol, fluorouraci, etoposide, cisplatin and oxaliplatin, but kept sensitivity to vinorelbine and taxotere. The doubling time of H460/Gem＇ cells was longer and figures in G0-G1 phase was decreased than that of NCl-H460 cells. Compared with NCl-H460 cells, H460/Gem＇ cells had achieved TIMP-1 protein expression emerged, nm23 protein expression enhanced, VEGF and MMP-9 protein expressions reduced, and CD44v6, P53 protein expressions vanished, but expressions of EGFR, c-erb-B-2, PTEN, PCNA, c-myc, MDR-1, Bcl-2 proteins and RRM1, ERCC1 mRNA changed trivially. The resistance index of H460/Gem cells to gemcitabine was 1.644, and the ceil line also exhibited cross-resistance to fluorouraci, cisplatin and oxaliplatin, but kept sensitivity to paclitaxol, vinorelbine, taxotere, and etoposide. The doubling time of H460/Gem cells was longer and figures in G0-G1 phase was decreased than those of NCl-H460 cells. The farther studies indicated that, compared with NCl-H460 cells, the expressions of MDR-1, nm23 and Bcl-2 proteins in H460/Gem cells had been enhanced, c-erb-B-2 protein expression emerged, P53, MMP-9 and VEGR protein expression had been weakened, but the changes of PTEN, PCNA, c-myc, TIMP-1, EGFR, CD44v6 protein, RRM1 mRNA and ERCC1 mRNA expressions were trivial. Furthermore, compared with its parental cells, H460/Gem cells were mixed with giant cells of different sizes that were larger and more irregular. Conclusion： The human gemcitabine-resistant non-small cell lung cancer cell line H460/Gem had achieved multi-drug resistance and great changes of biological characters compared with its parental cells. And these changes possibly participated in the formation of multidrug resistance.
