Objective: To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of paclitaxel-etoposide-carboplatin/cisplatin(TEP/TCE) regimen with those of etoposide-carboplatin/cisplatin(EP/CE) regimen as first-line treatment for combined s...Objective: To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of paclitaxel-etoposide-carboplatin/cisplatin(TEP/TCE) regimen with those of etoposide-carboplatin/cisplatin(EP/CE) regimen as first-line treatment for combined small-cell lung cancer(CSCLC).Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 62 CSCLC patients who were treated at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from July 2000 to April 2013 and administered with TEP/TCE regimen(n=19) or EP/CE regimen(n=43) as first-line CSCLC treatment. All patients received more than two cycles of chemotherapy, and the response was evaluated every two cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival(OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival(PFS), objective response rate(ORR), disease control rate(DCR), and adverse effects. Results: ORR between the TEP/TCE and EP/CE groups showed a statistical difference(90% vs. 53%, P=0.033). Both groups failed to reach a statistical difference in DCR(100% vs. 86%, P=0.212). The median PFS and OS of the TEP/TCE group were slightly longer than those of the EP/CE group, although both groups failed to reach a statistical difference(10.5 vs. 8.9 months, P=0.484; 24.0 vs. 17.5 months, P=0.457). However, stratified analysis indicated that the PFS of patients with stages III and IV CSCLC showed marginally significant difference between the TEP/TCE and EP/CE groups(19.5 vs. 7.6 months; P=0.071). Both rates of grade IV bone marrow depression and termination of chemotherapy in the TEP/TCE group were significantly higher than those in the EP/CE group(26.3% vs. 7.0%, P=0.036; 31.6% vs. 14.7%, P=0.004). Conclusion: The TEP/TCE regimen may not be preferred for CSCLC, and this three-drug regimen requires further exploration and research. To date, the EP/CE regimen remains the standard treatment for CSCLC patients.展开更多
We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of etoposide capsule combined with cisplatin or carboplatin in the treatment of elderly patients with small cell lung cancer （SCLC）. Methods： From October 2011 to Novembe...We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of etoposide capsule combined with cisplatin or carboplatin in the treatment of elderly patients with small cell lung cancer （SCLC）. Methods： From October 2011 to November 2013, 32 elderly patients （71-79 years old） with histopathologically confirmed SCLC in General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region （China） were enrolled in the research. The patients were administrated with lastet capsule 150-175 mg, dl-5, combined with cisplatin 20 mg/m^2 dl-3 or carbopiatin AUC = 5, applied over 2 days. Twenty-one days were 1 treatment cycle. Results：After treatments, 2 cases acquired complete response （CR）, 19 cases acquired partial response （PR）, 8 cases acquired stable disease （SD）, and 3 cases had progression of disease （PD）. The objective response rate was 65.6% （21/32）, disease control rate was 90.6% （29/32）. The median time of progression-free survival （PFS） was 6.9 months, the median survival time was 14.0 months, and 1 year survival rate was 62.4%. The main adverse reactions of 1/11 leukopenia and gastrointestinal reaction were observed. Conclusion： Etoposide capsule combined with cisplatin or carboplatin therapy have curative effect and good tolerance in elderly patients with SCLC.展开更多
基金supported by grants from the Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Project (Grant No. 11JCYBJC11300)National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81372517)National Science and Technology Major Project (Grant No. 09303001)
文摘Objective: To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of paclitaxel-etoposide-carboplatin/cisplatin(TEP/TCE) regimen with those of etoposide-carboplatin/cisplatin(EP/CE) regimen as first-line treatment for combined small-cell lung cancer(CSCLC).Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 62 CSCLC patients who were treated at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from July 2000 to April 2013 and administered with TEP/TCE regimen(n=19) or EP/CE regimen(n=43) as first-line CSCLC treatment. All patients received more than two cycles of chemotherapy, and the response was evaluated every two cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival(OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival(PFS), objective response rate(ORR), disease control rate(DCR), and adverse effects. Results: ORR between the TEP/TCE and EP/CE groups showed a statistical difference(90% vs. 53%, P=0.033). Both groups failed to reach a statistical difference in DCR(100% vs. 86%, P=0.212). The median PFS and OS of the TEP/TCE group were slightly longer than those of the EP/CE group, although both groups failed to reach a statistical difference(10.5 vs. 8.9 months, P=0.484; 24.0 vs. 17.5 months, P=0.457). However, stratified analysis indicated that the PFS of patients with stages III and IV CSCLC showed marginally significant difference between the TEP/TCE and EP/CE groups(19.5 vs. 7.6 months; P=0.071). Both rates of grade IV bone marrow depression and termination of chemotherapy in the TEP/TCE group were significantly higher than those in the EP/CE group(26.3% vs. 7.0%, P=0.036; 31.6% vs. 14.7%, P=0.004). Conclusion: The TEP/TCE regimen may not be preferred for CSCLC, and this three-drug regimen requires further exploration and research. To date, the EP/CE regimen remains the standard treatment for CSCLC patients.
基金Supported by grants from the Sub-Topics of Major Drug Discovery Platform in the Twelfth-Five Year Research Program of China(No.2012ZX09303016-002)China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(No.2012M512119)
文摘We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of etoposide capsule combined with cisplatin or carboplatin in the treatment of elderly patients with small cell lung cancer （SCLC）. Methods： From October 2011 to November 2013, 32 elderly patients （71-79 years old） with histopathologically confirmed SCLC in General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region （China） were enrolled in the research. The patients were administrated with lastet capsule 150-175 mg, dl-5, combined with cisplatin 20 mg/m^2 dl-3 or carbopiatin AUC = 5, applied over 2 days. Twenty-one days were 1 treatment cycle. Results：After treatments, 2 cases acquired complete response （CR）, 19 cases acquired partial response （PR）, 8 cases acquired stable disease （SD）, and 3 cases had progression of disease （PD）. The objective response rate was 65.6% （21/32）, disease control rate was 90.6% （29/32）. The median time of progression-free survival （PFS） was 6.9 months, the median survival time was 14.0 months, and 1 year survival rate was 62.4%. The main adverse reactions of 1/11 leukopenia and gastrointestinal reaction were observed. Conclusion： Etoposide capsule combined with cisplatin or carboplatin therapy have curative effect and good tolerance in elderly patients with SCLC.
