Objective: To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of paclitaxel-etoposide-carboplatin/cisplatin(TEP/TCE) regimen with those of etoposide-carboplatin/cisplatin(EP/CE) regimen as first-line treatment for combined s...Objective: To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of paclitaxel-etoposide-carboplatin/cisplatin(TEP/TCE) regimen with those of etoposide-carboplatin/cisplatin(EP/CE) regimen as first-line treatment for combined small-cell lung cancer(CSCLC).Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 62 CSCLC patients who were treated at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from July 2000 to April 2013 and administered with TEP/TCE regimen(n=19) or EP/CE regimen(n=43) as first-line CSCLC treatment. All patients received more than two cycles of chemotherapy, and the response was evaluated every two cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival(OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival(PFS), objective response rate(ORR), disease control rate(DCR), and adverse effects. Results: ORR between the TEP/TCE and EP/CE groups showed a statistical difference(90% vs. 53%, P=0.033). Both groups failed to reach a statistical difference in DCR(100% vs. 86%, P=0.212). The median PFS and OS of the TEP/TCE group were slightly longer than those of the EP/CE group, although both groups failed to reach a statistical difference(10.5 vs. 8.9 months, P=0.484; 24.0 vs. 17.5 months, P=0.457). However, stratified analysis indicated that the PFS of patients with stages III and IV CSCLC showed marginally significant difference between the TEP/TCE and EP/CE groups(19.5 vs. 7.6 months; P=0.071). Both rates of grade IV bone marrow depression and termination of chemotherapy in the TEP/TCE group were significantly higher than those in the EP/CE group(26.3% vs. 7.0%, P=0.036; 31.6% vs. 14.7%, P=0.004). Conclusion: The TEP/TCE regimen may not be preferred for CSCLC, and this three-drug regimen requires further exploration and research. To date, the EP/CE regimen remains the standard treatment for CSCLC patients.展开更多
Objective： To observe the effect and toxicity of docetaxel with cisplatin in anthracyclines-resistant advanced breast cancer. Methods： Forty-five female patients received docetaxel 60 mg/m^2 on dl and cisplatin 30 m...Objective： To observe the effect and toxicity of docetaxel with cisplatin in anthracyclines-resistant advanced breast cancer. Methods： Forty-five female patients received docetaxel 60 mg/m^2 on dl and cisplatin 30 mg/m^2 on d1-d3 of every 28 days. Every patient was treated with at least 2 cycles and a median of 3 cycles （2-6 cycles ）. Results： Five patients achieved complete response （11.1%） and 18 partial response （40.0%）, 10 stable disease （22.2%）. The overall response rate was 51.1%. The clinical disease control rate was 73.3%, median time to tumor progression （TTP） was 7.8 months （1.0-34.5 months）, median survival time was 17.6 months （range 1.9-48.0 months）, and one year survival rate was 65.2%. The main side effect was marrow suppression. The treatment was well tolerated with grades Ⅲ and Ⅳ leukopenia in nine （20%） and ten （22.2%） patients. Conclusion： Combinative chemotherapy of docetaxel and cisplatin has a good anti-tumor activity on refractory advanced breast cancer with manageable toxicity.展开更多
Objective： The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and side effects of docetaxel/cisplatin regiment and gemcitabine/cisplatin regiment in the patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer （NS...Objective： The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and side effects of docetaxel/cisplatin regiment and gemcitabine/cisplatin regiment in the patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer （NSCLC）. Methods： Seventy-six patients with advanced NSCLC who were chemotherapy-naive were enrolled in two groups. In docetaxel group （DP group） the patients received docataxel 75 mg/m^2 and cisplatin 60 mg/m^2 on day 1. In gemcitabine group （GP group） the patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^2 on day 1 and day 8. The dosage of cisplatin was the same as DP group. The two regiments were administrated intravenously every 21 days as a cycle, each patient received 2-4 cycles. All patients were followed up until disease progressed or patients died. Results： The overall response rates were 43.5% in DP group and 45.9% in GP group. The response rate was significantly different between the initial treated group and retreated group in both two groups （53.8% vs 23.0% in DP group and 56% vs 25% in GP group, P 〈 0.05, respectively）. The main side effects were bone marrow suppression and thrombocytopenia. Conclusion： Docetaxel/cisplatin regiment and gemcitabine/cisplatin regiment for the patients with advanced NSCLC were efficient and well-tolerated chemotherapeutic approachs with low toxicity levels. The efficacy and major toxicity in two groups were similar.展开更多
基金supported by grants from the Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Project (Grant No. 11JCYBJC11300)National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81372517)National Science and Technology Major Project (Grant No. 09303001)
文摘Objective: To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of paclitaxel-etoposide-carboplatin/cisplatin(TEP/TCE) regimen with those of etoposide-carboplatin/cisplatin(EP/CE) regimen as first-line treatment for combined small-cell lung cancer(CSCLC).Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 62 CSCLC patients who were treated at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from July 2000 to April 2013 and administered with TEP/TCE regimen(n=19) or EP/CE regimen(n=43) as first-line CSCLC treatment. All patients received more than two cycles of chemotherapy, and the response was evaluated every two cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival(OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival(PFS), objective response rate(ORR), disease control rate(DCR), and adverse effects. Results: ORR between the TEP/TCE and EP/CE groups showed a statistical difference(90% vs. 53%, P=0.033). Both groups failed to reach a statistical difference in DCR(100% vs. 86%, P=0.212). The median PFS and OS of the TEP/TCE group were slightly longer than those of the EP/CE group, although both groups failed to reach a statistical difference(10.5 vs. 8.9 months, P=0.484; 24.0 vs. 17.5 months, P=0.457). However, stratified analysis indicated that the PFS of patients with stages III and IV CSCLC showed marginally significant difference between the TEP/TCE and EP/CE groups(19.5 vs. 7.6 months; P=0.071). Both rates of grade IV bone marrow depression and termination of chemotherapy in the TEP/TCE group were significantly higher than those in the EP/CE group(26.3% vs. 7.0%, P=0.036; 31.6% vs. 14.7%, P=0.004). Conclusion: The TEP/TCE regimen may not be preferred for CSCLC, and this three-drug regimen requires further exploration and research. To date, the EP/CE regimen remains the standard treatment for CSCLC patients.
文摘Objective： To observe the effect and toxicity of docetaxel with cisplatin in anthracyclines-resistant advanced breast cancer. Methods： Forty-five female patients received docetaxel 60 mg/m^2 on dl and cisplatin 30 mg/m^2 on d1-d3 of every 28 days. Every patient was treated with at least 2 cycles and a median of 3 cycles （2-6 cycles ）. Results： Five patients achieved complete response （11.1%） and 18 partial response （40.0%）, 10 stable disease （22.2%）. The overall response rate was 51.1%. The clinical disease control rate was 73.3%, median time to tumor progression （TTP） was 7.8 months （1.0-34.5 months）, median survival time was 17.6 months （range 1.9-48.0 months）, and one year survival rate was 65.2%. The main side effect was marrow suppression. The treatment was well tolerated with grades Ⅲ and Ⅳ leukopenia in nine （20%） and ten （22.2%） patients. Conclusion： Combinative chemotherapy of docetaxel and cisplatin has a good anti-tumor activity on refractory advanced breast cancer with manageable toxicity.
文摘Objective： The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and side effects of docetaxel/cisplatin regiment and gemcitabine/cisplatin regiment in the patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer （NSCLC）. Methods： Seventy-six patients with advanced NSCLC who were chemotherapy-naive were enrolled in two groups. In docetaxel group （DP group） the patients received docataxel 75 mg/m^2 and cisplatin 60 mg/m^2 on day 1. In gemcitabine group （GP group） the patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^2 on day 1 and day 8. The dosage of cisplatin was the same as DP group. The two regiments were administrated intravenously every 21 days as a cycle, each patient received 2-4 cycles. All patients were followed up until disease progressed or patients died. Results： The overall response rates were 43.5% in DP group and 45.9% in GP group. The response rate was significantly different between the initial treated group and retreated group in both two groups （53.8% vs 23.0% in DP group and 56% vs 25% in GP group, P 〈 0.05, respectively）. The main side effects were bone marrow suppression and thrombocytopenia. Conclusion： Docetaxel/cisplatin regiment and gemcitabine/cisplatin regiment for the patients with advanced NSCLC were efficient and well-tolerated chemotherapeutic approachs with low toxicity levels. The efficacy and major toxicity in two groups were similar.
