期刊文献+
共找到5篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
凹侧撑开预矫形技术治疗重度僵硬性脊柱侧凸的早期研究
1
作者 薛旭红 张麒 +5 位作者 赵胜 张艳东 王世雄 席凡辉 葛贵喧 郭伟杰 《骨科》 CAS 2023年第2期132-137,共6页
目的 研究凹侧撑开预矫形技术治疗重度僵硬性特发性脊柱侧凸的早期疗效和安全性。方法 回顾性分析2020年1月至2022年12月山西医科大学第二医院收治并进行手术治疗的重度僵硬性脊柱侧凸的8例病人的临床资料。手术均采用凹侧撑开预矫形后... 目的 研究凹侧撑开预矫形技术治疗重度僵硬性特发性脊柱侧凸的早期疗效和安全性。方法 回顾性分析2020年1月至2022年12月山西医科大学第二医院收治并进行手术治疗的重度僵硬性脊柱侧凸的8例病人的临床资料。手术均采用凹侧撑开预矫形后双侧依次上棒二次矫形的手术方法。分别测量术前、术后及末次随访时的影像学参数包括主弯Cobb角、次弯Cobb角、胸椎后凸角(TK)、腰椎前凸角(LL)、主弯顶椎偏距(AVT)、躯干偏移(TS)。结果 病人随访(9.0±6.3)个月(1~16个月)。术前主弯Cobb角:97.4°±10.0°,次弯Cobb角:55.6°±8.4°,TK:50.4°±20.3°,LL:62.7°±6.3°,AVT:(7.64±1.55)cm,TS:(2.00±1.93) cm;术后即刻主弯Cobb角:25.8°±8.1°,次弯Cobb角:21.0°±12.0°,TK:24.9。±9.6°,LL:31.6°±11.9°,AVT:(2.34±1.45) cm,TS:(1.26±0.63) cm;末次随访主弯Cobb角:21.2°±9.1°,次弯Cobb角:22.4°±16.1°,TK:32.8°±12.0°,LL:37.6°±14.0°,AVT:(2.41±0.81) cm,TS:(1.6±1.4) cm。除TS外,上述其他指标术后即刻、末次随访时的数值与术前比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但术后即刻与末次随访时的数值比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。1例术后7个月出现迟发性感染,遂进行手术清创以及内固定取出术后再愈合。结论 采用凹侧撑开预矫形治疗重度脊柱侧凸能够获得满意的矫形效果,且出血少,术中及术后神经系统并发症发生率低,是一种安全有效且实用的治疗方法。 展开更多
关键词 重度特发性脊柱侧凸 凹侧 预矫形 二次矫形
下载PDF
颈椎牵引预矫形结合手术矫形治疗重度颈椎后凸畸形 被引量:9
2
作者 张立 孙宇 +5 位作者 张凤山 刘忠军 潘胜发 刁垠泽 陈欣 周非非 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第8期698-704,共7页
目的 :研究颈椎牵引预矫形结合手术矫形与单纯手术矫形治疗重度颈椎后凸畸形的疗效,探讨重度颈椎后凸畸形的治疗策略。方法:回顾性分析2003年3月~2017年3月,在我院接受手术治疗的大于40°的重度颈椎后凸畸形患者共32例,男24例,女8... 目的 :研究颈椎牵引预矫形结合手术矫形与单纯手术矫形治疗重度颈椎后凸畸形的疗效,探讨重度颈椎后凸畸形的治疗策略。方法:回顾性分析2003年3月~2017年3月,在我院接受手术治疗的大于40°的重度颈椎后凸畸形患者共32例,男24例,女8例。年龄5.9~63.4岁,平均19.5±12.2岁。根据治疗方案是否行牵引预矫形分为牵引组及非牵引组。牵引组26例,其中4例为颅骨牵引,22例为颈椎平衡悬吊牵引,6例先行颈椎松解手术、而后采用牵引预矫形,最后进行颈椎矫形内固定融合手术。非牵引组6例,单纯采用颈椎矫形内固定融合手术。测量及记录所有患者治疗前、矫形手术(前路、后路或前后联合入路矫形融合内固定手术)后出院前(术后2周左右)、末次随访时,以及牵引组患者牵引后(矫形手术前)不同时间点的颈椎后凸节段的后凸角、JOA脊髓功能评分并进行比较。结果 :本组32例后凸角由治疗前73.5°±26.5°矫正至术后16.6°±17.2°,最终矫正率平均(79.8±19.0)%,术后与治疗前存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。治疗前JOA评分11.9±4.5分,术后JOA评分15.2±2.9分,有统计学差异(P<0.05)。治疗前牵引组的后凸角(77.9°±26.5°)明显大于非牵引组(54.7°±18.2°,P<0.05),但是牵引组的手术矫正率(81.7±17.9)%高于非牵引组(73.4±25.8)%,存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。采用平衡悬吊牵引的牵引预矫正率(70.3±18.7)%及手术后的最终矫正率(83.8±14.4)%与采用颅骨牵引的相应指标(52.2±21.8)%、(70.4±32.1)%相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 :对于重度颈椎后凸畸形,采用颈椎牵引预矫形,结合前路、后路或者前后联合入路矫形固定融合手术,可以取得良好的矫形效果。 展开更多
关键词 重度颈椎后凸畸形 牵引预矫形 融合 内固定
下载PDF
多发颈椎不连综合征的影像学特点与外科诊疗策略
3
作者 夏天 孙宇 +7 位作者 潘胜发 周非非 刁垠泽 陈欣 赵衍斌 张凤山 张立 王少波 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第12期1072-1077,1105,共7页
目的:分析多发颈椎不连综合征(multilevel cervical disconnection syndrome,MCDS)的影像学特点及外科诊疗策略。方法:2004年3月~2021年6月,我院收治MCDS患者共7例,男性3例,女性4例;年龄5~46岁(中位年龄12岁)。7例MCDS患者中,平均椎体... 目的:分析多发颈椎不连综合征(multilevel cervical disconnection syndrome,MCDS)的影像学特点及外科诊疗策略。方法:2004年3月~2021年6月,我院收治MCDS患者共7例,男性3例,女性4例;年龄5~46岁(中位年龄12岁)。7例MCDS患者中,平均椎体发育不良节段数3.6±1.3个节段,平均椎弓不连节段数5.7±1.5个节段,局部后凸角平均-92.2°±20.2°,C2-7 Cobb角平均-68.6°±31.0°,T1倾斜角(T1 slope,T1S)平均-12.5°±12.5°,后凸顶点位于C4节段1例,C5节段5例,T1节段1例;术前改良日本骨科学会评分(mJOA评分)8.5~14分(平均12.6±2.1分),其中1例患者伴有吞咽困难。记录患者预矫形方式及手术方式,入院时、预矫形后、术后及末次随访影像学参数,神经功能及并发症。结果:1例术前接受颅骨牵引,3例接受平衡悬吊牵引,3例接受联合牵引,经术前牵引预矫形后,局部后凸角矫正率为60.8%。1例接受手术松解、Halo-vest外固定治疗,1例接受前路矫形内固定手术,1例接受后路矫形固定融合术,4例接受前-后联合手术治疗,手术固定6.0±2.1个节段,2例患者出现术后神经系统并发症,接受翻修手术。术后随访时间6~84个月(41.2±32.0个月),末次随访局部后凸角平均-27.9°±11.6°,矫正率69.7%,C2-7 Cobb角平均-13.3°±28.4°,T1S平均4.9°±17.9°;术后mJOA评分10.5~17分(15.7±2.3分),改善率78.3%。对比手术前后临床及影像学指标,mJOA评分、C2-7后凸角、局部后凸角及T1S有统计学差异。结论:MCDS影像学上主要表现为前方椎体发育不良伴多节段椎弓不连,继发严重后凸畸形。治疗策略可采取术前牵引预矫形并前路多节段椎体切除重建、后路长节段固定融合。 展开更多
关键词 重度先天性颈椎后凸畸形 牵引预矫形 多发颈椎不连综合征
下载PDF
Chinese Orthopedic Surgeons' Practice Regarding Postoperative Thromboembolic Prophylaxis after Major Orthopedic Surgery
4
作者 Zhi-jian Sun Gui-xing Qiu +2 位作者 Xi-sheng Weng Yu Zhao Jin Jin 《Chinese Medical Sciences Journal》 CAS CSCD 2012年第3期141-146,共6页
Objective To assess Chinese surgeon practice of thromboprophylaxis following major orthopedic surgery. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted amongst Chinese orthopedic surgeons. A total of 293 surgeons were sur... Objective To assess Chinese surgeon practice of thromboprophylaxis following major orthopedic surgery. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted amongst Chinese orthopedic surgeons. A total of 293 surgeons were surveyed concerning five key aspects of thromboembolic prophylaxis after major orthopedic surgery at the proseminar of Chinese guidelines for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after major orthopedic surgery in January of 2009. Results Totally, 208 surgeons (71.0%) responded, successfully completing the questionnaire. Of them, 57.6% respondents selected combined basic, mechanical, and pharmacologic methods for thromboprophylaxis; 51.0% respondents prefer starting prophylaxis 12-24 hours after surgery; 60.3% surgeons would use chemoprophylaxis for 7-10 days; 47.6% respondents prefer VTE prevention based on patients' special conditions and needs upon discharge. "Safety" was the most repeated and emphasized factor during VTE prophylaxis. Conclusions Multimodal thromboprophylaxis is frequently used after major orthopedic surgery. Half surgeons prefer to start chemoprophylaxis 12-24 hours after surgery. Thromboprophylaxis regimen varies for discharged patients. 展开更多
关键词 venous thromboembolism major orthopedic surgery survey THROMBOPROPHYLAXIS
下载PDF
Prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in orthopedic surgery 被引量:4
5
作者 刘林涛 马宝通 《Chinese Journal of Traumatology》 CAS 2006年第4期249-256,共8页
Venous thromboembolism ( VTE), which is manifested as deep vein thrombosis ( DVT ) and pulmonary embolism (PE), represents a significant cause of death, disability, and discomfort. They are frequent complication... Venous thromboembolism ( VTE), which is manifested as deep vein thrombosis ( DVT ) and pulmonary embolism (PE), represents a significant cause of death, disability, and discomfort. They are frequent complications of various surgical procedures. The aging population and the survival of more severely injured patients may suggest an increasing risk of thromboembolism in the trauma patients. Expanded understanding of the population at risk challenges physicians to carefully examine risk factors for VTE to identify high-risk patients who can benefit from prophylaxis. An accurate knowledge of evidence-based risk factors is important in predicting and preventing postoperative DVT, and can be incorporated into a decision support system for appropriate thromboprophylaxis use. Standard use of DVT prophylaxis in a high-risk trauma population leads to a low incidence of DVT. The incidence of VTE is common in Asia. The evaluation includes laboratory tests, Doppler test and phlebography. Screening Doppler sonography should be performed for surveillance on all critically injured patients to identify DVT. D-Dimer is a useful marker to monitor prophylaxis in trauma surgery patients. The optimal time to start prophylaxis is between 2 hours before and 10 hours after surgery, but the risk of PE continues for several weeks. Thromboprophylaxis includes graduated compression stockings and anticoagulants for prophylaxis. Anticoagulants include Warfarin, which belongs to Vitamin K antagonists, unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparins, factor Xa indirect inhibitor Fondaparinux, and the oral Ha inhibitor Melagatran and ximelagatran. Recombinant human soluble thrombomodunn is a new and highly effective antithrombotic agent. Prophylactic placement of vena caval filters in selected trauma patients may decrease the incidence of PE. The indications for prophylactic inferior vena cava filter insertion include prolonged immobilization with multiple injuries, closed head injury, pelvic fracture, spine fracture, multiple long bone fracture, and attending discretion. Multlple-trauma patients are at increased risk for DVT but are also at increased risk of bleeding, and the use of heparin may be contraindicated. Serial compression devices (SCDs) are an alternative for DVT prophylaxis. Compression devices provide adequate DArT prophylaxis with a low failure rate and no device-related complications. Immobilization is one of important reasons of VTE. The ambulant patient is far less likely to develop complications of inactivity, not only venous thrombosis, but also contractures, decubitns ulcers, or osteoporosis (with its associated fatigue fractures), as well as bowel or bladder complications. 展开更多
关键词 Venous thromboembolism ORTHOPEDICS PROPHYLAXIS
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部