期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
黑果腺肋花楸酒与赤霞珠葡萄酒香气物质对比分析 被引量:27
1
作者 毛建利 李艳 《食品科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第22期270-276,共7页
以赤霞珠葡萄酒为参照分析黑果腺肋花楸发酵酒的香气物质组成并进行感官品评,评价其酿酒潜质,为开发适宜消费者口味的黑果腺肋花楸酒提供参考。采用顶空固相微萃取结合气相色谱-质谱分析酒的香气物质成分。结果显示:黑果腺肋花楸酒香气... 以赤霞珠葡萄酒为参照分析黑果腺肋花楸发酵酒的香气物质组成并进行感官品评,评价其酿酒潜质,为开发适宜消费者口味的黑果腺肋花楸酒提供参考。采用顶空固相微萃取结合气相色谱-质谱分析酒的香气物质成分。结果显示:黑果腺肋花楸酒香气物质含量为赤霞珠葡萄酒的2.73倍,香气物质种类分别为41种和40种,其中共有的18种。醇类物质含量最高,分别占总香气的62.11%和73.87%。依据香气活度值,酯类物质对酒的香气贡献最大,分别为36.57%和22.04%。黑果腺肋花楸酒的主体香气物质是大马士酮、辛酸乙酯、正己酸乙酯和乙酸异戊酯,而赤霞珠葡萄酒则为α-紫罗酮、辛酸乙酯、正己酸乙酯和苯乙醛。2款酒中共有香气物质对香气贡献占比分别为34.20%和21.81%,说明具有一定的相似性,而大马士酮和α-紫罗酮对酒香气值的贡献分别为63.22%和76.36%,形成了各自酒的特色。经感官品评,黑果腺肋花楸酒比赤霞珠葡萄酒总得分高2分,黑果腺肋花楸作为黑色浆果具有开发酿酒的价值。 展开更多
关键词 黑果腺肋花楸发酵酒 赤霞珠葡萄酒 香气物质分析 顶空固相微萃取 气相色谱-质谱联用仪
下载PDF
不同酵母多糖对霞多丽干白葡萄酒品质的影响 被引量:16
2
作者 李惠琳 王婧 +3 位作者 许引虎 盛文军 李敏 米兰 《食品与发酵工业》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第4期142-153,共12页
以霞多丽干白葡萄基酒为材料,分别添加酵母甘露聚糖、酵母细胞壁、非活性酵母与酵母葡聚糖等4种商业酵母多糖,采用顶空固相微萃取和气相色谱-质谱联用技术对所得酒样进行分析,以了解不同商业酵母多糖的添加对于白葡萄酒感官品质的影响... 以霞多丽干白葡萄基酒为材料,分别添加酵母甘露聚糖、酵母细胞壁、非活性酵母与酵母葡聚糖等4种商业酵母多糖,采用顶空固相微萃取和气相色谱-质谱联用技术对所得酒样进行分析,以了解不同商业酵母多糖的添加对于白葡萄酒感官品质的影响。结果表明,与对照相比4种酵母多糖的添加均可提高葡萄酒总酸并降低挥发酸含量,其中酵母甘露聚糖挥发酸含量相比对照降低了51.40%;通过对挥发性香气物质贡献值(OAV)的分析表明,4种多糖处理酒样之间重要香气活性物质的种类和贡献程度差别较大,其中酵母葡聚糖处理获得的重要香气活性物质最多;感官分析也表明,4种多糖处理组酒样其香气浓郁度,感官平衡性均高于对照组,其中酵母甘露聚糖处理组的最为突出。 展开更多
关键词 酵母多糖 干白葡萄酒 理化指标 气相色谱-质谱法(GC-MS) 挥发性香气物质贡献值(OAV)分析 主成分分析
下载PDF
Judgment of Aroma Types of Middle and Upper Flue-cured Tobacco Leaves Based on Stepwise Discriminant Analysis
3
作者 詹军 周芳芳 +5 位作者 董石飞 饶智 朱海滨 资文华 蒋美红 罗华元 《Agricultural Science & Technology》 CAS 2014年第9期1550-1557,共8页
[Objective] The aim of this study was to establish mathematical models for judging the aroma types of middle and upper flue-cured tobacco leaves according to the contents and proportions of aroma compositions. [Method... [Objective] The aim of this study was to establish mathematical models for judging the aroma types of middle and upper flue-cured tobacco leaves according to the contents and proportions of aroma compositions. [Method] The aroma types of tobacco leaves were judged based on stepwise discriminant analysis, using 63 C3F and 65 B2F tobacco leaf samples from 13 tobacco producing regions in 11 provinces of China (Huili in Sichuan, Baokang in Hubei, Wulong in Chongqing, Lu- oyang in Henan, Zhucheng in Shandong, Wuyi Mountain in Fujian, Malong in Yun- nan, Chuxiong in Yunnan, Bijie in Guizhou, Liuyang in Hunan, Suiyang in Guizhou, Kaiyuan in Liaoning, Nanxiong in Guangdong) as calibration samples, and 67 aroma components as indices. And the Fisher discriminant functions were verified using 21 C3F and 19 B2F tobacco leaf samples. [Result] Variation coefficients of the propor- tions were lower than that of contents of most aroma components in middle and upper leaves of the samples, indicating that the proportions were more stable than contents of aroma components. The proportions of benzyl alcohol, solanone, β-dam- ascone, neophytadiene, farnesylacetone A, palmitic acid, thunbergol, methyl linole- nate and cembratriene-diol were all over 1% in both middle and upper leaves, al- though the dominant aroma components of the same aroma type varied between middle and upper leaves. Moreover, 11, 18, 7 and 11 aroma components were re- spectively introduced into the Fisher discriminant functions established based on the contents and proportions of middle and upper flue-cured tobacco leaves, which ex- hibited accuracy rates of 91.7%, 100%, 91.7% and 91.7% in the judgments of other tobacco leaf samples. The results revealed that the components those determined aroma types in middle leaves were obviously more than in upper leaves. In middle leaves, the accuracy rates of aroma type judgment could be improved by using the proportions rather than the contents of aroma components as indices. However, the functions based on the proportions and the contents of aroma components in upper leaves gave close accuracy rates. [Conclusion] The results of the study will provide references for identifying aroma types of flue-cured tobacco leaves in future work. 展开更多
关键词 Flue-cured tobacco leaves Middle leaves Upper leaves Aroma com- ponents Content PROPORTION Aroma type Discriminant analysis
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部