期刊文献+
共找到5篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
薇甘菊对香港郊野公园植物群落危害的分析 被引量:6
1
作者 周先叶 黄东光 +2 位作者 昝启杰 王勇军 廖文波 《生态科学》 CSCD 2006年第6期530-536,共7页
从薇甘菊(Mikania micrantha)对不同类型群落的危害,群落中各植物种类受薇甘菊危害的程度,以及薇甘菊与群落中主要乔木和灌木的种间联结性等方面,对香港郊野公园植物群落受薇甘菊危害状况进行了分析。研究样地所在的植被受薇甘菊的危害... 从薇甘菊(Mikania micrantha)对不同类型群落的危害,群落中各植物种类受薇甘菊危害的程度,以及薇甘菊与群落中主要乔木和灌木的种间联结性等方面,对香港郊野公园植物群落受薇甘菊危害状况进行了分析。研究样地所在的植被受薇甘菊的危害严重,草灌丛中薇甘菊的平均覆盖率高达80%,灌木群落中薇甘菊的平均覆盖率为60%左右,常绿阔叶林中的薇甘菊覆盖率平均约为30%。对香港郊野公园受薇甘菊危害的植物种类分析表明:受薇甘菊危害最大的主要是乔木和灌木,草本和藤本的受害比例和受害程度相对较小。受薇甘菊危害的乔木有30种,占群落中乔木的62.50%;受薇甘菊危害的灌木有29种,占群落中灌木的70.73%;受薇甘菊危害的草本植物有10种,占群落中草本植物的33.33%。通过无样方法采用2×2列联表的χ2检验对薇甘菊与群落中主要乔木和灌木的种间联结性分析表明:与薇甘菊呈正联结的乔木有12种,占主要乔木(28种)的42.86%,这些种大多是阳生性乔木;与薇甘菊呈负联结的乔木有16种,占主要乔木的57.16%。与薇甘菊呈正联结的灌木有11种,占主要灌木(19种)的57.89%,多是阳生性灌木;与薇甘菊呈负联结的灌木有8种,占主要灌木的42.11%,这些种大多数也是阳生性灌木,仅九节是耐阴性灌木。 展开更多
关键词 外来入侵植物 薇甘菊 危害 种间联结 香港郊野公园
下载PDF
香港郊野公园薇甘菊的化学防除研究 被引量:3
2
作者 黄东光 周先叶 +2 位作者 昝启杰 王勇军 廖文波 《华南师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2007年第3期109-114,131,共7页
在香港郊野公园内选择薇甘菊危害较严重的草灌丛、灌木林和常绿阔叶林3种群落类型,设置样地5 000 m^2,用0.05-0.1 g·m^-2嘧磺隆对样地中的薇甘菊进行化学防除试验,并在施用除草剂后3、5和14个月跟踪调查施药对薇甘菊的杀灭效果以... 在香港郊野公园内选择薇甘菊危害较严重的草灌丛、灌木林和常绿阔叶林3种群落类型,设置样地5 000 m^2,用0.05-0.1 g·m^-2嘧磺隆对样地中的薇甘菊进行化学防除试验,并在施用除草剂后3、5和14个月跟踪调查施药对薇甘菊的杀灭效果以及对样地中其他植物和群落物种多样性的影响.结果表明嘧磺隆对样地中薇甘菊有极好的杀灭效果.施药后3个月,样地中有45种植物受到了不同程度的影响,占样地内所有种类的30%.受影响最大的是藤本和草本植物,其次是灌木,乔木受影响最小.施药后14个月,乔木和灌木生长正常,草本植物基本恢复.施药清除薇甘菊后,能大幅度地增加群落的物种多样性. 展开更多
关键词 外来入侵植物 薇甘菊 化学防除 嘧磺隆 香港郊野公园
下载PDF
由香港郊野公园看南昌城市生态发展思路
3
作者 肖婧颖 《城市建筑》 2014年第33期11-12,共2页
当今,随着我国城镇化的快速发展,带来了如人居环境恶化等诸多城市问题。历经十余年的高速发展,南昌市目前正处城市建设的关键时期。本文对香港郊野公园模式的成功经验进行了分析,以期对南昌城市生态建设与发展提供可资借鉴的思路。
关键词 香港郊野公园 南昌 城市生态发展
下载PDF
The new economy of nature:can carbon pay for nature conservation? The case of the Hong Kong Country Parks
4
作者 Claudio O.DELANG 《Ecological Economy》 2010年第2期115-130,共16页
The Country Parks of Hong Kong occupy 40%of the total landmass of Hong Kong,and consists of vast areas of secondary woodlands,scrublands,grasslands,and reservoirs.That vegetation-and the soil underneathsubtract carbon... The Country Parks of Hong Kong occupy 40%of the total landmass of Hong Kong,and consists of vast areas of secondary woodlands,scrublands,grasslands,and reservoirs.That vegetation-and the soil underneathsubtract carbon from the atmosphere,which has a market value.The aim of this paper is to estimate the value of that carbon,to assess whether that value would be sufficient to pay for the upkeep of the Country Parks,and to compare that value to the costs of alternative ways to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide.To do this,we compare the land cover of 1978,1991,1997 and 2004 using remote sensing,and identify the three predominant land covers(woodlands,scrublands,grasslands) .We then estimate the amount and value of the carbon sequestered by the vegetation and soil of the Country Parks,and compare it to the budget available to the Agriculture,Fisheries and Conservation Department to run the Country Parks(HK$234 million in 2009/2010) .We extrapolate our results over 50 years,from 1978 to 2028.We conclude that by 2028 the carbon sequestered would be valued over HK$800 million,but the value of the additional carbon subtracted yearly would only cover approximately 7%of the total budget needed to run the Country Parks.We also conclude that because of the large budget allocated to the Country Parks,alternative methods of carbon sequestration-represented by the EU ETS price of carbon-are much cheaper. 展开更多
关键词 Hong Kong Country Parks Protected areas Carbon sequestration Carbon credits
下载PDF
The Comparative Analysis on Country Park Management between Hong Kong and Beijing 被引量:1
5
作者 ZHANG Shuying LIU Jiaming LONG Fei 《Journal of Resources and Ecology》 CSCD 2019年第4期451-459,共9页
With a comparatively mature state of country park development for China, Hong Kong serves as a model that is emulated by many cities in China's Mainland. In contrast, Beijing started to establish country parks rel... With a comparatively mature state of country park development for China, Hong Kong serves as a model that is emulated by many cities in China's Mainland. In contrast, Beijing started to establish country parks relatively late, but along with the nascent 'Country Park Loop', achieving scientific and reasonable operation management is now the major challenge facing Beijing. By comparing the differences between Hong Kong and Beijing country park management in terms of positioning, management organization, legal guarantees, supporting facilities and education, this paper explores the factors of social development stage, urban developmental history and planning, the wilderness concept and financial support which are responsible for those differences. In order to achieve sustainable development, this paper shows that Beijing country parks should seek corresponding solutions according to their own characteristics. 展开更多
关键词 country parks MANAGEMENT Hong Kong BEIJING
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部