Objective: To investigate the role of aprotinin blood anesthesia used in hepatotomy. Methods: Patients with liver cancer undergoing hepatotomy were divided into two groups. In experimental group (40 patients) a loadin...Objective: To investigate the role of aprotinin blood anesthesia used in hepatotomy. Methods: Patients with liver cancer undergoing hepatotomy were divided into two groups. In experimental group (40 patients) a loading dose with 1112 EPU aprotinin and maintained by 278 EPU/h was used until 2 h after operation. The control group (42 patients) was treated with 0.9% normal saline. The venous blood was withdrew for blood routine, thrombelastography and coagulable test at the time of preinduced, 1 h, 2 h and 4 h following the operation beginning, 6 h and 12 h after operation. The change of TEG and coagulable profile were monitored during the whole surgery. The volume of blood transfusion and hemorrhage between two groups were compared. Results: After the usage of aprotinin, the preoperative hypercoagulability of the experimental group was remitted and the coagulative state was kept relatively stable during the operation. However, hypercoagulability of the control group aggravated following the operation beginning and some of them switched to hypocoagulability. The volumes and rates of hemorrhage and transfusion were smaller in the experimental group than in the control group. Conclusion: Aprotinin can stabilize the coagulable state, reduce the volumes and rates of hemorrhage and transfusion, and is worth using in the surgery of operations of liver cancer.展开更多
文摘Objective: To investigate the role of aprotinin blood anesthesia used in hepatotomy. Methods: Patients with liver cancer undergoing hepatotomy were divided into two groups. In experimental group (40 patients) a loading dose with 1112 EPU aprotinin and maintained by 278 EPU/h was used until 2 h after operation. The control group (42 patients) was treated with 0.9% normal saline. The venous blood was withdrew for blood routine, thrombelastography and coagulable test at the time of preinduced, 1 h, 2 h and 4 h following the operation beginning, 6 h and 12 h after operation. The change of TEG and coagulable profile were monitored during the whole surgery. The volume of blood transfusion and hemorrhage between two groups were compared. Results: After the usage of aprotinin, the preoperative hypercoagulability of the experimental group was remitted and the coagulative state was kept relatively stable during the operation. However, hypercoagulability of the control group aggravated following the operation beginning and some of them switched to hypocoagulability. The volumes and rates of hemorrhage and transfusion were smaller in the experimental group than in the control group. Conclusion: Aprotinin can stabilize the coagulable state, reduce the volumes and rates of hemorrhage and transfusion, and is worth using in the surgery of operations of liver cancer.
