记:您自己已经在 IC 产业中服务了二十年,也曾经担任过 WSTS(Worldwide Semiconductor Trad-ing Statistics)亚太区主席的重要职位,请您简单介绍一下您本人的工作经历,及结合您丰富的行业的经验来简单介绍一下台湾集成电路发展的现状好...记:您自己已经在 IC 产业中服务了二十年,也曾经担任过 WSTS(Worldwide Semiconductor Trad-ing Statistics)亚太区主席的重要职位,请您简单介绍一下您本人的工作经历,及结合您丰富的行业的经验来简单介绍一下台湾集成电路发展的现状好吗?黄:我自己已经在 IC 行业内服务了二十年,首先从一个工研院电子工业究所业务工程师。展开更多
The emergence and rapid spread of multidrug-resistant gram-positive bacteria has become a vital and serious medical problem. A literature search was conducted in Pub Med, EMBASE, and Elsevier databases to identify rel...The emergence and rapid spread of multidrug-resistant gram-positive bacteria has become a vital and serious medical problem. A literature search was conducted in Pub Med, EMBASE, and Elsevier databases to identify relevant publications. To calculate the risk ratios（RRs） with 95% confidential intervals（CIs）, a fixed- or random-effects model was applied based on the heterogeneity across studies. Five studies containing seven RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. Regarding c SSTIs, HAP, SAB, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of clinical cure between telavancin and vancomycin or standard therapy in intention-to-treat population（ITT）（RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.97–1.05, P = 0.72; FEM） and clinically evaluable population（CE）（RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98–1.04, P = 0.41; FEM）. However, telavancin was more effective than vancomycin or standard therapy in MRSA eradication rate（RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02–1.14, P = 0.009; FEM）. Regarding the safety profile, no statistically significant differences were found in all-cause mortality（9.0% vs. 8.4%; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.88–1.31, P = 0.49; FEM） and overall adverse events（77.0% vs. 72.3%; RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.98–1.20, P = 0.12; FEM） between telavancin and vancomycin or standard therapy. Pooled data from c SSTIs, HAP and SAB studies on telavancin indicated higher rates of adverse-event related withdrawals（7.7% vs. 5.4%; RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.12–1.83, P = 0.05; FEM） and creatinine elevation（10.0% vs. 5.1%; RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.53–2.48, P0.00001; FEM） than vancomycin or standard therapy. Telavancin and vancomycin or standard therapy are equally effective for the treatment of c SSTIs, HAP and SAB, and telavancin might be an option for the treatment of difficult-to-treat serious infections caused by MRSA. However, telavancin is associated a higher incidence of creatinine elevation and adverse-event related withdrawals.展开更多
文摘记:您自己已经在 IC 产业中服务了二十年,也曾经担任过 WSTS(Worldwide Semiconductor Trad-ing Statistics)亚太区主席的重要职位,请您简单介绍一下您本人的工作经历,及结合您丰富的行业的经验来简单介绍一下台湾集成电路发展的现状好吗?黄:我自己已经在 IC 行业内服务了二十年,首先从一个工研院电子工业究所业务工程师。
文摘The emergence and rapid spread of multidrug-resistant gram-positive bacteria has become a vital and serious medical problem. A literature search was conducted in Pub Med, EMBASE, and Elsevier databases to identify relevant publications. To calculate the risk ratios（RRs） with 95% confidential intervals（CIs）, a fixed- or random-effects model was applied based on the heterogeneity across studies. Five studies containing seven RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. Regarding c SSTIs, HAP, SAB, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of clinical cure between telavancin and vancomycin or standard therapy in intention-to-treat population（ITT）（RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.97–1.05, P = 0.72; FEM） and clinically evaluable population（CE）（RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98–1.04, P = 0.41; FEM）. However, telavancin was more effective than vancomycin or standard therapy in MRSA eradication rate（RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02–1.14, P = 0.009; FEM）. Regarding the safety profile, no statistically significant differences were found in all-cause mortality（9.0% vs. 8.4%; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.88–1.31, P = 0.49; FEM） and overall adverse events（77.0% vs. 72.3%; RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.98–1.20, P = 0.12; FEM） between telavancin and vancomycin or standard therapy. Pooled data from c SSTIs, HAP and SAB studies on telavancin indicated higher rates of adverse-event related withdrawals（7.7% vs. 5.4%; RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.12–1.83, P = 0.05; FEM） and creatinine elevation（10.0% vs. 5.1%; RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.53–2.48, P0.00001; FEM） than vancomycin or standard therapy. Telavancin and vancomycin or standard therapy are equally effective for the treatment of c SSTIs, HAP and SAB, and telavancin might be an option for the treatment of difficult-to-treat serious infections caused by MRSA. However, telavancin is associated a higher incidence of creatinine elevation and adverse-event related withdrawals.
