BACKGROUND Recently,artificial intelligence(AI)has been widely used in gastrointestinal endoscopy examinations.AIM To comprehensively evaluate the application of AI-assisted endoscopy in detecting different digestive ...BACKGROUND Recently,artificial intelligence(AI)has been widely used in gastrointestinal endoscopy examinations.AIM To comprehensively evaluate the application of AI-assisted endoscopy in detecting different digestive diseases using bibliometric analysis.METHODS Relevant publications from the Web of Science published from 1990 to 2022 were extracted using a combination of the search terms“AI”and“endoscopy”.The following information was recorded from the included publications:Title,author,institution,country,endoscopy type,disease type,performance of AI,publication,citation,journal and H-index.RESULTS A total of 446 studies were included.The number of articles reached its peak in 2021,and the annual citation numbers increased after 2006.China,the United States and Japan were dominant countries in this field,accounting for 28.7%,16.8%,and 15.7%of publications,respectively.The Tada Tomohiro Institute of Gastroenterology and Proctology was the most influential institution.“Cancer”and“polyps”were the hotspots in this field.Colorectal polyps were the most concerning and researched disease,followed by gastric cancer and gastrointestinal bleeding.Conventional endoscopy was the most common type of examination.The accuracy of AI in detecting Barrett’s esophagus,colorectal polyps and gastric cancer from 2018 to 2022 is 87.6%,93.7%and 88.3%,respectively.The detection rates of adenoma and gastrointestinal bleeding from 2018 to 2022 are 31.3%and 96.2%,respectively.CONCLUSION AI could improve the detection rate of digestive tract diseases and a convolutional neural network-based diagnosis program for endoscopic images shows promising results.展开更多
Purpose:Methods to tackle Covid-19 have been developed by a wave of biomedical research but the pandemic has also influenced many aspects of society,generating a need for research into its consequences,and potentially...Purpose:Methods to tackle Covid-19 have been developed by a wave of biomedical research but the pandemic has also influenced many aspects of society,generating a need for research into its consequences,and potentially changing the way existing topics are investigated.This article investigates the nature of this influence on the wider academic research mission.Design/methodology/approach:This article reports an inductive content analysis of 500 randomly selected journal articles mentioning Covid-19,as recorded by the Dimensions scholarly database on 19 March 2021.Covid-19 mentions were coded for the influence of the disease on the research.Findings:Whilst two thirds of these articles were about biomedicine(e.g.treatments,vaccines,virology),or health services in response to Covid-19,others covered the pandemic economy,society,safety,or education.In addition,some articles were not about the pandemic but stated that Covid-19 had increased or decreased the value of the reported research or changed the context in which it was conducted.Research limitations:The findings relate only to Covid-19 influences declared in published journal articles.Practical implications:Research managers and funders should consider whether their current procedures are effective in supporting researchers to address the evolving demands of pandemic societies,particularly in terms of timeliness.Originality/value:The results show that although health research dominates the academic response to Covid-19,it is more widely disrupting academic research with new demands and challenges.展开更多
Purpose： One of the main indicators of scientific production is the number of papers published in scholarly journals. Turkey ranks 18th place in the world based on the number of scholarly publications. The objective ...Purpose： One of the main indicators of scientific production is the number of papers published in scholarly journals. Turkey ranks 18th place in the world based on the number of scholarly publications. The objective of this paper is to find out if the monetary support program initiated in 1993 by the Turkish Scientific and Technological Research Council （TUBITAK） to incentivize researchers and increase the number, impact, and quality of international publications has been effective in doing so.Design/methodology/approach： We analyzed some 390,000 publications with Turkish affiliations listed in the Web of Science （WoS） database between 1976 and 2015 along with about 157,000 supported ones between 1997 and 2015. We used the interrupted time series （ITS） analysis technique （also known as ＂quasi-experimental time series analysis＂ or ＂intervention analysis＂） to test if TOBITAK＇s support program helped increase the number of publications. We defined ARIMA （1,1,0） model for ITS data and observed the impact of TOBiTAK＇s support program in 1994, 1997, and 2003 （after one, four and 10 years of its start, respectively）. The majority of publications （93%） were full papers （articles）, which were used as the experimental group while other types of contributions functioned as the control group. We also carried out a multiple regression analysis.Findings： TUBITAK＇s support program has had negligible effect on the increase of the number of papers with Turkish affiliations. Yet, the number of other types of contributions continued to increase even though they were not well supported, suggesting that TUBITAK＇s support program is probably not the main factor causing the increase in the number of papers with Turkish affiliations. Research limitations： Interrupted time series analysis shows if the ＂intervention＂ has had any significant effect on the dependent variable but it does not explain what caused the increase in the number of papers if it was not the intervention. Moreover, except the＂intervention＂, other ＂event（s）＂ that might affect the time series data （e.g., increase in the number of research personnel over the years） should not occur during the period of analysis, a prerequisite that is beyond the control of the researcher. Practical implications： TUBITAK＇s ＂cash-for-publication＂ program did not seem to have direct impact on the increase of the number of papers published by Turkish authors, suggesting that small amounts of payments are not much of an incentive for authors to publish more. It might perhaps be a better strategy to concentrate limited resources on a few high impact projects rather than to disperse them to thousands of authors as ＂micropayments.＂ Originality/value： Based on 25 years＇ worth of payments data, this is perhaps one of the first large-scale studies showing that ＂cash-for-publication＂ policies or ＂piece rates＂ paid to researchers tend to have little or no effect on the increase of researchers＇ productivity. The main finding of this paper has some implications for countries wherein publication subsidies are used as an incentive to increase the number and quality of papers published in international journals. They should be prepared to consider reviewing their existing support programs （based usually on bibliometric measures such as journal impact factors） and revising their reward policies.展开更多
基金Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.82000531Project for Academic and Technical Leaders of Major Disciplines in Jiangxi Province,No.20212BCJL23065+1 种基金Key Research and Development Program of Jiangxi Province,No.20212BBG73018Youth Project of the Jiangxi Natural Science Foundation,No.20202BABL216006.
文摘BACKGROUND Recently,artificial intelligence(AI)has been widely used in gastrointestinal endoscopy examinations.AIM To comprehensively evaluate the application of AI-assisted endoscopy in detecting different digestive diseases using bibliometric analysis.METHODS Relevant publications from the Web of Science published from 1990 to 2022 were extracted using a combination of the search terms“AI”and“endoscopy”.The following information was recorded from the included publications:Title,author,institution,country,endoscopy type,disease type,performance of AI,publication,citation,journal and H-index.RESULTS A total of 446 studies were included.The number of articles reached its peak in 2021,and the annual citation numbers increased after 2006.China,the United States and Japan were dominant countries in this field,accounting for 28.7%,16.8%,and 15.7%of publications,respectively.The Tada Tomohiro Institute of Gastroenterology and Proctology was the most influential institution.“Cancer”and“polyps”were the hotspots in this field.Colorectal polyps were the most concerning and researched disease,followed by gastric cancer and gastrointestinal bleeding.Conventional endoscopy was the most common type of examination.The accuracy of AI in detecting Barrett’s esophagus,colorectal polyps and gastric cancer from 2018 to 2022 is 87.6%,93.7%and 88.3%,respectively.The detection rates of adenoma and gastrointestinal bleeding from 2018 to 2022 are 31.3%and 96.2%,respectively.CONCLUSION AI could improve the detection rate of digestive tract diseases and a convolutional neural network-based diagnosis program for endoscopic images shows promising results.
文摘Purpose:Methods to tackle Covid-19 have been developed by a wave of biomedical research but the pandemic has also influenced many aspects of society,generating a need for research into its consequences,and potentially changing the way existing topics are investigated.This article investigates the nature of this influence on the wider academic research mission.Design/methodology/approach:This article reports an inductive content analysis of 500 randomly selected journal articles mentioning Covid-19,as recorded by the Dimensions scholarly database on 19 March 2021.Covid-19 mentions were coded for the influence of the disease on the research.Findings:Whilst two thirds of these articles were about biomedicine(e.g.treatments,vaccines,virology),or health services in response to Covid-19,others covered the pandemic economy,society,safety,or education.In addition,some articles were not about the pandemic but stated that Covid-19 had increased or decreased the value of the reported research or changed the context in which it was conducted.Research limitations:The findings relate only to Covid-19 influences declared in published journal articles.Practical implications:Research managers and funders should consider whether their current procedures are effective in supporting researchers to address the evolving demands of pandemic societies,particularly in terms of timeliness.Originality/value:The results show that although health research dominates the academic response to Covid-19,it is more widely disrupting academic research with new demands and challenges.
文摘Purpose： One of the main indicators of scientific production is the number of papers published in scholarly journals. Turkey ranks 18th place in the world based on the number of scholarly publications. The objective of this paper is to find out if the monetary support program initiated in 1993 by the Turkish Scientific and Technological Research Council （TUBITAK） to incentivize researchers and increase the number, impact, and quality of international publications has been effective in doing so.Design/methodology/approach： We analyzed some 390,000 publications with Turkish affiliations listed in the Web of Science （WoS） database between 1976 and 2015 along with about 157,000 supported ones between 1997 and 2015. We used the interrupted time series （ITS） analysis technique （also known as ＂quasi-experimental time series analysis＂ or ＂intervention analysis＂） to test if TOBITAK＇s support program helped increase the number of publications. We defined ARIMA （1,1,0） model for ITS data and observed the impact of TOBiTAK＇s support program in 1994, 1997, and 2003 （after one, four and 10 years of its start, respectively）. The majority of publications （93%） were full papers （articles）, which were used as the experimental group while other types of contributions functioned as the control group. We also carried out a multiple regression analysis.Findings： TUBITAK＇s support program has had negligible effect on the increase of the number of papers with Turkish affiliations. Yet, the number of other types of contributions continued to increase even though they were not well supported, suggesting that TUBITAK＇s support program is probably not the main factor causing the increase in the number of papers with Turkish affiliations. Research limitations： Interrupted time series analysis shows if the ＂intervention＂ has had any significant effect on the dependent variable but it does not explain what caused the increase in the number of papers if it was not the intervention. Moreover, except the＂intervention＂, other ＂event（s）＂ that might affect the time series data （e.g., increase in the number of research personnel over the years） should not occur during the period of analysis, a prerequisite that is beyond the control of the researcher. Practical implications： TUBITAK＇s ＂cash-for-publication＂ program did not seem to have direct impact on the increase of the number of papers published by Turkish authors, suggesting that small amounts of payments are not much of an incentive for authors to publish more. It might perhaps be a better strategy to concentrate limited resources on a few high impact projects rather than to disperse them to thousands of authors as ＂micropayments.＂ Originality/value： Based on 25 years＇ worth of payments data, this is perhaps one of the first large-scale studies showing that ＂cash-for-publication＂ policies or ＂piece rates＂ paid to researchers tend to have little or no effect on the increase of researchers＇ productivity. The main finding of this paper has some implications for countries wherein publication subsidies are used as an incentive to increase the number and quality of papers published in international journals. They should be prepared to consider reviewing their existing support programs （based usually on bibliometric measures such as journal impact factors） and revising their reward policies.
