BACKGROUND Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE)is a severe,life-threatening disease.However,the role of rituximab in managing juvenile SLE remains undefined,although early biological intervention may improve dis...BACKGROUND Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE)is a severe,life-threatening disease.However,the role of rituximab in managing juvenile SLE remains undefined,although early biological intervention may improve disease outcomes.AIM To assess the differences in the outcomes of different types of rituximab administration(early and late).METHODS In this retrospective cohort study,the information of 36 children with SLE with administration(LRA)was analyzed.We compared initial disease characteristics at onset,at baseline(start of rituximab),and at the end of the study(EOS)at 12 months,as well as outcomes and treatment characteristics.RESULTS The main differences at baseline were a higher daily median dose of corticosteroids,increased MAS frequency,and a higher Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index(SLEDAI)in the ERA group.No differences in the main SLE outcomes between groups at the EOS were observed.The part of lupus nephritis patients who achieved remission changed from 44%to 31%in ERA and 32%to 11%in the LRA group.Patients with ERA had a shorter time to achieve low daily corticosteroid dose(≤0.2 mg/kg)at 1.2(0.9;1.4)years compared to 2.8(2.3;4.0)years(P=0.000001)and higher probability to achieve this low dose[hazard ratio(HR)=57.8(95%confidence interval(CI):7.2-463.2),P=0.00001 and remission(SLEDAI=0);HR=37.6(95%CI:4.45-333.3),P=0.00001].No differences in adverse events,including severe adverse events,were observed.CONCLUSION ERA demonstrated a better steroid-sparing effect and a possibility of earlier remission or low disease activity,except for lupus nephritis.Further investigations are required.展开更多
基金Supported by Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation,No.075-15-2022-301the Russian Science Foundation Grant,No.22-45-08004.
文摘BACKGROUND Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE)is a severe,life-threatening disease.However,the role of rituximab in managing juvenile SLE remains undefined,although early biological intervention may improve disease outcomes.AIM To assess the differences in the outcomes of different types of rituximab administration(early and late).METHODS In this retrospective cohort study,the information of 36 children with SLE with administration(LRA)was analyzed.We compared initial disease characteristics at onset,at baseline(start of rituximab),and at the end of the study(EOS)at 12 months,as well as outcomes and treatment characteristics.RESULTS The main differences at baseline were a higher daily median dose of corticosteroids,increased MAS frequency,and a higher Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index(SLEDAI)in the ERA group.No differences in the main SLE outcomes between groups at the EOS were observed.The part of lupus nephritis patients who achieved remission changed from 44%to 31%in ERA and 32%to 11%in the LRA group.Patients with ERA had a shorter time to achieve low daily corticosteroid dose(≤0.2 mg/kg)at 1.2(0.9;1.4)years compared to 2.8(2.3;4.0)years(P=0.000001)and higher probability to achieve this low dose[hazard ratio(HR)=57.8(95%confidence interval(CI):7.2-463.2),P=0.00001 and remission(SLEDAI=0);HR=37.6(95%CI:4.45-333.3),P=0.00001].No differences in adverse events,including severe adverse events,were observed.CONCLUSION ERA demonstrated a better steroid-sparing effect and a possibility of earlier remission or low disease activity,except for lupus nephritis.Further investigations are required.
