通过田间小区试验和微区试验相结合研究滴灌条件下不同灌溉水盐度、灌水量和施氮量对棉田土壤中氮肥去向的影响。试验设置3种灌溉水盐度(电导率,EC):0.35、4.61和8.04 d S m-1(分别以S0.35、S4.61和S8.04表示);2个灌水量:405和540 mm;...通过田间小区试验和微区试验相结合研究滴灌条件下不同灌溉水盐度、灌水量和施氮量对棉田土壤中氮肥去向的影响。试验设置3种灌溉水盐度(电导率,EC):0.35、4.61和8.04 d S m-1(分别以S0.35、S4.61和S8.04表示);2个灌水量:405和540 mm;同时设置2个施氮水平:240、360 kg hm-2(360 kg hm-2为当地棉田推荐氮肥用量)。结果表明:S0.35和S4.61灌溉处理的棉花氮素吸收量和产量无显著差异,分别较S8.04灌溉处理高出27.46%和33.65%、21.29%和21.63%。灌溉水盐度主要通过影响棉花单株结铃数来影响棉花产量。增加施氮量和灌水量,棉花氮素吸收量和产量均有所增加。15N同位素标记试验结果表明:植物15N回收率在34.20%~62.51%之间,随灌溉水盐度的增加,植物15N回收率呈现先增加后减小的趋势,S0.35、S4.61处理较S8.04处理分别高出30.70%和41.77%;增加灌水量和施氮量可显著提高植物15N回收率。土壤15N残留率随灌溉水盐度的增加而增加,S4.61和S8.04处理的土壤15N残留率较S0.35处理分别高出3.48%和23.22%。施氮量由240 kg hm-2增加至360 kg hm-2,土壤15N残留率增加9.51%。各处理15N淋洗损失率在0.35%~3.59%之间,低施氮量下,S0.35和S4.61处理的15N淋洗损失率无显著差异,S8.04处理的15N淋洗损失率分别较S0.35、S4.61处理高出1.87倍和0.84倍;高施氮量下,15N淋洗损失率随灌溉水盐度的增加而显著增加。增加灌水量和施氮量,15N淋洗损失率均显著增加。展开更多
[Objective] The aim of this study was investigated the rice yield, nitrogen uptake and ^15-fertilizer fate at different transplanting density to provide scientific ba- sis for improving the yield of rice and applying ...[Objective] The aim of this study was investigated the rice yield, nitrogen uptake and ^15-fertilizer fate at different transplanting density to provide scientific ba- sis for improving the yield of rice and applying reasonably fertilizer. [Method] A field experiment was carried out to study the effect of different transplanting density on rice yield, nitrogen (N) absorption, sources of N uptake by rice and the N balance in the plant-soil systems by using ^15-labelled urea. [Result] There were no significant differences in rice yields and total N uptakes by rice between treatments 30 cm × 30 cm and 40 cm × 40 cm, but the yield of rice and total N absorption in the two treatments were remarkably higher than those in 50 cm × 50 cm treatment. The amounts of total N uptake by rice were in the range of 112.3-162.7 kg/hm2 in the three transplanting densities. The result showed that about 1/3 of the total N uptake by rice was supplied by application fertilizer and the other 2/3 was obtained from the soil N pool. The ^15N-labelled urea absorbed by rice, residual in soil and lost accounted for 16.3%-26.1%, 17.0%-20.9% and 53.0%-66.7% of the total fertilizer, respectively. A great deal of ^15N-labelled urea was lost during the rice growing season. [Conclusion] Considering the rice yield and environmental protection, the transplanting density of 30 cm×30 cm was recommended in the hilly area of Sichuan basin in the southwest China.展开更多
文摘通过田间小区试验和微区试验相结合研究滴灌条件下不同灌溉水盐度、灌水量和施氮量对棉田土壤中氮肥去向的影响。试验设置3种灌溉水盐度(电导率,EC):0.35、4.61和8.04 d S m-1(分别以S0.35、S4.61和S8.04表示);2个灌水量:405和540 mm;同时设置2个施氮水平:240、360 kg hm-2(360 kg hm-2为当地棉田推荐氮肥用量)。结果表明:S0.35和S4.61灌溉处理的棉花氮素吸收量和产量无显著差异,分别较S8.04灌溉处理高出27.46%和33.65%、21.29%和21.63%。灌溉水盐度主要通过影响棉花单株结铃数来影响棉花产量。增加施氮量和灌水量,棉花氮素吸收量和产量均有所增加。15N同位素标记试验结果表明:植物15N回收率在34.20%~62.51%之间,随灌溉水盐度的增加,植物15N回收率呈现先增加后减小的趋势,S0.35、S4.61处理较S8.04处理分别高出30.70%和41.77%;增加灌水量和施氮量可显著提高植物15N回收率。土壤15N残留率随灌溉水盐度的增加而增加,S4.61和S8.04处理的土壤15N残留率较S0.35处理分别高出3.48%和23.22%。施氮量由240 kg hm-2增加至360 kg hm-2,土壤15N残留率增加9.51%。各处理15N淋洗损失率在0.35%~3.59%之间,低施氮量下,S0.35和S4.61处理的15N淋洗损失率无显著差异,S8.04处理的15N淋洗损失率分别较S0.35、S4.61处理高出1.87倍和0.84倍;高施氮量下,15N淋洗损失率随灌溉水盐度的增加而显著增加。增加灌水量和施氮量,15N淋洗损失率均显著增加。
基金Supported by the Financial Breeding Fund for Young Scholars in Sichuan Province(2008QNJJ-016)Financial Fund for Excellent Gene Engineering Papers in Sichuan Province (2010LWJJ-008)~~
文摘[Objective] The aim of this study was investigated the rice yield, nitrogen uptake and ^15-fertilizer fate at different transplanting density to provide scientific ba- sis for improving the yield of rice and applying reasonably fertilizer. [Method] A field experiment was carried out to study the effect of different transplanting density on rice yield, nitrogen (N) absorption, sources of N uptake by rice and the N balance in the plant-soil systems by using ^15-labelled urea. [Result] There were no significant differences in rice yields and total N uptakes by rice between treatments 30 cm × 30 cm and 40 cm × 40 cm, but the yield of rice and total N absorption in the two treatments were remarkably higher than those in 50 cm × 50 cm treatment. The amounts of total N uptake by rice were in the range of 112.3-162.7 kg/hm2 in the three transplanting densities. The result showed that about 1/3 of the total N uptake by rice was supplied by application fertilizer and the other 2/3 was obtained from the soil N pool. The ^15N-labelled urea absorbed by rice, residual in soil and lost accounted for 16.3%-26.1%, 17.0%-20.9% and 53.0%-66.7% of the total fertilizer, respectively. A great deal of ^15N-labelled urea was lost during the rice growing season. [Conclusion] Considering the rice yield and environmental protection, the transplanting density of 30 cm×30 cm was recommended in the hilly area of Sichuan basin in the southwest China.