期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
同轴2.2、3.0 mm小切口超声乳化手术治疗白内障的临床效果
1
作者 孔令菊 杨婧楠 杨甜 《临床医学研究与实践》 2017年第27期53-54,共2页
目的探讨同轴2.2、3.0 mm小切口超声乳化手术治疗白内障的临床效果。方法将我院收治的80例白内障患者随机分为观察组与对照组,各40例。观察组患者采取2.2 mm微创切口治疗,对照组患者采取3.0 mm常规切口治疗。比较两组患者的超声乳化能... 目的探讨同轴2.2、3.0 mm小切口超声乳化手术治疗白内障的临床效果。方法将我院收治的80例白内障患者随机分为观察组与对照组,各40例。观察组患者采取2.2 mm微创切口治疗,对照组患者采取3.0 mm常规切口治疗。比较两组患者的超声乳化能量及时间、手术源性散光、角膜切口形态及术后并发症。结果观察组超声乳化能量明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组超声乳化时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组术后1周、1月手术源性散光显著小于于对照组,且术后1月两组患者手术源性散光明显小于术后1周(P<0.05)。观察组术后1周、1月角膜切口角度及长度明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者均未见明显并发症发生。结论同轴2.2 mm微创切口超声乳化手术治疗白内障可降低超声乳化能量、手术源性散光,延长角膜切口长度,较常规3.3 mm切口临床价值更高。 展开更多
关键词 同轴2.2 小切口超声乳化 白内障
下载PDF
Corneal biomechanical properties changes after coaxial 2,2-mm microincision and standard 3,0-mm phacoemulsification 被引量:4
2
作者 Zhe Zhang Hua Yu +3 位作者 Hui Dong Li Wang Ya-Ding Jia Su-Hua Zhang 《International Journal of Ophthalmology(English edition)》 SCIE CAS 2016年第2期230-234,共5页
AIM: To compare the changes in corneal biomechanics measured by ocular response analyzer (ORA) after 2.2-ram microincision cataract surgery and 3.0-mm standard coaxial phacoemulsification. METHODS: The prospectiv... AIM: To compare the changes in corneal biomechanics measured by ocular response analyzer (ORA) after 2.2-ram microincision cataract surgery and 3.0-mm standard coaxial phacoemulsification. METHODS: The prospective nonrandomized study comprised eyes with cataract that had 2.2-mm coaxial microincision or 3.0 -mm standard incision phacoemulsification. The corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) and Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) were measured by ORA preoperatively and at ld, 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-week postoperatively. Results were analyzed and compared between groups. RESULTS: In both groups, CH decreased in the immediate postoperative period (P〈0.05), returned to the preoperative level at one week (P =0.249) in the 2.2-mm group, and at two weeks in the 3.0-mm group (P --0.264); there was no significant change in CRF values. In 2.2-mm group, mean IOPcc and IOPg increased at ld postoperatively (both ,P〈0.05), and returned to preoperative level at one week (,0 =0.491 and P =0.923, respectively). In 3.0-mm group, mean IOPcc and IOPg increased at ld and lwk postoperatively (P =0.005 and ,P =0.029, respectively), and returned to preoperative level at 2wk (P =0.347 and P =0.887, respectively). CONCLUSION: Significant differences between preoperative and postoperative corneal biomechanical values were found for CH, IOPcc and IOPg. But the recovery time courses were different between the two groups. The 2.2-mm coaxial microincision cataract surgery group seemed recovery faster compared to the 3.0-mm standard coaxial phacoemulsification group. 展开更多
关键词 coaxial microincision cataract surgery 2.2-mm microincision corneal biomechanical parameters time course
下载PDF
与传统超声乳化白内障手术的对比效果评价 被引量:1
3
作者 于兰 税永刚 张继扬 《中国社区医师》 2019年第24期19-20,共2页
目的:比较2.2mm同轴微切口超声乳化与传统超声乳化白内障手术治疗效果。方法:收治白内障患者80例,按照手术方式不同分为两组,对照组给予传统超声乳化白内障手术,观察组给予2.2mm同轴微切口超声乳化治疗,对比两组术后情况。结果:观察组... 目的:比较2.2mm同轴微切口超声乳化与传统超声乳化白内障手术治疗效果。方法:收治白内障患者80例,按照手术方式不同分为两组,对照组给予传统超声乳化白内障手术,观察组给予2.2mm同轴微切口超声乳化治疗,对比两组术后情况。结果:观察组白内障患者术后视力、角膜内皮计数以及角膜散光情况优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:2.2mm同轴微切口超声乳化治疗效果更佳。 展开更多
关键词 2.2mm同轴微切口超声乳化 传统超声乳化 白内障手术 视力
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部