目的探讨基于MRI征象与影像组学诊断进展期胃癌T3和T4a分期效能的对比分析。方法选取于同济大学附属东方医院庐江分院行MRI检查,经病理结果证实,共计纳入208例胃癌患者,其中T3期96例,T4a期112例。首先应用传统影像学征象判断进展期胃癌...目的探讨基于MRI征象与影像组学诊断进展期胃癌T3和T4a分期效能的对比分析。方法选取于同济大学附属东方医院庐江分院行MRI检查,经病理结果证实,共计纳入208例胃癌患者,其中T3期96例,T4a期112例。首先应用传统影像学征象判断进展期胃癌侵犯浆膜层等征象,比较多序列MRI征象在病理证实T3和T4a期胃癌中表现的差异性;其次按7:3的比例随机分为训练组(n=145)和验证组(n=63),分别从常规T2非抑脂序列及高比值DWI序列(b=1000 s/mm^(2))图像中提取影像组学特征,构建影像组学联合模型;然后分别绘制基于传统MRI征象与影像组学联合模型工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线,并计算ROC曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)、特异度及灵敏度,量化两种诊断方式对胃癌T3和T4a分期的诊断效能。结果传统多序列MRI征象诊断AUC:0.929(95%CI:0.887~0.970),特异度0.912,灵敏度0.916;MRI影像组学联合模型训练组诊断AUC:0.975(95%CI:0.974~0.976),特异度0.946,灵敏度0.956,验证组诊断AUC:0.971(95%CI:0.965~0.974),特异度0.946,灵敏度0.943,均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论基于MRI影像组学模型诊断T3和T4a分期效能高于传统MRI征象,值得临床工作中进一步推广使用。展开更多
Background: Pressure measurement in total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) patients is a domain of cardiaccatheterization. 4D velocity encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance (4D–flow MRI) offers an alternative fora...Background: Pressure measurement in total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) patients is a domain of cardiaccatheterization. 4D velocity encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance (4D–flow MRI) offers an alternative forassessment of even minor pressure differences. The scope of this study was to measure even minor pressure differencesin the anastomosis of TCPC patients, who are clinically uncompromised. Methods: Twenty-four patients(median 15 years [8;34]) with TCPC were studied prospectively by 4D-flow MRI. Pressure differences betweensuperior vena cava (SVC) and extracardiac conduit (C) to both right pulmonary artery (RPA) and left pulmonaryartery (LPA) were assessed. Small fluid obstructions as vortices within the anastomosis were detected by flowpathlines from 4D-flow MRI. In two patients pressure differences were calculated also by computational flowdynamics (CFD) as a plausibility check for the order of magnitude. Results: Median values of pressure differencesin the anastomosis between SVC and RPA were 0.63 (0.21–2.1) mmHg, between C and RPA 0.67 (0.3–2.2)mmHg, between SVC and LPA 0.8 (0.3–2.4) mmHg and between C and LPA 0.7 (0.2–1.9) mmHg. Patients withpotential flow obstruction (stents, occluder, vortices) had significantly higher gradients at the anastomosis (p <0.05) than patients without potential obstructions, although the absolute values were small. CFD- and measurement-based pressure difference showed good agreement. Conclusion: 4D-flow MRI is able to detect minor pressuredifferences within the Fontan circuit even in patients with apparently satisfactory TCPC. Slightly higherpressure differences are due to the presence of small flow obstruction.展开更多
目的:探讨超声引导穿刺活检与核磁共振成像(Magnetic Resonance Imaging,MRI)在诊断乳腺影像报告和数据系统4类乳腺肿块(Breast Imaging Report And Data System 4,BI-RADS 4)中的诊断效能,为BI-RADS 4类乳腺肿块的诊疗提供临床依据。方...目的:探讨超声引导穿刺活检与核磁共振成像(Magnetic Resonance Imaging,MRI)在诊断乳腺影像报告和数据系统4类乳腺肿块(Breast Imaging Report And Data System 4,BI-RADS 4)中的诊断效能,为BI-RADS 4类乳腺肿块的诊疗提供临床依据。方法:选取2021年2月至2023年2月安阳市肿瘤医院收治的90例疑似BI-RADS 4类乳腺肿块患者作为研究对象,以超声引导穿刺活检组织最终石蜡病理诊断为金标准,明确肿块病理结果,对比MRI检查结果在BI-RADS 4类乳腺肿块中其亚型病理和诊断效能。结果:所有乳腺肿块经石蜡病理证实,34例良性肿瘤中67.65%为纤维腺瘤,56例恶性肿瘤中80.36%为浸润性导管癌;在MRI检查中,BI-RADS 4a类乳腺肿块病灶中83.33%为良性肿块;BI-RADS 4c类乳腺肿块病灶中92.00%为恶性肿块;超声引导穿刺活检阳性检出共55例,阳性检出率为61.11%;MRI检查阳性检出共53例,阳性检出率为58.89%,两种检查方式阳性检出率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);经MRI检查后,其准确度、敏感度、特异度、阴性预测值、阳性预测值与超声引导穿刺活检诊断结果比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:在疑似BI-RADS 4类乳腺肿块中,BI-RADS 4a、BI-RADS 4c肿块病灶性质分别以纤维腺瘤、浸润性导管癌为主,且MRI检查结果与超声引导穿刺活检均具有较高的诊断效能。因此对于MRI检查BI-RADS 4a肿块患者可选择定期复查并观察肿块变化,而对BI-RADS 4c肿块患者强烈建议尽早穿刺活检以明确肿块病理性质。展开更多
Background:The assessment of Fontan circuit’sflow is traditionally evaluated by multiple through-plane phase-contrast MRI acquisitions(2Dflow),while recently,a single volumetric 4D-flow MRI acquisition is emerging as a ...Background:The assessment of Fontan circuit’sflow is traditionally evaluated by multiple through-plane phase-contrast MRI acquisitions(2Dflow),while recently,a single volumetric 4D-flow MRI acquisition is emerging as a comprehensive tool for the hemodynamic evaluation in congenital heart diseases.Purpose:To compare 2D and 4D-flow MRI measurements in patients after Fontan palliation and to evaluate parameters affecting potential dis-agreement.Methods:39 patients after Fontan palliation(23 males,age 22±11 years)who underwent cardiac MRI with 2D and 4D-flow MRI acquisition were included in the study.In all patients,bloodflow quantification in the Fontan circuit and aorta by 2Dflow and by 4Dflow MRI acquisition blinding to the 2D results was per-formed.The agreement between 2D and 4D-flow MRI was calculated as the intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC).The mean absolute differences between 4D and 2Dflows were analyzed using linear regression models.Results:4D-flow MRI acquisition time was slightly lower than 2D(7.6±1.8 min vs.9.4±3.3 min,p=0.03).Flow was slightly predominant in the right pulmonary artery(58%of total pulmonaryflow).Conduit/tunnel-pul-monary arteriesflow accounted for 60%of the Fontan circuit.Agreement between 2D and 4D was overall good-to-excellent from ICC:0.81795%CI:0.637–0.907 to 0.93295%CI:0.866–0.965.There was no significant influ-ence of evaluated parameters on the agreement on 4D and 2Dflow.Conclusions:4D-flow MRI represents a valid tool in Fontan’sflow quantification.Further larger studies are needed to confirm our results and to evaluate the impact of advanced 4D-flow MRI parameters on the prognostic stratification in patients after Fontan palliation.展开更多
目的探讨葡聚糖包裹的超顺磁性Fe_3O_4纳米颗粒(dextran-coated superparamagnetic iron oxides nanoparticles,dextrarr/SPlONP)作为间质注射的MRI造影剂的可行性。方法应用界面共沉淀法,制备dextran/SPIONP,用透射电镜、能谱分析、X...目的探讨葡聚糖包裹的超顺磁性Fe_3O_4纳米颗粒(dextran-coated superparamagnetic iron oxides nanoparticles,dextrarr/SPlONP)作为间质注射的MRI造影剂的可行性。方法应用界面共沉淀法,制备dextran/SPIONP,用透射电镜、能谱分析、X射线衍射、红外光谱测试、热重分析等方法对dextran/SPlONP的大小、磁性能等进行表征,并研究葡聚糖对SPlONP的影响。然后,将dextran/SPIONP稀释成不同剂量,兔舌粘膜下问质注射后的不同时间段,切取前哨淋巴结,行核磁共振波谱分析,确定dextran/SPIONP的最适剂量和最佳检测时间。结果dextran/SPION的平均直径为6～9nm,其表征与经典的共沉淀法制备的颗粒一致,具有超顺磁性,葡聚糖是影响SPIONP饱和磁化强度的主要因素。dextran/SPIONP用于间质注射的最适剂量为含铁量20μmol,最佳检测时间为注射后24h。结论用界面共沉淀法制备的dextran/SPIONP是一种适用于间质注射的MRI造影剂。展开更多
文摘目的探讨基于MRI征象与影像组学诊断进展期胃癌T3和T4a分期效能的对比分析。方法选取于同济大学附属东方医院庐江分院行MRI检查,经病理结果证实,共计纳入208例胃癌患者,其中T3期96例,T4a期112例。首先应用传统影像学征象判断进展期胃癌侵犯浆膜层等征象,比较多序列MRI征象在病理证实T3和T4a期胃癌中表现的差异性;其次按7:3的比例随机分为训练组(n=145)和验证组(n=63),分别从常规T2非抑脂序列及高比值DWI序列(b=1000 s/mm^(2))图像中提取影像组学特征,构建影像组学联合模型;然后分别绘制基于传统MRI征象与影像组学联合模型工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线,并计算ROC曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)、特异度及灵敏度,量化两种诊断方式对胃癌T3和T4a分期的诊断效能。结果传统多序列MRI征象诊断AUC:0.929(95%CI:0.887~0.970),特异度0.912,灵敏度0.916;MRI影像组学联合模型训练组诊断AUC:0.975(95%CI:0.974~0.976),特异度0.946,灵敏度0.956,验证组诊断AUC:0.971(95%CI:0.965~0.974),特异度0.946,灵敏度0.943,均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论基于MRI影像组学模型诊断T3和T4a分期效能高于传统MRI征象,值得临床工作中进一步推广使用。
基金This work was supported by Deutsche Herzstiftung e.V.
文摘Background: Pressure measurement in total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) patients is a domain of cardiaccatheterization. 4D velocity encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance (4D–flow MRI) offers an alternative forassessment of even minor pressure differences. The scope of this study was to measure even minor pressure differencesin the anastomosis of TCPC patients, who are clinically uncompromised. Methods: Twenty-four patients(median 15 years [8;34]) with TCPC were studied prospectively by 4D-flow MRI. Pressure differences betweensuperior vena cava (SVC) and extracardiac conduit (C) to both right pulmonary artery (RPA) and left pulmonaryartery (LPA) were assessed. Small fluid obstructions as vortices within the anastomosis were detected by flowpathlines from 4D-flow MRI. In two patients pressure differences were calculated also by computational flowdynamics (CFD) as a plausibility check for the order of magnitude. Results: Median values of pressure differencesin the anastomosis between SVC and RPA were 0.63 (0.21–2.1) mmHg, between C and RPA 0.67 (0.3–2.2)mmHg, between SVC and LPA 0.8 (0.3–2.4) mmHg and between C and LPA 0.7 (0.2–1.9) mmHg. Patients withpotential flow obstruction (stents, occluder, vortices) had significantly higher gradients at the anastomosis (p <0.05) than patients without potential obstructions, although the absolute values were small. CFD- and measurement-based pressure difference showed good agreement. Conclusion: 4D-flow MRI is able to detect minor pressuredifferences within the Fontan circuit even in patients with apparently satisfactory TCPC. Slightly higherpressure differences are due to the presence of small flow obstruction.
基金The Institutional Review Board and Regional Committee(CEAVNO)approved the study(Study No.13756 approved in September 2018).
文摘Background:The assessment of Fontan circuit’sflow is traditionally evaluated by multiple through-plane phase-contrast MRI acquisitions(2Dflow),while recently,a single volumetric 4D-flow MRI acquisition is emerging as a comprehensive tool for the hemodynamic evaluation in congenital heart diseases.Purpose:To compare 2D and 4D-flow MRI measurements in patients after Fontan palliation and to evaluate parameters affecting potential dis-agreement.Methods:39 patients after Fontan palliation(23 males,age 22±11 years)who underwent cardiac MRI with 2D and 4D-flow MRI acquisition were included in the study.In all patients,bloodflow quantification in the Fontan circuit and aorta by 2Dflow and by 4Dflow MRI acquisition blinding to the 2D results was per-formed.The agreement between 2D and 4D-flow MRI was calculated as the intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC).The mean absolute differences between 4D and 2Dflows were analyzed using linear regression models.Results:4D-flow MRI acquisition time was slightly lower than 2D(7.6±1.8 min vs.9.4±3.3 min,p=0.03).Flow was slightly predominant in the right pulmonary artery(58%of total pulmonaryflow).Conduit/tunnel-pul-monary arteriesflow accounted for 60%of the Fontan circuit.Agreement between 2D and 4D was overall good-to-excellent from ICC:0.81795%CI:0.637–0.907 to 0.93295%CI:0.866–0.965.There was no significant influ-ence of evaluated parameters on the agreement on 4D and 2Dflow.Conclusions:4D-flow MRI represents a valid tool in Fontan’sflow quantification.Further larger studies are needed to confirm our results and to evaluate the impact of advanced 4D-flow MRI parameters on the prognostic stratification in patients after Fontan palliation.
文摘目的探讨葡聚糖包裹的超顺磁性Fe_3O_4纳米颗粒(dextran-coated superparamagnetic iron oxides nanoparticles,dextrarr/SPlONP)作为间质注射的MRI造影剂的可行性。方法应用界面共沉淀法,制备dextran/SPIONP,用透射电镜、能谱分析、X射线衍射、红外光谱测试、热重分析等方法对dextran/SPlONP的大小、磁性能等进行表征,并研究葡聚糖对SPlONP的影响。然后,将dextran/SPIONP稀释成不同剂量,兔舌粘膜下问质注射后的不同时间段,切取前哨淋巴结,行核磁共振波谱分析,确定dextran/SPIONP的最适剂量和最佳检测时间。结果dextran/SPION的平均直径为6～9nm,其表征与经典的共沉淀法制备的颗粒一致,具有超顺磁性,葡聚糖是影响SPIONP饱和磁化强度的主要因素。dextran/SPIONP用于间质注射的最适剂量为含铁量20μmol,最佳检测时间为注射后24h。结论用界面共沉淀法制备的dextran/SPIONP是一种适用于间质注射的MRI造影剂。
