The electronic structures of LiYF4：Ce^3＋ and LiYF4 crystal simulated by an embedded （in a microcrystal containing 1938 ions） cluster CeY4Li8F24, and Y5LisF24 respectively, were computed by the ab initio self-consi...The electronic structures of LiYF4：Ce^3＋ and LiYF4 crystal simulated by an embedded （in a microcrystal containing 1938 ions） cluster CeY4Li8F24, and Y5LisF24 respectively, were computed by the ab initio self-consistent relativistic DV-Xa （discrete variational Xa） method. The ground-state calculation showed that only the lowest 5d level Ed of Ce^3＋ ion lies around the BCB （bottom of the conduction band） while the lowest 4f levels is 2.5 eV lower than BCB. The CB states consist of 4d of Y mixed with 5d of Ce, even for the wavefunctions （WFS） with energy Ed under BCB there are still 24% of Y-4d and 9% of F-2p as components. So, they are not pure crystal-field states at all. Furthermore, transition state （TS） calculation was performed to obtain the 4f→5d transition energies Efd, to improve the previous calculation performed by Andriessen et al, in which a small CeF8 cluster embedded in an array of point charge was used and the results of ground-state calculation were roughly used to compare with the observed 4f→5 d transition energies. The ionic radius of Ce^3＋ is larger than that of y^3＋ , so we had also modeled approximately the lattice relaxation. As results, the CeY4Li8F24 cluster with 4.56 % outward relaxation （of the nearest-neighbor and next nearest-neighbor eight fluorines） has the lowest total energy and gave satisfactory 4f→5d energies Efd, but the ground-state calculated Ed is 0.68 eV higher than BCB. For another cluster with 7.36% outward relaxation the Ed is 0.43 eV lower than BCB, which makes the observation of fine structure （including zero-phonon line） of the lowest 5 d band understandable easier, but the splits between the transition energies Efd were not as good as the former. Therefore, we consider the relaxation is some how around 4. 56% -7.36% outward, not as large as 10% proposed by Andriessen et al.展开更多
The electronic structures of LiYF4：Ce^3＋ and LiYF4 crystal simulated by an embedded （in a microcrystal containing 1938 ions） cluster CeY4Li8F24, and Y5LisF24 respectively, were computed by the ab initio self-consi...The electronic structures of LiYF4：Ce^3＋ and LiYF4 crystal simulated by an embedded （in a microcrystal containing 1938 ions） cluster CeY4Li8F24, and Y5LisF24 respectively, were computed by the ab initio self-consistent relativistic DV-Xa （discrete variational Xa） method. The ground-state calculation showed that only the lowest 5d level Ed of Ce^3＋ ion lies around the BCB （bottom of the conduction band） while the lowest 4f levels is 2.5 eV lower than BCB. The CB states consist of 4d of Y mixed with 5d of Ce, even for the wavefunctions （WFS） with energy Ed under BCB there are still 24% of Y-4d and 9% of F-2p as components. So, they are not pure crystal-field states at all. Furthermore, transition state （TS） calculation was performed to obtain the 4f→5d transition energies Efd, to improve the previous calculation performed by Andriessen et al, in which a small CeF8 cluster embedded in an array of point charge was used and the results of ground-state calculation were roughly used to compare with the observed 4f→5 d transition energies. The ionic radius of Ce^3＋ is larger than that of y^3＋ , so we had also modeled approximately the lattice relaxation. As results, the CeY4Li8F24 cluster with 4.56 % outward relaxation （of the nearest-neighbor and next nearest-neighbor eight fluorines） has the lowest total energy and gave satisfactory 4f→5d energies Efd, but the ground-state calculated Ed is 0.68 eV higher than BCB. For another cluster with 7.36% outward relaxation the Ed is 0.43 eV lower than BCB, which makes the observation of fine structure （including zero-phonon line） of the lowest 5 d band understandable easier, but the splits between the transition energies Efd were not as good as the former. Therefore, we consider the relaxation is some how around 4. 56% -7.36% outward, not as large as 10% proposed by Andriessen et al.展开更多
文摘The electronic structures of LiYF4：Ce^3＋ and LiYF4 crystal simulated by an embedded （in a microcrystal containing 1938 ions） cluster CeY4Li8F24, and Y5LisF24 respectively, were computed by the ab initio self-consistent relativistic DV-Xa （discrete variational Xa） method. The ground-state calculation showed that only the lowest 5d level Ed of Ce^3＋ ion lies around the BCB （bottom of the conduction band） while the lowest 4f levels is 2.5 eV lower than BCB. The CB states consist of 4d of Y mixed with 5d of Ce, even for the wavefunctions （WFS） with energy Ed under BCB there are still 24% of Y-4d and 9% of F-2p as components. So, they are not pure crystal-field states at all. Furthermore, transition state （TS） calculation was performed to obtain the 4f→5d transition energies Efd, to improve the previous calculation performed by Andriessen et al, in which a small CeF8 cluster embedded in an array of point charge was used and the results of ground-state calculation were roughly used to compare with the observed 4f→5 d transition energies. The ionic radius of Ce^3＋ is larger than that of y^3＋ , so we had also modeled approximately the lattice relaxation. As results, the CeY4Li8F24 cluster with 4.56 % outward relaxation （of the nearest-neighbor and next nearest-neighbor eight fluorines） has the lowest total energy and gave satisfactory 4f→5d energies Efd, but the ground-state calculated Ed is 0.68 eV higher than BCB. For another cluster with 7.36% outward relaxation the Ed is 0.43 eV lower than BCB, which makes the observation of fine structure （including zero-phonon line） of the lowest 5 d band understandable easier, but the splits between the transition energies Efd were not as good as the former. Therefore, we consider the relaxation is some how around 4. 56% -7.36% outward, not as large as 10% proposed by Andriessen et al.
文摘The electronic structures of LiYF4：Ce^3＋ and LiYF4 crystal simulated by an embedded （in a microcrystal containing 1938 ions） cluster CeY4Li8F24, and Y5LisF24 respectively, were computed by the ab initio self-consistent relativistic DV-Xa （discrete variational Xa） method. The ground-state calculation showed that only the lowest 5d level Ed of Ce^3＋ ion lies around the BCB （bottom of the conduction band） while the lowest 4f levels is 2.5 eV lower than BCB. The CB states consist of 4d of Y mixed with 5d of Ce, even for the wavefunctions （WFS） with energy Ed under BCB there are still 24% of Y-4d and 9% of F-2p as components. So, they are not pure crystal-field states at all. Furthermore, transition state （TS） calculation was performed to obtain the 4f→5d transition energies Efd, to improve the previous calculation performed by Andriessen et al, in which a small CeF8 cluster embedded in an array of point charge was used and the results of ground-state calculation were roughly used to compare with the observed 4f→5 d transition energies. The ionic radius of Ce^3＋ is larger than that of y^3＋ , so we had also modeled approximately the lattice relaxation. As results, the CeY4Li8F24 cluster with 4.56 % outward relaxation （of the nearest-neighbor and next nearest-neighbor eight fluorines） has the lowest total energy and gave satisfactory 4f→5d energies Efd, but the ground-state calculated Ed is 0.68 eV higher than BCB. For another cluster with 7.36% outward relaxation the Ed is 0.43 eV lower than BCB, which makes the observation of fine structure （including zero-phonon line） of the lowest 5 d band understandable easier, but the splits between the transition energies Efd were not as good as the former. Therefore, we consider the relaxation is some how around 4. 56% -7.36% outward, not as large as 10% proposed by Andriessen et al.
