BACKGROUND Target therapy is licensed by United States Food and Drug Administration on certain cancers.Both sorafenib and lenvatinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitor and indicated on radioactive iodine(RAI)-refractory di...BACKGROUND Target therapy is licensed by United States Food and Drug Administration on certain cancers.Both sorafenib and lenvatinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitor and indicated on radioactive iodine(RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer(DTC).Lenvatinib is more effective in cancers'control than sorafenib,but causes more nephrotoxicity than sorafenib does.This case is the second published case about the serial adaptions from lenvatinib to sorafenib for improving the proteinuria and,meanwhile,achieving the therapeutic goal.CASE SUMMARY A 56-year-old man suffered from bilateral edematous lower extremities after 1-mo prescription of lenvatinib of 20 mg/d for RAI-refractory DTC.Aside from this symptom,he also developed hypertension.His laboratory showed grade-3 proteinuria(estimated 24-h urine protein:9993 mg),hypoalbuminemia and hypercholesterolemia.Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)therapyinduced nephrotic syndrome was impressed.After reduced dosage of lenvatinib of 10 mg/d and related symptomatic drugs,limited improvement was observed in both adverse effects and caner control.Under this condition,we substituted sorafenib of 400 mg/d for lenvatinib of 10 mg/d.After a 5-mo prescription,not only hypertension and peripheral edema were greatly improved,but also proteinuria was improved from grade three to grade one(estimated 24-h urine protein:962 mg).At the same time the cancer control was achieved,judged from computed tomography and laboratory evidence[thyroglobulin(Tg)before prescription of sorafenib:354.7 ng/m L;Tg after prescription of sorafenib:108.9 ng/m L].CONCLUSION Adaption from lenvatinib to sorafenib is a feasible method to improve the antiVEGF therapy-induced nephrotic syndrome and achieve the therapeutic goal at the same time.展开更多
Once a patient has initiated an antiepileptic drug (AED) and achieved a sustained period of seizure freedom, the decision to discontinue AED should be balanced against continuation of AED therapy indefinitely. Studies...Once a patient has initiated an antiepileptic drug (AED) and achieved a sustained period of seizure freedom, the decision to discontinue AED should be balanced against continuation of AED therapy indefinitely. Studies show that the rate of seizure recurrence after AED withdrawal is about two to three times the rate in patients who continue AEDs. However, there are many benefits to AED withdrawal that should be evaluated on an individualized basis. AED discontinuation may be considered in patients whose seizures have been completely controlled for a prolonged period. There are several factors that would increase risk of recurrences which will be reviewed and discussed. As a consequence, the decision to withdraw or withhold treatment must be still individualized. In any patient, the decision to discontinue treatment should also take into effect the social aspects like driving license, job and leisure activities as well as emotional and personal factors and patients with adverse effects or drug interactions. Patients will ultimately have to decide themselves whether they wish to discontinue drug treatment.展开更多
Purpose: In hospitalized patients with severe motor and intellectual disabilities (SMID), we analyzed the association of the SMID class to factors such as the prevalence of epilepsy, frequency of seizures and number o...Purpose: In hospitalized patients with severe motor and intellectual disabilities (SMID), we analyzed the association of the SMID class to factors such as the prevalence of epilepsy, frequency of seizures and number of concomitantly used anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs), and evaluated the usefulness of addition of the new AEDs (gabapentin, topiramate, lamotrigine and levetiracetam) to the treatment regimen. Results: The prevalence of epilepsy in the study population was about 60%. There were 39.5% who were free of epileptic seizures during the 6-year survey period and remained well-controlled with medication. As the SMID increased in severity, the frequency of seizures increased, the number of concomitantly used AEDs increased, and the tendency towards addition of new AEDs became more marked. About the use situation of new AED and old AED, this comparison revealed a tendency towards addition of a new AED when the seizures were poorly controlled in response to concomitant use of multiple old AEDs. The frequency of seizures and the number of concomitantly used AEDs were higher in patients with SMID of high severity than in those with SMID of low severity. Analysis of the time-course of the frequency of seizures before and after the addition of new AEDs revealed a significant reduction in the frequency of seizures following the addition of the new AEDs (P > 0.001). Conclusions: These results suggest that the new AEDs are useful in the management of SMID-associated epilepsy, because of their effect of reducing the frequency of SMID-associated seizures and their high tolerability.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Target therapy is licensed by United States Food and Drug Administration on certain cancers.Both sorafenib and lenvatinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitor and indicated on radioactive iodine(RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer(DTC).Lenvatinib is more effective in cancers'control than sorafenib,but causes more nephrotoxicity than sorafenib does.This case is the second published case about the serial adaptions from lenvatinib to sorafenib for improving the proteinuria and,meanwhile,achieving the therapeutic goal.CASE SUMMARY A 56-year-old man suffered from bilateral edematous lower extremities after 1-mo prescription of lenvatinib of 20 mg/d for RAI-refractory DTC.Aside from this symptom,he also developed hypertension.His laboratory showed grade-3 proteinuria(estimated 24-h urine protein:9993 mg),hypoalbuminemia and hypercholesterolemia.Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)therapyinduced nephrotic syndrome was impressed.After reduced dosage of lenvatinib of 10 mg/d and related symptomatic drugs,limited improvement was observed in both adverse effects and caner control.Under this condition,we substituted sorafenib of 400 mg/d for lenvatinib of 10 mg/d.After a 5-mo prescription,not only hypertension and peripheral edema were greatly improved,but also proteinuria was improved from grade three to grade one(estimated 24-h urine protein:962 mg).At the same time the cancer control was achieved,judged from computed tomography and laboratory evidence[thyroglobulin(Tg)before prescription of sorafenib:354.7 ng/m L;Tg after prescription of sorafenib:108.9 ng/m L].CONCLUSION Adaption from lenvatinib to sorafenib is a feasible method to improve the antiVEGF therapy-induced nephrotic syndrome and achieve the therapeutic goal at the same time.
文摘Once a patient has initiated an antiepileptic drug (AED) and achieved a sustained period of seizure freedom, the decision to discontinue AED should be balanced against continuation of AED therapy indefinitely. Studies show that the rate of seizure recurrence after AED withdrawal is about two to three times the rate in patients who continue AEDs. However, there are many benefits to AED withdrawal that should be evaluated on an individualized basis. AED discontinuation may be considered in patients whose seizures have been completely controlled for a prolonged period. There are several factors that would increase risk of recurrences which will be reviewed and discussed. As a consequence, the decision to withdraw or withhold treatment must be still individualized. In any patient, the decision to discontinue treatment should also take into effect the social aspects like driving license, job and leisure activities as well as emotional and personal factors and patients with adverse effects or drug interactions. Patients will ultimately have to decide themselves whether they wish to discontinue drug treatment.
文摘Purpose: In hospitalized patients with severe motor and intellectual disabilities (SMID), we analyzed the association of the SMID class to factors such as the prevalence of epilepsy, frequency of seizures and number of concomitantly used anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs), and evaluated the usefulness of addition of the new AEDs (gabapentin, topiramate, lamotrigine and levetiracetam) to the treatment regimen. Results: The prevalence of epilepsy in the study population was about 60%. There were 39.5% who were free of epileptic seizures during the 6-year survey period and remained well-controlled with medication. As the SMID increased in severity, the frequency of seizures increased, the number of concomitantly used AEDs increased, and the tendency towards addition of new AEDs became more marked. About the use situation of new AED and old AED, this comparison revealed a tendency towards addition of a new AED when the seizures were poorly controlled in response to concomitant use of multiple old AEDs. The frequency of seizures and the number of concomitantly used AEDs were higher in patients with SMID of high severity than in those with SMID of low severity. Analysis of the time-course of the frequency of seizures before and after the addition of new AEDs revealed a significant reduction in the frequency of seizures following the addition of the new AEDs (P > 0.001). Conclusions: These results suggest that the new AEDs are useful in the management of SMID-associated epilepsy, because of their effect of reducing the frequency of SMID-associated seizures and their high tolerability.
