In recent years,the treatment of myofascial pain trigger point is a relatively popular technology,many people regard it as"Ashi point"in meridian theory,but compared with the traditional meridian theory,the ...In recent years,the treatment of myofascial pain trigger point is a relatively popular technology,many people regard it as"Ashi point"in meridian theory,but compared with the traditional meridian theory,the description of myofascial pain trigger point is more intuitive and easier to master.This paper expounds the similarities and differences between myofascial pain trigger point and traditional meridian theory from the aspects of theory,basic research and clinical application,in order to provide a specific idea for the scientific interpretation of meridian phenomenon in traditional Chinese medicine.展开更多
BACKGROUND Active myofascial trigger points(TrPs)often occur in the upper region of the upper trapezius(UT)muscle.These TrPs can be a significant source of neck,shoulder,and upper back pain and headaches.These TrPs an...BACKGROUND Active myofascial trigger points(TrPs)often occur in the upper region of the upper trapezius(UT)muscle.These TrPs can be a significant source of neck,shoulder,and upper back pain and headaches.These TrPs and their related pain and disability can adversely affect an individual’s everyday routine functioning,work-related productivity,and general quality of life.AIM To investigate the effects of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization(IASTM)vs extracorporeal shock wave therapy(ESWT)on the TrPs of the UT muscle.METHODS A randomized,single-blind,comparative clinical study was conducted at the Medical Center of the Egyptian Railway Station in Cairo.Forty patients(28 females and 12 males),aged between 20-years-old and 40-years-old,with active myofascial TrPs in the UT muscle were randomly assigned to two equal groups(A and B).Group A received IASTM,while group B received ESWT.Each group was treated twice weekly for 2 weeks.Both groups received muscle energy technique for the UT muscle.Patients were evaluated twice(pre-and posttreatment)for pain intensity using the visual analogue scale and for pain pressure threshold(PPT)using a pressure algometer.RESULTS Comparing the pre-and post-treatment mean values for all variables for group A,there were significant differences in pain intensity for TrP1 and TrP2(P=0.0001)and PPT for TrP1(P=0.0002)and TrP2(P=0.0001).Also,for group B,there were significant differences between the pre-and post-treatment pain intensity for TrP1 and TrP2 and PPT for TrP1 and TrP2(P=0.0001).There were no significant differences between the two groups in the post-treatment mean values of pain intensity for TrP1(P=0.9)and TrP2(P=0.76)and PPT for TrP1(P=0.09)and for TrP2(P=0.91).CONCLUSION IASTM and ESWT are effective methods for improving pain and PPT in patients with UT muscle TrPs.There is no significant difference between either treatment method.展开更多
Trigger point（TrP） acupuncture（dry needling）,the use of solid filiform needles at TrPs,has been developed from a comprehensive integration and adaptation of traditional acupuncture using current understandings of ...Trigger point（TrP） acupuncture（dry needling）,the use of solid filiform needles at TrPs,has been developed from a comprehensive integration and adaptation of traditional acupuncture using current understandings of TrPs.During the past twenty years,the concept and technique continues to evolve,with a potential to expand to other conditions beyond myofascial pain syndromes that can be managed via stimulating TrPs.In this article,we compared TrP acupuncture and traditional acupuncture from the following aspects：points of needle insertion,needles and needling techniques,and therapeutic indications.Traditional acupuncture encompasses an abundance of methods and techniques in acupuncture practices and has been widely used and studied for a variety of disorders.With unique specific characteristics,TrP acupuncture further develops traditional acupuncture theories,especially the concepts of Ashi point.The location of TrPs,their distribution pattern and pain indication are similar to those of traditional acupoints;the selection of needles,depth of needle insertion,and manipulation techniques are part of traditional acupuncture.TrP acupuncture is thus an integral part of traditional acupuncture.展开更多
目的观察激痛点火针疗法对腰背肌筋膜炎患者疼痛的影响。方法选取2021年3月—2023年3月在福建中医药大学附属三明市中西医结合医院康复科就诊的腰背肌筋膜炎患者65例,按随机数字表法分为对照组(n=32)与观察组(n=33)。对照组采用常规针...目的观察激痛点火针疗法对腰背肌筋膜炎患者疼痛的影响。方法选取2021年3月—2023年3月在福建中医药大学附属三明市中西医结合医院康复科就诊的腰背肌筋膜炎患者65例,按随机数字表法分为对照组(n=32)与观察组(n=33)。对照组采用常规针刺治疗,观察组采用针刺联合激痛点火针疗法。6周后评估2组患者疼痛评分、腰椎功能评分,观察腰背部红外成像结果。结果观察组患者视觉模拟评分法(visual analog scale,VAS)评分[(3.76±1.08)分vs.(5.28±1.55)分],Oswestry功能障碍指数问卷(Oswestry disability index,ODI)评分[(13.76±3.42)分vs.(11.50±4.58)分]及腰背部红外成像的平均温度[(30.21±3.03)℃vs.(33.31±3.16)℃]均显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论针刺联合激痛点火针疗法可以有效缓解腰背肌筋膜炎患者疼痛,改善腰椎功能障碍。展开更多
Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) plus Tanbo-plucking the trigger points for scapulohumeral periarthritis (SP). Methods:A total of 80 patients with SP were randomized into an obser...Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) plus Tanbo-plucking the trigger points for scapulohumeral periarthritis (SP). Methods:A total of 80 patients with SP were randomized into an observation group and an EA group by the random number table, with 40 cases in each group. The EA group was treated with EA therapy, and the observation group was treated with EA therapy plus Tanbo-plucking the trigger points. After treatment, the visual analog scale (VAS) and Melle scores of the two groups were compared to evaluate the improvement of shoulder pain and functional activity, and meanwhile the clinical efficacy was observed. Results: After treatment, the total effective rate of the observation group was 95.0% and the cure and markedly effective rate was 72.5%. The total effective rate of the EA group was 87.5% and the cure and markedly effective rate was 42.5%. There was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The cure and markedly effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the EA group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). After treatment, the intra-group differences in VAS and Melle scores of both groups were statistically significant (bothP<0.001). The inter-group differences in the changes of the VAS and Melle scores after treatment were statistically significant (bothP<0.001). Conclusion: EA plus Tanbo-plucking the trigger points has a better curative effect than EA therapy alone in the treatment of SP.展开更多
基金Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province(2017)
文摘In recent years,the treatment of myofascial pain trigger point is a relatively popular technology,many people regard it as"Ashi point"in meridian theory,but compared with the traditional meridian theory,the description of myofascial pain trigger point is more intuitive and easier to master.This paper expounds the similarities and differences between myofascial pain trigger point and traditional meridian theory from the aspects of theory,basic research and clinical application,in order to provide a specific idea for the scientific interpretation of meridian phenomenon in traditional Chinese medicine.
文摘BACKGROUND Active myofascial trigger points(TrPs)often occur in the upper region of the upper trapezius(UT)muscle.These TrPs can be a significant source of neck,shoulder,and upper back pain and headaches.These TrPs and their related pain and disability can adversely affect an individual’s everyday routine functioning,work-related productivity,and general quality of life.AIM To investigate the effects of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization(IASTM)vs extracorporeal shock wave therapy(ESWT)on the TrPs of the UT muscle.METHODS A randomized,single-blind,comparative clinical study was conducted at the Medical Center of the Egyptian Railway Station in Cairo.Forty patients(28 females and 12 males),aged between 20-years-old and 40-years-old,with active myofascial TrPs in the UT muscle were randomly assigned to two equal groups(A and B).Group A received IASTM,while group B received ESWT.Each group was treated twice weekly for 2 weeks.Both groups received muscle energy technique for the UT muscle.Patients were evaluated twice(pre-and posttreatment)for pain intensity using the visual analogue scale and for pain pressure threshold(PPT)using a pressure algometer.RESULTS Comparing the pre-and post-treatment mean values for all variables for group A,there were significant differences in pain intensity for TrP1 and TrP2(P=0.0001)and PPT for TrP1(P=0.0002)and TrP2(P=0.0001).Also,for group B,there were significant differences between the pre-and post-treatment pain intensity for TrP1 and TrP2 and PPT for TrP1 and TrP2(P=0.0001).There were no significant differences between the two groups in the post-treatment mean values of pain intensity for TrP1(P=0.9)and TrP2(P=0.76)and PPT for TrP1(P=0.09)and for TrP2(P=0.91).CONCLUSION IASTM and ESWT are effective methods for improving pain and PPT in patients with UT muscle TrPs.There is no significant difference between either treatment method.
文摘Trigger point（TrP） acupuncture（dry needling）,the use of solid filiform needles at TrPs,has been developed from a comprehensive integration and adaptation of traditional acupuncture using current understandings of TrPs.During the past twenty years,the concept and technique continues to evolve,with a potential to expand to other conditions beyond myofascial pain syndromes that can be managed via stimulating TrPs.In this article,we compared TrP acupuncture and traditional acupuncture from the following aspects：points of needle insertion,needles and needling techniques,and therapeutic indications.Traditional acupuncture encompasses an abundance of methods and techniques in acupuncture practices and has been widely used and studied for a variety of disorders.With unique specific characteristics,TrP acupuncture further develops traditional acupuncture theories,especially the concepts of Ashi point.The location of TrPs,their distribution pattern and pain indication are similar to those of traditional acupoints;the selection of needles,depth of needle insertion,and manipulation techniques are part of traditional acupuncture.TrP acupuncture is thus an integral part of traditional acupuncture.
文摘目的观察激痛点火针疗法对腰背肌筋膜炎患者疼痛的影响。方法选取2021年3月—2023年3月在福建中医药大学附属三明市中西医结合医院康复科就诊的腰背肌筋膜炎患者65例,按随机数字表法分为对照组(n=32)与观察组(n=33)。对照组采用常规针刺治疗,观察组采用针刺联合激痛点火针疗法。6周后评估2组患者疼痛评分、腰椎功能评分,观察腰背部红外成像结果。结果观察组患者视觉模拟评分法(visual analog scale,VAS)评分[(3.76±1.08)分vs.(5.28±1.55)分],Oswestry功能障碍指数问卷(Oswestry disability index,ODI)评分[(13.76±3.42)分vs.(11.50±4.58)分]及腰背部红外成像的平均温度[(30.21±3.03)℃vs.(33.31±3.16)℃]均显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论针刺联合激痛点火针疗法可以有效缓解腰背肌筋膜炎患者疼痛,改善腰椎功能障碍。
文摘Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) plus Tanbo-plucking the trigger points for scapulohumeral periarthritis (SP). Methods:A total of 80 patients with SP were randomized into an observation group and an EA group by the random number table, with 40 cases in each group. The EA group was treated with EA therapy, and the observation group was treated with EA therapy plus Tanbo-plucking the trigger points. After treatment, the visual analog scale (VAS) and Melle scores of the two groups were compared to evaluate the improvement of shoulder pain and functional activity, and meanwhile the clinical efficacy was observed. Results: After treatment, the total effective rate of the observation group was 95.0% and the cure and markedly effective rate was 72.5%. The total effective rate of the EA group was 87.5% and the cure and markedly effective rate was 42.5%. There was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The cure and markedly effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the EA group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). After treatment, the intra-group differences in VAS and Melle scores of both groups were statistically significant (bothP<0.001). The inter-group differences in the changes of the VAS and Melle scores after treatment were statistically significant (bothP<0.001). Conclusion: EA plus Tanbo-plucking the trigger points has a better curative effect than EA therapy alone in the treatment of SP.
