Added value of ratio of cross diameters of the appendix in ultrasound diagnosis of acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND The maximum outer diameter(MOD)of the appendix is an essential parameter for diagnosing acute appendicitis,but there is space for improvement in ultrasound(US)diagnostic performance.AIM To investigate whether combining the ratio of the cross diameters(RATIO)of the appendix with MOD of the appendix can enhance the diagnostic performance of acute appendicitis.METHODS A retrospective study was conducted,and medical records of 233 patients with acute appendicitis and 112 patients with a normal appendix were reviewed.The MOD and RATIO of the appendix were calculated and tested for their diagnostic performance of acute appendicitis,both individually and in combination.RESULTS The RATIO for a normal appendix was 1.32±0.16,while for acute appendicitis it was 1.09±0.07.The cut-off value for RATIO was determined to be≤1.18.The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC)for diagnosing acute appendicitis using RATIO≤1.18 and MOD>6 mm was 0.870 and 0.652,respectively.There was a significant difference in AUC between RATIO≤1.18 and MOD>6 mm(P<0.0001).When comparing the combination of RATIO≤1.18 and MOD>6 mm with MOD>6 mm alone,the combination showed increased specificity,positive predictive value(PPV),and AUC.However,the sensitivity and negative predictive value decreased.CONCLUSION Combining RATIO of the appendix≤1.18 and MOD>6 mm can significantly improve the specificity,PPV,and AUC in the US diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Epidemiological, Clinical, and Therapeutic Characteristics of Acute Appendicitis at the Reference Health Center in Commune I of the District of Bamako Mali

Acute appendicitis is the most common abdominal surgical emergency. This work is a prospective study from January 2012 to December to analyze the epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic aspects of acute appendicitis in the Cs ref of commune I of the district of Bamako and the results obtained were then compared with those reported in other countries. Our study included 72 patients. The appendectomy surgical specimens were the subject of an anatomical pathology study at Point G University Hospital in Bamako in Mali, 1.4% of cases of which were healthy. All our operated patients received antibiotics (mono or dual antibiotics) with a post-operative hospitalization duration of 1.5 (36 hours) days on average. We recorded 6 complications such as parietal suppuration, i.e. 8.33% of cases. No 5th day syndrome or late complications were noted. The average length of hospitalization was 36 hours. Abdominal ultrasound;used as an additional examination was carried out in 55 of our patients or 76.39% of cases. We have not recorded any deaths. Raising awareness among patients about the dangers of complications motivated patients to undergo surgery as soon as possible.

Unusual Cause of Acute Appendicitis: Bone Fragment

Foreign bodies are a rare cause of appendicitis, because in most cases these ingested foreign bodies cross the digestive tract asymptomatically [1] [2] [3]. However, some penetrate the lumen of the appendix causing its inflammation. We report an unusual observation of acute appendicitis induced by a foreign body namely a bone fragment in the visceral surgery department of the Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Villeneuve Saint-Georges.

Analysis of the Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Appendectomy Compared to Laparotomy in the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis

Objective:To analyze the clinical effects of laparoscopic appendectomy compared to traditional laparotomy in treating acute appendicitis.Methods:90 patients with acute appendicitis were selected as research subjects.They were divided into a control group and an observation group,with 45 cases in each group.The control group underwent traditional laparotomy,while the observation group underwent laparoscopic appendectomy.The intraoperative indicators,postoperative recovery indicators,postoperative stress indicators,and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared.Results:The operative time of the observation group was longer,but the incision length was shorter and the blood loss was lesser(P<0.05);the observation group had shorter postoperative first gas-passing time,recovery of gastrointestinal function,ambulation time,and lower postoperative pain score.The observation group had lower postoperative stress index levels(P<0.05);the observation group had a lower postoperative complication rate(P<0.05).Conclusion:Aside from prolonging the operative time,laparoscopic appendectomy is more ideal than traditional laparotomy in all other indicators and has better therapeutic effects in treating acute appendicitis.

Revisiting delayed appendectomy in patients with acute appendicitis

Acute appendicitis(AA)is the most common acute abdomen,and appendectomy is the most common nonelective surgery performed worldwide.Despite the long history of understanding this disease and enhancements to medical care,many challenges remain in the diagnosis and treatment of AA.One of these challenges is the timing of appendectomy.In recent decades,extensive studies focused on this topic have been conducted,but there have been no conclusive answers.From the onset of symptoms to appendectomy,many factors can cause delay in the surgical intervention.Some are inevitable,and some can be modified and improved.The favorable and unfavorable results of these factors vary according to different situations.The purpose of this review is to discuss the causes of appendectomy delay and its risk-related costs.This review also explores strategies to balance the positive and negative effects of delayed appendectomy.

Acute appendicitis in the short term following radical total gastrectomy misdiagnosed as duodenal stump leakage:A case report

BACKGROUND Common diseases after radical gastrectomy include cholecystitis and pancreatitis,but the sudden onset of acute appendicitis in a short period following radical gastrectomy is very rare,and its clinical symptoms are easily misdiagnosed as duodenal stump leakage.CASE SUMMARY This is a case report of a 77-year-old woman with lower right abdominal pain 14 d after radical resection of gastric cancer.Her pain was not relieved by conservative treatment,and her inflammatory markers were elevated.Computed tomography showed effusion in the perihepatic and hepatorenal spaces,right paracolic sulcus and pelvis,as well as exudative changes in the right iliac fossa.Ultrasoundguided puncture revealed a slightly turbid yellow-green fluid.Laparoscopic exploration showed a swollen appendix with surrounding pus moss and no abnormalities of the digestive anastomosis or stump;thus,laparoscopic appendectomy was performed.The patient recovered well after the operation.Postoperative pathology showed acute purulent appendicitis.The patient continued adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery,completing three cycles of oxaliplatin plus S-1(SOX regimen).CONCLUSION Acute appendicitis in the short term after radical gastrectomy needs to be differentiated from duodenal stump leakage,and early diagnosis and surgery are the most important means of treatment.

Imaging of acute appendicitis: Advances

We read with interest the review by Teng et al,who summarized the current approach to the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis(AA).Also,the article summarizes the clinical scoring systems very effectively.In one of the previous studies conducted by our research group,we showed that the use of the Alvarado score,ultrasound and C-reactive protein values in combination provides a safe confirmation or exclusion of the diagnosis of AA.Computed tomography is particularly sensitive in detecting periappendiceal abscess,peritonitis and gangrenous changes.Computed tomography is not a good diagnostic tool in pediatric patients because of the ionizing radiation it produces.Ultrasound is a valuable diagnostic tool to differentiate AA from lymphoid hyperplasia.Presence of fluid collection in the periappendiceal and lamina propria thickness less than 1 mm are the most effective parameters in differentiating appendicitis from lymphoid hyperplasia.Although AA is the most common cause of surgical acute abdomen,it remains an important diagnostic and clinical challenge.By combining clinical scoring systems,laboratory data and appropriate imaging methods,diagnostic accuracy and adherence to treatment can be increased.Lymphoid hyperplasia and perforated appendicitis present significant diagnostic challenges in children.Additional ultrasound findings are increasingly defined to differentiate AA from these conditions.

Acute Appendicitis Pathways: A Systemic Review

Background: Clinical pathways are effective in reducing healthcare cost and standardizing management protocol for diseases and conditions. However, there are no standardized pathways for appendicitis. This study aims to determine whether implementation of a standardized clinical pathway for managing appendicitis may lead to improved patient care. Materials and Methods: We searched for articles published in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane library between 1974 and 2015. Thirty-seven papers published in English that met inclusion criteria were included and analyzed in this review. A total of 37 studies met inclusion criteria and were analyzed for the purpose of this study. Results: A clear definition for appendicitis pathway was observed in 30 articles. Appendicitis was diagnosed based on clinical and laboratory findings;however, 34% of the studies included radiological investigations. Sixteen studies provided clear definitions for discharge criteria. Time of follow-up (5 - 28 days) was reported in 10 studies. Operative time was the most commonly used outcome measure. The mean length of stay for non-complicated appendicitis was 1.3 days, and 6.26 days for complicated appendicitis. Most of the studies concluded that the accuracy of a clinical pathway for appendicitis diagnosis can be achieved by assessing the incidence of a normal appendix. The mean cost for patient care was $4874.14 (SAR 18,278.03). Conclusion: There was no standardized definition for appendicitis clinical pathway components. Studies suggested that establishing a clinical pathway for appendicitis improves the outcome and minimizes the cost.

Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Adults: Role of a Simple Clinical Diagnostic Triad

Objectives: Acute appendicitis remains the commonest intra-abdominal surgical emergency. This study sought to identify the clinical factors that are most reliable in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Methods: This was a retrospective review of consecutive adult appendicectomies over a 6 months period. The frequency of different clinical parameters was assessed to determine the most reliable predictors of acute appendicitis. A simple triad of 3 of the most frequent clinical parameters was examined for diagnostic potential by calculating its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Results: There were a total of 124 patients. The median age was 33 years while the gender distribution was 54 males to 70 females. The most common clinical parameters in the patients with appendicitis were right iliac fossa tenderness or peritonism (100.0%), anorexia (78.8%), nausea (75.9%), migratory abdominal pain i.e. pain migrating to right lower quadrant (55.7%), tachycardia (41.3%) and pyrexia i.e. body temperature of 37.8 degrees Celsius and above (22.1%). The simple triad of anorexia, right iliac fossa tenderness and migratory abdominal pain showed specificity for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis of 84.2% and sensitivity of 45.7%. The positive predictive value of this triad was 94.1% while the negative predictive value was 21.9%. Conclusion: Our study reveals that the positivity for this simple clinical triad strongly rules in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Its specificity and positive predictive value compares with the most reliable scoring systems for acute appendicitis in literature. Further approaches to diagnosis such as imaging and diagnostic laparoscopy should be considered when this triad is negative and appendicitis is suspected. This simple diagnostic approach allows for prompt diagnosis and treatment which expectedly would improve the morbidity associated with acute appendicitis.

Managing acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic in Jiaxing, China

BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 19(COVID-19)is a global pandemic and has had a profound impact on our routine surgical activities.Acute appendicitis is the most common abdominal emergency worldwide.Therefore,it is highly essential to assess the influence the pandemic has on acute appendicitis.AIM To assess the efficacy of the management of acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 90 patients who presented with acute appendicitis during the outbreak of COVID-19 in Jiaxing,China.Clinical data regarding appendectomies patients were also collected for the corresponding time frame from 2019.Preoperative management,intraoperative protective measures,and postoperative management were conducted.RESULTS After screening,six patients were identified as unqualified due to fever and were then referred to the COVID-19 expert group.The results of the nucleic acid test were negative.Of the 76 patients enrolled in the simple group,nine patients received medication therapy,and all others underwent surgery.From this same group,66 patients were diagnosed with suppurative appendicitis,and one patient was diagnosed with perforated appendicitis after surgery.There were 14 patients in the complex group,for which the postoperative diagnosis indicated perforated appendicitis.The proportion of men with perforated appendicitis was higher than that in 2019(P<0.05).The chief complaint duration for perforated appendicitis patients in 2020 was longer than that in 2019(P<0.05).The routine blood test showed that white blood cell counts and neutrophil ratios were higher in perforated appendicitis patients in 2020 than in 2019(P<0.05).The ratio of open appendectomies to the amount of mean blood loss during surgery was greater in 2020 than in 2019(P<0.05).Online consultation after discharge was selected in 59 cases(65.6%).No perioperative infection with COVID-19 or long-term postoperative complications were found.CONCLUSION The management of acute appendicitis from Jiaxing effectively reduced the influence of the pandemic and minimized the risk of nosocomial infection.

COVID-19 pandemic changed the management and outcomes of acute appendicitis in northern Beijing:A single-center study

BACKGROUND Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic,outcomes and management of many diseases have been affected.Acute appendicitis is a common acute abdomen.The incidence rate is 0.05%-0.5%.Studies reported that the number of patients with appendicitis admitted to emergency department significantly decreased since the pandemic.People avoided going to the hospital for fear of being infected.Different countries have different epidemic prevention measures that result in different treatment outcomes.The Chinese government also published some temporary measures in order to prevent the outbreak.AIM To explore the changes in management and outcomes of acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic in the North of Beijing.METHODS Patients with acute appendicitis admitted to Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital between February and June 2019 and February and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed.Cases were grouped according to admission year.The demographic characteristics,present illnesses,medical history,symptoms and signs,comorbidities,blood test results,imaging data,appendix pathology,and treatment details were compared.RESULTS Overall,74 patients received nonsurgical treatment and 113 patients underwent surgical treatment in group 2019,whereas 159 patients received nonsurgical treatment and 26 patients received surgical treatment in group 2020.Fever,thick appendix,nonsurgical management,and uncomplicated appendicitis(simple or supportive appendicitis)were more common in group 2020(P<0.05).Among the nonsurgical management cases,the neutrophil percentage,neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio,and recurrence rate were higher in group 2020(P<0.05).Among surgically managed cases,there were more cases with gastrointestinal symptoms,peritonitis,ascites in the image,and intraoperative adhesion or ascites in group 2020(P<0.05).The white blood cell count,time from diagnosis to surgery,surgical time,and intraoperative blood loss were higher in group 2020(P<0.05).CONCLUSION During the COVID-19 pandemic,patients suffering from acute appendicitis in Beijing tended to present with severe symptoms and opt for nonsurgical treatment.For patients who underwent surgical management,the operation was delayed and more difficult during the pandemic.Nevertheless,the hospital stay and the incidence of postsurgical complications did not change.

Acute appendicitis complicated by mesenteric vein thrombosis: A case report

BACKGROUND Acute appendicitis with mesenteric vein thrombosis(MVT)is an uncommon condition and usually lacks specific clinical manifestations,which leads to a high rate of misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis,especially when it is accompanied by other abdominal diseases.Prompt and accurate recognition is vital for treatment and prognosis.CASE SUMMARY A 37-year-old woman had a history of acute metastatic right lower abdominal pain,nausea,and fever.A contrast-enhanced computed tomography(CT)scan showed a filling defect in the mesenteric vessels.The patient was diagnosed with acute appendicitis complicated by MVT and was treated with anticoagulation and intravenous antibiotics.The follow-up CT scan showed full resolution of the thrombosis and inflammation.CONCLUSION Clinical awareness is essential for recognizing MVT,especially when it is accompanied by other common acute abdominal diseases,such as acute appendicitis.Contrast-enhanced CT is helpful for the diagnosis of MVT and is recommended for patients with acute abdominal diseases.

Endoscopic treatment for acute appendicitis with coexistent acute pancreatitis: Two case reports

BACKGROUND Appendectomy is the procedure of choice for the treatment of acute appendicitis.However,surgery may not be appropriate for patients with coexisting severe illness or comorbidities such as acute pancreatitis(AP).Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis treatment(ERAT)may be a novel alternative to surgery for treating such patients where existing medical therapies have failed.CASE SUMMARY We report 2 cases of moderately severe AP who developed acute uncomplicated appendicitis during their hospital stay and did not respond to traditional medical therapy.One patient had moderately severe AP due to hyperlipidemia,while the other patient had a gallstone induced by moderately severe AP.Neither patient was fit to undergo an appendectomy procedure because of the concurrent AP.Therefore,the alternative and minimally invasive ERAT was considered.After written informed consent was collected from the patients,the ERAT procedure was performed.Both patients exhibited fast postoperative recovery after ERAT with minimal surgical trauma.CONCLUSION ERAT is a safe and effective minimally invasive endoscopic procedure for acute appendicitis in patients with coexistent AP.

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with presumed diagnosis of acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND Acute appendicitis(AAp) is the most frequent cause of acute abdominal pain,and appendectomy is the most frequent emergency procedure that is performed worldwide.The coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) pandemic has caused delays in managing diseases requiring emergency approaches such as AAp and trauma.AIM To compare the demographic,clinical,and histopathological outcomes of patients with AAp who underwent appendectomy during pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods.METHODS The demographic,clinical,biochemical,and histopathological parameters were evaluated and compared in patients who underwent appendectomy with the presumed diagnosis of AAp in the pre-COVID-19(October 2018-March 2020) and COVID-19(March 2020-July 2021) periods.RESULTS Admissions to our tertiary care hospital for AAp increased 44.8% in the COVID-19 period.PreCOVID-19(n = 154) and COVID-19(n = 223) periods were compared for various parameters,and we found that there were statistically significant differences in terms of variables such as procedures performed on the weekdays or weekends [odds ratio(OR):1.76;P = 0.018],presence of AAp findings on ultrasonography(OR:15.4;P < 0.001),confirmation of AAp in the histopathologic analysis(OR:2.6;P = 0.003),determination of perforation in the appendectomy specimen(OR:2.2;P = 0.004),the diameter of the appendix(P < 0.001),and hospital stay(P = 0.003).There was no statistically significant difference in terms of interval between the initiation of symptoms and admission to the hospital between the pre-COVID-19(median:24 h;interquartile range:34) and COVID-19(median:36 h;interquartile range:60) periods(P = 0.348).The interval between the initiation of symptoms until the hospital admission was significantly longer in patients with perforated AAp regardless of the COVID-19 or pre-COVID-19 status(P < 0.001).CONCLUSION The present study showed that in the COVID-19 period,the ultrasonographic determination rate of AAp,perforation rate of AAp,and duration of hospital stay increased.On the other hand,negative appendectomy rate decreased.There was no statistically significant delay in hospital admissions that would delay the diagnosis of AAp in the COVID-19 period.

The Role of C-Reactive Protein, Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor and Total Antioxidant Capacity in Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

Background and Aim: Despite the fact that acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency all around the world, its diagnosis is still based on clinical evaluation and accuracy of the diagnosis depending on experience. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of inflammatory markers in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Material and Method: The study includes 77 cases with histopathologically proven acute appendicitis and 17 control cases. Blood samples were obtained from all cases and C-reactive protein (CRP), Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) and Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) were measured. Findings: In cases with acute appendicitis, CRP and G-CSF levels were found to be related to acute appendicitis;however, TAC was not affected by the disease process. Moreover, CRP and G-CSF levels were correlated with the disease severity. Conclusion: Both CRP and G-CSF can be used in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Furthermore, increased CRP level can be a marker to show advanced cases. However, G-CSF is not an effective marker to show disease severity.

Clinical Significance of Serum Bilirubin in the Diagnosis of Atypical Acute Appendicitis

Objective:To investigate the significance of serum bilirubin in the diagnosis of atypical acute appendicitis.Methods:perform a retrospective analysis of 120 patients with atypical acute appendicitis diagnosed in our hospital from July 2012 to July 2016.All patients underwent routine liver function tests before surgery.Results:83 patients were confirmed by surgery as acute appendicitis,of which 68 patients had elevated serum total bilirubin and direct bilirubin,and 15 patients were normal;37 patients were confirmed by surgery as non-acute appendicitis,of which 7 patients had elevated serum total bilirubin and direct bilirubin,and 30 patients were normal.Conclusion:The increase of serum bilirubin level has certain clinical significance for the diagnosis of atypical acute appendicitis.

Usefulness of a Clinico-Biological Francois’Score in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis:Experience of the University Hospital Center of Parakou,Benin

Introduction: Diagnostic wanderings of acute appendicitis are responsible for serious complications or abusive appendectomies. Existing Clinico-biological scores are efficient. Objective: To determine the diagnostic efficiency of Fran?ois’ score in acute appendicitis. Methodology: over 10 months, all the patients admitted in the CHUD-Parakou Emergency Department for pain in the right iliac fossa had been examined by resident students who calculated Fran?ois’ score. After verification by the surgeon, patients were put into three categories: category 1 score ≥ 2;category 2, score between -6 and 2;category 3, score below -6. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Results: out of 54 patients selected (29 men and 25 women), 29 were classified as group 1;19 as group 2 and 6 as group 3. An ultrasound was performed in all patients in group 2, and signs in favor of appendicitis were found in 12 patients. Of the 41 appendicectomies performed, the histologic analysis of 33 operative specimens found a pathological appendix. Sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value per group were 100%. It has prevented almost in one every four patients (24.07%) an abusive appendectomy. Conclusion: This score would reduce diagnostic wanderings and target patient groups for imaging studies.

Leptin and NUCB2/Nesfatin-1 in Acute Appendicitis

Objective: Appetite loss is seen in 90% to 95% of patients with acute appendicitis;however, the cause of this symptom remains unknown. This study is performed to determine whether changes in the blood levels of two anorexigenic hormones, leptin and NUCB2/nesfatin-1, can help to diagnose acute appendicitis in children and whether these two parameters can distinguish acute appendicitis from abdominal pain. Methods: Sixty children with comparable ages and body mass indices are divided into three groups of 20 children each: those with acute appendicitis, those with abdominal pain, and controls. The blood sample with acute appendicitis is taken preoperatively (T1), and subsequent samples are taken 24 hrs postoperatively (T2) and 3 days postoperatively (T3). The blood sample with abdominal pain subjects is also taken in the corresponding times with those with acute appendicitis while blood sample from controls is only taken in the T1 corresponding time. Leptin and NUCB2/nesfatin-1 levels are measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: The serum leptin levels are significantly higher preoperatively than postoperatively in all three groups. The NUCB2/nesfatin-1 levels at T1 in acute appendicitis are significantly higher than those at T2 in all three groups, but are restored at T3 to levels similar to those of controls. Neutrophil percentage has a sensitivity of 100%, and specificity of 76.32%, NUCB2/nesfatin-1 level has a sensitivity of 47% and specificity of 95%, and the leptin level has a sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 51% in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Conclusions: High preoperative leptin and NUCB2/nesfatin-1 levels may be a causative factor for appetite suppression observed in patients with acute appendicitis. High preoperative and low postoperative serum leptin and NUCB2/nesfatin-1 concentrations may serve as new candidate biomarkers that help to distinguish acute appendicitis from abdominal pain in children in addition to high CRP concentration, high WBC count, and neutrophilia.

Timing of Surgery and Complications of Acute Appendicitis:A Retrospective Study

Introduction: Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most frequent surgical condition of the abdomen during childhood. Its clinical presentation in children under 5 may be atypical and thus causes a delay in diagnosis, which often leads to complications such as perforation and peritonitis. Patients with unperforated AA at hospital admission may have their surgery postponed up to 24 hours while antibiotics are initiated without significant increase in complications, instead of undergoing immediate surgery. Immediate surgery to prevent complications has been questioned. Delaying surgery in patients admitted to hospital with AA has not increased the risk of perforation. Objective: To determine the impact of timing of surgery of patients with AA admitted to our Pediatric Surgery Ward of the Sorocaba Hospital Complex of the Medical Science and Health Faculty (CHS-PUC/SP) on the rate of complications (perforation, peritoneal drainage and infection of the surgical wound). Methods: We reviewed the records of 195 children aged 4 to 12 years, admitted between 2010 and 2014. They were separated in 2 groups according to timing of surgery under 7 hours (group A) and 7 to 24 hours (group B) and had their rate of complications (infection of the surgical wound, drainage and perforation (grade IV) assessed. Results: Ninety-seven children underwent surgery less than 7 hours after admission (group A) and 98 children were operated between 7 and 24 hours after admission (group B). Groups A and B had no significant difference regarding the rates of wound infection (p = 0.2277), peritoneal drain insertion (p = 0.4085) or perforation (p = 0.7125). Conclusions: In our study, timing of surgery for AA had no impact on the occurrence of complications, such as infection of the surgical wound, peritoneal drainage or perforation.

Safety in Surgery:Evaluation of Safety and Efficiency in Use of Aminoglycosides in Acute Appendicitis

Background: Aminoglycosides are used as empirical antibiotic treatment of intraabdominal infections which are caused by Gram negative bacteria and for which the treatment of choice is surgery. Aminoglycosides maintain good efficacy against these bacteria and reduce the need for prescribing fluoroquinolone, cephalosporin and carbapenem antibiotics which contribute to the development of resistant bacterial strains. In recent years, several clinical trials and international guidelines have advised against the use of aminoglycosides owing largely to doubts about their effectiveness and to the concern for their known nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. Aim: In our study, we aimed to prove whether aminoglycosides are appropriate agents in the treatment of acute appendicitis. Methods: Retrospectively, patients with acute appendicitis we included in the trial. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, clinical signs and symptoms, the type of antibiotic and surgical treatment were analyzed. The effect of independent variables on the occurrence of complications was calculated using Student’s T-test and Fisher’s precise test. The effect of aminoglycosides on the loss of kidney function was determined by means of a linear regression method. Results: 300 patients proved acute appendicitis were included in the study. Univariate statistical analysis showed that the risk factors for postoperative complications in treating acute appendicitis were: age over 76 years (p Conclusion: Aminoglycoside antibiotics are a safe and effective treatment of acute appendicitis;our not published data are positive of AGs use in acute cholecystitis and left colon diverticulitis which requires surgery. If used for a limited time period, they do not increase the risk for kidney injury and remain a stable low level of all over complications.