Analysis of the Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Appendectomy Compared to Laparotomy in the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis

Objective:To analyze the clinical effects of laparoscopic appendectomy compared to traditional laparotomy in treating acute appendicitis.Methods:90 patients with acute appendicitis were selected as research subjects.They were divided into a control group and an observation group,with 45 cases in each group.The control group underwent traditional laparotomy,while the observation group underwent laparoscopic appendectomy.The intraoperative indicators,postoperative recovery indicators,postoperative stress indicators,and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared.Results:The operative time of the observation group was longer,but the incision length was shorter and the blood loss was lesser(P<0.05);the observation group had shorter postoperative first gas-passing time,recovery of gastrointestinal function,ambulation time,and lower postoperative pain score.The observation group had lower postoperative stress index levels(P<0.05);the observation group had a lower postoperative complication rate(P<0.05).Conclusion:Aside from prolonging the operative time,laparoscopic appendectomy is more ideal than traditional laparotomy in all other indicators and has better therapeutic effects in treating acute appendicitis.

Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: How to discourage surgeons using inadequate therapy

Acute appendicitis(AA) develops in a progressive and irreversible manner, even if the clinical course of AA can be temporarily modified by intentional medications. Reliable and real-time diagnosis of AA can be made based on findings of the white blood cell count and enhanced computed tomography. Emergent laparoscopic appendectomy(LA) is considered as the first therapeutic choice for AA. Interval/delayed appendectomy at 6-12 wk after disease onset is considered as unsafe with a high recurrent rate during the waiting time. However, this technique may have some advantages for avoiding unnecessary extended resection in patients with an appendiceal mass. Nonoperative management of AA may be tolerated only in children. Postoperative complications increase according to the patient's factors, and temporal avoidance of emergent general anesthesia may be beneficial for high-risk patients. The surgeon's skill and cooperation of the hospital are important for successful LA. Delaying appendectomy for less than 24 h from diagnosis is safe. Additionally, a semi-elective manner(i.e., LA within 24 h after onset of symptoms) may be paradoxically acceptable, according to the factors of the patient, physician, and institution. Prompt LA is mandatory for AA. Fortunately, the Japanese government uses a universal health insurance system, which covers LA.

Acute appendicitis: Epidemiology, treatment and outcomesanalysis of 16544 consecutive cases

AIM To investigate the epidemiology,treatment and outcomes of acute appendicitis(AA) in a large population study.METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study derived from the administrative dataset of the Bergamo district healthcare system(more than 1 million inhabitants) from 1997 to 2013.Data about treatment,surgery,length of stay were collected.Moreover for each patients were registered data about relapse of appendicitis and hospital admission due to intestinal obstruction.RESULTS From 1997 to 2013 in the Bergamo district we collected 16544 cases of AA,with a crude incidence rate of 89/100000 inhabitants per year; mean age was 24.51 ± 16.17,54.7% were male and the mean Charlson's comorbidity index was 0.32 ± 0.92.Mortality was < 0.0001%.Appendectomy was performed in 94.7% of the patients and the mean length of stay was 5.08 ± 2.88 d; the cumulative hospital stay was 5.19 ± 3.36 d and 1.2% of patients had at least one further hospitalization due intestinal occlusion.Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 48% of cases.Percent of 5.34 the patients were treated conservatively with a mean length of stay of 3.98 ± 3.96 d; the relapse rate was 23.1% and the cumulative hospital stay during the study period was 5.46 ± 6.05 d.CONCLUSION The treatment of acute appendicitis in Northern Italy is slowly changing,with the large diffusion of laparoscopic approach; conservative treatment of non-complicated appendicitis is still a neglected option,but rich of promising results.

Is endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy a better modality for acute uncomplicated appendicitis? A systematic review and metaanalysis

BACKGROUND Previous studies had shown endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy(ERAT)is an effective treatment for acute appendicitis.However,different studies reported conflicting outcomes regarding the effectiveness of ERAT in comparison with laparoscopic appendectomy(LA).AIM To compare the effectiveness of ERAT with LA.METHODS Randomized controlled trials(RCTs)and retrospective studies of ERAT for acute uncomplicated appendicitis were searched in PubMed,Cochrane Library,Web of Science,Embase database,China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),the WanFang Database,and Chinese Scientific Journals Database(VIP)from the establishment date to March 12021.Heterogeneity was assessed using the Isquared statistic.Pooled odds ratios(OR),weighted mean difference(WMD),and standard mean difference(SMD),with 95%confidence intervals(CI)were calculated through either fixed-effects or random-effects model.Sensitivity analysis was also performed.Publication bias was tested by Egger's test,and Begg’s test.The quality of included RCT were evaluated by the Jadad scale,while Newcastle-Ottawa scale is adopted for assessing the methodological quality of case-control studies.All statistical analysis was performed using Stata 15.1 statistical software.All statistical analysis was performed using Stata 15.1 statistical software.This study is registered with PROSPERO,CRD42021243955.RESULTS After screening,10 RCTs and 2 case-control studies were included in the current systematic review.Firstly,the length of hospitalizations[WMD=-1.15,95%CI:-1.99,-0.31;P=0.007]was shorter than LA group.Secondly,the level of postoperative CRP[WMD=-10.06,95%CI:(-17.39,-2.73);P=0.007],TNF-α[WMD=-7.70,95%CI:(-8.47,-6.93);P<0.001],and IL-6 Levels[WMD=-9.78,95%CI:(-10.69,-8.88);P<0.001;P<0.001]in ERAT group was significantly lower than LA group.Thirdly,ERAT group had a lower incidence of intestinal obstruction than LA group.[OR=0.19,95%CI:(0.05,0.79);P=0.020].Moreover,the quality of 10 RCTs were low with 0-3 Jadad scores,while the methodological quality of two case-control studies were fair with a score of 2(each).CONCLUSION Compared with LA,ERAT reduces operation time,the level of postoperative inflammation,and results in fewer complications and shorter recovery time,with preserving the appendix and its immune and biological functions.

Endoscopic treatment for acute appendicitis with coexistent acute pancreatitis: Two case reports

BACKGROUND Appendectomy is the procedure of choice for the treatment of acute appendicitis.However,surgery may not be appropriate for patients with coexisting severe illness or comorbidities such as acute pancreatitis(AP).Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis treatment(ERAT)may be a novel alternative to surgery for treating such patients where existing medical therapies have failed.CASE SUMMARY We report 2 cases of moderately severe AP who developed acute uncomplicated appendicitis during their hospital stay and did not respond to traditional medical therapy.One patient had moderately severe AP due to hyperlipidemia,while the other patient had a gallstone induced by moderately severe AP.Neither patient was fit to undergo an appendectomy procedure because of the concurrent AP.Therefore,the alternative and minimally invasive ERAT was considered.After written informed consent was collected from the patients,the ERAT procedure was performed.Both patients exhibited fast postoperative recovery after ERAT with minimal surgical trauma.CONCLUSION ERAT is a safe and effective minimally invasive endoscopic procedure for acute appendicitis in patients with coexistent AP.

COVID-19 pandemic changed the management and outcomes of acute appendicitis in northern Beijing:A single-center study

BACKGROUND Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic,outcomes and management of many diseases have been affected.Acute appendicitis is a common acute abdomen.The incidence rate is 0.05%-0.5%.Studies reported that the number of patients with appendicitis admitted to emergency department significantly decreased since the pandemic.People avoided going to the hospital for fear of being infected.Different countries have different epidemic prevention measures that result in different treatment outcomes.The Chinese government also published some temporary measures in order to prevent the outbreak.AIM To explore the changes in management and outcomes of acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic in the North of Beijing.METHODS Patients with acute appendicitis admitted to Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital between February and June 2019 and February and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed.Cases were grouped according to admission year.The demographic characteristics,present illnesses,medical history,symptoms and signs,comorbidities,blood test results,imaging data,appendix pathology,and treatment details were compared.RESULTS Overall,74 patients received nonsurgical treatment and 113 patients underwent surgical treatment in group 2019,whereas 159 patients received nonsurgical treatment and 26 patients received surgical treatment in group 2020.Fever,thick appendix,nonsurgical management,and uncomplicated appendicitis(simple or supportive appendicitis)were more common in group 2020(P<0.05).Among the nonsurgical management cases,the neutrophil percentage,neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio,and recurrence rate were higher in group 2020(P<0.05).Among surgically managed cases,there were more cases with gastrointestinal symptoms,peritonitis,ascites in the image,and intraoperative adhesion or ascites in group 2020(P<0.05).The white blood cell count,time from diagnosis to surgery,surgical time,and intraoperative blood loss were higher in group 2020(P<0.05).CONCLUSION During the COVID-19 pandemic,patients suffering from acute appendicitis in Beijing tended to present with severe symptoms and opt for nonsurgical treatment.For patients who underwent surgical management,the operation was delayed and more difficult during the pandemic.Nevertheless,the hospital stay and the incidence of postsurgical complications did not change.

Acute Appendicities in the Reference Health Center of Municipality II of Bamako District

This was a prospective study from January 2019 to December 2019 in the reference health center of municipality II of the Bamako district. During this period, we operated on 73 patients for acute appendicitis, including 51 men and 22 women, for a sex ratio of 1.7. The average age was 25.5 with extremes of 1 and 40 years. Abdominal pain was the main reason for consultation. The physical signs were dominated by the positivity of the Blumberg sign in 97.3% of the cases, the defense of the right iliac fossa in 79.5%, and the Rovsing sign in 61.6% of the cases. This physical examination made it possible to make the diagnosis in the majority of cases. In the face of some doubtful cases, we requested an abdominal ultrasound. Locoregional anesthesia was the most used anesthesia technique at 72.6%. The classic anterograde appendectomy with stump burial by Mac Burney was the most commonly used technique, respectively. The postoperative consequences were straightforward in 87.6%. Anatomopathology examination was performed on 69 surgical specimens and 4 appendectomy specimens were not subjected to an anatomo-pathological examination. Phlegmonous appendicitis was the most common at 63% of cases. Appendicitis remains the most common surgical emergency in a community setting. The early diagnosis and the speed of treatment guarantee improvements in the prognosis. The treatment is mainly surgical.

Laparoscopic appendectomy,stump closure and endoloops:A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Acute appendicitis(AA)is one of the main indications for urgent surgery.Laparoscopic appendectomy(LA)has shown advantages in terms of clinical results and cost-effectiveness,even if there is still controversy about different devices to utilize,especially with regards to the endoloop(EL)vs endostapler(ES)when it comes to stump closure.AIM To compare safety and cost-effectiveness of EL vs ES.METHODS From a prospectively maintained database,data of 996 consecutive patients treated by LA with a 3 years-follow up in the department of Emergency General Surgery-St Orsola University Hospital,Bologna(Italy)were retrieved.A metaanalysis was performed in terms of surgical complications,in comparison to the international literature published from 1995 to 2021.RESULTS The meta-analysis showed no evidence regarding wound infections,abdominal abscesses,and total post-operative complications,in terms of superiority of a surgical technique for the stump closure in LA.CONCLUSION Even when AA is complicated,the routine use of EL is safe in most patients.

Samonella typhi infection-related appendicitis:A case report

BACKGROUND Acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute abdominal emergencies around the world,which is always associated with infection.Infection with Salmonella typhi,an enteric pathogen,is a rare cause of acute appendicitis.We here report a patient with acute appendicitis associated with Samonella typhi infection,accompanied with spleen and kidney infarction,providing a rare example for a common surgical emergency.CASE SUMMARY A 25-year-old Pakistani man presented to the hospital with a 3-d history of fevers,vomiting,and abdominal pain.Computed tomography(CT)revealed a thickened intestinal wall of the ileocecal junction with multiple enlarged lymph nodes nearby.He was diagnosed with acute appendicitis and received laparoscopic appendectomy,which showed mild inflammation of the appendix.After the surgery,the patient presented again with a high fever(>39℃)and diarrhea.A CT angiography scan indicated spleen and kidney infarction.According to the blood culture,the diagnosis was finally clear to be Samonella typhi infection.The pyrexia and enteric symptoms were relieved after the application of intravenous levofloxacin.CONCLUSION This case,characterized by the combination of Salmonella typhi infection,acute appendicitis,and renal and splenic infraction,serves as a rare example for a common surgical emergency.

Laparoscopic versus Open Appendectomy Outcomes

Background: Appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies requiring an appendectomy, with a life-time risk of 6%. The overall mortality rate for open appendectomy (OA) is around 0.3% and morbidity is about 11%. Objective: To compare laparoscopic vs open appendectomy with regard to postoperative pain and nausea, operative results, perioperative and postoperative complications, hospital admission. Methods: This prospective comparative study is performed in the Department of Surgery, North West Aramed Forced Hospital, Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. All patients between 13 and 60 years of age admitted through the accident and emergency (A&E) department with a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis and those who completed follow-up are included in the study. All those patients in whom a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis was not established or have a palpable mass in the right lower quadrant, suggesting an appendiceal abscess and those who does not give consent are excluded from the study. We reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent a laparoscopic and open appendectomy in King Salman Armed Forces Hospital, Saudi Arabia from 1/1/2012 to 31/12/2015. Result: A total of 502 patients underwent Appendectomy at King Salman Armed Forces Hospital from 1/1/2012 till 31/12/2015. Of these, 203 were male (40.4%) and 299 were female (59.6%). The mean age was 18 years. Alvarado Score more than 7 in 93% of patients diagnosed with appendicitis. Comorbidities included diabetes 21 (5.56%) and hypertension 7 (1.39%). The mean Body Mass Index (BMI) was 20 kg/m2. 328 patients (65.3%) underwent Open Appendectomy (OA). None of Laproscopic appendectomy(LA) had a conversion. The mean operative time was 76 minutes (44 minutes and 50 minutes for OA and LA, respectively). Mean hospital stay in OA 2 days and one day LA. Eight cases (1.6%) developed seroma (6 cases in OA and 2 cases in LA with rates of 1.2% and 0.4% respectively). Nine patients (1.6%) had wound infection, 8 in OA and one in LA with rate of 1.5% and 0.2% respectively). Four patients (0.8%) develop the hematoma (3 cases in OA and one case in LA with rates of 0.6% and 0.2% respectively). Seven cases of reported appendectomy develop the pelvic abscess (1.4%) (5 cases in OA and 2 cases in LA with rates of 1% and 0.4% respectively). Conclusion: Alvarado Score carries high significance in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Laparoscopic appendectomy has improved diagnostic accuracy along with advantages in terms of fewer seroma, hematoma, wound infections, faster recovery, and earlier retention to normal activity but longer operative time.

腹腔镜切除妊娠期阑尾的疗效分析

目的 比较腹腔镜手术和开腹手术治疗妊娠期急性阑尾炎的优势和安全性。方法 回顾性分析2004年11月-2023年4月该院收治的22例早期妊娠、中期妊娠和晚期妊娠急性阑尾炎患者的临床资料。按不同手术方式分为腹腔镜组(n=9)和开腹组(n=13),比较两组患者感染指标和胎儿结局影响指标等。结果 两组患者住院时间、术中出血量、引流管放置率、术后C反应蛋白、降钙素原、抗生素使用时间、切口感染率、腹腔感染率、保胎治疗时间、病理学表现、早产率、分娩方式和胎儿存活率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P> 0.05);腹腔镜组手术时间长于开腹组,术后镇痛剂使用时间、首次进食时间和肛门排气时间短于开腹组,术后白细胞计数低于开腹组,差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05),两组患者麻醉方式比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论 腹腔镜手术治疗妊娠期急性阑尾炎,安全可行,与开腹手术相比,具有切口小、切口美观、肠道功能恢复快、进食早、感染少、母胎结局好和胎儿安全性高等优点。

腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎患者的临床效果

目的探究腹腔镜手术应用于急性阑尾炎治疗中的效果。方法随机选取2020年8月—2023年11月聊城市人民医院收治的80例急性阑尾炎患者作为研究对象,根据不同的手术方法将所有患者分为参照组(传统开腹手术治疗)和分析组(腹腔镜手术治疗),每组40例。对比两组患者的临床治疗效果、围术期主要指标及并发症发生率。结果分析组治疗总有效率为95.00%(38/40),高于参照组的80.00%(32/40),差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.114,P<0.05)。两组手术持续时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。分析组的术后下床时间、术后首次排气时间、住院时间短于参照组,术中出血量低于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。分析组的并发症总发生率低于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论急性阑尾炎治疗中,腹腔镜手术治疗有效率更高,术后恢复速度更快,且并发症发生率更低。

急性阑尾炎腹腔镜手术患儿遵医行为现状及影响因素分析

目的 探讨急性阑尾炎(acute appendicitis, AA)腹腔镜手术患儿遵医行为现状及影响因素。方法 选取2021年1月-2023年9月在南京医科大学附属儿童医院行AA腹腔镜手术的763例患儿及家长为研究对象。采用一般情况调查表、遵医行为量表、社会支持评定量表(Social Support Rating Scale, SSRS)对患儿及家长进行调查,根据患儿遵医行为量表评分,将患儿分为遵医行为良好组和遵医行为不良组,采用单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析影响患儿遵医行为的因素。结果 研究样本共有763例患儿及家长,实际调查有效例数为680例;680例患儿中,有197例遵医行为良好,483例遵医行为不良,不良率为71.03%;患儿遵医行为中,合理饮食评分最高,自我管理评分最低。两组患者的患儿年龄、家长年龄、文化程度、人均月收入、职业状态、婚姻状态、SSRS评分比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。患儿年龄小、家长年轻、家长文化程度低、SSRS评分<41.73分是影响患儿遵医行为的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。结论 AA腹腔镜手术患儿遵医行为普遍较差,其独立危险因素有患儿年龄小、家长年轻、家长文化程度低、SSRS评分低,对以上因素进行干预,有助于改善患儿遵医行为。

单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜在治疗儿童急性阑尾炎中的疗效对比研究

目的:比较单孔腹腔镜与传统三孔腹腔镜手术治疗儿童急性阑尾炎的效果。方法:回顾性分析2022年1—9月于南通大学附属医院小儿外科收治的急性阑尾炎患儿的临床资料,根据手术方法分为传统多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(conventional three-incision laparoscopic appendectomy,CLA)组(30例)和单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy,SILA)组(30例),对两组患儿的术前一般资料、术后恢复情况及随访结果进行比较。结果:两组患儿在性别、年龄、BMI、WBC计数、CRP等术前一般资料,术后疼痛评分、住院时间、并发症发生率及住院总费用等方面,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);SILA组手术时长较CLA组略高,但差异无统计学意义;SILA孔组的术后外观满意度明显优于CLA组(P<0.05)。结论:SILA与CLA临床疗效等同,在外观满意度上更具优势,是治疗儿童急性阑尾炎更为理想的手术方法。

ERAT与LA治疗成人急性无并发症性阑尾炎疗效及安全性的Meta分析

目的 比较内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗术(ERAT)和腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)治疗成人急性无并发症性阑尾炎的临床疗效及安全性差异。方法 检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Embase、中国生物医学文献数据库(SinoMed)、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库和中国科学期刊数据库自建立之日起至2022年12月1日采用ERAT与LA治疗成人急性无并发症性阑尾炎的随机对照研究、回顾性研究和前瞻性研究。采用RevMan5.3软件对最终统计的数据进行Meta分析。采用统计量I2评估研究的异质性。通过固定效应或随机效应模型计算95%置信区间(CI)的优势比(OR)、加权平均差(WMD)。结果 ERAT组的手术时间(WMD=-19.46,95%CI:-27.36~-11.55,P<0.001)、术后体温恢复正常时间(WMD=-0.92,95%CI:-1.13~-0.71,P<0.001)、白细胞计数降至正常时间(WMD=-1.79,95%CI:-2.55~-1.02,P<0.001)、术后持续卧床时间(WMD=-1.77,95%CI:-2.34~-1.20,P<0.001)、术后住院时间(WMD=-2.77,95%CI:-3.63~-1.91,P<0.001)均短于LA组,且并发症(OR=0.26,95%CI:0.12~0.54;P=0.000 3)发生率更低。结论 相较于LA,ERAT治疗成人急性无并发症性阑尾炎更具优势。不仅减少了患者的痛苦,节约了医疗资源,还保留了阑尾的生物学功能,具有较大的临床推广及应用价值。

腹腔镜下经脐单部位阑尾切除术治疗小儿阑尾炎的效果及对炎症因子的影响

目的:探究腹腔镜下经脐单部位阑尾切除术治疗小儿阑尾炎的效果及对炎症因子的影响。方法:回顾性分析2022年3月至2023年6月期间我院就诊的阑尾炎患儿的临床资料,从接受腹腔镜下经脐单部位阑尾切除术的患儿中采用随机数字表法随机抽取55例纳入观察组,从接受采取传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗的患儿中采用随机数字表法随机抽取50例纳入对照组。比较两组患儿的手术相关指标、术后恢复情况和术后并发症发生情况。并比较术前和术后5d的阑尾炎症状缓解情况[阑尾炎炎症反应(appendicitis inflammatory response,AIR)评分、视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分],比较术前、术后48h和术后5d的炎症因子水平。结果:观察组患儿的手术时间、术中出血量、术后首次排气时间、体温恢复正常时间、下床活动时间、住院时间、术后并发症发生率均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后5d,两组患儿的AIR评分和VAS评分较术前降低,且观察组降低幅度大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。重复测量方差分析显示两组患者术后的时点效应、组间效应及时点和组间的交互效应均可影响CRP、PCT、WBC水平的变化(P<0.05),且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜下经脐单部位阑尾切除术治疗小儿阑尾炎具有积极效果,减少术后并发症,降低炎症因子水平,有助于患儿快速恢复。

不同气腹压下的腹腔镜阑尾切除术对急性阑尾炎患儿应激反应、胃肠功能的影响

目的探讨急性阑尾炎患儿给予不同气腹压下的腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)对应激反应、胃肠功能的影响。方法选取2020年7月至2022年2月在九江市妇幼保健院接受LA治疗的90例急性阑尾炎患儿作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分成A组(30例)、B组(30例)、C组(30例),A组术中二氧化碳(CO_(2))气腹压维持在8.0~9.0 mmHg,B组维持在>9.0~10.0 mmHg,C组维持在>10.0~11.0 mmHg,比较三组术野清晰度、应激反应及胃肠功能、局部疼痛。结果B组患儿的术野清晰度总优良率高于A组、C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.017);A组、C组患儿术野清晰度总优良率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.017)。三组患儿T_(0)时的促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)、皮质醇(Cor)水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);三组患儿T_(1)、T_(2)时的ACTH、Cor水平均高于本组T_(0)时,T_(2)时的ACTH、Cor水平均低于本组T_(1)时,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);但B组T_(1)、T_(2)时的ACTH、Cor水平均低于A组、C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组、C组T_(1)、T_(2)时的ACTH、Cor水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。B组患儿的肠鸣音恢复时间、肛门首次排气、排便时间均短于A组、C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组、C组患儿肠鸣音恢复时间、肛门首次排气、排便时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。B组患儿局部疼痛评估总优良率高于A组、C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.017);A组、C组患儿局部疼痛评估总优良率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.017)。结论急性阑尾炎患儿给予>9.0~10.0 mmHg气腹压下的LA,能够改善术野清晰度,促使胃肠功能恢复,对应激反应影响更小,局部疼痛感轻。

腹腔镜下阑尾切除术对急性阑尾炎患者术后并发症、炎性指标及康复效果分析

目的探讨腹腔镜下阑尾切除术对急性阑尾炎患者术后并发症、炎性指标及康复效果的影响。方法回顾性分析2023年1月至2024年1月本院阑尾切除手术的急性阑尾炎病例,按照手术方式不同,将实施开腹阑尾切除术的急性阑尾炎50例为对照组,实施腹腔镜下阑尾切除术的急性阑尾炎50例为研究组。关于两组病例各项临床指标作比较。结果研究组的手术耗时较对照组更长,术中失血量及术后并发症总发生率较对照组更低(均P<0.05)。研究组术后恢复肛门排气、恢复排便、初次离床活动的时间及住院天数均较对照组更短(均P<0.05)。研究组术后第1、2、3天的疼痛感评分均低于对照组(均P<0.05)。在术后1 d,研究组病例血清C反应蛋白和白细胞介素6水平均比对照组低(均P<0.05)。结论在急性阑尾炎患者进行手术治疗时,相比于应用开腹阑尾切除术,腹腔镜下阑尾切除术能够减少手术中血液的丢失量,减轻术后炎症反应和疼痛感,降低在手术后发生并发症的风险,从而促使手术后康复速度加快。

急性阑尾炎术后并发粘连性肠梗阻的相关影响因素

目的:探讨急性阑尾炎患者腹腔镜手术后并发粘连性肠梗阻(AIO)的相关影响因素。方法:回顾性分析医院收治的102例急性阑尾炎患者的临床资料,根据术后是否并发AIO分为发生AIO组和未发生AIO组,并收集患者性别、年龄、病程、体质指数、病理类型等临床资料,使用单因素、多因素分析影响急性阑尾炎患者腹腔镜手术后并发AIO的相关因素。结果:单因素分析显示,性别、年龄、体质指数、白细胞计数、留置腹腔引流管与急性阑尾炎患者术后并发AIO无关,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);病程、病理类型、腹腔残余感染与急性阑尾炎患者术后并发AIO有关,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);Logistic回归分析显示:病程(>24h)、病理类型(坏疽伴穿孔)、腹腔残余感染(有)均是急性阑尾炎患者术后发生AIO的高危因素(P<0.05)。结论:急性阑尾炎患者腹腔镜手术后并发AIO风险较高,与病程长、坏疽伴穿孔、腹腔内残余感染均相关,临床需针对该类因素采取有效干预措施。

临床路径护理干预对急性阑尾炎手术患者护理质量的影响分析

目的分析在急性阑尾炎手术患者中开展临床路径护理干预对其护理质量的影响。方法前瞻性随机选取2021年11月—2023年11月费县人民医院收治的80例急性阑尾炎患者为研究对象,经随机数表法分为观察组与对照组,每组40例。观察组实施临床路径护理干预,对照组给予常规护理干预,分析两组的护理效果。结果观察组患者对健康知识掌握度以及护理治疗依从性高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。观察组患者焦虑程度以及术后疼痛程度均轻于对照组,术后下床活动所用时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。观察组护理不良事件发生率为2.50%,明显低于对照组的20.00%,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=6.134,P<0.05)。结论在急性阑尾炎手术患者中采用临床路径护理干预,可以提高临床护理的质量,提高患者在治疗期间的身心舒适度与配合度,加快术后恢复速度。