目的探讨感染性休克患者血清肽酰基精氨酸脱亚胺酶2(peptidylarginine deiminase type 2,PAD2)表达水平与急性生理学和慢性健康状况评价Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ,APACHEⅡ)评分的相关性。方法选取内江市第...目的探讨感染性休克患者血清肽酰基精氨酸脱亚胺酶2(peptidylarginine deiminase type 2,PAD2)表达水平与急性生理学和慢性健康状况评价Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ,APACHEⅡ)评分的相关性。方法选取内江市第一人民医院2020年6月~2022年6月收治的103例感染性休克患者作为研究组,采用APACHEⅡ评分根据患者病情严重程度将其分为轻度组(n=9)、中度组(n=51)和重度组(n=13),另外选取103例同期在该院体检且一般资料与研究组患者相匹配的健康者作为对照组。采用酶联免疫吸附法测定感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平;采用Spearman法分析感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平与APACHEⅡ评分的相关性;采用Logistic回归分析影响感染性休克患者病情严重程度的相关因素;采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线分析血清PAD2对中重度感染性休克的诊断价值。结果研究组与对照组血肌酐(137.52±9.01μmol/L vs 112.22±8.67μmol/L)水平及血小板计数(74.58±5.19 vs 86.02±5.34)×109/L比较,差异具有统计学意义(t=20.535,15.591,均P<0.05);研究组患者血清PAD2表达水平(42.47±6.22 ng/ml)高于对照组(38.59±5.31 ng/ml),差异具有统计学意义(t=4.815,P<0.05);感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平和APACHEⅡ评分均随病情严重程度的增加而逐渐升高(F=3.777,176.582,均P<0.05);感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平与APACHEⅡ评分呈正相关(r=0.859,P<0.05);血肌酐(OR=1.927)、PAD2(OR=1.803)及APACHEⅡ评分(OR=1.657)均为发生中重度感染性休克的危险因素(均P<0.05),血小板计数(OR=0.781)则是发生中重度感染性休克的保护因素(P<0.05)。血清PAD2诊断中重度感染性休克的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)为0.880,敏感度、特异度分别为75.73%(95%CI:0.701~0.826)和90.29%(95%CI:0.851~0.935),对中重度感染性休克具有较高的诊断价值。结论血清PAD2表达水平与APACHEⅡ评分呈正相关,且对中重度感染性休克具有较好诊断价值。展开更多
BACKGROUND Laparotomy remains one of the commonest emergency surgical procedures.Early prognostic evaluation would aid in selecting the high-risk patients for an aggressive treatment.Awareness about risks could potent...BACKGROUND Laparotomy remains one of the commonest emergency surgical procedures.Early prognostic evaluation would aid in selecting the high-risk patients for an aggressive treatment.Awareness about risks could potentially contribute to the quality of perioperative care and optimum utilization of resources.Portsmouth modification of Physiological and operative severity for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM) and the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHE-Ⅱ) have been the most widely used scoring systems for emergency laparotomies.It is always better to have a single scoring system to predict outcomes and audit healthcare organizations.AIM To compare the ability of APACHE-II and P-POSSUM to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.METHODS All patients undergoing emergency laparotomy at the Tata Main Hospital,Jamshedpur between December 2013 and November 2014 were included in the study.In this observational study,P-POSSUM and APACHE-Ⅱ scoring were done,and the outcome analysis evaluated with mortality being the primary outcome.RESULTS For P-POSSUM,at a cut off value of 63 to predict mortality using receiver operating characteristics curve analysis,the area under the curve was 0.989;and for APACHE-Ⅱ,at the cut off value of 24,the area under the curve was 0.965.CONCLUSION Because the ability of APACHE-Ⅱ to predict mortality was similar to P-POSSUM and APACHE-Ⅱ does not need scoring for intra-operative findings and histopathology reports,APACHE-Ⅱ can be used pre-operatively to assess the risk in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.However,for audit purposes,either of the two scoring systems can be used.展开更多
目的探讨改良早期预警(modified early warning score,MEWS)评分、快速急诊内科(rapid emergency medicine score,REMS)评分、急性生理学及慢性健康状况Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluationsⅡ,APACHEⅡ)评分、简化急性...目的探讨改良早期预警(modified early warning score,MEWS)评分、快速急诊内科(rapid emergency medicine score,REMS)评分、急性生理学及慢性健康状况Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluationsⅡ,APACHEⅡ)评分、简化急性生理Ⅱ(simplified acute physiology socreⅡ,SAPSⅡ)评分在老年危重患者中的相关性及对预后评估的准确性。方法分析入选的150例老年危重患者4种评分情况,统计患者治疗后28天病死率,比较死亡组和生存组间各评分之间是否存在差异。并分析4种评分间的相关性及利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线探究4种评分对患者预后的评估能力。结果 4种评分在死亡组与存活组间差异具有统计学意义。4种评分间均互呈正相关关系。通过ROC曲线分析显示:4种评分对患者预后均具有一定评估能力。APACHEⅡ评分的评估准确性优于SAPSⅡ、REMS评分、MEWS评分。SAPSⅡ评分评估准确性同样优于REMS评分和MEWS评分。REMS评分和MEWS评分评估准确性相当。结论 4种评分系统对急诊老年患者预后均具有评估意义。急诊早期MEWS评分、REMS评分与ICU病房APACHEⅡ评分、SAPSⅡ评分间对患者预后评估具有一致性。急诊早期可行MEWS评分、REMS评分评估患者病情,对可能预后不良患者早期ICU病房进行分诊,进一步根据不同情况行APACHEⅡ评分和SAPSⅡ评分动态观察、综合评估,同时各评分系统间相互结合与补充,适时采取临床相关干预措施,调整诊疗方案,挽救患者生命。展开更多
文摘目的探讨感染性休克患者血清肽酰基精氨酸脱亚胺酶2(peptidylarginine deiminase type 2,PAD2)表达水平与急性生理学和慢性健康状况评价Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ,APACHEⅡ)评分的相关性。方法选取内江市第一人民医院2020年6月~2022年6月收治的103例感染性休克患者作为研究组,采用APACHEⅡ评分根据患者病情严重程度将其分为轻度组(n=9)、中度组(n=51)和重度组(n=13),另外选取103例同期在该院体检且一般资料与研究组患者相匹配的健康者作为对照组。采用酶联免疫吸附法测定感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平;采用Spearman法分析感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平与APACHEⅡ评分的相关性;采用Logistic回归分析影响感染性休克患者病情严重程度的相关因素;采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线分析血清PAD2对中重度感染性休克的诊断价值。结果研究组与对照组血肌酐(137.52±9.01μmol/L vs 112.22±8.67μmol/L)水平及血小板计数(74.58±5.19 vs 86.02±5.34)×109/L比较,差异具有统计学意义(t=20.535,15.591,均P<0.05);研究组患者血清PAD2表达水平(42.47±6.22 ng/ml)高于对照组(38.59±5.31 ng/ml),差异具有统计学意义(t=4.815,P<0.05);感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平和APACHEⅡ评分均随病情严重程度的增加而逐渐升高(F=3.777,176.582,均P<0.05);感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平与APACHEⅡ评分呈正相关(r=0.859,P<0.05);血肌酐(OR=1.927)、PAD2(OR=1.803)及APACHEⅡ评分(OR=1.657)均为发生中重度感染性休克的危险因素(均P<0.05),血小板计数(OR=0.781)则是发生中重度感染性休克的保护因素(P<0.05)。血清PAD2诊断中重度感染性休克的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)为0.880,敏感度、特异度分别为75.73%(95%CI:0.701~0.826)和90.29%(95%CI:0.851~0.935),对中重度感染性休克具有较高的诊断价值。结论血清PAD2表达水平与APACHEⅡ评分呈正相关,且对中重度感染性休克具有较好诊断价值。
文摘BACKGROUND Laparotomy remains one of the commonest emergency surgical procedures.Early prognostic evaluation would aid in selecting the high-risk patients for an aggressive treatment.Awareness about risks could potentially contribute to the quality of perioperative care and optimum utilization of resources.Portsmouth modification of Physiological and operative severity for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM) and the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHE-Ⅱ) have been the most widely used scoring systems for emergency laparotomies.It is always better to have a single scoring system to predict outcomes and audit healthcare organizations.AIM To compare the ability of APACHE-II and P-POSSUM to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.METHODS All patients undergoing emergency laparotomy at the Tata Main Hospital,Jamshedpur between December 2013 and November 2014 were included in the study.In this observational study,P-POSSUM and APACHE-Ⅱ scoring were done,and the outcome analysis evaluated with mortality being the primary outcome.RESULTS For P-POSSUM,at a cut off value of 63 to predict mortality using receiver operating characteristics curve analysis,the area under the curve was 0.989;and for APACHE-Ⅱ,at the cut off value of 24,the area under the curve was 0.965.CONCLUSION Because the ability of APACHE-Ⅱ to predict mortality was similar to P-POSSUM and APACHE-Ⅱ does not need scoring for intra-operative findings and histopathology reports,APACHE-Ⅱ can be used pre-operatively to assess the risk in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.However,for audit purposes,either of the two scoring systems can be used.
文摘目的探讨改良早期预警(modified early warning score,MEWS)评分、快速急诊内科(rapid emergency medicine score,REMS)评分、急性生理学及慢性健康状况Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluationsⅡ,APACHEⅡ)评分、简化急性生理Ⅱ(simplified acute physiology socreⅡ,SAPSⅡ)评分在老年危重患者中的相关性及对预后评估的准确性。方法分析入选的150例老年危重患者4种评分情况,统计患者治疗后28天病死率,比较死亡组和生存组间各评分之间是否存在差异。并分析4种评分间的相关性及利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线探究4种评分对患者预后的评估能力。结果 4种评分在死亡组与存活组间差异具有统计学意义。4种评分间均互呈正相关关系。通过ROC曲线分析显示:4种评分对患者预后均具有一定评估能力。APACHEⅡ评分的评估准确性优于SAPSⅡ、REMS评分、MEWS评分。SAPSⅡ评分评估准确性同样优于REMS评分和MEWS评分。REMS评分和MEWS评分评估准确性相当。结论 4种评分系统对急诊老年患者预后均具有评估意义。急诊早期MEWS评分、REMS评分与ICU病房APACHEⅡ评分、SAPSⅡ评分间对患者预后评估具有一致性。急诊早期可行MEWS评分、REMS评分评估患者病情,对可能预后不良患者早期ICU病房进行分诊,进一步根据不同情况行APACHEⅡ评分和SAPSⅡ评分动态观察、综合评估,同时各评分系统间相互结合与补充,适时采取临床相关干预措施,调整诊疗方案,挽救患者生命。
