TRIANGLE operation,combined with adequate adjuvant chemotherapy,can improve the prognosis of pancreatic head cancer:A retrospective study

BACKGROUND The TRIANGLE operation involves the removal of all tissues within the triangle bounded by the portal vein-superior mesenteric vein,celiac axis-common hepatic artery,and superior mesenteric artery to improve patient prognosis.Although previously promising in patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC),data are limited regarding the long-term oncological outcomes of the TRIANGLE operation among resectable PDAC patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD).AIM To evaluate the safety of the TRIANGLE operation during PD and the prognosis in patients with resectable PDAC.METHODS This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent PD for pancreatic head cancer between January 2017 and April 2023,with or without the TRIANGLE operation.Patients were divided into the PD_(TRIANGLE)and PD_(non-TRIANGLE)groups.Surgical and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups.Adequate adjuvant chemotherapy was defined as adjuvant chemotherapy≥6 months.RESULTS The PD_(TRIANGLE)and PD_(non-TRIANGLE) groups included 52 and 55 patients,respectively.There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics or perioperative indexes between the two groups.Furthermore,the recurrence rate was lower in the PD_(TRIANGLE) group than in the PD_(non-TRIANGLE) group(48.1%vs 81.8%,P<0.001),and the local recurrence rate of PDAC decreased from 37.8%to 16.0%.Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that PD_(TRIANGLE)(HR=0.424;95%CI:0.256-0.702;P=0.001),adequate adjuvant chemotherapy≥6 months(HR=0.370;95%CI:0.222-0.618;P<0.001)and margin status(HR=2.255;95%CI:1.252-4.064;P=0.007)were found to be independent factors for the recurrence rate.CONCLUSION The TRIANGLE operation is safe for PDAC patients undergoing PD.Moreover,it reduces the local recurrence rate of PDAC and may improve survival in patients who receive adequate adjuvant chemotherapy.

Optimal extent of lymphadenectomy improves prognosis and guides adjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal cancer: A propensity scorematched analysis

BACKGROUND The optimal extent of lymphadenectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC)patients remained debatable.AIM To explore the ideal number of cleared lymph nodes in ESCC patients undergoing upfront surgery.METHODS In this retrospective,propensity score-matched study,we included 1042 ESCC patients who underwent esophagectomy from November 2008 and October 2019.Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy were excluded.We collected pa-tients’clinicopathological features and information regarding lymph nodes,in-cluding the total number of resected lymph nodes(NRLN),and pathologically diagnosed positive lymph nodes(RPLN).SPSS and R software were used for statistical analysis.RESULTS Among the included 1042 patients,two cohorts:≤21(n=664)and>21 NRLN(n=378)were identified.The final prognostic model included four variables:T stage,N,venous thrombus,and the number of removed lymph nodes.Among them,NRLN>21 was determined as an independent prognosticator after surgery for esophageal cancer(hazards regression=0.66,95%confidence interval:0.50-0.87,P=0.004).A nomogram was created based on the regression coefficients of the variables in the final model.In the training cohort,the predictive model dis-played an uncorrected five-year overall survival C-index of 0.659,with a bootstrap-corrected C-index of 0.654.In the subgroup analysis,adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial in the subgroup with NRLN>21 and RPLN≤0.16 and NRLN≤21 and RPLN>0.16.CONCLUSION NRLN>21 was an independent prognostic factor after ESCC surgery.The combination of NRLN and RPLN may provide a reference for adjuvant chemotherapy use in potential beneficiaries.

Predictors of disease recurrence after radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIb-IIIa squamous cell lung cancer:A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND Lung cancer(LC)is a global medical,social and economic problem and is one of the most common cancers and the leading cause of mortality from malignant neoplasms.LC is characterized by an aggressive course,and in the presence of disease recurrence risk factors,patients,even at an early stage,may be indicated for adjuvant therapy to improve survival.However,combined treatment does not always guarantee a favorable prognosis.In this regard,establishing predictors of LC recurrence is highly important both for determining the optimal treatment plan for the patients and for evaluating its effectiveness.AIM To establish predictors of disease recurrence after radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIb-IIIa lung squamous cell carcinoma(LSCC).METHODS A retrospective case-control cohort study included 69 patients with LSCC who underwent radical surgery at the Orenburg Regional Clinical Oncology Center from 2009 to 2018.Postoperatively,all patients received adjuvant chemotherapy.Histological samples of the resected lung were stained with Mayer's hematoxylin and eosin and examined under a light microscope.Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictors associated with the risk of disease recurrence.Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to discriminate between patients with a high risk of disease recurrence and those with a low risk of disease recurrence.Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.The log-rank test was used to compare survival curves between patient subgroups.Differences were considered to be significant at P<0.05.RESULTS The following predictors of a high risk of disease recurrence in patients with stage IIb-IIa LSCC were established:a low degree of tumor differentiation[odds ratio(OR)=7.94,95%CI=1.08-135.81,P=0.049];metastases in regional lymph nodes(OR=5.67,95%CI=1.09-36.54,P=0.048);the presence of loose,fine-fiber connective tissue in the tumor stroma(OR=21.70,95%CI=4.27-110.38,P=0.0002);and fragmentation of the tumor solid component(OR=2.53,95%CI=1.01-12.23,P=0.049).The area under the curve of the predictive model was 0.846(95%CI=0.73-0.96,P<0.0001).The sensitivity,accuracy and specificity of the method were 91.8%,86.9%and 75.0%,respectively.In the group of patients with a low risk of LSCC recurrence,the 1-,2-and 5-year disease-free survival(DFS)rates were 84.2%,84.2%and 75.8%,respectively,while in the group with a high risk of LSCC recurrence the DFS rates were 71.7%,40.1%and 8.2%,respectively(P<0.00001).Accordingly,in the first group of patients,the 1-,2-and 5-year overall survival(OS)rates were 94.7%,82.5%and 82.5%,respectively,while in the second group of patients,the OS rates were 89.8%,80.1%and 10.3%,respectively(P<0.00001).CONCLUSION The developed method allows us to identify a group of patients at high risk of disease recurrence and to adjust to ongoing treatment.

Current Status and Research Progress of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumours worldwide, with a high degree of malignancy and a poor prognosis. While early gastric cancer can be cured by surgical treatment, locally advanced gastric cancer requires neoadjuvant therapy to shrink the tumour, suppress potential metastases, achieve down-staging, and provide patients with the opportunity for radical surgery to prolong their survival. This article reviews the current status and progress of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer.

Role of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence and survival in patients with resected ampulla of Vater carcinoma

BACKGROUND Owing to rarity of disease and lack of prospective studies, data supporting the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in ampulla of Vater(AoV) carcinoma is limited.AIM To evaluate whether adjuvant chemotherapy cases for AoV carcinoma had better disease-free survival(DFS) rates than cases of observation following curative surgery.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the association between adjuvant chemotherapy and DFS and overall survival(OS) in patients with stage IB-Ⅲ AoV carcinoma who underwent curative surgical resection. Fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy was administered after surgery at the discretion of the physician. Adjusted multivariate regression models were used to evaluate the association between adjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcomes.RESULTS Of the total 104 patients who underwent curative surgery, 52 received adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis revealed that higher histologic grade [hazard ratio(HR) = 2.24, P = 0.046], advanced tumor stage(HR = 1.85, P = 0.030), and vascular invasion(HR = 2.14, P = 0.010) were associated with shorter DFS. Adjuvant chemotherapy improved DFS compared to the observation group(HR =0.50, P = 0.015) and tended to be associated with a longer OS, although the difference was not statistically significant(HR = 0.58, P = 0.098).CONCLUSION Among patients with resected AoV carcinoma, the adjuvant chemotherapy group was not associated with a significant survival benefit compared to the observation group. However, on multivariate analysis adjusting for prognostic factors, adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery was an independent prognostic factor for DFS in patients with resected AoV carcinoma. Further studies are needed to investigate the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy according to histologic phenotype.

Effect of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapyon the prognosis of patients with ypT0-3N0 rectalcancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) on theprognosis of patients with ypT0-3N0 rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Methods The study participants were 110 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Thirty-fourpatients did not receive postoperative AC treatment, and the other 76 patients received postoperative ACtreatment. The differences in the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between thetwo groups were compared.Results Age was an important determinant of the patients’ decision to undergo postoperative treatment.Patients who did not receive AC treatment were significantly older than those who received AC treatment(P < 0.05). The tumor location (distance above anal margin) in the AC group was significantly larger thanthat in the non-AC group (P < 0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the 5-year DFS andOS between the two groups. Postoperative AC did not significantly improve the prognosis of patients withrectal cancer. Age, tumor differentiation, and the number of resected lymph nodes were independent factorsaffecting the OS of patients (P < 0.05). Older patients, patients with lower degree of tumor differentiation,and patients with <12 resected lymph nodes showed worse prognosis (P < 0.05).Conclusion Patients with rectal cancer whose ypT0-3N0 stage is reduced after neoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy, especially those without adverse prognostic factors, do not need AC after surgery.

Oxaliplatin plus S-1 or capecitabine as neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer with D2lymphadenectomy: 5-year follow-up results of a phase II-III randomized trial

Objective： To compare the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy （NACT） with adjuvant chemotherapy （ACT） using oxaliplatin plus S-1 （sex） or capecitabine （CapeOX） on gastric cancer patients with D2 lymphadenectomy. Methods： This was a two-by-two factorial randomized phase Ⅱ-Ⅲ trial, and registered on ISRCTN registry （No. ISRCTN12206108）. Locally advanced gastric cancer patients were randomized to neoadjuvant sex, neoadjuvant CapeOX, adjuvant sex, or adjuvant CapeOX arms. Primary analysis was performed on an intention- to-treat （ITT） basis using overall survival （OS） as primary endpoint. Results： This trial started in September 2011 and closed in December 2012 with 100 patients enrolled. Treatment completion rate was 56%, 52%, 38% and 30% in the four arms, respectively. NACT group had fewer dropouts due to unacceptable toxicity （P=0.042）. Surgical complication rate did not differ by the four groups （P=0.986）. No survival signifcant difference was found comparing NACT with ACT （P=0.664; 5-year-OS： 70% vs. 74% respectively）, nor between the sex and CapeOX groups （P=0.252; 5-year-OS： 78% vs. 66% respectively）. Subgroup analysis showed sex significantly improved survival in patents with diffuse type （P=0.048）. Conclusions： No significant survival difference was found between NACT and ACT. sex and CapeOX had good safety and efficacy as neoadjuvant regimens. Diffuse type patients may survive longer due to sex.

Is there an optimal time to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy to predict benefit of survival in non-small cell lung cancer?

Objective: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after curative resection is known to improve the survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, few studies have reported the correlation between the time to initiation of AC (TTAC) and survival in NSCLC patients. Methods: The clinical data of 925 NSCLC patients who received curative resection and post-operative AC at the Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between 2003 and 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. TTAC was measured from the date of surgery to the initiation of AC. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the duration from surgery to the time of tumor recurrence or last follow-up evaluation. The optimal cut-off value of TTAC was determined by maximally selected log-rank statistics. The DFS curve was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify risk factors independently associated with DFS. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for survival analysis using the match data. Results: The optimal discriminating cut-off value of TTAC was set at d 35 after curative resection based on which the patients were assigned into two groups: group A (<= 35 d) and group B (> 35 d). There was no significant difference in the DFS between the two groups (P=0.246), indicating that the TTAC is not an independent prognostic factor for DFS. A further comparison continued to show no significant difference in the DFS among 258 PSM pairs (P=0.283). Conclusions: There was no significant correlation between the TTAC and DFS in NSCLC patients. Studies with larger samples are needed to further verify this conclusion.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin in lymph node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Objective： No standard postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy has ever been established in node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma （ESCC）. This is a study to explore the effect of postoperative paelitaxel （PTX） and cisplatin （DDP） in lymph node-positive, completely resected thoracic ESCC patients. Methods： We conducted a prospective phase II trial. Patients had pathologically node-positive thoracic ESCC with negative margins. Outcomes of disease-free survival （DFS） and overall survival （OS） were compared with a matched historical control cohort. The postoperative chemotherapy regimen consisted of 4 to 6 cycles of PTX 150 mg/m2 administered intravenously on d 1 followed by DDP 50 mg/m2 on d 2 every 14 d. Results： Forty-three patients were accrued from December 2007 to May 2012 at Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences for adjuvant chemotherapy. The historical control group consisted of 80 patients who received complete resection but no adjuvant chemotherapy during the same period of time. Of the 43 patients with adjuvant chemotherapy, 37 （86.0%） patients completed 4 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy. The 3-year DFS rates were 56.3% in the adjuvant group and 34.6% in the control group （P=0.006）. The 3-year OS rates were 55.0% in the adjuvant group and 37.5% in the control group （P=0.013）. Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative chemotherapy was the significant predictor for improved OS （P=0.005）. Conclusions： Biweekly adjuvant PTX and DDP might improve 3-year DFS and OS in lymph node-positive, curatively resected thoracic ESCC patients. These conclusions warrant further study in randomized phase III clinical trials.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage cervical cancer

The aim of this review is to address the current status of adjuvant chemotherapy alone in early-stage cervical cancer treatments in the literature. At present, the therapeutic effect of adjuvant chemotherapy alone after radical surgery （RS） has not yet been established, and radiation therapy （RT） or concurrent chemoradiotherapy （CCRT） is recommended as the standard adjuvant therapy after RS for early-stage cervical cancer in various guidelines. The main purpose of adjuvant therapy after RS, however, should be to reduce extrapelvic recurrence rather than local recurrence, although adjuvant RT or CCRT has survival benefits for patients with intermediate- or high-risk factors for recurrence. Moreover, several studies reported that adjuvant therapies including RT were associated with a higher incidence of complications, such as lymphedema, bowel obstruction and urinary disturbance, and a lower grade of long-term quality of life （QOL） or sexual functioning than adjuvant chemotherapy alone. The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy alone for early-stage cervical cancer with intermediate- or high-risk factors for recurrence were not fully investigated in prospective studies, but several retrospective studies suggest that the adjuvant effects of chemotherapy alone are at least similar to that of RT or CCRT in terms of recurrence rate, disease-free survival, or overall survival （OS） with lower incidence of complications. Whereas cisplatin based combination regimens were used in these studies, paclitaxel/cisplatin （TP） regimen, which is currently recognized as a standard chemotherapy regimen for patients with metastatic, recurrent or persistent cervical cancer by Gynecologic Oncology Group （GOG）, had also survival benefit as an adjuvant therapy. Therefore, it may be worth considering a prospective randomized controlled trial （RCT） of adjuvant chemotherapy alone using TP regimen versus adjuvant RT as an alternative adjuvant therapy. Because early-stage cervical cancer is a curable condition, it is necessary that the therapeutic strategies should be improved with considering adverse events and QOL for long-term survivors.

Implications of clinical research on adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: Where to go next?

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy(ACT)confers superior gastric cancer(GC)survival in the Eastern cohort.However,is the current standard of ACT already excessive,or is it still necessary to increase its intensity for specific subgroups?Tailored ACT strategies for GC depend on gradual exploration by clinical trials in selected patients.Thus,understanding the implications of previous and current research can help us respond wisely and design effective,rational trials,save medical resources and make better decisions in clinical practice.After reviewing and analyzing studies on ACT for GC patients undergoing curative resection,we found that research strategies for conducting"addition""ACT for specific stages of the disease have achieved great progress in making ACT more tailored and personalized in consideration of pathology stages.Furthermore,trials indicate that"addition"ACT strategies for GC patient subgroups based on histological characteristics might be helpful to move toward a more specific tailored and personalized management approach.Designing ACT research focused on different node statuses should also be conducted according to the biological specificity of lymph node(LN)metastasis.Therefore,future trials designed to determine tailored treatment based on histological and biological characteristics for specific subgroups are urgently needed and conducted as the theme of the 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology(ASCO):Caring for Every Patient,Learning from Every Patient.

Dose-dense paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs.epirubicin and cyclophosphamide with paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk triple-negative breast cancer

Objective:The objective of this open-label,randomized study was to compare dose-dense paclitaxel plus carboplatin(PCdd)with dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel(ECdd-P)as an adjuvant chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer(TNBC).Methods:We included Chinese patients with high recurrence risk TNBC who underwent primary breast cancer surgery.They were randomly assigned to receive PCdd[paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 on d 1 and carboplatin,the area under the curve,(AUC)=3 on d 2]or ECdd-P(epirubicin 80 mg/m2 divided in 2 d and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 on d 1 for 4 cycles followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on d 1 for 4 cycles)every 2 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(G-CSF)support.The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival(DFS);the secondary endpoints were overall survival(OS)and safety.Results:The intent-to-treat population included 143 patients(70 in the PCdd arm and 73 in the ECdd-P arm).Compared with the ECdd-P arm,the PCdd arm had significantly higher 3-year DFS[93.9%vs.79.1%;hazard ratio(HR)=0.310;95%confidence interval(95%CI),0.137-0.704;log-rank,P=0.005]and OS(98.5%vs.92.9%;HR=0.142;95%CI,0.060-0.825;log-rank,P=0.028).Worse neutropenia(grade 3/4)was found in the ECdd-P than the PCdd arm(47.9%V5.21.4%,P=0.001).Conclusions:PCdd was superior to ECdd-P as an adjuvant chemotherapy for early TNBC with respect to improving the 3-year DFS and OS.PCdd also yielded lower hematological toxicity.Thus,PCdd might be a preferred regimen for early TNBC patients with a high recurrence risk.

Adjuvant chemotherapy after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND： Hepatocellular carcinoma （HCC） is one of the most common tumors worldwide and liver transplanta- tion （LT） is considered as the best therapeutic option for patients with HCC combined with cirrhosis. However, tumor recurrence after LT for HCC remains the major obstacle for long-term survival. The present study was to evaluate the effi- cacy and necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HCC who had undergone LT.

Comparison of efficacy between adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation therapy for pancreatic cancer: AJCC stage-based approach

BACKGROUND The adjuvant treatment for patients with resected pancreatic cancer(PC)is not yet standardized.Because the prognosis differs according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC)stage,a tailored approach to establish more aggressive treatment plans in high-risk patients is necessary.However,studies comparing the efficacy of adjuvant treatment modalities according to the AJCC stage are largely lacking.AIM To compare the efficacy of chemotherapy and chemoradiation therapy according to AJCC 8th staging system in patients with PC who underwent surgical resection.METHODS A total of 335 patients who underwent surgical resection and adjuvant treatment for PC were included.Patients were divided into three groups:Chemoradiation therapy(CRT)group,systemic chemotherapy(SCT)group and combined treatment of chemoradiation plus chemotherapy therapy(CRT-SCT)group.The primary outcomes were differences in overall survival(OS)between the three groups.The secondary outcomes were differences in recurrence-free survival,recurrence pattern and adverse events between the three groups.RESULTS Patients received CRT(n=65),SCT(n=62)and CRT-SCT(n=208).Overall median OS was 33.3 mo(95%confidence interval(CI):27.4-38.6).In patients with stage I/II,the median OS was 27.0 mo(95%CI:2.06-89.6)in the CRT group,35.8 mo(95%CI:26.9-NA)in the SCT group and 38.6 mo(95%CI:33.3-55.7)in the CRT SCT group.Among them,there was no significant difference in OS between the three groups.In 59 patients with stage III,median OS in the SCT group[19.0 mo(95%CI:12.6-NA)]and the CRT-SCT group[23.4 mo(95%CI:22.0-44.4)]was significantly longer than that in the CRT group[17.7 mo(95%CI:6.8-NA);P=0.011 and P<0.001,respectively].There were no significant differences in incidence of locoregional and distant recurrences between the three groups(P=0.158 and P=0.205,respectively).Incidences of grade 3 or higher hematologic adverse events were higher in the SCT and CRT-SCT groups than in the CRT group.CONCLUSION SCT and CRT-SCT showed significantly longer OS and recurrence-free survival than CRT in patients with AJCC stage III,while there was no significant difference in OS between the CRT,SCT and CRT-SCT groups in patients with AJCC stage I/II.Different adjuvant therapy according to AJCC stage can be applied in patients with PC.

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy vs adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced Siewert type Ⅱ/Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of gastroesophageal junction after D2/R0 resection

BACKGROUND For Siewert type Ⅱ/Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of gastroesophageal junction(AGE), the efficacy of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy(CRT) after D2/R0 resection remains uncertain.AIM To determine whether CRT was superior to chemotherapy(CT) alone after D2/R0 resection for locally advanced Siewert type Ⅱ/Ⅲ AGE.METHODS We identified 316 locally advanced Siewert type Ⅱ/Ⅲ AGE patients who were treated with D2/R0 resection at National Cancer Center from 2011 to 2018.57 patients received adjuvant CRT and 259 patients received adjuvant CT.We followed patients for overall survival(OS), relapse-free survival, and recurrence pattern.RESULTS Five-year OS rates of the CRT group and the CT group for all patients were 66.7% and 41.9%(P = 0.010).Five-year OS rates of the CRT group and the CT group for Siewert type Ⅲ AGE patients were 65.7% and 43.9%(P = 0.006).Among the 195 patients whose recurrence information could be obtained, 18 cases(34.6%) and 61 cases(42.7%) were diagnosed as recurrence in the CRT group and CT group, respectively.The local and regional recurrence rates in the CRT group were lower than that in the CT group(22.2% vs 24.6%, 27.8% vs 39.3%).Multivariable cox regression analysis showed that vascular invasion, nerve invasion, and adjuvant CRT were important prognostic factors for Siewert type Ⅲ AGE.CONCLUSION For locally advanced Siewert type Ⅲ AGE, adjuvant CRT may prolong OS and reduce the regional recurrence rate.

Adjuvant chemotherapy may improve outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with metastasis of intrapulmonary lymph nodes after systematic dissection of N1 nodes

Objective: Survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy(AC) of patients with intrapulmonary lymph node(IPLN)metastasis(level 12-14) needs investigation.We evaluated the impact of AC on patients whose metastatic nodes were limited to intrapulmonary levels after systematic dissection of N1 nodes.Methods: First,155 consective cases of lung cancer confirmed as pathologic N1 were collected and evaluated.Patients received systematic dissection of N2 and N1 nodes.For patients with IPLN metastasis,survival outcomes were compared between those receiving AC and those not receiving AC.Results: In this group,112 cases(72.3%) had IPLN metastasis and 55 cases(35.5%) had N1 involvement limited to level 13-14 without further disease spread to higher levels.Patients with IPLN involvement had a better prognosis than that of patients with hilar-interlobar involvement.For the intrapulmonary N1 group(level 12-14-positive,level 10-11-negative or unknown,n=112),no survival benefit was found between the AC group and nonAC group [5-year overall survival(OS): 54.6±1.6 vs.50.4±2.4 months,P=0.177].However,76 of 112 cases for whom harvesting of level-10 and level-11 nodes was done did not show cancer involvement in pathology reports(level 12-14-positive,level 10-11 both negative),oncologic outcome was better for patients receiving AC than those not receiving AC in this subgroup(5-year OS: 57.3±1.5 vs.47.1±3.2 months,P=0.002).Conclusions: Oncologic outcome may be improved by AC for patients with involvement of N1 nodes limited to intrapulmonary levels after complete examination of N1 nodes.

A Prospective Randomized Study of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Completely Resected Stage III-N2 Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

To evaluate the effect of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on survival after complete resection of stage III-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer. Methods： From Jan. 1999 to Dec. 2003, one-hundred and fifty patients, who were diagnosed as stage III-N2 non-small cell lung cancer after operation, were randomly devided into chemotherapy group and control group. The former received four cycles of chemotherapy with NVB （25 mg/m^2, D1, D5）/paclitaxel （175 mg/m^2, D1） and Carboplatin （AUC=5, D1）. Results： In chemotherapy group, 75.8% （68/79） of patients had finished the 4 cycles of chemotherapy and no one died of toxic effects of chemotherapy. Twenty-five percent of the patients had grade 3-4 neutropenia and 2% had febrile neutropenia. The median survival for the entire 150 patients was 879 d, with 1-year survival rate of 81%, 2-year survival rate of 59% and 3-year survival rate of 43%. There was no significant difference in median survival between chemotherapy and control group （897 d vs 821 d, P=0.0527）, but there was significant difference in the 1-year and 2-year overall survival （94.71%, 76.28% vs 512 d, P=0.122）, but there was significant difference in the 2-year survival rate between two groups with brain metastases （66.7% vs 37.6% P〈0.05）. The median survival after brain metastasis appeared was 190 days. Conclusion： Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy does not significantly improve median survival among patients with completely resected stage II-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer, but significantly improves the 1-year and 2-year overall survival. It neither decreases the incidence of brain metastasis but put off the time of brain metastasis.

Real-world evidence on adjuvant chemotherapy in older adults with stage II/III colon cancer

Colon cancer represents one of the most common cancers diagnosed in older adults worldwide.The standard of care in resected stage II and stage III colon cancer continues to evolve.While there is unequivocal evidence to suggest both disease free and overall survival benefits with the use of combination chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer,data regarding its use in patients with stage II colon cancer are less clear.Further,although colon cancer is a disease that affects older adults,there is considerable debate on the value of adjuvant chemotherapy in the aging population.In particular,many older patients are undertreated when compared to their younger counterparts.In this review,we will describe the clinical trials that contributed to the current adjuvant chemotherapy approach in colon cancer,discuss representation of older adults in trials and the specific challenges associated with the management of this subpopulation,and highlight the role of comprehensive geriatric assessments.We will also review how real-world evidence complements the data gaps from clinical trials of early stage colon cancer.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy May Not Be Necessary for Women with Stage IC1 Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Objective:To determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy improves the prognoses in women with stage IC1 epithelial ovarian cancer(EOC).Methods:All eligible women diagnosed with stage IC1 EOC from 2003 to 2019 in Tongji Hospital were included.Patient characteristics,tumor features,surgical types,and chemotherapeutic treatments were collected.Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis were performed to evaluate progression-free survival(PFS)and overall survival(OS).

ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOLLOWING RADICAL SURGERYFOR NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER:A RANDOMIZED STUDY

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Seventy patients with NSCLC (stage I–III) undergone radical surgery were randomized into two groups: 35 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (CTX) 300 mg/m2, vincristine (VCR) 1.4% mg/m2, adriamycin (ADM) 50 mg/m2, lomustine (CCNU) 50 mg/m2 dl, cisplatin (DDP) 20 mg/m2, d1–5, for 4 cycles, and followed by oral Ftorafur (FT-207) 600–900 mg/d for 1 year (adjuvant chemotherapy group). The other 35 patients received surgical treatment only (surgery group). Results: The overall 5-year survival rate was 48.6% in the adjuvant chemotherapy group, and 31.4% in the surgery group, respectively. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The 5-year survival rate of patients in stage III was 44.0% and 20.8% received surgery with and without adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.025). The 5-year survival rate of patients in stage I–II in the two groups was 60.0% and 54.5%, respectively (P>0.75). Conclusion: Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC can improve survival, for those patients in stage III, it suggests significantly 5-year survival rate in the adjuvant chemotherapy group was higher than that in the surgery alone group.