Pang Fuwan Uses Yao Medicine to Observe the Therapeutic Effects on the Physical and Mental Symptoms of Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Objective: Investigate the efficacy and safety of Yao Medicine in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma, and explore the best therapeutic measure for clinical benefit. Methods: From July 2020 to July 2022, 84 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma were selected and randomly divided into the Observation Group and control group, and the control group was treated with routine Western medicine, with 42 cases in each group. The activity of daily living (ADL) was assessed before and after treatment, meanwhile, the self-rating depression scale (SDS) and self-rating anxiety SAS (SAS) were used to assess the improvement of a bad mood, and quality of life SF-36 was used to assess the quality of life, to judge the efficacy and safety. Results: The effective rate of observation group was 91.67%. The effective rate of the control group was 76.19%. The effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P 0.05). There were no significant differences in the scores of SDS, SAS and quality of life between the two groups before treatment (P > 0.05), and after treatment, the scores of SDS, SAS and quality of life in the two groups were compared with those in the control group (P > 0.05), the scores of VAS, SDS and SAS decreased significantly, while ESCV, angle of straight leg elevation, ADL, physiological score, emotional score, social score and health status score increased significantly, the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). Conclusion: Yao Medicine can improve the psychosomatic symptoms of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma better, with better efficacy and higher safety.

Shenqi Fuzheng injection combined with GP chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer： a meta-analysis

Objective： To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Shenqi Fuzheng injection combined with gemcitabine plus cisplatin（GP） in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC）. Methods： we performed a systematicsearch in the electronic databases such as Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Embase, Chinese Journal Full-text Database,Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Full-text Database andWanfang Database up to 30 January 2017. Randomized controlled trials （RCT） of Shenqi Fuzheng Injectioncombined with GP chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC were searched, and all the RCTs wereconducted on methodological quality assessment. Data extraction and data analysis were according to standards ofCochrane systematic review. Results： Eight trials were included including a total of 701 patients. Meta-analysisresults： Shenqi Fuzheng injection combined with GP chemotherapy could significantly improve the functionalstatus of patients with NSCLC （OR = 3.44, 95% CI [2.26, 5.25], P 〈 0.0001） and clinical treatment efficacy （OR =（OR = 0.31, 95%CI [0.20, 0.47], P 〈 0.0001. The rate of leukopenia （OR = .31, 95%CI [0.20,0.47], P 〈 0.0001）,thrombocytopenia （OR = 0.58, 95%CI [0.37, 0.91], P = 0.020）, hemoglobin decline （（OR = 0.31, 95%CI [0.16,0.59], P = 0.0004） and incidence of gastrointestinal reactions （OR = 0.58,P 〈 0.05） could be reduced. Conclusion：Shenqi Fuzheng injection combined with GP chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC obtainedsignificantly clinical efficacy. The quality of the literature incorporated is low, the conclusion requires high-qualityresearch to further prove.

Intraoperative permanent implantation of radioactive I-125 seed for local advanced non small lung cancer

Objective： To study the clinical efficacy and methods of permanent implantation of radioactive I-125 seed in surgery for local advanced non small lung cancer （LANSCLC）. Methods： From Apr. 2004 to Apr. 2006, the I-125 seeds were implanted into 30 patients with LANSCLC in surgery. The numbers of seeds were 10-40. The chemotherapy was performed in 10 to 14 days after operation. Results： There was no operative death, and the distribution of seeds and complications were reviewed by CT and X-ray after treatment. The distribution of seeds was satisfactory in all patients. The complete response rate （CR） was 56.6% and the part response （PR） was 26.6%. The overall response rate was 83.3% after 4-24 months of surgery. There was no one occurred radiation pneumonia. Prospective efficacy await further follow-up. Conclusion： Permanent implantation of 1-125 seed in surgery for LANSCLC, is a safe and effective method with mild complications.

Nab-paclitaxel(abraxane)-based chemotherapy to treat elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:a single center,randomized and open-label clinical trial

Background： The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of abraxane-based chemotherapy with/without nedaplatin in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer （NSCLC）. Materials and methods： From October 2009 to January 2013, 48 elderly patients （≥65 years） with NSCLC were investigated in this clinical trial. The patients were randomized and equally allocated into arms A and AP- （A） abraxane （130 mg/m2, days 1, 8）; （B） abraxane ＋ nedaplatin （20 mg/m2 days 1-3, q3w）. The parameters of objective response rate （ORR）, disease control rate （DCR）, progression-free survival （PFS）, overall survival （OS） and side effects were evaluated between two arms. Results： Over 80% of the patients completed four cycles of chemotherapy. The total ORR was 21.3 %, DCR was 55.3%, PFS 4.5 months and OS 12.6 months. No significant difference was found between arms A and AP in terms of ORR （16.7% vs. 26.1%, P=0.665） or DCR （55.3% vs. 56.5%, P=0.871）. The median PFS in arm A was 3.3 months [25-75% confidence interval （CI）： 3.1-7.2] and 5.5 months （25-75% CI： 3.2-7.0） in arm AP with no statistical significance （P=0.640）. The median OS in arm A was 12.6 months （25-75% CI： 5.7-26.2） and 15.1 months （25-75% CI： 6.4-35.3） in arm AP with no statistical significance （P=0.770）. The side effects were mainly grade 1-2. The incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities was 29.1% in arm A and 62.5% in arm AP with a statistical significance （P=0.020）. Conclusions： Compared with combined therapy, abraxane alone chemotherapy was beneficial for elderly NSCLC patients with better tolerability and less adverse events, whereas did not significantly differ in terms of ORR, DCR, PFS or OS.

TT genotype of GNAS1 T393C polymorphism predicts better outcome of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

AIM: To evaluate the potential prognostic value of GNAS1 T393 C polymorphism in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.METHODS: We extracted genomic DNA from the peripheral blood leucocytes of 94 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to determine the allelic discrimination. The correlation between genotype and overall survival was evaluated using the multivariate analysis and Kaplan-Meier approach.RESULTS: Thirty-eight out of 94(40%) patients displayed a TT genotype, 29 out of 94(31%) a CT genotype and 27 out of 94(29%) a CC genotype. The median survival of TT(25 mo) genotype carriers was longer than CT(12 mo) or CC(8 mo) genotype carriers. The favorable TT genotype predicted better overall survival(OS)(2-year OS: 48%; P =0.01) compared with CT(2-year OS: 18%) or CC(2-year OS: 15%) genotype. However, dichotomization between C-genotypes(CC + CT) and T-genotypes(TT) revealed significantly lower survival rates(2-year OS: 16%; P = 0.01) for C allele carriers.CONCLUSION: Our data provided strong evidence that the GNAS1 T393 C genetic polymorphism influenced the prognosis in advanced non-small lung cancer with a worse outcome for C allele carriers.

Weekly albumin-bound paclitaxel/cisplatin versus gemcitabine/cisplatin as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:A phase II open-label clinical study

Objective: The aim of this trial was to compare both the efficacy and the safety of a weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel(nab-paclitaxel) plus cisplatin vs. gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods: A total of 84 participants received either 100 mg/m^2 nab-paclitaxel each week on d 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle, as well as cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 on d 1 every three weeks(nab-TP arm); or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m^2 on d 1 and 8, plus cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 on d 1 every three weeks(GP arm). The primary end point was progression-free survival(PFS). The secondary end points were overall response rate(ORR) and overall survival(OS).Results: According to our analysis, the median PFS was 4.8 months for the nab-TP arm vs. 5.2 months for the GP arm(P=0.55). Analysis showed the median OS was 14.6 months for participants who were in the nab-TP arm vs. 15.1 months for those in the GP arm(P=0.94). Besides, nab-TP showed OS advantages over GP in patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR) mutation(26.7 vs. 15.3 months, P=0.046) and patients with a performance status of 0(23.5 vs. 14.7 months, P=0.020). It was found that incidences of drug-related grade 3 or 4 toxicities were comparable between the two treatment arms.Conclusions: Therefore, it can be seen that weekly nab-TP treatment has a similar efficacy and tolerability to GP treatment for patients who are undergoing their first-line treatment for NSCLC. It could be that survival differences among platinum doublets in the context of both EGFR mutation and performance status have the potential to be the basis for our further clinical trials.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus S-1as thirdly-line or later-line treatmentin advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Objective Anlotinib,an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2(VEGFR2)inhibitor,has confirmed antitumor activity in lung cancer in both in vitro and in vivo assays,and has been recommended as third-line treatment agent in non-oncogene driven non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).This prospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus S-1 for third-or later-line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC.Methods Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC,and documented disease progression following second-line chemotherapy,and/or epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor(EGFR-TKI)treatment were enrolled in this study.The patients were treated anlotinib(8 mg daily d 1–14)and S-1(60 mg/m^2 d 1–14)and the treatment was repeated every 3 weeks.Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.The objective response rate(ORR),disease control rate(DCR),progression-free survival(PFS),and adverse events(AEs)were reviewed and evaluated.Results Forty-one patients were enrolled in the study between June 2018 and December 2018.The total ORR and DCR were 26.8%and 80.5%,respectively.The median PFS was 5.2 months[95%confidence interval(CI),3.9 to 6.6 months].In the univariate analysis,there was a significant difference in the median PFS between patients with brain metastases and those without brain metastases(4.8 months vs 5.9 months,respectively;P=0.039).The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG)performance status(P=0.002),lines of therapy(P=0.015),and therapeutic evaluation(P=0.014)were independent factors that influenced PFS.The most common AEs were hypertension,proteinuria,myelosuppression,gastrointestinal reactions,fatigue,and mucositis.Conclusion Anlotinib plus S-1 is an effective and safe regimen for advanced NSCLC as third-or later-line therapy.

Efficacy and safety of albumin-bound paclitaxel in treating recurrent advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Objective： To observe the efficacy and safety of albumin-bound paclitaxel （ABP） monotherapy in treating recurrent advanced non-small-cell lung cancer （NSCLC）. Methods： We retrospectively analyzed the short-term efficacy and toxicities of ABP monotherapy in treating 21 patients who had previously undergone multiple cycles of therapy for their advanced NSCLC in our hospital since 2010. The treatment-related survival was also analyzed. Results： Of these 21 patients, the best overall response was partial response （PR） in 6 patients （28.6%）, stable disease （SD） in I0 patients （47.6%）, and progressive disease （PD） in 5 patients （23.8%）. The overall response rate （ORR） was 28.6% and the disease control rate （DCR） （PR ＋ SD） was 76.2%. The median progression-flee survival （PFS） was 4.0 months （95% CI, 5.0-7.0 months）. The main grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia （11.1%）, peripheral nerve toxicity （5.6%）, muscle and joint aches （5.6%）, and fatigue （5.6%）. Conclusions： The ABP monotherapy can achieve good objective response in advanced NSCLC patients who have previously received multiple cycles of treatment and be well tolerated.

Achievable complete remission of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Case report and review of the literature

Surgery is the first choice of treatment for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC), but few patients can be treated surgically because of either advanced disease or poor pulmonary function. Other therapies include radiotherapy and chemotherapy, as well as complementary and alternative therapies, usually with disappointing results. Bronchial artery infusion(BAI) is a manageable and effective method for treating advanced NSCLC. Outcome is good by BAI due to its repeatability and low toxicity. Icotinib hydrochloride is a newly developed and highly specific epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor and has been safely and efficiently used to treat advanced NSCLC. We herein report a 73-year-old patient with chronic cough, who was diagnosed with advanced NSCLC with the EGFR mutation of L858 R substitution in exon 21, and treated with the combination of oral icotinib and BAI chemotherapy as the first-line therapy, which resulted in a satisfactory clinical outcome. Complete remission of advanced NSCLC can be achieved using the combination of oral icotinib and BAI chemotherapy.

Advanced small-bowel well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours:An international survey of practice on 3rd-line treatment

BACKGROUND Somatostatin analogues are an established first-line therapy for well differentiated small bowel neuroendocrine tumours(Wd-SBNETs),while and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy(PRRT)is frequently used as a second-line therapy.Adequate treatment selection of third-line treatment remains challenging due to the limited prospective data currently available on the best therapeutic sequence.AIM To understand current practice and rationale for decision-making by physicians in the 3rd-line setting by building an online survey.METHODS Weighted average(WA)of likelihood of usage between responders(1 very unlikely;4 very likely)was used to reflect the relevance of factors explored.RESULTS Replies from representatives of 28 centers were received(5/8/2020-21/9/2020);medical oncologist(53.6%),gastroenterologist(17.9%);United Kingdom(21.4%),Spain(17.9%),Italy(14.3%).Majority from European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society(ENETS)Centres of Excellence(57.1%),who followed ENETS guidelines(82.1%).Generally speaking,3rd-line treatment for Wd-SBNETs was:everolimus(EVE)(66.7%),PRRT(18.5%),liver embolization(LE)(7.4%)and interferon-alpha(IFN)(3.7%);chemotherapy(0%);decision was based on clinical trial data(59.3%),or personal experience(22.2%).EVE was most likely used if Ki-67<10%(WA 3.27/4)or age<70 years(WA 3.23/4),in the 3rd-line setting(WA 3.23/4);regardless of presence/absence of carcinoid syndrome(CS),rate of progression or extent of disease.Chemotherapy was mainly utilised only if rapid progression(within 6 mo)(WA 3.35/4),Ki-6710%-20%(WA 2.77/4),negative somatostatin receptor imaging(WA 2.65/4)or high tumour burden(WA 2.77/4);temozolomide or streptozocin was used with capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil(5-FU)(57.7%),FOLFOX(5-FU combined with oxaliplatin)(23.1%).LE was selected if presence of CS(WA 3.24/4)or Ki-67<10%(WA 2.8/4),after progression to other treatments(WA 2.8/4).IFN was rarely used(WA 1.3/4).CONCLUSION Everolimus was the most frequently used therapeutic option in the third-line setting.The most important factors for decision-making included Ki-67,rate of progression,functionality and tumour burden;since this decision is based on multiple factors,it highlights the need for a multidisciplinary assessment.

CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ADVANCED COLORECTAL CANCER 30mm OR SMALLER IN DIAMETER

Objective To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of advanced colorectal cancer which was 30 mm or smaller in diameter. Methods Retrospective analysis documented 80 patients with small advanced colorectal cancer from May 1985 to May 2002. According to the diameter of tumors, all patients were divided into three groups: Group A (10 mm or less), Group B (11-20 mm), Group C (21-30 mm). Considering the number of patients in Group A was smaller, we combined Group A with Group B as Group D. Then various clinicopathological characteristics were compared between Group C and Group D. Results The most common site of small advanced colorectal cancer was sigmoid colon and rectum that accounted for 36.2% and 35.0% of all cases. The average diameter of total tumors was 23.3 mm. Type 2 was the most common macroscopic type (63.7%) and the moderate differentiation was seen in 77.5% of cases. Thirty-eight (47.5%) cases had lymph node metastasis. Three (3.8%) cases had liver metastasis and three (3.8%) cases had peritoneal metastasis. The frequency of lymph node metastasis was found significantly different between Group C and Group D (54.2% vs. 28.6%, P<0.05), as well as between the groups with different depth of invasion (P<0.05). Curability A resection was performed in 69 (86.2%) cases. Conclusions Tumor size and depth of invasion are related to lymph node metastasis in small advanced colorectal cancer. However, the small size of tumor may not always be a.reliable parameter for estimating the risk of lymph node metastasis. Small colorectal cancers also do not always mean the early stage. Surgeons should be aware of the features of small advanced colorectal cancers to select ideal management and perform perfect resection.

CLINICAL STUDY IN ACCELERATED HYPERFRACTIONATED IRRADIATION IN THE TREATMENT OF LOCAL ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER

Objective To evaluate the effect of accelerated hyperfractionated irradiation (AHFJ) and conventional fractionated irradiation (CFI) for local advanced non- small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods The patients of AI-IFJ group were irradiated to large-field target volume by a daily fraction of 2Gy, and small-field target volume by a daily fraction of 1Gy with more than 6h interval. The total dose of large-field target volume was SOGy/25Fx/SW and of small-field target volume was 7SGy/SOFx/5W. The patients in CFI group were irradiated by a daily fraction of 2Gy to the total dose of 66Gy/33Fx/6. 6W. After 3 months of radiotherapy, the tumor response rates of complete recovery (CR), partial recovery (PR), and no change (NC) and 1- and 2- year survival rate in the two groups were observed. Results The tumor response rates of CR,PR,NC in AHFI group and CFI group were 22.9%(8/35), 60.0%(21/35), 17.1%(6/35) and 11.4% (4/35), 51.4% (18/35), 37.2% (13/35) respectively (P>0. 05). All patients were followed up 2 years or more. The 1- and 2- year survival rates in AHFI group and CFI group were 62.9% (22/35), 31 .4% (11/35) and 42.9% (15/35) , 17.1% (6/35) respectively (P< 0.05). The incidences of esophagitis and pneumonitis in AHFI group and CFI group were 34.3% (12/35), 22. 9% (8/35) and 40.0% (14/35), 17.1% (6/35)(P>0. 05). Conclusion In comparison with CFI, AHFI may increase 1- and 2- year sur-vival rate after treatment of local advanced non-small cell lung cancer, while the radio-reactions, either early or late, did not increase significantly.

Cetuximab Combination with Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Objective： To observe the efficacy and safety of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer （NSCLC）, and to investigate the association of status of K-RAS gene mutation and epidermal growth factor receptor （EGFR） genotype with clinical outcome. Methods： Between Jan. 2006 and Sep. 2009, nineteen patients with advanced NSCLC received cetuximab （〉4 weeks） combined with chemotherapy in Department of Thoracic Oncology at Beijing Cancer Hospital. Response, survival and toxicity were retrospectively assessed, epidermal growth factor receptor （EGFR） protein expression was evaluated by ELISA Kit. The status of K-RAS gene mutation was tested by PCR-RFLP and EGFR gene amplification was measured by EGFR fluorescence in situ hybridization （FISH）. Results： Partial response（PR） was observed in 26.3%（5/19） of the patients and stable disease（SD） in 52.6%（10/19）. Median progression free survival（PFS） was 6 months （95% CI： 3.6-8.4）. Median overall survival （MST） and 1-year survival rate（SR） were 10.6 months （95% CI： 6.6-14.6） and 47.6%, respectively. Mild or moderate skin rash was the most common toxicity related with cetuximab. K-RAS gene mutation, EGFR protein level and amplification have little correlation with prognosis. Conclusion： Cetuximab combined with chemotherapy was tolerable and the skin rash related with cetuximab was mild to moderate. Cetuximab may prolong survival of the patients who failed to previous chemotherapy.

ALK突变晚期非小细胞肺癌靶向治疗耐药后帕博利珠单抗治疗的新探索

目的探索间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)突变晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)靶向治疗耐药后帕博利珠单抗治疗的效果。方法本方案采用前瞻性、对照、单中心、随机、单盲临床研究方法设计。选择2020年3月至2022年7月在西安高新医院就诊的95例ALK突变晚期NSCLC靶向治疗耐药后患者,以随机数字表法分为对照组和试验组。对照组入组47例,脱落2例,最终45例纳入分析;试验组入组48例,脱落2例,最终46例纳入分析。对照组男29例,女16例;年龄(56.85±8.67)岁;ⅢB期12例,Ⅳ期33例;鳞癌12例,腺癌33例。试验组男26例,女20例;年龄(55.02±8.23)岁;ⅢB期15例,Ⅳ期31例;鳞癌10例,腺癌36例。对照组接受阿来替尼治疗,试验组在对照组基础上接受帕博利珠单抗治疗。21 d为1个治疗周期,两组均治疗3个周期。比较两组治疗前后基质金属蛋白酶-9(MMP-9)、血清细胞角蛋白19片段抗原21-1(CYFRA21-1)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、糖类抗原9(CA9)、内皮抑素(ES)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、自然杀伤(NK)细胞、CD8^(+)、CD4^(+)水平,临床疗效,药物不良反应;记录两组患者生存情况。采用独立样本t检验、配对t检验、χ^(2)检验。结果治疗后,两组CYFRA21-1、NSE、CA9、MMP-9、VEGF、CD8^(+)水平均低于治疗前(均P<0.05),且试验组均低于对照组(均P<0.05);两组ES、CD4^(+)、NK水平均高于治疗前(均P<0.05),且试验组均高于对照组(均P<0.05)。试验组总有效率高于对照组[78.26%(36/46)比57.78%(26/45)](χ^(2)=4.396,P=0.036)。两组药物不良反应总发生率比较差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=0.385,P=0.535)。随访1年,试验组失访1例,对照组失访2例,随访率为97.70%。试验组的1年总生存率为55.56%(25/45),对照组的1年总生存率为34.88%(15/43)。两组患者总生存期(OS)曲线比较差异有统计学意义(Log-rankχ^(2)=7.805,P=0.005)。结论帕博利珠单抗治疗ALK突变晚期NSCLC靶向治疗耐药后患者疗效显著,可改善免疫功能,降低肿瘤标志物水平,提高生存率,改善血管生成调节因子水平,且不会明显增加药物不良反应的发生率。

甲磺酸奥希替尼联合常规培美曲塞二钠加卡铂化疗方法治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床效果分析

目的探讨甲磺酸奥希替尼联合常规培美曲塞二钠加卡铂化疗方法治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床效果。方法选取2018年10月至2023年1月首都医科大学宣武医院收治的105例晚期NSCLC患者为研究对象。依照随机数字表法分为对照组(52例)和观察组(53例)。对照组给予培美曲塞二钠加卡铂化疗,观察组在对照组基础上给予甲磺酸奥希替尼治疗,3周为1个疗程,2组均连续治疗2个疗程。治疗后进行疾病控制率评价,比较2组治疗前后的Karnofsky功能状态(KPS)评分、CD_(3)^(+)、CD_(4)^(+)水平、CD_(4)^(+)/CD_(8)^(+)比值及细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)、癌胚抗原、胸苷激酶1水平及治疗期间不良反应发生率。结果观察组疾病控制率高于对照组[83.0%(44/53)比65.4%(34/52)],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后观察组KPS评分高于对照组[(76±6)分比(64±6)分];观察组CD_(3)^(+)、CD_(4)^(+)水平及CD_(4)^(+)/CD_(8)^(+)比值高于治疗前且高于对照组;2组CYFRA21-1、癌胚抗原、胸苷激酶1水平均低于治疗前且观察组低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。治疗期间,观察组与对照组不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义[13.2%(7/53)比9.6%(5/52)](P>0.05)。结论甲磺酸奥希替尼联合常规培美曲塞二钠加卡铂化疗方法治疗晚期NSCLC的临床效果较好,有助于患者生活质量和免疫功能的提高,且具有较好的安全性。

重组人血管内皮抑制素联合奥希替尼治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效及预后分析

目的:分析重组人血管内皮抑制素联合奥希替尼对晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC)患者疗效及预后的影响。方法:选择2020年06月至2022年02月医院就诊的晚期NSCLC患者92例,采用随机数字表法将其分成对照组与研究组,各46例。对照组接受奥希替尼治疗,研究组在对照组的基础上接受重组人血管内皮抑制素治疗。21 d为1个周期,2组均治疗3个周期评估效果。对比2组临床疗效、健康状况、生活质量、肿瘤标志物、肿瘤相关蛋白因子及不良反应,随访1年,记录2组无进展生存期(PFS)。结果:研究组客观缓解率(50.00%)高于对照组(26.09%)(P<0.05),研究组疾病控制率(76.09%)高于对照组(54.35%)(P<0.05)。治疗3个周期后,2组卡氏功能状态(KPS)评分、癌症治疗功能性量表(FACT-L)评分均升高(P<0.05),且研究组更高(P<0.05)。治疗3个周期后,2组血清细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)、鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCC)、糖类抗原50(CA50)水平均降低(P<0.05),且研究组更低(P<0.05)。治疗3个周期后,2组磷酸酶张力蛋白同源物(PTEN)相对表达量均升高(P<0.05),且研究组更高(P<0.05);治疗3个周期后,2组血黏蛋白(MUC1)相对表达量均降低(P<0.05),且研究组更低(P<0.05)。2组Ⅰ-Ⅳ级消化道反应、血小板下降、肝肾功能损伤、中性粒细胞减少不良反应总发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随访1年,2组均失访1例,随访率为97.83%,研究组中位PFS为8.97(95%CI:6.13~11.35)个月,对照组中位PFS为6.53(95%CI:3.85~9.61)个月,研究组PFS曲线优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:重组人血管内皮抑制素联合奥希替尼治疗晚期NSCLC患者疗效确切,可降低肿瘤标志物水平,改善患者生活质量,调节肿瘤相关蛋白因子表达,安全可靠,且可延长患者PFS。

奥希替尼序贯和吉非替尼治疗EGFR突变型晚期非小细胞肺癌近期生存获益的临床研究

目的:探讨奥希替尼序贯和吉非替尼治疗对表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变型晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者近期生存获益的影响。方法:回顾性收集2017年7月~2022年7月期间某院收治的150例吉非替尼耐药后EGFR突变型晚期NSCLC患者作为研究对象,将使用奥希替尼序贯治疗的患者纳入序贯组(n=78),使用吉非替尼治疗的患者纳入对照组(n=72)。对照组给予吉非替尼片加量治疗,序贯组给予甲磺酸奥希替尼片序贯治疗,两组均治疗3个疗程。比较两组临床疗效、肿瘤标志物[癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原125(CA125)、糖类抗原199(CA199)]水平、生存质量[生存质量核心问卷(QLQ-C30)评分]及不良反应发生情况。结果:治疗后,序贯组治疗总有效率及生存获益率均高于对照组(P<0.05);两组血清CEA、CA125、CA199水平均降低(P<0.05),且序贯组低于对照组(P<0.05);两组QLQ-C30功能评分均升高(P<0.05),且序贯组高于对照组(P<0.05);两组QLQ-C30症状评分均降低(P<0.05),且序贯组低于对照组(P<0.05);两组脱发、白细胞减少、胃肠道症状和肝肾功能异常发生率比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:使用奥希替尼序贯和吉非替尼治疗EGFR突变型晚期NSCLC患者临床疗效确切,可有效降低血清肿瘤标志物水平,改善患者生存质量。

自拟健脾除积方联合免疫检查点抑制剂治疗对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床疗效及对其外周血管生长因子的影响

目的 探究自拟健脾除积方联合免疫检查点抑制剂治疗对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床疗效及对其外周血管生长因子的影响。方法 选取2021年6月—2022年12月期间河北省沧州中西医结合医院收治的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者70例,按随机数字表法分为对照组和治疗组,每组各35例。对照组给予常规化疗方法,采用信迪利单抗联合含铂双药治疗,治疗组在对照组的基础上加用自拟健脾除积方治疗。每21 d(3周)为一个治疗周期,两组患者连续接受2个疗程的药物治疗,观察比较两组患者临床疗效、不良反应情况,治疗前后中医临床证候评分、KPS评分、血管生长因子(Vascular endothelial growth factor,VEGF)水平。结果 治疗后治疗组总有效率88.57%(31/35)明显高于对照组65.71%(23/35),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后两组患者中医证候评分均较治疗前降低,功能状态疗效KPS评分均较治疗前升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且治疗组中医证候评分明显低于对照组,功能状态疗效KPS评分明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。治疗后两组患者血清VEGF水平均较治疗前降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且治疗组血清VEGF水平明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者不良反应分级比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗组白细胞计数降低、恶心/呕吐发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 自拟健脾除积方联合免疫检查点抑制剂治疗晚期非小细胞肺可提高临床治疗效果,改善中医证候评分,提高生活质量,降低外周血血管生长因子含量,且具有相当的安全性,值得推荐使用。

自拟健脾除积方联合信迪利单抗及化疗对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的影响

目的:探讨自拟健脾除积方联合信迪利单抗及化疗对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者疾病控制率、中医症候积分及不良反应的影响。方法:选取2020年10月—2022年10月在我院就诊的102例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组各51例,对照组在吉西他滨+顺铂化疗的基础上给予信迪利单抗,观察组在对照组基础上联合自拟健脾除积方治疗。比较两组患者临床疗效、治疗前后中医症候积分、肿瘤标志物水平及不良反应。结果:观察组有效率和疾病控制率明显高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组和对照组治疗后中医症候积分均显著低于治疗前;治疗后,观察组中医症候积分显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组治疗后血清铁蛋白(SF)、鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCCA)及癌胚抗原(CEA)水平均显著低于同组治疗前,观察组SF、SCCA、CEA水平均显著低于对照组。观察组白细胞计数减少、恶心、呕吐症状总发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:自拟健脾除积方联合信迪利单抗对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者治疗效果较好,可改善患者中医症候,具有较高的安全性。

同步放化疗联合PD-1抑制剂帕博利珠单抗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床效果分析

目的 探讨晚期非小细胞肺癌的治疗中,采用同步放化疗联合程序性细胞死亡蛋白-1(Programmed Death-1, PD-1)抑制剂帕博利珠单抗治疗的临床应用价值。方法 随机选取2022年9月—2023年10月山东省滕州市中心人民医院收治的70例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者作为研究对象,根据治疗方法的不同将其分为两组,各35例。对比组予以同步放化疗联合顺铂、吉西他滨。研究组在同步放化疗基础上联合帕博利珠单抗治疗。对两组临床效果进行评价。结果 研究组治疗总有效率(85.71%)高于对比组(62.86%),差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.786,P=0.028)。两组不良反应发生情况对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,研究组CD3^(+)、CD4^(+)、CD4^(+)/CD8^(+)均高于对比组,CD8^(+)低于对比组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论 针对晚期非小细胞肺癌,选择同步放化疗与PD-1抑制剂帕博利珠单抗联合治疗方案疗效确切,不良反应可控,具有安全性。