Clinical efficacy and safety of erlotinib combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer:A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Advanced pancreatic cancer is resistant to chemotherapeutic drugs,resulting in limited treatment efficacy and poor prognosis.Combined administration of the chemotherapeutic gemcitabine and erlotinib is considered a potential first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer.However,their comparative benefits and potential risks remain unclear.AIM To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of erlotinib combined with other chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.METHODS Literature on the clinical efficacy and safety of erlotinib combined with chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer was retrieved through an online search.The retrieved literature was subjected to a methodological qualitative assessment and was analyzed using the RevMan 5.3 software.Ten randomized controlled trials involving 2444 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were included in the meta-analysis.RESULTS Compared with chemotherapeutic treatment,erlotinib combined with chemotherapy significantly prolonged the progression-free survival time of pancreatic cancer patients[hazard ratio(HR)=0.78,95%CI:0.66-0.92,P=0.003].Meanwhile,the overall survival(HR=0.99,95%CI:0.72-1.37,and P=0.95)and disease control rate(OR=0.93,95%CI:0.45-0.91,P=0.84)were not significantly favorable.In terms of safety,the erlotinib and chemotherapy combination was associated with a significantly higher risk of diarrhea(OR=3.59,95%CI:1.63-7.90,P<0.05)and rash(OR=3.63,95%CI:1.64-8.01,P<0.05)compared with single-agent chemotherapy.Moreover,the risk of vomiting(OR=1.27,95%CI:0.62-2.59,P=0.51),regurgitation/anorexia(OR=1.61,95%CI:0.25-10.31,P=0.62),and infection(OR=0.72,95%CI:0.28-1.87,P=0.50)were not significant in either group.CONCLUSION Compared with a single chemotherapeutic modality,erlotinib combined with gemcitabine can prolong progression-free survival in pancreatic cancer,but does not improve survival benefit or disease control rate,and can increase the risk of diarrhea and rash.

Systemic Inflammation Response Index and weight loss as prognostic factors in metastatic pancreatic cancer: A concept study from the PANTHEIA-SEOM trial

BACKGROUND The prognostic value of the Systemic Inflammation Response Index(SIRI)in advanced pancreatic cancer is recognized,but its correlation with patients´nutritional status and outcomes remains unexplored.AIM To study the prognostic significance of SIRI and weight loss in metastatic pancreatic cancer.METHODS The PANTHEIA-Spanish Society of Medical Oncology(SEOM)study is a multicentric(16 Spanish hospitals),observational,longitudinal,non-interventional initiative,promoted by the SEOM Real World-Evidence work group.This pilot study sought to analyze the association between weight loss and inflammatory status as defined by SIRI.The cohort stems from a proof-of-concept pilot study conducted at one of the coordinating centers.Patients with pathologically confirmed metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma,treated from January 2020 to January 2023,were included.The index was calculated using the product of neutrophil and monocyte counts,divided by lymphocyte counts,obtained within 15 days before initiation chemotherapy.This study evaluated associations between overall survival(OS),SIRI and weight loss.RESULTS A total of 50 patients were included.66%of these patients were male and the median age was 66 years.Metastasis sites:36%liver,12%peritoneal carcinomatosis,10%lung,and 42%multiple locations.Regarding the first line palliative chemotherapy treatments:50%received gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel;28%,modified fluorouracil,leucovorin,irinotecan and oxaliplatin,and 16%were administered gemcitabine.42%had a weight loss>5%in the three months(mo)preceding diagnosis.21 patients with a SIRI≥2.3×10^(3)/L exhibited a trend towards a lower median OS compared to those with a SIRI<2.3×10^(3)/L(4 vs 18 mo;P<0.000).Among 21 patients with>5%weight loss before diagnosis,the median OS was 6 mo,in contrast to 19 mo for those who did not experience such weight loss(P=0.003).Patients with a weight loss>5%showed higher SIRI levels.This difference was statistically significant(P<0.000).For patients with a SIRI<2.3×10^(3)/L,those who did not lose>5%of their weight had an OS of 20 mo,compared to 11 mo for those who did(P<0.001).No association was found between carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels≥1000 U/mL and weight loss.CONCLUSION A higher SIRI was correlated with decreased survival rates in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and associated with weight loss.An elevated SIRI is suggested as a predictor of survival,emphasizing the need for prospective validation in the upcoming PANTHEIA-SEOM study.

Developments and challenges in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC)remains a significant public health challenge and is currently the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality in developed countries.Despite advances in cancer treatment,the 5-year survival rate for patients with PDAC remains less than 5%.In recent years,neoadjuvant therapy(NAT)has emerged as a promising treatment option for many cancer types,including locally advanced PDAC,with the potential to improve patient outcomes.To analyze the role of NAT in the setting of locally advanced PDAC over the past decade,a systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed and Web of Science.The results suggest that NAT may reduce the local mass size,promote tumor downstaging,and increase the likelihood of resection.These findings are supported by the latest evidence-based medical literature and the clinical experience of our center.Despite the potential benefits of NAT,there are still challenges that need to be addressed.One such challenge is the lack of consensus on the optimal timing and duration of NAT.Improved criteria for patient selection are needed to further identify PDAC patients likely to respond to NAT.In conclusion,NAT has emerged as a promising treatment option for locally advanced PDAC.However,further research is needed to optimize its use and to better understand the role of NAT in the management of this challenging disease.With continued advances in cancer treatment,there is hope of improving the outcomes of patients with PDAC in the future.

Efficacy of continuous arterial perfusion chemotherapy combined with transarterial chemoembolization regional arterial thermal perfusion in the treatment of pancreatic cancer with liver metastases

Background:The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy of continuous transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer with liver metastasis.Methods:Sixty patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and liver metastases were enrolled in this study.In the treatment group,31patients underwent continuous transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with TACE regional arterial thermal perfusion,whereas 29 patients included in the control group received intravenous chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1.All patients received maintenance chemotherapy with S-1 after 4 cycles of the study regimen.Treatment efficacy,quality of life,survival,and toxicity were evaluated.Results:Efficacy was better in the treatment group than in the control group,as reflected by the objective remission,partial remission,and disease progression rates(all P<0.05).The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and Numerical Rating Scale pain scores were also higher in the treatment group(both P<0.05).In survival analysis,the 1-year overall survival rates in the treatment and control groups were64.516%and 10.345%,respectively,whereas the median overall survival times were 16 and 6 months,respectively(both P<0.05).The6-month progression-free survival rates in the treatment and control groups were 77.419%and 13.790%,respectively,and the median progression-free survival times were 12 and 3 months,respectively(both P<0.05).The rates of hematological and nonhematological toxicological adverse effects were also lower in the treatment group(both P<0.05).Although the rate of liver dysfunction was higher in the treatment group,this finding had no adverse effects on prognosis.Conclusions:Continuous transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with TACE regional arterial perfusion chemotherapy resulted in better efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer and liver metastasis,suggesting its utility as a reference method for the clinical treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

Therapeutic Evaluation on Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated by Integrative Chinese and Western Medicine──Clinical Analysis of 56 Cases

Objective: In comparison with chemotherapy, to evaluate therapeutic effects on advanced pancreatic cancer treated by integrative Chinese and western medicine (ICWM) therapies. Methods: Based on the retrospective study of 56 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, life table was applied to the analysis of patients' survival rate and Xz test to the comparison of therapeutic response between ICWM and chemotherapy groups. Results: The results showed that 1-year survival rate in the ICWM group was 55. 37%±3.24%; 2-year survival rate 34. 61%±16. 31%; 3-year survival rate 25. 96%±24. 64%; 5-year survival rate 25. 96%±24.64%; and median survival period 16. 3 months. However 1-year survival rate in the chemotherapy group was 21. 95%±27. 54% ; 2-year survival rate 7. 31%±27. 54% ; 3-year survival rate 0 % ; and median survival period 7. 5 months. The therapeutic effects between two groups were significantly different (P=0. 004). Further analysis suggested that the reduction of cancer mass in the ICWM group was more than that in chemotherapy group (P=0.049) and the improvement of advanced pancreatic cancer related-symptoms better than that of chemotherapy group (P = 0. 002). Conclusion: The ICWM comprehensive therapy is of important value in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

Nab-paclitaxel(abraxane)-based chemotherapy to treat elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:a single center,randomized and open-label clinical trial

Background： The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of abraxane-based chemotherapy with/without nedaplatin in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer （NSCLC）. Materials and methods： From October 2009 to January 2013, 48 elderly patients （≥65 years） with NSCLC were investigated in this clinical trial. The patients were randomized and equally allocated into arms A and AP- （A） abraxane （130 mg/m2, days 1, 8）; （B） abraxane ＋ nedaplatin （20 mg/m2 days 1-3, q3w）. The parameters of objective response rate （ORR）, disease control rate （DCR）, progression-free survival （PFS）, overall survival （OS） and side effects were evaluated between two arms. Results： Over 80% of the patients completed four cycles of chemotherapy. The total ORR was 21.3 %, DCR was 55.3%, PFS 4.5 months and OS 12.6 months. No significant difference was found between arms A and AP in terms of ORR （16.7% vs. 26.1%, P=0.665） or DCR （55.3% vs. 56.5%, P=0.871）. The median PFS in arm A was 3.3 months [25-75% confidence interval （CI）： 3.1-7.2] and 5.5 months （25-75% CI： 3.2-7.0） in arm AP with no statistical significance （P=0.640）. The median OS in arm A was 12.6 months （25-75% CI： 5.7-26.2） and 15.1 months （25-75% CI： 6.4-35.3） in arm AP with no statistical significance （P=0.770）. The side effects were mainly grade 1-2. The incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities was 29.1% in arm A and 62.5% in arm AP with a statistical significance （P=0.020）. Conclusions： Compared with combined therapy, abraxane alone chemotherapy was beneficial for elderly NSCLC patients with better tolerability and less adverse events, whereas did not significantly differ in terms of ORR, DCR, PFS or OS.

Direct therapeutic intervention for advanced pancreatic cancer

Currently,chemotherapy is an accredited,standard treatment for unresectable,advanced pancreatic cancer(PC). However,it has been still showed treatmentresistance and followed dismal prognosis in many cases. Therefore,some sort of new,additional treatments are needed for the better therapeutic results for advanced PC. According to the previous reports,it is obvious that interventional endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS) is a well-established,helpful and low-risky procedure in general. As the additional treatments of the conventional therapy for advanced PC,many therapeutic strategies,such as immunotherapies,molecular biological therapies,physiochemical therapies,radioactive therapies,using si RNA,using autophagy have been developing in recent years. Moreover,the efficacy of the other potential therapeutic targets for PC using EUS-fine needle injection,for example,intra-tumoral chemotherapeutic agents(paclitaxel,irinotecan),several ablative energies(radiofrequency ablation and cryothermal treatment,neodymiumdoped yttrium aluminum garnet laser,high-intensity focused ultrasound),etc.,has already been showed in animal models. Delivering these promising treatments reliably inside tumor,interventional EUS may probably be indispensable existence for the treatment of locally advanced PC in near future.

Management of pancreatic cancer in the elderly

Currently, pancreatic adenocarcinoma mainly occurs after 60 years of age, and its prognosis remains poor despite modest improvements in recent decades. The aging of the population will result in a rise in the incidence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma within the next years. Thus, the management of pancreatic cancer in the elderly population is gaining increasing relevance. Older cancer patients represent a heterogeneous group with different biological, functional and psychosocial characteristics that can modify the usual management of this disease, including pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes, polypharmacy, performance status, comorbidities and organ dysfunction. However, the biological age, not the chronological age, of the patient should be the limiting factor in determining the most appropriate treatment for these patients. Unfortunately, despite the increased incidence of this pathology in older patients, there is an underrepresentation of these patients in clinical trials, and the management of older patients is thus determined by extrapolation from the results of studies performed in younger patients. In this review, the special characteristics of the elderly, the multidisciplinary management of localized and advanced ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and the most recent advances in the management of this condition will be discussed, focusing on surgery, chemotherapy, radiation and palliative care.

Chemoradiotherapy with twice-weekly administration of low-dose gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

AIM:To evaluate the chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer utilizing low dose gemcitabine as a radiation sensitizer administered twice weekly. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of chemoradiotherapy utilizing gemcitabine administered twice weekly at a dose of 40 mg/m2. After that, maintenance systemic chemotherapy with gemcitabine, at a dose of 1000 mg/m2, was administered weekly for 3 wk with 1-wk rest until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity developed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Three of those patients could not continue with the therapy; one patient had interstitial pneumonia during radiation therapy and two other patients showed liver metastasis or peritoneal metastasis during an early stage of the therapy. The median survival was 15.0 mo and the overall 1-year survival rate was 60%, while the median progression-free survival was 8.0 mo. The subgroup which showed the reduction of tumor development, more than 50% showed a tendency for a better prognosis; however, other parameters including age, gender and performance status did not correlate with survival. The median survival of the groups that died of liver metastasis and peritoneal metastasis were 13.0 mo and 27.7 mo, respectively.CONCLUSION: Chemoradiotherapy with low-dose gemcitabine administered twice weekly could be effective to patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer; however, patients developing liver metastases had a worse prognosis. Another chemoradiotherapy strategy might be needed for those patients, such as administrating one or two cycles of chemotherapy initially, followed by chemoradiotherapy for the cases with no distant metastases.

A patient with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer achieving long-term survival with Gemcitabine chemotherapy

A 68-year-old female visited a local clinic with epigastralgia. A routine laboratory test revealed jaundice and liver dysfunction. She was referred to this hospital. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) revealed that the density of the entire pancreas had decreased,and showed dilatation of the common bile duct (CBD) and the main pancreatic duct (MPD). Pancreatic cancer was diagnosed by cytological examination analyzing the pancreatic juice obtained by ERCP. When jaundice had decreased the tumor was observed via laparotomy. No ascites,liver metastasis,or peritoneal dissemination was observed. The entire pancreas was a hard mass,and a needle biopsy was obtained from the head,body and tail of the pancreas. These biopsies diagnosed a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Hepaticojejunostomy was thus performed,and postoperative progress was good. Chemotherapy with 1000 mg/body per week of gemcitabine was administered beginning 15 d postoperatively. However,the patient suffered relatively severe side effects,and it was necessary to change the dosing schedule of gemcitabine. Abdominal CT revealed a complete response (CR) after 3 treatments. Therefore,weekly chemotherapy was stopped and was changed to monthly administration. To date,for 4 years after chemotherapy,the tumor has not reappeared.

Clinical Application and Research Progress of Accelerated Rehabilitation Surgery in Perioperative Period of Advanced Gastric Cancer in the Elderly

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been used in various surgical professions in recent years and is widely accepted by doctors. This concept not only helps patients speed up postoperative recovery, reduce the incidence of related complications and shorten hospital stays, but also has been proved to be effective and safe in the perioperative application of gastric cancer. This article reviews the clinical application and research progress of enhanced recovery after surgery in the perioperative period of advanced gastric cancer in the elderly.

Clinical observation of capecitabine monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced breast cancer

Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of capecitabine mono-chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced breast cancer. Methods The data from 36 cases of capecitabine monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced breast cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Oral administration of capecitabine 2000 mg/m^2 twice daily （D1-14） for 21 days constituted a cycle. The effect of the disease and main adverse reactions were evaluated every 2 cycles. Results The data from 36 elderly patients were studied. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 4. The total effective rate was 30.6% （11/36） and the disease control rate was 72.2% （26/36）. The number of patients with clinical comptete remission was 2, clinical partial response was 9, stable disease was 15, and progressive disease was 10. Where treatment was effective, the median time to progression was 6 months and the median overall survival was 9.5 months. The main adverse events were gastrointestinal reactions, bone marrow suppression, and oral mucositis; most of the reactions were grade 1 to 2. Grade 3 to 4 adverse reactions included granulocytopenia in 2 patients （12.5%） and hand-foot syndrome in 1 patient （6.7%）. Conclusion Capecitabine monotherapy was effective in controlling disease progression, and adverse reactions were tolerated by elderly patients with advanced breast cancer.

Computed tomography-based radiomic to predict resectability in locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy

BACKGROUND Surgical resection after neoadjuvant treatment is the main driver for improved survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer(LAPC).However,the diagnostic performance of computed tomography(CT)imaging to evaluate the residual tumour burden at restaging after neoadjuvant therapy is low due to the difficulty in distinguishing neoplastic tissue from fibrous scar or inflammation.In this context,radiomics has gained popularity over conventional imaging as a complementary clinical tool capable of providing additional,unprecedented information regarding the intratumor heterogeneity and the residual neoplastic tissue,potentially serving in the therapeutic decision-making process.AIM To assess the capability of radiomic features to predict surgical resection in LAPC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy.METHODS Patients with LAPC treated with intensive chemotherapy followed by ablative radiation therapy were retrospectively reviewed.One thousand six hundred and fifty-five radiomic features were extracted from planning CT inside the gross tumour volume.Both extracted features and clinical data contribute to create and validate the predictive model of resectability status.Patients were repeatedly divided into training and validation sets.The discriminating performance of each model,obtained applying a LASSO regression analysis,was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC).The validated model was applied to the entire dataset to obtain the most significant features.RESULTS Seventy-one patients were included in the analysis.Median age was 65 years and 57.8%of patients were male.All patients underwent induction chemotherapy followed by ablative radiotherapy,and 19(26.8%)ultimately received surgical resection.After the first step of variable selections,a predictive model of resectability was developed with a median AUC for training and validation sets of 0.862(95%CI:0.792-0.921)and 0.853(95%CI:0.706-0.960),respectively.The validated model was applied to the entire dataset and 4 features were selected to build the model with predictive performance as measured using AUC of 0.944(95%CI:0.892-0.996).CONCLUSION The present radiomic model could help predict resectability in LAPC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy,potentially integrating clinical and morphological parameters in predicting surgical resection.

In Frail Elderly Patients, Low-Dose Gemcitabine over 6-Hour Infusion Is Equally Effective and Less Toxic Than the Standard Gemcitabine Protocol for Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Randomized Phase II Trial

Background:?Treatment of frail elderly patients with pancreatic cancer is still a major problem due to intolerance to standard chemotherapy doses. Aim:?This study aims to compare the low-dose gemcitabine over 6 hours (LD6H) to the standard gemcitabine protocol in terms of clinical benefit, survival, and safety in the frail elderly patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods:?Patients enrolled in this trial were randomly assigned by in a 1:1 fashion via closed envelope method to either receive gemcitabine of 1000 mg/m2?over 30-minute infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 4-week cycle (standard protocol arm) or gemcitabine as a weekly low-dose (250 mg/m2) over 6-hour infusion (LD6H arm). Results:?We enrolled eighty-two eligible frail elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either standard gemcitabine protocol (40 patients) or low-dose (250 mg/m2) gemcitabine over 6-hour infusion, given weekly (42 patients). There was no significant difference between the standard group and low-dose group as regard of the overall response rate (p = 0.654), the disease control rate (DCR) (p = 0.845), the median progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.908) and the overall survival (OS) (p = 0.331). The low-dose regimen had a significantly lower incidence of adverse effects grades 3 or 4 when compared to the standard regimen: (p = 0.024 for fatigue, p = 0.027 for hypotension, p = 0.012 for each anemia as well as thrombocytopenia, and p = 0.006 for neutropenia). Conclusion:?Low-dose gemcitabine over 6-hour infusion is equally effective and less toxic when compared to standard gemcitabine protocol in frail elderly patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. So, we recommend the low-dose gemcitabine for frail elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Optimal combination of radiofrequency ablation with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Problems have been reported in the treatment of pancreatic cancer with radiofrequency ablation(RFA), such as the friability of the organ itself. This report presents possible solutions to such problems. Although our patient suffered from locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer, she remained well at 18 mo after RFA with no evidence of recurrence. To ameliorate the side effects of RFA, after a palliative bypass procedure, the subject was treated with combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy. After this regimen had been administered, a contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan confirmed that RFA is a viable approach to the treatment of pancreatic cancer as the chemoradiotherapy had resulted in marked tumor shrinkage and pancreatic fibrosis; i.e., sufficient tumor ablation was achieved without serious RFA-related complications, such as pancreatitis or pancreatic fistulae. The present case suggests that RFA combined with preceding chemoradiotherapy is safe and effective for the palliative treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

FOLFOXIRI vs FOLFIRINOX as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND FOLFIRINOX regimen is the first-line reference chemotherapy(L1)in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(aPDAC).FOLFOXIRI,a schedule with a lower dose of irinotecan and no bolus 5-fluorouracil,has demonstrated efficacy and feasibility in colorectal cancer.AIM To investigate the potential clinical value of FOLFOXIRI in patients with aPDAC in routine clinical practice.METHODS Analyses were derived from all consecutive aPDAC patients treated in L1 between January 2011 and December 2017 in two French institutions,with either FOLFOXIRI(n=165)or FOLFIRINOX(n=124)regimens.FOLFOXIRI consisted of irinotecan(165 mg/m2),oxaliplatin(85 mg/m2),leucovorin(200 mg/m2)and 5-fluorouracil(3200 mg/m2 as a 48-h continuous infusion)every 2 wk.Ninety-six pairs of patients were selected through propensity score matching,and clinical outcomes of the two treatment regimens were compared.RESULTS Median overall survival was 11.1 mo in the FOLFOXIRI and 11.6 mo in the FOLFIRINOX cohorts,respectively.After propensity score matching,survival rates remained similar between the two regimens in terms of overall survival(hazard ratio=1.22;P=0.219)and progression-free survival(hazard ratio=1.27;P=0.120).The objective response rate was 37.1%in the FOLFOXIRI group vs 47.8%in the FOLFIRINOX group(P=0.187).Grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in 28.7%of patients in the FOLFOXIRI cohort vs 19.5%in the FOLFIRINOX cohort(P=0.079).FOLFOXIRI was associated with a higher incidence of grade 3/4 digestive adverse events.Hematopoietic growth factors were used after each chemotherapy cycle and the low hematological toxicity rates were below 5%with both regimens.CONCLUSION FOLFOXIRI is feasible in L1 in patients with aPDAC but does not confer any therapeutic benefit as compared with FOLFIRINOX.The low hematological toxicity rates strengthened the relevance of primary prophylaxis with hematopoietic growth factors.

First-line chemotherapy in very elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer:Gemcitabine monotherapy vs combination chemotherapy

BACKGROUND Combination chemotherapy(gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX)is widely used as the standard first-line treatment for pancreatic cancer.Considering the severe toxicities of combination chemotherapy,gemcitabine monotherapy(G mono)could be used as a first-line treatment in very elderly patients or those with a low Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status.However,reports on the efficacy of G mono in patients older than 75 years are limited.AIM To evaluate the efficacy of G mono and combination chemotherapy by comparing their clinical outcomes in very elderly patients with pancreatic cancer.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 104 older patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent chemotherapy with G mono(n=45)or combination therapy(n=59)as a first-line treatment between 2011 and 2019.All patients were histologically diagnosed with ductal adenocarcinoma.Primary outcomes were progression-free survival and overall survival.We also analyzed subgroups according to age[65-74 years(elderly)and≥75 years(very elderly)].Propensity score matching was performed to compare the outcomes between the two chemotherapy groups.RESULTS The baseline characteristics were significantly different between the two chemotherapy groups,especially regarding age,ratio of multiple metastases,tumor burden,and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.After propensity score matching,the baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the chemotherapy groups in elderly and very elderly patients.In the elderly patients,the median progression-free survival(62 d vs 206 d,P=0.000)and overall survival(102 d vs 302 d,P=0.000)were longer in the combination chemotherapy group.However,in the very elderly patients,the median progression-free survival(147 d and 174 d,respectively,P=0.796)and overall survival(227 d and 211 d,respectively,P=0.739)were comparable between the G mono and combination chemotherapy groups.Adverse events occurred more frequently in the combination chemotherapy group than in the G mono group,especially thromboembolism(G mono vs nab-paclitaxel vs FOLFIRINOX;8.9%vs 5.9%vs 28%,P=0.041),neutropenia(40.0%vs 76.5%vs 84.0%,P=0.000),and neuropathy(0%vs 61.8%vs 28.0%,P=0.006).CONCLUSION In elderly patients,combination therapy is more effective than G mono.However,G mono is superior for the management of metastatic pancreatic cancer in very elderly patients.

Clinical observation of docetaxel in treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly patients

Objective:The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and side effects of docetaxel as single chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Forty-two elderly patients with advanced NSCLC who were chemotherapy-naive were enrolled in this study. Docetaxel at the doses of 70 mg/m2 was administrated intravenously every 21 days as a cycle, each patient received 2-4 cycles. All patients were followed up until disease progressed or patients died. Results: Among 42 patients, 40 could be evaluated, 1 complete response (CR), 9 partial response (PR), 13 stable disease (SD), 17 progress disease (PD). The overall response rate (CR+PR) was 35% and disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 57.5%. The median time to progress (TTP) was 4.2 months, median survival time was 6.1 months and 1-year survival rate was 35.8%. The main toxicity was myelosuppression and decreasing platelet. Conclusion: Single agent docetaxel for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC is an efficient and well-tolerated chemotherapeutic approach with a low toxicity level.

Decision-Making Process for the Place of Death of Elderly Patients with Advanced Cancer and Their Families

Purpose: This study aims to understand how elderly patients with advanced cancer and their families make a decision for a place of death for the patient. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 pairs of elderly patients and members of their family. The patients had finished anticancer treatment and made some decision about the preferred place of death. A modified grounded-theory approach was used for the data analysis. Results: Making a “tentative” decision for the place of death of the elderly patients is a process with the core category [carefully choosing the final place for self-fulfillment]. The patients were “conducting a comprehensive review of the place of death” and “embracing the wishes for a way of life without difficulty”. Involving the family in making a “tentative” decision about the place of death of the elderly patients is the process with the core category [realizing the wish of patients in the terminal condition for the way for death]. The families were “examining the place of death from different aspects” and “respecting the patient’s intention as far as possible”. Conclusions: When the patients [carefully choosing the final place for self-fulfillment], it was important to reconcile their wishes with the burden on the families. When the families were trying to [realize the wish of patients in the terminal condition for the way for dying], it was important to balance the respect for the patient intentions and homecare they can provide for the patient. For the patients and their families, it is essential to mutually understand the intentions and wishes of the other party in decision making about the place of death.

Influence on liver function of hepatic artery interventional chemoembolization combined reduced glutathione therapy for elderly patients with advanced liver cancer

Objective:To explore the influence on liver function of hepatic artery interventional chemoembolization combined reduced glutathione therapy for elderly patients with advanced liver cancer.Methods:A total of 120 cases of elderly patients with advanced liver cancer from digestive surgery in-patient department of our hospital during the period of January 2014 and January 2016 were selected as the research object, the patients were divided into two groups by using the random number table method,each for 60 cases.The control group were given conventional drugs chemotherapy, the study group were given hepatic artery interventional chemoembolization combined reduced glutathione therapy, serum liver function indexes of Direct Bilirubin(DBil), Total Bilirubin(TBil), Aspartate Transaminase(AST) and Alanineamino Transferase (ALT)were detected by using automatic biochemical analyzer. Results: The clinical remission rate of study group was significantly higher than the control group, the recurrence rate was obviously lower than the control group,compared between the two groups with statistically significant differences. The average survival time of study group (29.36±6.25) months, was significantly longer than the control group (18.02±4.16) months .Before the treatment, serum DBil, TBil, AST and ALT levels compared between the two groups with no statistically significant differences,after the treatment,the indexes of study group was significantly lower than the control group. The indexes levels compared between pre-therapy and post-therapy in study group with no statistically significant differences, while the indexes levels of post-therapy in the control group were significantly higher than those pre-therapy. Before the treatment, the life quality score compared between the two groups with no statistically significant differences, after treatment,the score of all patients were significantly higher than those pre-therapywhich the score of study group was significantly higher than the control group.The incidence rate of drug adverse reactions compared between the two groups with no statistically significant differences.Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of hepatic artery interventional chemoembolization combined reduced glutathione therapy for elderly patients with advanced liver cancer is satisfying, and helps to significantly improve liver function, improve life quality, it is worth popularization and application in the clinical practice.