目的探讨血清壳多糖酶3样蛋白1(chitinase-3-like protein 1,CHI3L1)、甲胎蛋白(alpha fetoprotein,AFP)和γ-谷氨酰转移酶(γ-glutamyl transferase,GGT)检测在乙型肝炎病毒(hepatitis B virus,HBV)感染相关肝癌诊断中的临床应用价值...目的探讨血清壳多糖酶3样蛋白1(chitinase-3-like protein 1,CHI3L1)、甲胎蛋白(alpha fetoprotein,AFP)和γ-谷氨酰转移酶(γ-glutamyl transferase,GGT)检测在乙型肝炎病毒(hepatitis B virus,HBV)感染相关肝癌诊断中的临床应用价值。方法选取2021年7月—2023年7月在玉林市第一人民医院就诊HBV病毒感染相关的50例肝癌患者,50例肝硬化患者,50例慢性乙型肝炎患者以及50名同期健康体检者作为研究对象。比较4组研究对象血清中CHI3L1、AFP、GGT、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(alanine aminotransferase,ALT)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(aspartate aminotransferase,AST)等水平的差异,用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC)曲线评估各指标在肝癌中的诊断价值。结果肝炎组、肝硬化组、肝癌组的CHI3L1、AST、ALT水平均高于对照组,肝癌组AFP、GGT水平高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与肝炎组比较,肝硬化组及肝癌组的CHI3L1、AFP、GGT、AST、ALT水平均升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与肝硬化组比较,肝癌组的CHI3L1、AFP、GGT、AST水平均升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,CHI3L1、AFP、GGT联合时的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)最大(AUC=0.936)。Spearman相关分析结果显示,CHI3L1与AST呈正相关(r=0.414,P=0.003),AFP与GGT呈正相关(r=0.437,P=0.002),AFP与AST呈正相关(r=0.504,P<0.001),GGT与AST呈正相关(r=0.759,P<0.001),GGT与ALT呈正相关(r=0.636,P<0.001)。结论CHI3L1、AFP及GGT联合检测可提高肝癌的诊断价值,对临床肝癌患者诊疗有重要作用。展开更多
目的:探讨血清生物标志物甲胎蛋白(AFP)、维生素K缺失或拮抗剂Ⅱ诱导的蛋白质(PIVKA-Ⅱ)和磷脂酰肌醇蛋白聚糖3(GPC-3)单独或联合用于肝细胞癌(以下简称肝癌)诊断的价值。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase三个数据库,收集2002...目的:探讨血清生物标志物甲胎蛋白(AFP)、维生素K缺失或拮抗剂Ⅱ诱导的蛋白质(PIVKA-Ⅱ)和磷脂酰肌醇蛋白聚糖3(GPC-3)单独或联合用于肝细胞癌(以下简称肝癌)诊断的价值。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase三个数据库,收集2002年以来发表的AFP、PIVKA-Ⅱ和GPC-3单独或联合用于诊断肝癌的文献。根据纳入和排除标准筛选文献并提取相关数据。利用诊断准确性研究的质量评价(QUADAS)检查表对纳入的文献进行质量评价,并采用Meta DiSc软件、Review Manager 5.4软件和Stata 15.1软件对AFP、PIVKA-Ⅱ和GPC-3单用和联合使用诊断肝癌的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感度、特异度等指标进行数据分析。结果:共纳入32篇文献。Meta分析结果显示,单个标志物用于诊断肝癌时,PIVKA-Ⅱ的AUC值最高,为0.88(95%CI:0.85~0.91),其次是GPC-3和AFP;多个标志物联合用于诊断肝癌的AUC均高于单个标志物,其中PIVKA-Ⅱ联合GPC-3诊断的AUC值最高,为0.90(95%CI:0.87~0.92)。单个标志物用于诊断肝癌时,PIVKA-Ⅱ和GPC-3的敏感度相对较高(分别为0.75和0.76),但GPC-3的特异度不如PIVKA-Ⅱ和AFP(AFP、PIVKA-Ⅱ和GPC-3分别为0.87、0.88和0.81);多个标志物联合用于诊断肝癌的敏感度较单个标志物诊断时有所提高,但特异度无明显提高。单个标志物用于诊断肝癌时,PIVKA-Ⅱ的诊断比值比(DOR)最高,为22(95%CI:13~36),其次是GPC-3和AFP;两个标志物联合用于诊断肝癌的DOR均高于单个标志物,其中AFP联合GPC-3诊断的DOR最高,为25(95%CI:9~67);三个标志物联合用于诊断肝癌时的DOR明显降低,为10(95%CI:7~45)。结论:单个标志物用于肝癌诊断时,PIVKA-Ⅱ的诊断价值更高。两种标志物联合能显著提高肝癌诊断的敏感度,三种标志物联合未能进一步提高诊断价值。结合临床实际,推荐AFP联合PIVKA-Ⅱ用于肝癌的诊断。展开更多
AIM To investigate clinicopathological features of early stage gastric cancer with enteroblastic differentiation(GCED).METHODS We retrospectively investigated data on 6 cases of early stage GCED and 186 cases of early...AIM To investigate clinicopathological features of early stage gastric cancer with enteroblastic differentiation(GCED).METHODS We retrospectively investigated data on 6 cases of early stage GCED and 186 cases of early stage conventional gastric cancer(CGC: well or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma) who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection or endoscopic mucosal resection from September 2011 to February 2015 in our hospital.GCED was defined as a tumor having a primitive intestine-like structure composed of cuboidal or columnar cells with clear cytoplasm and immunohistochemical positivity for either alpha-fetoprotein, Glypican 3 or SALL4. The following were compared between GCED and CGC: age, gender, location and size of tumor, macroscopic type, ulceration, depth of invasion, lymphatic and venous invasion, positive horizontal and vertical margin, curative resection rate.RESULTS Six cases(5 males, 1 female; mean age 75.7 years; 6 lesions) of early gastric cancer with a GCED component and 186 cases(139 males, 47 females; mean age 72.7 years; 209 lesions) of early stage CGC were investigated. Mean tumor diameters were similar but rates of submucosal invasion, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, and non-curative resection were higher in GCED than CGC(66.6% vs 11.4%, 33.3% vs 2.3%, 66.6% vs 0.4%, 83.3% vs 11% respectively, P < 0.01). Deep submucosal invasion was not revealed endoscopically or by preoperative biopsy. Histologically, in GCED the superficial mucosal layer was covered with a CGC component. The GCED component tended to exist in the deeper part of the mucosa to the submucosa by lymphatic and/or venous invasion, without severe stromal reaction. In addition, Glypican 3 was the most sensitive marker for GCED(positivity, 83.3%), immunohistochemically.CONCLUSION Even in the early stage GCED has high malignant potential, and preoperative diagnosis is considered difficult. Endoscopists and pathologists should know the clinicopathological features of this highly malignant type of cancer.展开更多
文摘目的探讨血清壳多糖酶3样蛋白1(chitinase-3-like protein 1,CHI3L1)、甲胎蛋白(alpha fetoprotein,AFP)和γ-谷氨酰转移酶(γ-glutamyl transferase,GGT)检测在乙型肝炎病毒(hepatitis B virus,HBV)感染相关肝癌诊断中的临床应用价值。方法选取2021年7月—2023年7月在玉林市第一人民医院就诊HBV病毒感染相关的50例肝癌患者,50例肝硬化患者,50例慢性乙型肝炎患者以及50名同期健康体检者作为研究对象。比较4组研究对象血清中CHI3L1、AFP、GGT、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(alanine aminotransferase,ALT)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(aspartate aminotransferase,AST)等水平的差异,用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC)曲线评估各指标在肝癌中的诊断价值。结果肝炎组、肝硬化组、肝癌组的CHI3L1、AST、ALT水平均高于对照组,肝癌组AFP、GGT水平高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与肝炎组比较,肝硬化组及肝癌组的CHI3L1、AFP、GGT、AST、ALT水平均升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与肝硬化组比较,肝癌组的CHI3L1、AFP、GGT、AST水平均升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,CHI3L1、AFP、GGT联合时的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)最大(AUC=0.936)。Spearman相关分析结果显示,CHI3L1与AST呈正相关(r=0.414,P=0.003),AFP与GGT呈正相关(r=0.437,P=0.002),AFP与AST呈正相关(r=0.504,P<0.001),GGT与AST呈正相关(r=0.759,P<0.001),GGT与ALT呈正相关(r=0.636,P<0.001)。结论CHI3L1、AFP及GGT联合检测可提高肝癌的诊断价值,对临床肝癌患者诊疗有重要作用。
文摘AIM To investigate clinicopathological features of early stage gastric cancer with enteroblastic differentiation(GCED).METHODS We retrospectively investigated data on 6 cases of early stage GCED and 186 cases of early stage conventional gastric cancer(CGC: well or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma) who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection or endoscopic mucosal resection from September 2011 to February 2015 in our hospital.GCED was defined as a tumor having a primitive intestine-like structure composed of cuboidal or columnar cells with clear cytoplasm and immunohistochemical positivity for either alpha-fetoprotein, Glypican 3 or SALL4. The following were compared between GCED and CGC: age, gender, location and size of tumor, macroscopic type, ulceration, depth of invasion, lymphatic and venous invasion, positive horizontal and vertical margin, curative resection rate.RESULTS Six cases(5 males, 1 female; mean age 75.7 years; 6 lesions) of early gastric cancer with a GCED component and 186 cases(139 males, 47 females; mean age 72.7 years; 209 lesions) of early stage CGC were investigated. Mean tumor diameters were similar but rates of submucosal invasion, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, and non-curative resection were higher in GCED than CGC(66.6% vs 11.4%, 33.3% vs 2.3%, 66.6% vs 0.4%, 83.3% vs 11% respectively, P < 0.01). Deep submucosal invasion was not revealed endoscopically or by preoperative biopsy. Histologically, in GCED the superficial mucosal layer was covered with a CGC component. The GCED component tended to exist in the deeper part of the mucosa to the submucosa by lymphatic and/or venous invasion, without severe stromal reaction. In addition, Glypican 3 was the most sensitive marker for GCED(positivity, 83.3%), immunohistochemically.CONCLUSION Even in the early stage GCED has high malignant potential, and preoperative diagnosis is considered difficult. Endoscopists and pathologists should know the clinicopathological features of this highly malignant type of cancer.
