BACKGROUND Acute traumatic spinal cord injury(ATSCI)usually results in disability,yet data on contemporary national trends of ATSCI incidence are limited.AIM To provide a systematic and basic theoretical basis for imp...BACKGROUND Acute traumatic spinal cord injury(ATSCI)usually results in disability,yet data on contemporary national trends of ATSCI incidence are limited.AIM To provide a systematic and basic theoretical basis for improving the treatment of acute spinal cord injury.METHODS Data from the Peking University Third Hospital Inpatient Sample databases were analyzed.A total of 304 patients with ATSCI were included from 2012 to 2017.The epidemiological data,treatment,complications and clinical outcomes of these patients were reviewed.RESULTS Of the 304 patients,257(84.5%)were male,and 75%of the patients were 55 years old or younger.135 patients had improved follow-up American Spinal Injury Association(ASIA)grades(44.4%).Only 14 patients with ASIA grade A improved.A statistically significant difference in prognosis between patients who underwent surgery within 72 h and those who underwent surgery after 72 h was observed(P<0.05).Surgery within 72 h resulted in better prognosis.The Steroid group and the Non-Steroid group showed a significant difference in outcome among patients with ASIA grades A and B(P<0.05).Patients with pneumonia had a poorer prognosis than patients without pneumonia(P<0.05).Surgery within 72 h resulted in better prognosis.CONCLUSION This study found that there was no significant difference in hospitalization time and prognosis between the Steroid group and the Non-Steroid group,but the patients with severe spinal cord injury(ASIA grades A and B)who underwent surgery combined with steroid therapy had a better prognosis than those who underwent surgery alone.The disastrous consequences of ATSCI and lack of consensus on the management strategy are obvious.Further improvements in treatment planns are needed in order to obtain more reliable functional outcomes.展开更多
The ＂Center of Excellence＂ concept has been employed in healthcare for several decades. This concept has been adopted in several disciplines; such as bariatric surgery, orthopedic surgery, diabetes and stroke. The m...The ＂Center of Excellence＂ concept has been employed in healthcare for several decades. This concept has been adopted in several disciplines; such as bariatric surgery, orthopedic surgery, diabetes and stroke. The most successful model in surgery thus far has been the bariatric program, with a very extensive network and a large prospective database. Recently, the American As-sociation of Gynecologic Laparoscopists has introduced this concept in gynecologic surgery. The ＂Center Of Excellence in Minimally Invasive Gynecology＂ （COEMIG） designation program has been introduced with the goals of increasing safety and efficiency, cutting cost and increasing patient awareness and access to mini-mally invasive surgical options for women. The program may harbor challenges as well, such as human and fnancial resources, and diffculties with implementation and maintenance of such designation. This commen-tary describes the COEMIG designation process, along with its potential benefits and possible challenges. Though no studies have been published to date on the value of this concept in the feld of gynecologic surgery, we envision this commentary to provoke such studies to examine the relative value of this new program.展开更多
AIM To quantify the variability of financial disclosures by authors presenting orthopaedic trauma research. METHODS Self-reported authorship disclosure information published for the 2012 American Academy of Orthopaedi...AIM To quantify the variability of financial disclosures by authors presenting orthopaedic trauma research. METHODS Self-reported authorship disclosure information published for the 2012 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons(AAOS) and Orthopaedic Trauma Association(OTA) meetings was compiled from meeting programs. Both the AAOS and OTA required global disclosures for participants. Data collected included:(1) total number of presenters;(2) number of presenters with financial disclosures;(3) number of disclosures per author;(4) total number of companies supporting each author; and(5) specific type of disclosure. Disclosures made by authors presenting at more than one meeting were then compared for discrepancies.RESULTS Of the 5002 and 1168 authors presenting at the AAOS and OTA annual meetings, respectively, 1649(33%) and 246(21.9%) reported a financial disclosure(P < 0.0001). At the AAOS conference, the mean number of disclosures among presenters with disclosures was 4.01 with a range from 1 to 44. The majority of authors with disclosures reported three or more disclosures(n = 876, 53.1%). The most common cited disclosurewas as a paid consultant(51.5%) followed by research support(43.0%) and paid speaker(34.8%). Among the 256 physicians with financial disclosures presenting at the OTA conference, the mean number of disclosures was 4.03 with a range from 1 to 22. Similar to the AAOS conference, the majority of authors with any disclosures at the OTA conference reported three or more disclosures(n = 140, 54.7%). Most authors with a disclosure had three or more disclosures and the most common type of disclosure was paid consulting. At the OTA conference, the most commonly cited form of disclosure was paid consultant(54.3%) followed by research support(46.1%) and paid speaker(42.6%). Of the 346 researchers who presented at both meetings, 112(32.4%) authors were found to have at least one disclosure discrepancy. Among authors with a discrepancy, 36(32.1%) had three or more discrepancies. CONCLUSION There were variability and inconsistencies in financial disclosures by researchers presenting orthopaedic trauma research. Improved transparency of conflict of interest disclosures is warranted among trauma researchers presenting at national meetings.展开更多
BACKGROUND Hip fractures(HF)are common among the aging population,and surgery within 48 h is recommended.Patients can be hospitalized for surgery through different pathways,either trauma or medicine admitting services...BACKGROUND Hip fractures(HF)are common among the aging population,and surgery within 48 h is recommended.Patients can be hospitalized for surgery through different pathways,either trauma or medicine admitting services.AIM To compare management and outcomes among patients admitted through the trauma pathway(TP)vs medical pathway(MP).METHODS This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study included 2094 patients with proximal femur fractures(AO/Orthopedic Trauma Association Type 31)who underwent surgery at a level 1 trauma center between 2016-2021.There were 69 patients admitted through the TP and 2025 admitted through the MP.To ensure comparability between groups,66 of the 2025 MP patients were propensity matched to 66 TP patients by age,sex,HF type,HF surgery,and American Society of Anesthesiology score.The statistical analyses included multivariable analysis,group characteristics,and bivariate correlation comparisons with theχ^(2)test and t-test.RESULTS After propensity matching,the mean age in both groups was 75-years-old,62%of both groups were females,the main HF type was intertrochanteric(TP 52%vs MP 62%),open reduction internal fixation was the most common surgery(TP 68%vs MP 71%),and the mean American Society of Anesthesiology score was 2.8 for TP and 2.7 for MP.The majority of patients in TP and MP(71%vs 74%)were geriatric(≥65-years-old).Falls were the main mechanism of injury in both groups(77%vs 97%,P=0.001).There were no significant differences in pre-surgery anticoagulation use(49%vs 41%),admission day of the week,or insurance status.The incidence of comorbidities was equal(94%for both)with cardiac comorbidities being dominant in both groups(71%vs 73%).The number of preoperative consultations was similar for TP and MP,with the most common consultation being cardiology in both(44%and 36%).HF displacement occurred more among TP patients(76%vs 39%,P=0.000).Time to surgery was not statistically different(23 h in both),but length of surgery was significantly longer for TP(59 min vs 41 min,P=0.000).Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were not statistically different(5 d vs 8 d and 6 d for both).There were no statistical differences in discharge disposition and mortality(3%vs 0%).CONCLUSION There were no differences in outcomes of surgeries between admission through TP vs MP.The focus should be on the patient’s health condition and on prompt surgical intervention.展开更多
Renal injuries are classified,based on the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma classification,in to five grades of injury.Several imaging modalities have been available for assessing the grade of renal inju...Renal injuries are classified,based on the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma classification,in to five grades of injury.Several imaging modalities have been available for assessing the grade of renal injury,each with their usefulness and limitations.Currently,plain radiographs and intravenous urography have no role in the evaluation of patients with suspected renal injury.Ultrasonography(USG) has a limited role in evaluating patients with suspected retroperitoneal injury;however,it plays an important role during follow up in patients with urinoma formation.USG helps to monitor the size of a urinoma and also for the drainage procedure.The role of selective renal arteriography is mainly limited to an interventional purpose rather than for diagnostic utility.Retrograde pyelography is useful in assessing ureteral and renal pelvis integrity in suspected ureteropelvic junction injury and for an interventional purpose,like placing a stent across the site of ureteric injury.Magnetic resonance imaging has no role in acute renal injuries.Multidetector computed tomography is the modality of choice in the evaluation of renal injuries.It is also useful in evaluating traumatic injuries to kidneys with preexisting abnormalities and can help to define the extent of penetrating injuries in patients with stab wounds in the flank region.The combination of imaging findings along with clinical information is important in the management of the individual patient.This article will describe a spectrum of renal injuries encountered in a trauma setting.展开更多
美国胸外科学会(American Association for Thoracic Surgery,AATS)第98届年会于2018年4月28日至5月1日在美国加州圣迭戈市召开。本届年会围绕胸外科临床、基础研究热点,公布了多项研究成果,内容包括早期肺癌国际多中心研究的部分结果...美国胸外科学会(American Association for Thoracic Surgery,AATS)第98届年会于2018年4月28日至5月1日在美国加州圣迭戈市召开。本届年会围绕胸外科临床、基础研究热点,公布了多项研究成果,内容包括早期肺癌国际多中心研究的部分结果、大数据研究对肺癌诊疗指南的影响、手术与立体定向放疗疗效比较、肺癌免疫治疗、食管癌术前新辅助放化疗方案选择、食管癌术后复发方式及危险因素分析、食管良性疾病治疗新术式、气管隆突手术经验、肺移植供肺相关研究进展以及体外膜肺氧合在肺移植中的应用等。本文按照肺癌外科、食管外科、气管外科、肺移植进行分类,就会议公布的研究成果进行荟萃和报道。展开更多
Spondyloptosis in the clinic is rarely reported.We herein present a 47-year-old female,who suffered from a crush injury directly by a heavy cylindrical object from the lateral side.She was diagnosed to have traumatic ...Spondyloptosis in the clinic is rarely reported.We herein present a 47-year-old female,who suffered from a crush injury directly by a heavy cylindrical object from the lateral side.She was diagnosed to have traumatic L3 spondyloptosis with multiple traumas.Staged surgical procedures were conducted and a three-year follow-up was obtained.Eventually,normal spinal alignment was restored,and neurological deficits were gradually improved.At three years follow-up,the motor strength scores and function of the sphincters were incompletely improved.Previously published reports on traumatic lumbar spondyloptosis were reviewed and several critical points for management of this severe type of spinal injury were proposed.First,thoracolumbar and lumbosacral junction were mostly predilection sites.Second,numerous patients involving traumatic lumbar spondyloptosis were achieved to American Spinal Injury Association grade A.Third,lumbar spondyloptosis was commonly coupling withcauda equina injury.Finally,the outcomes were still with poorly prognosis and recovery of patients was correlation to spondyloptosis severity.Based on this case report and literatures review,we highlighted that the spinal alignment restoration relying on staged operations and following rehabilitation hereof are both important once facing with multiple traumas.Furthermore,we suggested to perform routine CT angiography during lumbar spondyloptosis to justify whether there are large vessel compression or injury.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Acute traumatic spinal cord injury(ATSCI)usually results in disability,yet data on contemporary national trends of ATSCI incidence are limited.AIM To provide a systematic and basic theoretical basis for improving the treatment of acute spinal cord injury.METHODS Data from the Peking University Third Hospital Inpatient Sample databases were analyzed.A total of 304 patients with ATSCI were included from 2012 to 2017.The epidemiological data,treatment,complications and clinical outcomes of these patients were reviewed.RESULTS Of the 304 patients,257(84.5%)were male,and 75%of the patients were 55 years old or younger.135 patients had improved follow-up American Spinal Injury Association(ASIA)grades(44.4%).Only 14 patients with ASIA grade A improved.A statistically significant difference in prognosis between patients who underwent surgery within 72 h and those who underwent surgery after 72 h was observed(P<0.05).Surgery within 72 h resulted in better prognosis.The Steroid group and the Non-Steroid group showed a significant difference in outcome among patients with ASIA grades A and B(P<0.05).Patients with pneumonia had a poorer prognosis than patients without pneumonia(P<0.05).Surgery within 72 h resulted in better prognosis.CONCLUSION This study found that there was no significant difference in hospitalization time and prognosis between the Steroid group and the Non-Steroid group,but the patients with severe spinal cord injury(ASIA grades A and B)who underwent surgery combined with steroid therapy had a better prognosis than those who underwent surgery alone.The disastrous consequences of ATSCI and lack of consensus on the management strategy are obvious.Further improvements in treatment planns are needed in order to obtain more reliable functional outcomes.
文摘The ＂Center of Excellence＂ concept has been employed in healthcare for several decades. This concept has been adopted in several disciplines; such as bariatric surgery, orthopedic surgery, diabetes and stroke. The most successful model in surgery thus far has been the bariatric program, with a very extensive network and a large prospective database. Recently, the American As-sociation of Gynecologic Laparoscopists has introduced this concept in gynecologic surgery. The ＂Center Of Excellence in Minimally Invasive Gynecology＂ （COEMIG） designation program has been introduced with the goals of increasing safety and efficiency, cutting cost and increasing patient awareness and access to mini-mally invasive surgical options for women. The program may harbor challenges as well, such as human and fnancial resources, and diffculties with implementation and maintenance of such designation. This commen-tary describes the COEMIG designation process, along with its potential benefits and possible challenges. Though no studies have been published to date on the value of this concept in the feld of gynecologic surgery, we envision this commentary to provoke such studies to examine the relative value of this new program.
文摘AIM To quantify the variability of financial disclosures by authors presenting orthopaedic trauma research. METHODS Self-reported authorship disclosure information published for the 2012 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons(AAOS) and Orthopaedic Trauma Association(OTA) meetings was compiled from meeting programs. Both the AAOS and OTA required global disclosures for participants. Data collected included:(1) total number of presenters;(2) number of presenters with financial disclosures;(3) number of disclosures per author;(4) total number of companies supporting each author; and(5) specific type of disclosure. Disclosures made by authors presenting at more than one meeting were then compared for discrepancies.RESULTS Of the 5002 and 1168 authors presenting at the AAOS and OTA annual meetings, respectively, 1649(33%) and 246(21.9%) reported a financial disclosure(P < 0.0001). At the AAOS conference, the mean number of disclosures among presenters with disclosures was 4.01 with a range from 1 to 44. The majority of authors with disclosures reported three or more disclosures(n = 876, 53.1%). The most common cited disclosurewas as a paid consultant(51.5%) followed by research support(43.0%) and paid speaker(34.8%). Among the 256 physicians with financial disclosures presenting at the OTA conference, the mean number of disclosures was 4.03 with a range from 1 to 22. Similar to the AAOS conference, the majority of authors with any disclosures at the OTA conference reported three or more disclosures(n = 140, 54.7%). Most authors with a disclosure had three or more disclosures and the most common type of disclosure was paid consulting. At the OTA conference, the most commonly cited form of disclosure was paid consultant(54.3%) followed by research support(46.1%) and paid speaker(42.6%). Of the 346 researchers who presented at both meetings, 112(32.4%) authors were found to have at least one disclosure discrepancy. Among authors with a discrepancy, 36(32.1%) had three or more discrepancies. CONCLUSION There were variability and inconsistencies in financial disclosures by researchers presenting orthopaedic trauma research. Improved transparency of conflict of interest disclosures is warranted among trauma researchers presenting at national meetings.
文摘BACKGROUND Hip fractures(HF)are common among the aging population,and surgery within 48 h is recommended.Patients can be hospitalized for surgery through different pathways,either trauma or medicine admitting services.AIM To compare management and outcomes among patients admitted through the trauma pathway(TP)vs medical pathway(MP).METHODS This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study included 2094 patients with proximal femur fractures(AO/Orthopedic Trauma Association Type 31)who underwent surgery at a level 1 trauma center between 2016-2021.There were 69 patients admitted through the TP and 2025 admitted through the MP.To ensure comparability between groups,66 of the 2025 MP patients were propensity matched to 66 TP patients by age,sex,HF type,HF surgery,and American Society of Anesthesiology score.The statistical analyses included multivariable analysis,group characteristics,and bivariate correlation comparisons with theχ^(2)test and t-test.RESULTS After propensity matching,the mean age in both groups was 75-years-old,62%of both groups were females,the main HF type was intertrochanteric(TP 52%vs MP 62%),open reduction internal fixation was the most common surgery(TP 68%vs MP 71%),and the mean American Society of Anesthesiology score was 2.8 for TP and 2.7 for MP.The majority of patients in TP and MP(71%vs 74%)were geriatric(≥65-years-old).Falls were the main mechanism of injury in both groups(77%vs 97%,P=0.001).There were no significant differences in pre-surgery anticoagulation use(49%vs 41%),admission day of the week,or insurance status.The incidence of comorbidities was equal(94%for both)with cardiac comorbidities being dominant in both groups(71%vs 73%).The number of preoperative consultations was similar for TP and MP,with the most common consultation being cardiology in both(44%and 36%).HF displacement occurred more among TP patients(76%vs 39%,P=0.000).Time to surgery was not statistically different(23 h in both),but length of surgery was significantly longer for TP(59 min vs 41 min,P=0.000).Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were not statistically different(5 d vs 8 d and 6 d for both).There were no statistical differences in discharge disposition and mortality(3%vs 0%).CONCLUSION There were no differences in outcomes of surgeries between admission through TP vs MP.The focus should be on the patient’s health condition and on prompt surgical intervention.
文摘Renal injuries are classified,based on the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma classification,in to five grades of injury.Several imaging modalities have been available for assessing the grade of renal injury,each with their usefulness and limitations.Currently,plain radiographs and intravenous urography have no role in the evaluation of patients with suspected renal injury.Ultrasonography(USG) has a limited role in evaluating patients with suspected retroperitoneal injury;however,it plays an important role during follow up in patients with urinoma formation.USG helps to monitor the size of a urinoma and also for the drainage procedure.The role of selective renal arteriography is mainly limited to an interventional purpose rather than for diagnostic utility.Retrograde pyelography is useful in assessing ureteral and renal pelvis integrity in suspected ureteropelvic junction injury and for an interventional purpose,like placing a stent across the site of ureteric injury.Magnetic resonance imaging has no role in acute renal injuries.Multidetector computed tomography is the modality of choice in the evaluation of renal injuries.It is also useful in evaluating traumatic injuries to kidneys with preexisting abnormalities and can help to define the extent of penetrating injuries in patients with stab wounds in the flank region.The combination of imaging findings along with clinical information is important in the management of the individual patient.This article will describe a spectrum of renal injuries encountered in a trauma setting.
文摘美国胸外科学会(American Association for Thoracic Surgery,AATS)第98届年会于2018年4月28日至5月1日在美国加州圣迭戈市召开。本届年会围绕胸外科临床、基础研究热点,公布了多项研究成果,内容包括早期肺癌国际多中心研究的部分结果、大数据研究对肺癌诊疗指南的影响、手术与立体定向放疗疗效比较、肺癌免疫治疗、食管癌术前新辅助放化疗方案选择、食管癌术后复发方式及危险因素分析、食管良性疾病治疗新术式、气管隆突手术经验、肺移植供肺相关研究进展以及体外膜肺氧合在肺移植中的应用等。本文按照肺癌外科、食管外科、气管外科、肺移植进行分类,就会议公布的研究成果进行荟萃和报道。
文摘Spondyloptosis in the clinic is rarely reported.We herein present a 47-year-old female,who suffered from a crush injury directly by a heavy cylindrical object from the lateral side.She was diagnosed to have traumatic L3 spondyloptosis with multiple traumas.Staged surgical procedures were conducted and a three-year follow-up was obtained.Eventually,normal spinal alignment was restored,and neurological deficits were gradually improved.At three years follow-up,the motor strength scores and function of the sphincters were incompletely improved.Previously published reports on traumatic lumbar spondyloptosis were reviewed and several critical points for management of this severe type of spinal injury were proposed.First,thoracolumbar and lumbosacral junction were mostly predilection sites.Second,numerous patients involving traumatic lumbar spondyloptosis were achieved to American Spinal Injury Association grade A.Third,lumbar spondyloptosis was commonly coupling withcauda equina injury.Finally,the outcomes were still with poorly prognosis and recovery of patients was correlation to spondyloptosis severity.Based on this case report and literatures review,we highlighted that the spinal alignment restoration relying on staged operations and following rehabilitation hereof are both important once facing with multiple traumas.Furthermore,we suggested to perform routine CT angiography during lumbar spondyloptosis to justify whether there are large vessel compression or injury.
