Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis(RP-IPAA) is the gold standard surgical treatment for ulcerative colitis.However,despite the widespread use of RP-IPAA,many aspects of this treatment still ...Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis(RP-IPAA) is the gold standard surgical treatment for ulcerative colitis.However,despite the widespread use of RP-IPAA,many aspects of this treatment still remain controversial,such as the approach(open or laparoscopic),number of stages in the surgery,type of pouch,and construction type(hand-sewn or stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis).The present narrative review aims to discuss current evidence on the short-,mid-,and long-term results of each of these technical alternatives as well as their benefits and disadvantages.A review of the MEDLINE,EMBASE,and Ovid databases was performed to identify studies published through March 2016.Few large,randomized,controlled studies have been conducted,which limits the conclusions that can be drawn regarding controversial issues.The available data from retrospective studies suggest that laparoscopic surgery has no clear advantages compared with open surgery and that one-stage RP-IPAA may be indicated in selected cases.Regarding 2- and 3-stage RP-IPAA,patients who underwent these surgeries differed significantly with respect to clinical and laboratory variables,making any comparisons extremely difficult.The long-term results regarding the pouch type show that the W- and J-reservoirs do not differ significantly,although the J pouch is generally preferred by surgeons.Hand-sewn and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomoses have their own advantages,and there is no clear benefit of one technique over the other.展开更多
AIM:To investigate the feasibility and long-term functional outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with modified double-stapled mucosectomy.METHODS:From January 2002 to March 2011,fourtyfive patients underwent ileal ...AIM:To investigate the feasibility and long-term functional outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with modified double-stapled mucosectomy.METHODS:From January 2002 to March 2011,fourtyfive patients underwent ileal pouch anal anastomosis with modified double-stapled mucosectomy technique and the clinical data obtained for these patients were reviewed.RESULTS:Patients with ulcerative colitis(n = 29) and familial adenomatous polyposis(n = 16) underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with modified doublestapled mucosectomy.Twenty-eight patients underwent one-stage restorative proctocolectomy,ileal pouch anal anastomosis,protective ileostomy and the ileostomy was closed 4-12 mo postoperatively.Two-stage procedures were performed in seventeen urgent patients,proctectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis were completed after previous colectomy with ileostomy.Morbidity within the first 30 d of surgery occurred in 10(22.2%) patients,all of them could be treated conservatively.During the median follow-up of 65 mo,mild to moderate anastomotic narrowing was occurred in 4 patients,one patient developed persistent anastomotic stricture and need surgical intervention.Thirtyfive percent of patients developed at least 1 episode of pouchitis.There was no incontinence in our patients,the median functional Oresland score was 6,3 and 2 after 1 year,2.5 years and 5 years respectively.Nearly half patients(44.4%) reported "moderate functioning",37.7% reported "good functioning",whereas in 17.7% of patients "poor functioning" was observed after 1 year.Five years later,79.2% of patients with good function,16.7% with moderate function,only 4.2% of patients with poor function.CONCLUSION:The results of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with modified double-stapled mucosectomy technique are promising,with a low complication rate and good long-term functional results.展开更多
Acute severe ulcerative colitis(UC) is a highly morbid con dition that requires both medical and surgical managementhrough the collaboration of gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons. First line treatment for pat...Acute severe ulcerative colitis(UC) is a highly morbid con dition that requires both medical and surgical managementhrough the collaboration of gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons. First line treatment for patients presenting with acute severe UC consists of intravenous steroids, but those who do not respond require escalation of therapy or emergent colectomy. The mortality of emergent colectomy has declined significantly in recent decades, but due to the morbidity of this procedure, second line agents such as cyclosporine and infliximab have been used as salvage therapy in an attempt to avoid emergent surgery. Unfortunately, protracted medical therapy has led to patients presenting for surgery in a poorer state of health leading to poorer post-operative outcomes. In this era of multiple medical modalities available in the treatment of acute severe UC, physicians must consider the advantages and disadvantages of prolonged medical therapy in an attempt to avoid surgery. Colectomy remains a mainstay in the treatment of severe ulcerative colitis not responsive to corticosteroids and rescue therapy, and timely referral for surgery allows for improved post-operative outcomes with lower risk of sepsis and improved patient survival. Options for reconstructive surgery include three-stage ileal pouchanal anastomosis or a modified two-stage procedure that can be performed either open or laparoscopically. The numerous avenues of medical and surgical therapy have allowed for great advances in the treatment of patients with UC. In this era of options, it is important to maintain a global view, utilize biologic therapy when indicated, and then maintain an appropriate threshold for surgery. The purpose of this review is to summarize the growing number of medical and surgical options available in the treatment of acute, severe UC.展开更多
文摘AIM: To investigate the outcomes of treatments for complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in Korean patients with ulcerative colitis.
文摘Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis(RP-IPAA) is the gold standard surgical treatment for ulcerative colitis.However,despite the widespread use of RP-IPAA,many aspects of this treatment still remain controversial,such as the approach(open or laparoscopic),number of stages in the surgery,type of pouch,and construction type(hand-sewn or stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis).The present narrative review aims to discuss current evidence on the short-,mid-,and long-term results of each of these technical alternatives as well as their benefits and disadvantages.A review of the MEDLINE,EMBASE,and Ovid databases was performed to identify studies published through March 2016.Few large,randomized,controlled studies have been conducted,which limits the conclusions that can be drawn regarding controversial issues.The available data from retrospective studies suggest that laparoscopic surgery has no clear advantages compared with open surgery and that one-stage RP-IPAA may be indicated in selected cases.Regarding 2- and 3-stage RP-IPAA,patients who underwent these surgeries differed significantly with respect to clinical and laboratory variables,making any comparisons extremely difficult.The long-term results regarding the pouch type show that the W- and J-reservoirs do not differ significantly,although the J pouch is generally preferred by surgeons.Hand-sewn and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomoses have their own advantages,and there is no clear benefit of one technique over the other.
文摘AIM:To investigate the feasibility and long-term functional outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with modified double-stapled mucosectomy.METHODS:From January 2002 to March 2011,fourtyfive patients underwent ileal pouch anal anastomosis with modified double-stapled mucosectomy technique and the clinical data obtained for these patients were reviewed.RESULTS:Patients with ulcerative colitis(n = 29) and familial adenomatous polyposis(n = 16) underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with modified doublestapled mucosectomy.Twenty-eight patients underwent one-stage restorative proctocolectomy,ileal pouch anal anastomosis,protective ileostomy and the ileostomy was closed 4-12 mo postoperatively.Two-stage procedures were performed in seventeen urgent patients,proctectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis were completed after previous colectomy with ileostomy.Morbidity within the first 30 d of surgery occurred in 10(22.2%) patients,all of them could be treated conservatively.During the median follow-up of 65 mo,mild to moderate anastomotic narrowing was occurred in 4 patients,one patient developed persistent anastomotic stricture and need surgical intervention.Thirtyfive percent of patients developed at least 1 episode of pouchitis.There was no incontinence in our patients,the median functional Oresland score was 6,3 and 2 after 1 year,2.5 years and 5 years respectively.Nearly half patients(44.4%) reported "moderate functioning",37.7% reported "good functioning",whereas in 17.7% of patients "poor functioning" was observed after 1 year.Five years later,79.2% of patients with good function,16.7% with moderate function,only 4.2% of patients with poor function.CONCLUSION:The results of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with modified double-stapled mucosectomy technique are promising,with a low complication rate and good long-term functional results.
文摘Acute severe ulcerative colitis(UC) is a highly morbid con dition that requires both medical and surgical managementhrough the collaboration of gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons. First line treatment for patients presenting with acute severe UC consists of intravenous steroids, but those who do not respond require escalation of therapy or emergent colectomy. The mortality of emergent colectomy has declined significantly in recent decades, but due to the morbidity of this procedure, second line agents such as cyclosporine and infliximab have been used as salvage therapy in an attempt to avoid emergent surgery. Unfortunately, protracted medical therapy has led to patients presenting for surgery in a poorer state of health leading to poorer post-operative outcomes. In this era of multiple medical modalities available in the treatment of acute severe UC, physicians must consider the advantages and disadvantages of prolonged medical therapy in an attempt to avoid surgery. Colectomy remains a mainstay in the treatment of severe ulcerative colitis not responsive to corticosteroids and rescue therapy, and timely referral for surgery allows for improved post-operative outcomes with lower risk of sepsis and improved patient survival. Options for reconstructive surgery include three-stage ileal pouchanal anastomosis or a modified two-stage procedure that can be performed either open or laparoscopically. The numerous avenues of medical and surgical therapy have allowed for great advances in the treatment of patients with UC. In this era of options, it is important to maintain a global view, utilize biologic therapy when indicated, and then maintain an appropriate threshold for surgery. The purpose of this review is to summarize the growing number of medical and surgical options available in the treatment of acute, severe UC.
