BACKGROUND Major hip surgery usually requires neuraxial or general anesthesia with tracheal intubation and may be supplemented with a nerve block to provide intraoperative and postoperative pain relief.CASE SUMMARY Th...BACKGROUND Major hip surgery usually requires neuraxial or general anesthesia with tracheal intubation and may be supplemented with a nerve block to provide intraoperative and postoperative pain relief.CASE SUMMARY This report established that hip surgical procedures can be performed with a fascia iliaca compartment block(FICB)and monitored anesthesia care(MAC)while avoiding neuraxial or general anesthesia.This was a preliminary experience with two geriatric patients with hip fracture,American Society of Anesthesiologists status III,and with many comorbidities.Neither patient could be operated on within 48 h after admission.Both general anesthesia and neuraxial anesthesia were high-risk procedures and had contraindications.Hence,we chose nerve block combined with a small amount of sedation.Intraoperative analgesia was provided by single-injection ultrasound-guided FICB.Light intravenous sedation was added.Surgical exposure was satisfactory,and neither patient complained of any symptoms during the procedure.CONCLUSION This report showed that hip surgery for geriatric patients can be performed with FICB and MAC,although complications and contraindications are common.The anesthetic program was accompanied by stable respiratory and circulatory system responses and satisfactory analgesia while avoiding the adverse effects and problems associated with either neuraxial or general anesthesia.展开更多
<strong>Background:</strong><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Gabapentin is routinely prescribed preoperatively to decrease...<strong>Background:</strong><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Gabapentin is routinely prescribed preoperatively to decrease postoperative pain intensity. It is included in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) recommendations. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Objective:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> To analyze correlation of gabapentin dosage and post anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay (LOS) and cost. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Study Design:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent general anesthesia and received preoperative oral gabapentin from June 2017 </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">to</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> August 2017 for pelvic and breast procedures. The main outcome was correlation between PACU LOS and gabapentin dosage in the outpatients. Financial analysis was performed to assess the cost to the hospital associated with increased LOS. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Of the 636 patients, 405 patients received 300 </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">mg and 231 patients received 100 mg gabapentin. Mean dosage per kg (mg/k</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">g ±</span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">SD) was 3.12</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1.51 (range: </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.86 to 6.12). PACU LOS was 96</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">77 (minutes ±</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">SD) in patients receiving 100 mg and 120</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">96 in patients receiving 300 mg capsule (p</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.001). Linear regression analysis, failed to show a </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">statistically significant correlation between per kg dosage and PACU LOS (</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 0</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.13). Using multiple regression analysis, we calculated the correlation coefficient to be +1.71 minutes per 1mg/kg gabapentin (95% CI: -</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3.75 to +7.10, p</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 0</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.54) after adjusting for confounders. Adding 3</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">mg/kg to pre-op g</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">abapentin dosage of all outpatients cost on average</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> an extra $9794 per mo</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">nth in this cohort. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Every 1mg/kg increase in gabapentin dosage adds an estimated 7.1 minutes to PACU LOS. A 3</span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">mg/kg increase in gabapentin adds estimated 22 additional minutes in PACU LOS. Unfortunately, increase LOS is associated with increased hospital costs.</span>展开更多
Background:Awake craniotomy(AC)has become gold standard in surgical resection of gliomas located in eloquent areas.The conscious sedation techniques in AC include both monitored anesthesia care(MAC)and asleep-awake-as...Background:Awake craniotomy(AC)has become gold standard in surgical resection of gliomas located in eloquent areas.The conscious sedation techniques in AC include both monitored anesthesia care(MAC)and asleep-awake-asleep(AAA).The choice of optimal anesthetic method depends on the preferences of the surgical team(mainly anesthesiologist and neurosurgeon).The aim of this study was to compare the difference in physiological and blood gas data,dosage of different drugs,the probability of switching to endotracheal intubation,and extent of tumor resection and dysfunction after operation between AAA and MAC anesthetic management for resection of gliomas in eloquent brain areas.Methods:Two-hundred and twenty-five patients with super-tentorial tumor located in eloquent areas underwent AC from 2009 to 2021 in Xijing Hospital.Forty-one patients underwent AAA technique,and the rest one-hundred eighty-four patients underwent MAC technique.Anesthetic management,dosage of different drugs,intraoperative complications,postoperative outcomes,adverse events,extent of resection and motor,and sensory and language dysfunction after operation were compared between MAC and AAA.Result:There was no significant difference in gender,KPS score,MMSE score,glioma grade,type,and growth site between the patients in the two groups,except the older age of patients in MAC group than that in AAA group.During the whole process of operation,there were greater pulse pressure difference(P=0.046),shorter operation time(P=0.039),less dosage of remifentanil(P=0.000),more dosage of dexmedetomidine(P=0.013),more use of antiemetics(81%,P=0.0067),lower use of vasoactive agent(45.1%,P=0.010),and lower probability of conversion to general anesthesia(GA,P=0.027)in MAC group than that in AAA group.Blood gas analysis showed that PetCO2(P=0.000),Glu concentration(P=0.000),and PaCO2(P=0.000)were higher,but SPO2(P=0.002)and PaO2(P=0.000)were lower in MAC group than that in AAA group.In the postoperative recovery stage,compared with that of AAA group,the probability of dysfunction in MAC group at 1,3,5,and 7 days after operation was lower,which were 27.8%vs 53.6%(P=0.003),31%vs 68.3%(P=0.000),28.8%vs 63.4%(P=0.000),and 25.6%vs 58.5%(P=0.000),respectively.Conclusion:Compared with AAA,it seems that MAC has more advantages in the management for resection of gliomas in eloquent brain areas,and MAC combined with multiple monitoring such as cerebral cortical mapping,neuronavigation,and ultrasonic detection is worthy of popularization for the resection of gliomas in eloquent brain areas.展开更多
Background:There is no gold standard sedation method for pediatric cardiac catheterization.In congenital heart diseases with intracardiac shunts,hemodynamic parameters are prone to change depending on the ventilation ...Background:There is no gold standard sedation method for pediatric cardiac catheterization.In congenital heart diseases with intracardiac shunts,hemodynamic parameters are prone to change depending on the ventilation conditions and anesthetics,although few studies have examined these effects.The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of two different sedation methods on the hemodynamic parameters.Methods:This study retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with ventricular septal defect(VSD)below 1 year of age who underwent cardiac catheterization at Aichi Children’s Health and Medical Center,who were divided into age-and VSD diameter-matched general anesthesia(GA)and monitored anesthesia care(MAC)under the natural airway groups(n=40 each),for comparison of hemodynamic parameters.Results:In the GA group,arterial blood pH and arterial partial pressure of oxygen were significantly higher(p<0.01),whereas arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide was significantly lower than in the MAC group(p<0.01).Mean pulmonary artery pressure(p<0.05)and systemic blood pressure(p<0.01)were lower in the GA group.Pulmonary vascular resistance index(p<0.01)and systemic vascular resistance index(p<0.01)were also significantly lower in the GA group than the MAC group.There were no significant differences in pulmonary blood flow index,systemic blood flow index,and pulmonary/systemic blood flow ratio between the two groups.Conclusions:Cardiac catheterization under GA in VSD patients results in different hemodynamic parameters compared to that under MAC.In particular,when using pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance measured under GA for judgment regarding the surgical indications or perioperative management,consideration should be given to the fact that these parameters might be lower compared to those measured under MAC.展开更多
AIM To evaluate the potential benefits and risks of the use of epidural anaesthesia within an enhanced recovery protocol in this specific subpopulation.METHODS A retrospective review was conducted, including all cirrh...AIM To evaluate the potential benefits and risks of the use of epidural anaesthesia within an enhanced recovery protocol in this specific subpopulation.METHODS A retrospective review was conducted, including all cirrhotic patients who underwent open liver resection between January 2013 and December 2015 at Bologna University Hospital. Patients with an abnormal coagulation profile contraindicating the placement of an epidural catheter were excluded from the analysis. The control group was composed by patients refusing epidural anaesthesia. RESULTS Of the 183 cirrhotic patients undergoing open liver resections, 57 had contraindications to the placement of an epidural catheter; of the remaining 126, 86 patients received general anaesthesia and 40 combined anaesthesia. The two groups presented homogeneous characteristics. Intraoperatively the metabolic data did not differ between the two groups, whilst the epidural group had a lower mean arterial pressure(P = 0.041) and received more colloid infusions(P = 0.007). Postoperative liver and kidney function did not differ significantly.Length of mechanical ventilation(P = 0.003) and hospital stay(P = 0.032) were significantly lower in the epidural group. No complications related to the epidural catheter placement or removal was recorded.CONCLUSION The use of Epidural Anaesthesia within a fast track protocol for cirrhotic patients undergoing liver resections had a positive impact on the patient's outcomes and comfort as demonstrated by a significantly lower length of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay in the epidural group. The technique appears to be safely manageable in this fragile population even though these results need confirmation in larger studies.展开更多
Lung tumors represent a major health impact globally. Pulmonary cryoablation treatment as a palliative measure for patients with non-operable pulmonary lesions has gained popularity over the last decade. With increasi...Lung tumors represent a major health impact globally. Pulmonary cryoablation treatment as a palliative measure for patients with non-operable pulmonary lesions has gained popularity over the last decade. With increasing case load and patients medical status becoming more complex, preparation for pulmonary cryoablation requires the implementation of an enhanced perioperative anesthetic plan. Current literature as well as our institutional experience shows that this patient population presents with multiple comorbidities raising the challenge of providing anesthetic care. These procedures are done under challenging conditions with limited resources and in remote locations in the hospital. A team approach by the anesthesiologist, thoracic surgeon, and interventional radiologist is critical to the success of this treatment. The present review examines our institution’s anesthetic management of percutaneous cryoablation treatment (PCT) in the treatment of non-operable lung cancer and metastases. The objective of this article is to review the current literature guidelines and to discuss our retrospective institutional experience in anesthesia management of PCT procedures.展开更多
目的研究麻醉复苏室(Post-anesthesia care unit,PACU)护士对麻醉苏醒期风险认知和患者安全胜任力现状,并分析麻醉苏醒期风险认知和患者安全胜任力相关性的影响因素。方法采用分层多阶段聚类抽样法于2022年6月-8月抽取新疆16所综合性医...目的研究麻醉复苏室(Post-anesthesia care unit,PACU)护士对麻醉苏醒期风险认知和患者安全胜任力现状,并分析麻醉苏醒期风险认知和患者安全胜任力相关性的影响因素。方法采用分层多阶段聚类抽样法于2022年6月-8月抽取新疆16所综合性医院的228名PACU护士为研究对象,采用电子问卷形式,问卷由一般资料、麻醉苏醒期风险认知调查问卷和患者安全胜任力护士评价量表组成,收集PACU护士对麻醉苏醒期风险认知和患者安全胜任力情况,分析患者安全胜任力和麻醉苏醒期风险认知的相关性及影响因素。结果PACU护士麻醉苏醒期风险认知总得分为(97.34±8.06)分,患者安全胜任力护士评价量表总得分为(148.72±11.80)分。在不同医院级别、学历、职称、麻醉护理工作年限、麻醉风险应急预案和麻醉风险培训频率PACU护士的患者安全胜任力和麻醉苏醒期风险认知差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Pearson相关性分析显示,PACU护士麻醉苏醒期风险认知与患者安全胜任力各维度呈正相关(P<0.05)。多元线性回归分析显示,麻醉护理工作年限、职称、麻醉风险培训频率、苏醒期风险认知总分是PACU护士患者安全胜任力的影响因素(P均<0.05)。结论PACU护士的麻醉苏醒期风险认知和患者安全胜任力处于中等偏上水平,麻醉苏醒期风险认知水平的改善有助于PACU护士提高患者安全胜任力。展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Major hip surgery usually requires neuraxial or general anesthesia with tracheal intubation and may be supplemented with a nerve block to provide intraoperative and postoperative pain relief.CASE SUMMARY This report established that hip surgical procedures can be performed with a fascia iliaca compartment block(FICB)and monitored anesthesia care(MAC)while avoiding neuraxial or general anesthesia.This was a preliminary experience with two geriatric patients with hip fracture,American Society of Anesthesiologists status III,and with many comorbidities.Neither patient could be operated on within 48 h after admission.Both general anesthesia and neuraxial anesthesia were high-risk procedures and had contraindications.Hence,we chose nerve block combined with a small amount of sedation.Intraoperative analgesia was provided by single-injection ultrasound-guided FICB.Light intravenous sedation was added.Surgical exposure was satisfactory,and neither patient complained of any symptoms during the procedure.CONCLUSION This report showed that hip surgery for geriatric patients can be performed with FICB and MAC,although complications and contraindications are common.The anesthetic program was accompanied by stable respiratory and circulatory system responses and satisfactory analgesia while avoiding the adverse effects and problems associated with either neuraxial or general anesthesia.
文摘<strong>Background:</strong><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Gabapentin is routinely prescribed preoperatively to decrease postoperative pain intensity. It is included in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) recommendations. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Objective:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> To analyze correlation of gabapentin dosage and post anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay (LOS) and cost. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Study Design:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent general anesthesia and received preoperative oral gabapentin from June 2017 </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">to</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> August 2017 for pelvic and breast procedures. The main outcome was correlation between PACU LOS and gabapentin dosage in the outpatients. Financial analysis was performed to assess the cost to the hospital associated with increased LOS. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Of the 636 patients, 405 patients received 300 </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">mg and 231 patients received 100 mg gabapentin. Mean dosage per kg (mg/k</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">g ±</span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">SD) was 3.12</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1.51 (range: </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.86 to 6.12). PACU LOS was 96</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">77 (minutes ±</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">SD) in patients receiving 100 mg and 120</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">96 in patients receiving 300 mg capsule (p</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.001). Linear regression analysis, failed to show a </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">statistically significant correlation between per kg dosage and PACU LOS (</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 0</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.13). Using multiple regression analysis, we calculated the correlation coefficient to be +1.71 minutes per 1mg/kg gabapentin (95% CI: -</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3.75 to +7.10, p</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 0</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.54) after adjusting for confounders. Adding 3</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">mg/kg to pre-op g</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">abapentin dosage of all outpatients cost on average</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> an extra $9794 per mo</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">nth in this cohort. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Every 1mg/kg increase in gabapentin dosage adds an estimated 7.1 minutes to PACU LOS. A 3</span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">mg/kg increase in gabapentin adds estimated 22 additional minutes in PACU LOS. Unfortunately, increase LOS is associated with increased hospital costs.</span>
基金funded by multidisciplinary MDT diagnosis and treatment fund for glioma and academic discipline boosting of Xijing Hospital.
文摘Background:Awake craniotomy(AC)has become gold standard in surgical resection of gliomas located in eloquent areas.The conscious sedation techniques in AC include both monitored anesthesia care(MAC)and asleep-awake-asleep(AAA).The choice of optimal anesthetic method depends on the preferences of the surgical team(mainly anesthesiologist and neurosurgeon).The aim of this study was to compare the difference in physiological and blood gas data,dosage of different drugs,the probability of switching to endotracheal intubation,and extent of tumor resection and dysfunction after operation between AAA and MAC anesthetic management for resection of gliomas in eloquent brain areas.Methods:Two-hundred and twenty-five patients with super-tentorial tumor located in eloquent areas underwent AC from 2009 to 2021 in Xijing Hospital.Forty-one patients underwent AAA technique,and the rest one-hundred eighty-four patients underwent MAC technique.Anesthetic management,dosage of different drugs,intraoperative complications,postoperative outcomes,adverse events,extent of resection and motor,and sensory and language dysfunction after operation were compared between MAC and AAA.Result:There was no significant difference in gender,KPS score,MMSE score,glioma grade,type,and growth site between the patients in the two groups,except the older age of patients in MAC group than that in AAA group.During the whole process of operation,there were greater pulse pressure difference(P=0.046),shorter operation time(P=0.039),less dosage of remifentanil(P=0.000),more dosage of dexmedetomidine(P=0.013),more use of antiemetics(81%,P=0.0067),lower use of vasoactive agent(45.1%,P=0.010),and lower probability of conversion to general anesthesia(GA,P=0.027)in MAC group than that in AAA group.Blood gas analysis showed that PetCO2(P=0.000),Glu concentration(P=0.000),and PaCO2(P=0.000)were higher,but SPO2(P=0.002)and PaO2(P=0.000)were lower in MAC group than that in AAA group.In the postoperative recovery stage,compared with that of AAA group,the probability of dysfunction in MAC group at 1,3,5,and 7 days after operation was lower,which were 27.8%vs 53.6%(P=0.003),31%vs 68.3%(P=0.000),28.8%vs 63.4%(P=0.000),and 25.6%vs 58.5%(P=0.000),respectively.Conclusion:Compared with AAA,it seems that MAC has more advantages in the management for resection of gliomas in eloquent brain areas,and MAC combined with multiple monitoring such as cerebral cortical mapping,neuronavigation,and ultrasonic detection is worthy of popularization for the resection of gliomas in eloquent brain areas.
文摘Background:There is no gold standard sedation method for pediatric cardiac catheterization.In congenital heart diseases with intracardiac shunts,hemodynamic parameters are prone to change depending on the ventilation conditions and anesthetics,although few studies have examined these effects.The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of two different sedation methods on the hemodynamic parameters.Methods:This study retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with ventricular septal defect(VSD)below 1 year of age who underwent cardiac catheterization at Aichi Children’s Health and Medical Center,who were divided into age-and VSD diameter-matched general anesthesia(GA)and monitored anesthesia care(MAC)under the natural airway groups(n=40 each),for comparison of hemodynamic parameters.Results:In the GA group,arterial blood pH and arterial partial pressure of oxygen were significantly higher(p<0.01),whereas arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide was significantly lower than in the MAC group(p<0.01).Mean pulmonary artery pressure(p<0.05)and systemic blood pressure(p<0.01)were lower in the GA group.Pulmonary vascular resistance index(p<0.01)and systemic vascular resistance index(p<0.01)were also significantly lower in the GA group than the MAC group.There were no significant differences in pulmonary blood flow index,systemic blood flow index,and pulmonary/systemic blood flow ratio between the two groups.Conclusions:Cardiac catheterization under GA in VSD patients results in different hemodynamic parameters compared to that under MAC.In particular,when using pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance measured under GA for judgment regarding the surgical indications or perioperative management,consideration should be given to the fact that these parameters might be lower compared to those measured under MAC.
文摘AIM To evaluate the potential benefits and risks of the use of epidural anaesthesia within an enhanced recovery protocol in this specific subpopulation.METHODS A retrospective review was conducted, including all cirrhotic patients who underwent open liver resection between January 2013 and December 2015 at Bologna University Hospital. Patients with an abnormal coagulation profile contraindicating the placement of an epidural catheter were excluded from the analysis. The control group was composed by patients refusing epidural anaesthesia. RESULTS Of the 183 cirrhotic patients undergoing open liver resections, 57 had contraindications to the placement of an epidural catheter; of the remaining 126, 86 patients received general anaesthesia and 40 combined anaesthesia. The two groups presented homogeneous characteristics. Intraoperatively the metabolic data did not differ between the two groups, whilst the epidural group had a lower mean arterial pressure(P = 0.041) and received more colloid infusions(P = 0.007). Postoperative liver and kidney function did not differ significantly.Length of mechanical ventilation(P = 0.003) and hospital stay(P = 0.032) were significantly lower in the epidural group. No complications related to the epidural catheter placement or removal was recorded.CONCLUSION The use of Epidural Anaesthesia within a fast track protocol for cirrhotic patients undergoing liver resections had a positive impact on the patient's outcomes and comfort as demonstrated by a significantly lower length of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay in the epidural group. The technique appears to be safely manageable in this fragile population even though these results need confirmation in larger studies.
文摘Lung tumors represent a major health impact globally. Pulmonary cryoablation treatment as a palliative measure for patients with non-operable pulmonary lesions has gained popularity over the last decade. With increasing case load and patients medical status becoming more complex, preparation for pulmonary cryoablation requires the implementation of an enhanced perioperative anesthetic plan. Current literature as well as our institutional experience shows that this patient population presents with multiple comorbidities raising the challenge of providing anesthetic care. These procedures are done under challenging conditions with limited resources and in remote locations in the hospital. A team approach by the anesthesiologist, thoracic surgeon, and interventional radiologist is critical to the success of this treatment. The present review examines our institution’s anesthetic management of percutaneous cryoablation treatment (PCT) in the treatment of non-operable lung cancer and metastases. The objective of this article is to review the current literature guidelines and to discuss our retrospective institutional experience in anesthesia management of PCT procedures.
文摘目的研究麻醉复苏室(Post-anesthesia care unit,PACU)护士对麻醉苏醒期风险认知和患者安全胜任力现状,并分析麻醉苏醒期风险认知和患者安全胜任力相关性的影响因素。方法采用分层多阶段聚类抽样法于2022年6月-8月抽取新疆16所综合性医院的228名PACU护士为研究对象,采用电子问卷形式,问卷由一般资料、麻醉苏醒期风险认知调查问卷和患者安全胜任力护士评价量表组成,收集PACU护士对麻醉苏醒期风险认知和患者安全胜任力情况,分析患者安全胜任力和麻醉苏醒期风险认知的相关性及影响因素。结果PACU护士麻醉苏醒期风险认知总得分为(97.34±8.06)分,患者安全胜任力护士评价量表总得分为(148.72±11.80)分。在不同医院级别、学历、职称、麻醉护理工作年限、麻醉风险应急预案和麻醉风险培训频率PACU护士的患者安全胜任力和麻醉苏醒期风险认知差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Pearson相关性分析显示,PACU护士麻醉苏醒期风险认知与患者安全胜任力各维度呈正相关(P<0.05)。多元线性回归分析显示,麻醉护理工作年限、职称、麻醉风险培训频率、苏醒期风险认知总分是PACU护士患者安全胜任力的影响因素(P均<0.05)。结论PACU护士的麻醉苏醒期风险认知和患者安全胜任力处于中等偏上水平,麻醉苏醒期风险认知水平的改善有助于PACU护士提高患者安全胜任力。