Post-operative abdominal complications in Crohn's disease in the biological era: Systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on post-operative complications after surgery for Crohn's disease(CD) comparing biological with no therapy.METHODS: Pub Med, Medline and Embase databases were searched to identify studies comparing postoperative outcomes in CD patients receiving biological therapy and those who did not. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios(OR) and confidence intervals(CI) for each outcome measure of interest. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies were included for metaanalysis, comprising a total of 5425 patients with CD 1024(biological treatment, 4401 control group). After biological therapy there was an increased risk of total infectious complications(OR = 1.52; 95%CI: 1.14-2.03, 8 studies) and wound infection(OR = 1.73; 95%CI: 1.12-2.67; P = 0.01, 7 studies). There was no increased risk for other complications including anastomotic leak(OR = 1.19; 95%CI: 0.82-1.71; P = 0.26), abdominal sepsis(OR = 1.22; 95%CI: 0.87-1.72; P = 0.25) and re-operation(OR = 1.12; 95%CI: 0.81-1.54; P = 0.46) in patients receiving biological therapy. CONCLUSION: Pre-operative use of anti-TNF-α therapy may increase risk of post-operative infectious complications after surgery for CD and in particular wound related infections.

Seronegative spondyloarthropathy-associated inflammatory bowel disease

Seronegative spondyloarthropathy(SpA)usually starts in the third decade of life with negative rheumatoid factor,human leukocyte antigen-B27 genetic marker and clinical features of spinal and peripheral arthritis,dactylitis,enthesitis and extra-articular manifestations(EAMs).Cases can be classified as ankylosing spondylitis,psoriatic arthritis,reactive arthritis,enteropathic arthritis,or juvenileonset spondyloarthritis.Joint and gut inflammation is intricately linked in SpA and inflammatory bowel disease(IBD),with shared genetic and immunopathogenic mechanisms.IBD is a common EAM in SpA patients,while extraintestinal manifestations in IBD patients mostly affect the joints.Although individual protocols are available for the management of each disease,the standard therapeutic guidelines of SpA-associated IBD patients remain to be established.Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are recommended as initial therapy of peripheral and axial SpA,whereas their use is controversial in IBD due to associated disease flares.Conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs are beneficial for peripheral arthritis but ineffective for axial SpA or IBD therapy.Anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibodies are effective medications with indicated use in SpA and IBD,and a drug of choice for treating SpA-associated IBD.Janus kinase inhibitors,approved for treating SpA and ulcerative colitis,are promising therapeutics in SpA coexistent with ulcerative colitis.A tight collaboration between gastroenterologists and rheumatologists with mutual referral from early accurate diagnosis to appropriately prompt therapy is required in this complex clinical scenario.

Efficacy of cytapheresis in patients with ulcerative colitis showing insufficient or lost response to biologic therapy

For the optimal management of refractory ulcerative colitis(UC),secondary loss of response(LOR)and primary non-response to biologics is a critical issue.This article aimed to summarize the current literature on the use of cytapheresis(CAP)in patients with UC showing a poor response or LOR to biologics and discuss its advantages and limitations.Further,we summarized the efficacy of CAP in patients with UC showing insufficient response to thiopurines or immunomodulators(IM).Eight studies evaluated the efficacy of CAP in patients with UC with inadequate responses to thiopurines or IM.There were no significant differences in the rate of remission and steroid-free remission between patients exposed or not exposed to thiopurines or IM.Three studies evaluated the efficacy of CAP in patients with UC showing an insufficient response to biologic therapies.Mean remission rates of biologics exposed or unexposed patients were 29.4%and 44.2%,respectively.Fourteen studies evaluated the efficacy of CAP in combination with biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease showing a poor response or LOR to biologics.The rates of remission/response and steroid-free remission in patients with UC ranged 32%-69%(mean:48.0%,median:42.9%)and 9%-75%(mean:40.7%,median:38%),respectively.CAP had the same effectiveness for remission induction with or without prior failure on thiopurines or IM but showed little benefit in patients with UC refractory to biologics.Although heterogeneity existed in the efficacy of the combination therapy with CAP and biologics,these combination therapies induced clinical remission/response and steroid-free remission in more than 40%of patients with UC refractory to biologics on average.Given the excellent safety profile of CAP,this combination therapy can be an alternative therapeutic strategy for UC refractory to biologics.Extensive prospective studies are needed to understand the efficacy of combination therapy with CAP and biologics.