Anterior cervical decompression and fusion(ACDF)treatment for cervical spondylosis has been more than half a century,and achieved good clinical results.However,with the continuous extension of follow-up time,the fusio...Anterior cervical decompression and fusion(ACDF)treatment for cervical spondylosis has been more than half a century,and achieved good clinical results.However,with the continuous extension of follow-up time,the fusion segment-associated postoperative complications emerged gradually.Reserved cervical stability and activity,the concept of non-fusion was born.As a non-fusion technique,cervical artificial disc replacement(CADR)developed rapidly.With the continuous development of artificial prosthesis materials and design concepts,and specification and proficiency of surgical procedures,CADR has achieved better short and mid-term clinical efficacy than ACDF.Compared with ACDF,the main advantages of CADR are that the postoperative recovery is quick,the activity and stability of cervical vertebra are maintained,the height of cervical intervertebral space is restored,and the stress of adjacent segments and the rate of surgical renovation are reduced.In clinical work,as an emerging technology,CADR requires spine surgeons to control the surgical indications,contraindications,and patients'conditions strictly.This article reviews the research progress of CADR in order to provide new ideas for clinical treatment of cervical spondylosis.展开更多
BACKGROUND Total cervical artificial disc replacement(TDR)has been considered a safe and effective alternative surgical treatment for cervical spondylosis and degenerative disc disease that have failed to improve with...BACKGROUND Total cervical artificial disc replacement(TDR)has been considered a safe and effective alternative surgical treatment for cervical spondylosis and degenerative disc disease that have failed to improve with conservative methods.Positioning the surgical patient is a critical part of the procedure.Appropriate patient positioning is crucial not only for the safety of the patient but also for optimizing surgical exposure,ensuring adequate and safe anesthesia,and allowing the surgeon to operate comfortably during lengthy procedures.The surgical posture is the traditional position used in anterior cervical approach;in general,patients are in a supine position with a pad under their shoulders and a ring-shaped pillow under their head.AIM To investigate the clinical outcomes of the use of a modified surgical position versus the traditional surgical position in anterior approach for TDR.METHODS In the modified position group,the patients had a soft pillow under their neck,and their jaw and both shoulders were fixed with wide tape.The analyzed data included intraoperative blood loss,position setting time,total operation time,and perioperative blood pressure and heart rate.RESULTS Blood pressure and heart rate were not significantly different before and after body positioning in both groups(P>0.05).Compared with the traditional position group,the modified position group showed a statistically significantly longer position setting time(P<0.05).However,the total operation time and intraoperative blood loss were significantly reduced in the modified position group compared with the traditional position group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION The clinical outcomes indicated that total operation time and intraoperative blood loss were relatively lower in the modified position group than in the traditional position group,thus reducing the risks of surgery while increasing the position setting time.The modified surgical position is a safe and effective method to be used in anterior approach for TDR surgery.展开更多
Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of Bryan disc replacement with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with cervical spondylopathy. Methods Sixteen patients underwent Bryan cervicaldisc r...Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of Bryan disc replacement with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with cervical spondylopathy. Methods Sixteen patients underwent Bryan cervicaldisc replacement (A group) ,and展开更多
目的观察单节段Discover人工颈椎间盘置换术及颈椎前路减压融合术后颈椎整体曲度和置换节段活动度的变化情况,分析其临床效果。方法回顾性分析2008年3月至2013年3月治疗的48例颈椎病及颈椎间盘突出症患者,其中18例行Discover人工颈椎间...目的观察单节段Discover人工颈椎间盘置换术及颈椎前路减压融合术后颈椎整体曲度和置换节段活动度的变化情况,分析其临床效果。方法回顾性分析2008年3月至2013年3月治疗的48例颈椎病及颈椎间盘突出症患者,其中18例行Discover人工颈椎间盘置换术（置换组）,男8例,女10例,年龄31-58岁,平均44.2岁;30例行颈椎前路减压融合术（融合组）,男13例,女17例,年龄35-68岁,平均49.8岁。测量手术前后和末次随访时置换节段活动度（range of motion,ROM）,置换节段脊柱功能单位（functional spinal unit,FSU）Cobb角和颈椎整体曲度（C2-7Cobb角）。结果两组患者均获得12个月以上随访,末次随访置换节段屈伸活动度置换组较术前稍增加,左右侧屈活动度无明显变化,而融合组屈伸及左右侧屈活动度较术前明显减小,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;两组间末次随访相比较,融合组屈伸及左右侧屈活动度明显减小,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。末次随访FSU置换组较术前明显增加,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）,而融合组无明显变化;两组间末次随访相比较,置换组明显增加,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。末次随访颈椎曲度置换组较术前稍增加,而融合组较术前明显减小,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;两组间末次随访相比较,融合组明显减小,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论单节段Discover人工颈椎间盘置换术后对颈椎整体曲度及置换节段活动度的影响小,与传统前路减压融合术相比,可以较好发挥其对颈椎的保护作用。展开更多
文摘Anterior cervical decompression and fusion(ACDF)treatment for cervical spondylosis has been more than half a century,and achieved good clinical results.However,with the continuous extension of follow-up time,the fusion segment-associated postoperative complications emerged gradually.Reserved cervical stability and activity,the concept of non-fusion was born.As a non-fusion technique,cervical artificial disc replacement(CADR)developed rapidly.With the continuous development of artificial prosthesis materials and design concepts,and specification and proficiency of surgical procedures,CADR has achieved better short and mid-term clinical efficacy than ACDF.Compared with ACDF,the main advantages of CADR are that the postoperative recovery is quick,the activity and stability of cervical vertebra are maintained,the height of cervical intervertebral space is restored,and the stress of adjacent segments and the rate of surgical renovation are reduced.In clinical work,as an emerging technology,CADR requires spine surgeons to control the surgical indications,contraindications,and patients'conditions strictly.This article reviews the research progress of CADR in order to provide new ideas for clinical treatment of cervical spondylosis.
文摘BACKGROUND Total cervical artificial disc replacement(TDR)has been considered a safe and effective alternative surgical treatment for cervical spondylosis and degenerative disc disease that have failed to improve with conservative methods.Positioning the surgical patient is a critical part of the procedure.Appropriate patient positioning is crucial not only for the safety of the patient but also for optimizing surgical exposure,ensuring adequate and safe anesthesia,and allowing the surgeon to operate comfortably during lengthy procedures.The surgical posture is the traditional position used in anterior cervical approach;in general,patients are in a supine position with a pad under their shoulders and a ring-shaped pillow under their head.AIM To investigate the clinical outcomes of the use of a modified surgical position versus the traditional surgical position in anterior approach for TDR.METHODS In the modified position group,the patients had a soft pillow under their neck,and their jaw and both shoulders were fixed with wide tape.The analyzed data included intraoperative blood loss,position setting time,total operation time,and perioperative blood pressure and heart rate.RESULTS Blood pressure and heart rate were not significantly different before and after body positioning in both groups(P>0.05).Compared with the traditional position group,the modified position group showed a statistically significantly longer position setting time(P<0.05).However,the total operation time and intraoperative blood loss were significantly reduced in the modified position group compared with the traditional position group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION The clinical outcomes indicated that total operation time and intraoperative blood loss were relatively lower in the modified position group than in the traditional position group,thus reducing the risks of surgery while increasing the position setting time.The modified surgical position is a safe and effective method to be used in anterior approach for TDR surgery.
文摘Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of Bryan disc replacement with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with cervical spondylopathy. Methods Sixteen patients underwent Bryan cervicaldisc replacement (A group) ,and
文摘目的观察单节段Discover人工颈椎间盘置换术及颈椎前路减压融合术后颈椎整体曲度和置换节段活动度的变化情况,分析其临床效果。方法回顾性分析2008年3月至2013年3月治疗的48例颈椎病及颈椎间盘突出症患者,其中18例行Discover人工颈椎间盘置换术（置换组）,男8例,女10例,年龄31-58岁,平均44.2岁;30例行颈椎前路减压融合术（融合组）,男13例,女17例,年龄35-68岁,平均49.8岁。测量手术前后和末次随访时置换节段活动度（range of motion,ROM）,置换节段脊柱功能单位（functional spinal unit,FSU）Cobb角和颈椎整体曲度（C2-7Cobb角）。结果两组患者均获得12个月以上随访,末次随访置换节段屈伸活动度置换组较术前稍增加,左右侧屈活动度无明显变化,而融合组屈伸及左右侧屈活动度较术前明显减小,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;两组间末次随访相比较,融合组屈伸及左右侧屈活动度明显减小,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。末次随访FSU置换组较术前明显增加,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）,而融合组无明显变化;两组间末次随访相比较,置换组明显增加,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。末次随访颈椎曲度置换组较术前稍增加,而融合组较术前明显减小,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;两组间末次随访相比较,融合组明显减小,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论单节段Discover人工颈椎间盘置换术后对颈椎整体曲度及置换节段活动度的影响小,与传统前路减压融合术相比,可以较好发挥其对颈椎的保护作用。
