Objective This study aimed to explore the clinical value of Children Neuropsychological and Behavioral Scale-Revision 2016(CNBS-R2016)for Autism Spectrum Disorder(ASD)screening in the presence of developmental surveil...Objective This study aimed to explore the clinical value of Children Neuropsychological and Behavioral Scale-Revision 2016(CNBS-R2016)for Autism Spectrum Disorder(ASD)screening in the presence of developmental surveillance.Methods All participants were evaluated by the CNBS-R2016 and Gesell Developmental Schedules(GDS).Spearman’s correlation coefficients and Kappa values were obtained.Taking GDS as a reference assessment,the performance of the CNBS-R2016 for detecting the developmental delays of children with ASD was analyzed with receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves.The efficacy of the CNBS-R2016 to screen for ASD was explored by comparing Communication Warning Behavior with Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule,Second Edition(ADOS-2).Results In total,150 children aged 12–42 months with ASD were enrolled.The developmental quotients of the CNBS-R2016 were correlated with those of the GDS(r=0.62–0.94).The CNBS-R2016 and GDS had good diagnostic agreement for developmental delays(Kappa=0.73–0.89),except for Fine Motor.There was a significant difference between the proportions of Fine Motor,delays detected by the CNBS-R2016 and GDS(86.0%vs.77.3%).With GDS as a standard,the areas under the ROC curves of the CNBS-R2016 were above 0.95 for all the domains except Fine Motor,which was 0.70.In addition,the positive rate of ASD was 100.0%and 93.5%when the cut-off points of 7 and 12 in the Communication Warning Behavior subscale were used,respectively.Conclusion The CNBS-R2016 performed well in developmental assessment and screening for children with ASD,especially by Communication Warning Behaviors subscale.Therefore,the CNBS-R2016 is worthy of clinical application in children with ASD in China.展开更多
The purpose of this study was to propose indicators for grasping autistic characteristics of people with intellectual disabilities who were going to engage in agricultural vocational training. We analyzed the data of ...The purpose of this study was to propose indicators for grasping autistic characteristics of people with intellectual disabilities who were going to engage in agricultural vocational training. We analyzed the data of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) of 44 students at the high school course of a special needs education school who participated in agricultural vocational training. The data were divided into two groups according to the scores of “General Impressions”, one of 15 question items of the CARS: one was the group whose score was 1 (usual), and the other was the group whose scores were 1.5 to 4 (unusual). The results of the Mann-Whitney U test showed significant differences between two groups in eight items including “Relating to People” (p Relating to People” with six other items. As a result, “Relating to People” was considered to be the most effective item to know the participant’s autistic characteristics at a very early stage of training. Eventually, adding two items, “Body Use” and “Imitation” which are necessary to master agricultural tasks, to “Relating to People”, we proposed three indicators.展开更多
目的探讨Griffiths发育评估量表-中文版(G D S-C)在评估孤独症谱系障碍(A S D)儿童中的应用价值,为其临床应用及推广提供理论依据。方法本研究共纳入39例ASD儿童作为研究对象,均使用GDS-C和0~6岁儿童神经心理发育量表(简称儿心量表)在2...目的探讨Griffiths发育评估量表-中文版(G D S-C)在评估孤独症谱系障碍(A S D)儿童中的应用价值,为其临床应用及推广提供理论依据。方法本研究共纳入39例ASD儿童作为研究对象,均使用GDS-C和0~6岁儿童神经心理发育量表(简称儿心量表)在2周内进行评估,并使用儿童孤独症评定量表(CARS)评估ASD程度。将GDS-C各维度分别与儿心量表和CARS进行分析比较,观察其相关性。结果除A运动维度外,GDS-C测得的B个人-社会、C语言、D手眼协调、E表现维度智龄均高于儿心量表(t值分别为2.90、2.85、3.58、3.40,均P<0.01)。按照ASD儿童各维度迟缓分布,GDS-C测评中A维度发现迟缓人数比率明显高于儿心量表(χ~2=15.10,P <0.01),其他各维度比较无明显差异。GDS-C量表A、B、C、D、E维度与儿心量表运动、社会行为、语言、精细动作、适应能力维度相关系数高且显著(r值分别为0.95、0.84、0.78、0.83、0.92,均P <0.01),F实际推理与儿心量表适应能力相关性稍弱(r=0.50,P <0.01)。GDS-C量表B、C及F维度与CARS量表成负相关(r值分别为―0.37、―0.38、―0.39,均P <0.05)。结论 GDS-C量表与儿心量表在ASD儿童的发育评估中具有较高的一致性。因其测试项目更为细致,能更准确的得到被测儿童的实际智龄,值得临床推广。展开更多
基金This study was supported by Emergency Technology Research Project of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(No.2020kfyXGYJ020).
文摘Objective This study aimed to explore the clinical value of Children Neuropsychological and Behavioral Scale-Revision 2016(CNBS-R2016)for Autism Spectrum Disorder(ASD)screening in the presence of developmental surveillance.Methods All participants were evaluated by the CNBS-R2016 and Gesell Developmental Schedules(GDS).Spearman’s correlation coefficients and Kappa values were obtained.Taking GDS as a reference assessment,the performance of the CNBS-R2016 for detecting the developmental delays of children with ASD was analyzed with receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves.The efficacy of the CNBS-R2016 to screen for ASD was explored by comparing Communication Warning Behavior with Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule,Second Edition(ADOS-2).Results In total,150 children aged 12–42 months with ASD were enrolled.The developmental quotients of the CNBS-R2016 were correlated with those of the GDS(r=0.62–0.94).The CNBS-R2016 and GDS had good diagnostic agreement for developmental delays(Kappa=0.73–0.89),except for Fine Motor.There was a significant difference between the proportions of Fine Motor,delays detected by the CNBS-R2016 and GDS(86.0%vs.77.3%).With GDS as a standard,the areas under the ROC curves of the CNBS-R2016 were above 0.95 for all the domains except Fine Motor,which was 0.70.In addition,the positive rate of ASD was 100.0%and 93.5%when the cut-off points of 7 and 12 in the Communication Warning Behavior subscale were used,respectively.Conclusion The CNBS-R2016 performed well in developmental assessment and screening for children with ASD,especially by Communication Warning Behaviors subscale.Therefore,the CNBS-R2016 is worthy of clinical application in children with ASD in China.
文摘The purpose of this study was to propose indicators for grasping autistic characteristics of people with intellectual disabilities who were going to engage in agricultural vocational training. We analyzed the data of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) of 44 students at the high school course of a special needs education school who participated in agricultural vocational training. The data were divided into two groups according to the scores of “General Impressions”, one of 15 question items of the CARS: one was the group whose score was 1 (usual), and the other was the group whose scores were 1.5 to 4 (unusual). The results of the Mann-Whitney U test showed significant differences between two groups in eight items including “Relating to People” (p Relating to People” with six other items. As a result, “Relating to People” was considered to be the most effective item to know the participant’s autistic characteristics at a very early stage of training. Eventually, adding two items, “Body Use” and “Imitation” which are necessary to master agricultural tasks, to “Relating to People”, we proposed three indicators.
文摘目的探讨Griffiths发育评估量表-中文版(G D S-C)在评估孤独症谱系障碍(A S D)儿童中的应用价值,为其临床应用及推广提供理论依据。方法本研究共纳入39例ASD儿童作为研究对象,均使用GDS-C和0~6岁儿童神经心理发育量表(简称儿心量表)在2周内进行评估,并使用儿童孤独症评定量表(CARS)评估ASD程度。将GDS-C各维度分别与儿心量表和CARS进行分析比较,观察其相关性。结果除A运动维度外,GDS-C测得的B个人-社会、C语言、D手眼协调、E表现维度智龄均高于儿心量表(t值分别为2.90、2.85、3.58、3.40,均P<0.01)。按照ASD儿童各维度迟缓分布,GDS-C测评中A维度发现迟缓人数比率明显高于儿心量表(χ~2=15.10,P <0.01),其他各维度比较无明显差异。GDS-C量表A、B、C、D、E维度与儿心量表运动、社会行为、语言、精细动作、适应能力维度相关系数高且显著(r值分别为0.95、0.84、0.78、0.83、0.92,均P <0.01),F实际推理与儿心量表适应能力相关性稍弱(r=0.50,P <0.01)。GDS-C量表B、C及F维度与CARS量表成负相关(r值分别为―0.37、―0.38、―0.39,均P <0.05)。结论 GDS-C量表与儿心量表在ASD儿童的发育评估中具有较高的一致性。因其测试项目更为细致,能更准确的得到被测儿童的实际智龄,值得临床推广。
