Objective: To investigate blood pressure variability of Elder hypertensives with type 2 diabetes and its relationship with cognition. Methods: A total of 143 elderly hypertensives were enrolled and divided into diabet...Objective: To investigate blood pressure variability of Elder hypertensives with type 2 diabetes and its relationship with cognition. Methods: A total of 143 elderly hypertensives were enrolled and divided into diabetic group (59 cases) and non-diabetic group (84 cases). The difference of general clinical characteristics, biochemical parameters, carotid ultrasound, a neuropsychological Scales and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (24hABPM) parameters between the two groups of subjects were compared. Then, the two groups (diabetic group and non-diabetic group) were further divided into (Mild cognitive dysfunction) subgroup (MMSE>26) and normal cognition subgroup (MMSE≤26), respectively. On the basis of MMSE scores, the difference of the parameters of ABPM between the two subgroups was analyzed. Results: Compared with the control group, 24hSBP, 24hPP, dSBP, dPP, nSBP, nPP, 24hSSD, dSSD, nSSD, 24hSCV, dSCV and nSCV were significantly higher in the diabetic group (p<0.05). However, cognition was lower in the diabetic group. No significant difference was found in the circadian pattern of blood pressure between the two groups. 24hSSD, dSSD, nSSD, 24hSCV, dSCV, nSCV were significantly higher in the MCI subgroup than normal cognition subgroup in both diabetic and non-diabetic groups(p<0.05), and they were negatively associated with scores of MMSE, the correlation coefficient were -0.235,-0.246,-0.341,-0.158,-0.222,-0.238 (0.001≤P<0.05). Conclusion: The study showed that in the elderly with hypertension, the mean systolic blood pressure and blood pressure variability were both higher in the diabetic group, and the cognition was lower instead. Whether or not with diabetes, blood pressure variability was always higher in the MCI subgroup. Blood pressure variability increased in patients with diabetes, and was associated with cognitive decline.展开更多
目的观察未合并高血压的糖耐量减低患者24 h血压改变情况。方法回顾分析2005～2007年入院查体患者162例,根据空腹血糖、口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)或餐后2 h血糖分为健康对照组40例,无高血压的糖耐量减低组37例,无高血压的糖尿病组45例,...目的观察未合并高血压的糖耐量减低患者24 h血压改变情况。方法回顾分析2005～2007年入院查体患者162例,根据空腹血糖、口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)或餐后2 h血糖分为健康对照组40例,无高血压的糖耐量减低组37例,无高血压的糖尿病组45例,无糖耐量减低的高血压组40例,记录各组的血脂(TG、TC、HDL、LDL)、偶测血压数值,采用动态血压监测仪记录24 h动脉血压并测量24 h平均收缩压(24 h SBP)、24 h平均舒张压(24 h DBP)及24 h动态脉压(24 h PP)。结果(1)糖耐量减低组与糖尿病组的TG高于健康对照组和高血压组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(2)糖耐量减低组24 h SBP及24 hDBP与健康对照组差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),而与高血压组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。糖耐量减低组24 h PP与高血压组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论糖耐量减低患者在临床明确诊断高血压前已发生血压调节的明显改变。展开更多
目的探讨诊室、随诊间、24h动态收缩压与肱踝动脉脉搏波传导速度(baPWV)的关系。方法在参加开滦研究队列第3次健康体检的人群中,采取整群抽样的方法随机抽取年龄≥60岁的开滦集团离退休员工3064名进行24h动态血压监测和baPWV等检查。分...目的探讨诊室、随诊间、24h动态收缩压与肱踝动脉脉搏波传导速度(baPWV)的关系。方法在参加开滦研究队列第3次健康体检的人群中,采取整群抽样的方法随机抽取年龄≥60岁的开滦集团离退休员工3064名进行24h动态血压监测和baPWV等检查。分别按照诊室、随诊间、24h、日间、夜间收缩压中位数将观察对象分为两组,比较年龄、体质量指数、空腹血糖等基线资料和baPWV的情况;采用多元线性回归分析各种收缩压对baPWV的影响。结果共纳入资料完整的研究对象930(男性588、女性342)名进行分析。诊室、随诊间、24h、日间、夜间收缩压的中位数分别为142.0、139.0、128.5、130.8和121.1mm Hg,baPWV的中位数为1731cm/s。高收缩压组的baPWV值,左、右侧baPWV值及baPWV≥1731cm/s的检出率均高于低收缩压组(P<0.01)。多元线性回归分析显示:诊室、随诊间、24h、日间、夜间收缩压均与baPWV呈正相关,其每增加1 mm Hg,baPWV分别增加9.13、10.79、9.68、9.14、8.26cm/s(均P<0.01);去除24h收缩压后,比较诊室、随诊间、日间、夜间收缩压对baPWV的影响,并校正其他相同的混杂因素,结果显示诊室收缩压与baPWV的相关性较大(β=0.36)。结论诊室、随诊间、24h、日间、夜间收缩压均与baPWV呈正相关,其中诊室收缩压与baPWV相关性最大。展开更多
文摘Objective: To investigate blood pressure variability of Elder hypertensives with type 2 diabetes and its relationship with cognition. Methods: A total of 143 elderly hypertensives were enrolled and divided into diabetic group (59 cases) and non-diabetic group (84 cases). The difference of general clinical characteristics, biochemical parameters, carotid ultrasound, a neuropsychological Scales and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (24hABPM) parameters between the two groups of subjects were compared. Then, the two groups (diabetic group and non-diabetic group) were further divided into (Mild cognitive dysfunction) subgroup (MMSE>26) and normal cognition subgroup (MMSE≤26), respectively. On the basis of MMSE scores, the difference of the parameters of ABPM between the two subgroups was analyzed. Results: Compared with the control group, 24hSBP, 24hPP, dSBP, dPP, nSBP, nPP, 24hSSD, dSSD, nSSD, 24hSCV, dSCV and nSCV were significantly higher in the diabetic group (p<0.05). However, cognition was lower in the diabetic group. No significant difference was found in the circadian pattern of blood pressure between the two groups. 24hSSD, dSSD, nSSD, 24hSCV, dSCV, nSCV were significantly higher in the MCI subgroup than normal cognition subgroup in both diabetic and non-diabetic groups(p<0.05), and they were negatively associated with scores of MMSE, the correlation coefficient were -0.235,-0.246,-0.341,-0.158,-0.222,-0.238 (0.001≤P<0.05). Conclusion: The study showed that in the elderly with hypertension, the mean systolic blood pressure and blood pressure variability were both higher in the diabetic group, and the cognition was lower instead. Whether or not with diabetes, blood pressure variability was always higher in the MCI subgroup. Blood pressure variability increased in patients with diabetes, and was associated with cognitive decline.
文摘目的观察未合并高血压的糖耐量减低患者24 h血压改变情况。方法回顾分析2005～2007年入院查体患者162例,根据空腹血糖、口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)或餐后2 h血糖分为健康对照组40例,无高血压的糖耐量减低组37例,无高血压的糖尿病组45例,无糖耐量减低的高血压组40例,记录各组的血脂(TG、TC、HDL、LDL)、偶测血压数值,采用动态血压监测仪记录24 h动脉血压并测量24 h平均收缩压(24 h SBP)、24 h平均舒张压(24 h DBP)及24 h动态脉压(24 h PP)。结果(1)糖耐量减低组与糖尿病组的TG高于健康对照组和高血压组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(2)糖耐量减低组24 h SBP及24 hDBP与健康对照组差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),而与高血压组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。糖耐量减低组24 h PP与高血压组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论糖耐量减低患者在临床明确诊断高血压前已发生血压调节的明显改变。
文摘目的探讨诊室、随诊间、24h动态收缩压与肱踝动脉脉搏波传导速度(baPWV)的关系。方法在参加开滦研究队列第3次健康体检的人群中,采取整群抽样的方法随机抽取年龄≥60岁的开滦集团离退休员工3064名进行24h动态血压监测和baPWV等检查。分别按照诊室、随诊间、24h、日间、夜间收缩压中位数将观察对象分为两组,比较年龄、体质量指数、空腹血糖等基线资料和baPWV的情况;采用多元线性回归分析各种收缩压对baPWV的影响。结果共纳入资料完整的研究对象930(男性588、女性342)名进行分析。诊室、随诊间、24h、日间、夜间收缩压的中位数分别为142.0、139.0、128.5、130.8和121.1mm Hg,baPWV的中位数为1731cm/s。高收缩压组的baPWV值,左、右侧baPWV值及baPWV≥1731cm/s的检出率均高于低收缩压组(P<0.01)。多元线性回归分析显示:诊室、随诊间、24h、日间、夜间收缩压均与baPWV呈正相关,其每增加1 mm Hg,baPWV分别增加9.13、10.79、9.68、9.14、8.26cm/s(均P<0.01);去除24h收缩压后,比较诊室、随诊间、日间、夜间收缩压对baPWV的影响,并校正其他相同的混杂因素,结果显示诊室收缩压与baPWV的相关性较大(β=0.36)。结论诊室、随诊间、24h、日间、夜间收缩压均与baPWV呈正相关,其中诊室收缩压与baPWV相关性最大。
