<strong>Objectives:</strong><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Evaluate the effect of ...<strong>Objectives:</strong><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Evaluate the effect of artificial oocyte activation (AOA) using calcium ionophore (A23187) on the rate of fertilization and cleavage of embryos in surgically retrieved sperm of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Study design: </span></b></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">This study was conducted on 60 infertile couples undergoing ICSI cycles as a randomized controlled parallel group’s experimental study in a private IVF center in Egypt from January 2018 to July 2019. ICSI cycles were divided into two g</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">roups: Group A: includes 30 ICSI patients with surgically retrieved sperms of non-obstructive azoospermia treated with calcium ionophore (A23187). Group C/Control: includes 30 ICSI patients with surgically retrieved sperms of non-obstructive azoospermia non-treated with calcium ionophore (A23187)</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">There was no statistical difference between both groups regarding the fertilization rate (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.853). There was no statistical difference between them regarding implantation rate (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.237). The percentage of Class A embryos in the ca ionophore group was 81.7%, while it was 82.8% in the control group. There was insignificant difference between them (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.782). There was no statistical significant difference between the two groups regarding the clinical pregnancy rate</span></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> it was (56.7%) in the ca ionophore group while it was (53.3%) in the control group.</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion: </span></b></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">AOA by Ca</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2++</span></sup></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ionophore didn’t improve the outcome of ICSI cycle in cases of non obstructive azoospermia in terms of fertilization, implantation and pregnancy rate.</span></span></span>展开更多
文摘<strong>Objectives:</strong><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Evaluate the effect of artificial oocyte activation (AOA) using calcium ionophore (A23187) on the rate of fertilization and cleavage of embryos in surgically retrieved sperm of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Study design: </span></b></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">This study was conducted on 60 infertile couples undergoing ICSI cycles as a randomized controlled parallel group’s experimental study in a private IVF center in Egypt from January 2018 to July 2019. ICSI cycles were divided into two g</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">roups: Group A: includes 30 ICSI patients with surgically retrieved sperms of non-obstructive azoospermia treated with calcium ionophore (A23187). Group C/Control: includes 30 ICSI patients with surgically retrieved sperms of non-obstructive azoospermia non-treated with calcium ionophore (A23187)</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">There was no statistical difference between both groups regarding the fertilization rate (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.853). There was no statistical difference between them regarding implantation rate (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.237). The percentage of Class A embryos in the ca ionophore group was 81.7%, while it was 82.8% in the control group. There was insignificant difference between them (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.782). There was no statistical significant difference between the two groups regarding the clinical pregnancy rate</span></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> it was (56.7%) in the ca ionophore group while it was (53.3%) in the control group.</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion: </span></b></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">AOA by Ca</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2++</span></sup></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ionophore didn’t improve the outcome of ICSI cycle in cases of non obstructive azoospermia in terms of fertilization, implantation and pregnancy rate.</span></span></span>