Objective:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and patient-reported outcomes,and their correlation,after percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid(BAHA)implantation.Methods:A prospective study was con...Objective:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and patient-reported outcomes,and their correlation,after percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid(BAHA)implantation.Methods:A prospective study was conducted between January 2018 and December 2020 in a tertiary care center.All adult patients who were implanted with a percutaneous BAHA device during this evaluation period were included in the study.Complete auditory function and patients reported outcome measures(PROMs)were assessed in the preoperative period and 6 months after the implant activation.The PROMs included a generic form(Medical Outcome Study 36 Short Form Healthy Survey(MOS SF-36)),and three disease-specific forms(Hearing Handicap Inventory(HHI),Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life Scale(SADLS),and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory(THI)).Results:Twenty-two patients with an average age of 53 years were included in the study.The overall functional gain with the BAHA in sound-field pure tone average(PTA)was 29 dB,with no statistically significant differences according to surgical indication(F(3,18)=2.319,p=0.110).The greater the preoperative air-bone gap,the greater the functional gain obtained(r=0.505,p<0.05).In the PROMs,we found a significant improvement in HHI scores(p<0.005)and a significant increase in overall SADLS scores(p<0.05)with the use of percutaneous BAHA devices.We did not verify any statistically significant correlation between functional and PROMs results.Conclusions:The BAHA is a safe and effective alternative hearing rehabilitation option in selected patients.The PROMs results prove patient's overall satisfaction.展开更多
Objective: To report a case of intractable skin reactions caused by bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implantation to improve our under-standing and treatment of BAHA implantation-caused skin reactions. Methods:We repo...Objective: To report a case of intractable skin reactions caused by bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implantation to improve our under-standing and treatment of BAHA implantation-caused skin reactions. Methods:We reported a case of severe skin reactions caused by BAHA implantation. Related literature were also reviewed. Results:We found grade IV skin reactions, including hyperplasia around the implant, which led to the removal of the BAHA implant 10 months after implantation. The findings indicated poor skin hygiene, allergy to titanium and inadequate surgicals skills as the possible causes of the skin reaction. Conclusion: Skin adverse reactions, usually rare in BAHA implantation patients, may cause implant removal and implantation failure. We suggest to further investigate the mechanisms underlying titanium allergy. Copyright ? 2016, PLA General Hospital Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Production and hosting by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).展开更多
文摘Objective:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and patient-reported outcomes,and their correlation,after percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid(BAHA)implantation.Methods:A prospective study was conducted between January 2018 and December 2020 in a tertiary care center.All adult patients who were implanted with a percutaneous BAHA device during this evaluation period were included in the study.Complete auditory function and patients reported outcome measures(PROMs)were assessed in the preoperative period and 6 months after the implant activation.The PROMs included a generic form(Medical Outcome Study 36 Short Form Healthy Survey(MOS SF-36)),and three disease-specific forms(Hearing Handicap Inventory(HHI),Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life Scale(SADLS),and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory(THI)).Results:Twenty-two patients with an average age of 53 years were included in the study.The overall functional gain with the BAHA in sound-field pure tone average(PTA)was 29 dB,with no statistically significant differences according to surgical indication(F(3,18)=2.319,p=0.110).The greater the preoperative air-bone gap,the greater the functional gain obtained(r=0.505,p<0.05).In the PROMs,we found a significant improvement in HHI scores(p<0.005)and a significant increase in overall SADLS scores(p<0.05)with the use of percutaneous BAHA devices.We did not verify any statistically significant correlation between functional and PROMs results.Conclusions:The BAHA is a safe and effective alternative hearing rehabilitation option in selected patients.The PROMs results prove patient's overall satisfaction.
基金supported by Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Project:2013B022000046
文摘Objective: To report a case of intractable skin reactions caused by bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implantation to improve our under-standing and treatment of BAHA implantation-caused skin reactions. Methods:We reported a case of severe skin reactions caused by BAHA implantation. Related literature were also reviewed. Results:We found grade IV skin reactions, including hyperplasia around the implant, which led to the removal of the BAHA implant 10 months after implantation. The findings indicated poor skin hygiene, allergy to titanium and inadequate surgicals skills as the possible causes of the skin reaction. Conclusion: Skin adverse reactions, usually rare in BAHA implantation patients, may cause implant removal and implantation failure. We suggest to further investigate the mechanisms underlying titanium allergy. Copyright ? 2016, PLA General Hospital Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Production and hosting by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
