The latest regulatory framework,which has been introduced globally in the form of Basel III,and its implementation in the legislation of the member states of the Euro-pean Union has generated much interest in the impa...The latest regulatory framework,which has been introduced globally in the form of Basel III,and its implementation in the legislation of the member states of the Euro-pean Union has generated much interest in the impact of regulation on the efficiency and profitability of banks.This study aims to examine the impact of the introduction of two major regulatory changes(Basel II and Basel III)on bank performance,in terms of bank size and bank-specific and macroeconomic variables.A two-stage empirical anal-ysis was conducted on a sample of 433 European commercial banks over the 2006–2015 period.In the first stage,relative efficiency was calculated using non-parametric data envelopment analysis.In the second stage,the generalized method of moments was used to examine the impact of bank-specific and macroeconomic variables as well as regulation on bank performance,that is,profitability and efficiency.Consider-ing bank size,the results show a diverse impact of regulation on bank performance.Regarding large-and medium-sized banks,regulation positively affects both efficiency and profitability,whereas,for small banks,it negatively affects performance.The results suggest that larger banks have skillfully adapted to the new regulatory environment.In contrast,small banks have problems with profitability and efficiency because the new regulatory framework has imposed additional administrative and regulatory burdens.This could result in future failure or mergers with larger banks,resulting in a higher concentration in the banking sector and increased systemic risk.Our results strongly suggest that regulation should not be implemented equally for all banks;that is,on a one size fits all terms.A distinction between small and large banks when introducing new regulatory frameworks should be made if a reasonable level of competition is to be preserved.展开更多
The study examines the effect of director’s ownership on capital adequacy and risk taking of private commercial banks in Bangladesh within the Basel capital adequacy framework.The secondary panel data were obtained f...The study examines the effect of director’s ownership on capital adequacy and risk taking of private commercial banks in Bangladesh within the Basel capital adequacy framework.The secondary panel data were obtained from annual report of quoted 20 private commercial Banks in Bangladesh as compiled in the Dhaka Stock Exchange for the period 2015 to 2019.The study finds the director’s ownership concentration plays an important role in capital formation that contributes to reducing excess risk taking.However,the presence of director’s ownership in capital adequacy influences risk-taking practices of banking industries.These results support the research on capital formation and risk taking.The study adds a new dimension to the capital mechanism research that could be a valuable source of knowledge for policy makers and regulators of financial industries.As this study covers the role of director’s ownership on capital adequacy and risk taking,it could be useful for capital formation,regulation,and policy making.展开更多
基金supported by the University of Rijeka projects uniri-mladi-drustv-20-5.and uniri-drustv-18-228.
文摘The latest regulatory framework,which has been introduced globally in the form of Basel III,and its implementation in the legislation of the member states of the Euro-pean Union has generated much interest in the impact of regulation on the efficiency and profitability of banks.This study aims to examine the impact of the introduction of two major regulatory changes(Basel II and Basel III)on bank performance,in terms of bank size and bank-specific and macroeconomic variables.A two-stage empirical anal-ysis was conducted on a sample of 433 European commercial banks over the 2006–2015 period.In the first stage,relative efficiency was calculated using non-parametric data envelopment analysis.In the second stage,the generalized method of moments was used to examine the impact of bank-specific and macroeconomic variables as well as regulation on bank performance,that is,profitability and efficiency.Consider-ing bank size,the results show a diverse impact of regulation on bank performance.Regarding large-and medium-sized banks,regulation positively affects both efficiency and profitability,whereas,for small banks,it negatively affects performance.The results suggest that larger banks have skillfully adapted to the new regulatory environment.In contrast,small banks have problems with profitability and efficiency because the new regulatory framework has imposed additional administrative and regulatory burdens.This could result in future failure or mergers with larger banks,resulting in a higher concentration in the banking sector and increased systemic risk.Our results strongly suggest that regulation should not be implemented equally for all banks;that is,on a one size fits all terms.A distinction between small and large banks when introducing new regulatory frameworks should be made if a reasonable level of competition is to be preserved.
文摘The study examines the effect of director’s ownership on capital adequacy and risk taking of private commercial banks in Bangladesh within the Basel capital adequacy framework.The secondary panel data were obtained from annual report of quoted 20 private commercial Banks in Bangladesh as compiled in the Dhaka Stock Exchange for the period 2015 to 2019.The study finds the director’s ownership concentration plays an important role in capital formation that contributes to reducing excess risk taking.However,the presence of director’s ownership in capital adequacy influences risk-taking practices of banking industries.These results support the research on capital formation and risk taking.The study adds a new dimension to the capital mechanism research that could be a valuable source of knowledge for policy makers and regulators of financial industries.As this study covers the role of director’s ownership on capital adequacy and risk taking,it could be useful for capital formation,regulation,and policy making.
