Red cell distribution width: A predictor of the severity of hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND Compared with patients with other causes of acute pancreatitis,those with hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis(HTG-AP)are more likely to develop persistent organ failure(POF).Therefore,recognizing the individuals at risk of developing POF early in the HTG-AP process is a vital for improving outcomes.Bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis(BISAP),a simple parameter that is obtained 24 h after admission,is an ideal index to predict HTG-AP severity;however,the suboptimal sensitivity limits its clinical application.Hence,current clinical scoring systems and biochemical parameters are not sufficient for predicting HTG-AP severity.AIM To elucidate the early predictive value of red cell distribution width(RDW)for POF in HTG-AP.METHODS In total,102 patients with HTG-AP were retrospectively enrolled.Demographic and clinical data,including RDW,were collected from all patients on admission.RESULTS Based on the Revised Atlanta Classification,37(33%)of 102 patients with HTG-AP were diagnosed with POF.On admission,RDW was significantly higher in patients with HTG-AP and POF than in those without POF(14.4%vs 12.5%,P<0.001).The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated a good discrim-inative power of RDW for POF with a cutoff of 13.1%,where the area under the curve(AUC),sensitivity,and specificity were 0.85,82.4%,and 77.9%,respectively.When the RDW was≥13.1%and one point was added to the original BISAP to obtain a new BISAP score,we achieved a higher AUC,sensitivity,and specificity of 0.89,91.2%,and 67.6%,respectively.CONCLUSION RDW is a promising predictor of POF in patients with HTG-AP,and the addition of RDW can promote the sensitivity of BISAP.

Body-mass index correlates with severity and mortality in acute pancreatitis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Obesity rates have increased sharply in recent decades. As there is a growing number of cases in which acute pancreatitis(AP) is accompanied by obesity, we found it clinically relevant to investigate how body-mass index(BMI) affects the outcome of the disease.AIM To quantify the association between subgroups of BMI and the severity and mortality of AP.METHODS A meta-analysis was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis(PRISMA) Protocols. Three databases(PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library) were searched for articles containing data on BMI, disease severity and mortality rate for AP. Englishlanguage studies from inception to 19 June 2017 were checked against our predetermined eligibility criteria. The included articles reported all AP cases with no restriction on the etiology of the disease. Only studies that classified AP cases according to the Atlanta Criteria were involved in the severity analyses. Odds ratios(OR) and mean differences(MD) were pooled using the random effects model with the DerSimonian-Laird estimation and displayed on forest plots. The meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO under number CRD42017077890.RESULTS A total of 19 articles were included in our meta-analysis containing data on 9997 patients. As regards severity, a subgroup analysis showed a direct association between AP severity and BMI. BMI < 18.5 had no significant effect on severity;however, BMI > 25 had an almost three-fold increased risk for severe AP in comparison to normal BMI(OR = 2.87, 95%CI: 1.90-4.35, P < 0.001). Importantly,the mean BMI of patients with severe AP is higher than that of the non-severe group(MD = 1.79, 95%CI: 0.89-2.70, P < 0.001). As regards mortality, death rates among AP patients are the highest in the underweight and obese subgroups. A BMI < 18.5 carries an almost two-fold increase in risk of mortality compared to normal BMI(OR = 1.82, 95%CI: 1.32-2.50, P < 0.001). However, the chance of mortality is almost equal in the normal BMI and BMI 25-30 subgroups. A BMI >30 results in a three times higher risk of mortality in comparison to a BMI < 30(OR = 2.89, 95%CI: 1.10-7.36, P = 0.026).CONCLUSION Our findings confirm that a BMI above 25 increases the risk of severe AP, while a BMI > 30 raises the risk of mortality. A BMI < 18.5 carries an almost two times higher risk of mortality in AP.

Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE Ⅱ scoring system in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome

AIM: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a process with variable involvement of regional tissues or organ systems.Multifactorial scales included the Ranson, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE Ⅱ) systems and Balthazar computed tomography severity index (CTSI).The purpose of this review study was to assess the accuracy of CTSI, Ranson score, and APACHE Ⅱ score in course and outcome prediction of AP.METHODS: We reviewed 121 patients who underwent helical CT within 48 h after onset of symptoms of a first episode of AP between 1999 and 2003. Fourteen inappropriate subjects were excluded; we reviewed the 107 contrastenhanced CT images to calculate the CTSI. We also reviewed their Ranson and APACHE Ⅱ score. In addition, complications,duration of hospitalization, mortality rate, and other pathology history also were our comparison parameters.RESULTS: We classified 85 patients (79%) as having mild AP (CTSI ＜5) and 22 patients (21%) as having severe AP (CTSI ≥5). In mild group, the mean APACHE Ⅱ score and Ranson score was 8.6±1.9 and 2.4±1.2, and those of severe group was 10.2±2.1 and 3.1±0.8, respectively. The most common complication was pseudocyst and abscess and it presented in 21 (20%) patients and their CTSI was 5.9±1.4. A CTSI ≥5 significantly correlated with death,complication present, and prolonged length of stay.Patients with a CTSI ≥5 were 15 times to die than those CTSI ＜5, and the prolonged length of stay and complications present were 17 times and 8 times than that in CTSI ＜5,respectively.CONCLUSION: CTSI is a useful tool in assessing the severity and outcome of AP and the CTSI ≥5 is an index in our study. Although Ranson score and APACHE Ⅱ score also are choices to be the predictors for complications,mortality and the length of stay of AP, the sensitivity of them are lower than CTSI.

Clinical significance of melatonin concentrations in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis

AIM: To assess the value of plasma melatonin in pre-dicting acute pancreatitis when combined with the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) and bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis (BISAP) scoring systems. METHODS: APACHEⅡ and BISAP scores were calculated for 55 patients with acute physiology (AP) in the first 24 h of admission to the hospital. Additionally, morning (6:00 AM) serum melatonin concentrations were measured on the first day after admission. According to the diagnosis and treatment guidelines for acute pancreatitis in China, 42 patients suffered mild AP (MAP). The other 13 patients developed severe AP (SAP). A total of 45 healthy volunteers were used in this study as controls. The ability of melatonin and the APACHEⅡ and BISAP scoring systems to predict SAP was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The optimal melatonin cutoff concentration for SAP patients, based on the ROC curve, was used to classify the patients into either a high concen-tration group (34 cases) or a low concentration group (21 cases). Differences in the incidence of high scores, according to the APACHEⅡ and BISAP scoring sys- tems, were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The MAP patients had increased melatonin levels compared to the SAP (38.34 ng/L vs 26.77 ng/L) (P = 0.021) and control patients (38.34 ng/L vs 30.73 ng/L) (P = 0.003). There was no significant difference inmelatoninconcentrations between the SAP group and the control group. The accuracy of determining SAP based on the melatonin level, the APACHEⅡ score and the BISAP score was 0.758, 0.872, and 0.906, respectively, according to the ROC curve. A melatonin concentration ≤ 28.74 ng/L was associated with an increased risk of developing SAP. The incidence of high scores (≥ 3) using the BISAP system was significantly higher in patients with low melatonin concentration (≤ 28.74 ng/L) compared to patients with high melatonin concentration (> 28.74 ng/L) (42.9% vs 14.7%, P = 0.02). The incidence of high APACHEⅡ scores (≥ 10) between the two groups was not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The melatonin concentration is closely related to the severity of AP and the BISAP score. Therefore, we can evaluate the severity of disease by measuring the levels of serum melatonin.

A body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with acute pancreatitis: a study of Japanese patients

BACKGROUND:In Asian population, there is limited infor mation on the relevance between obesity and poor outcomes in acute pancreatitis(AP). The objective of this study was to examine the clinical impact of obesity based on body mass index(BMI) on prognosis of AP in Japanese patients.METHODS:A total of 116 patients with AP were enrolled in this study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine relations between BMI and patients’ outcomes. Additionally, to investigate whether including obesity as a prognostic factor improved the predic tive accuracy of a Japanese prognostic factor score(PF score)a receiver-operating characteristic(ROC) curve analysis of mortality was conducted.RESULTS:Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that BMI ≥25 kg/m2was associated with a significant higher mor tality [odds ratio(OR)=15.8; 95% confidence interval(CI):1.1-227; P=0.043]. The area under the ROC curve(AUC) for the combination of PF score and BMI ≥25 kg/m2(AUC=0.881;95% CI:0.809-0.952) was higher than that for the PF score alone(AUC=0.820; 95% CI:0.713-0.927)(P=0.034).CONCLUSIONS:The negative impact of a high BMI on the prognosis of AP was confirmed in a Japanese population Including BMI ≥25 kg/m2 as an additional parameter to PF score enhanced the predictive value of the PF score for AP-related mortality.

Can ultrasound predict the severity of acute pancreatitis early by observing acute fluid collection?

INTRODUCTIONThe spectrum of acute pancreatitis (AP) ranges from a mild spontaneously resolved disorder to severe disease with mortality up to 20%-48.4%[1-3]. sAP is defined as the AP with organ failure and /or local complications which developed form acute fluid collection (AFC) including necrosis ,abscess , pseudocyst formation into or around the pancreas [4].

Extrapancreatic necrosis volume:A new tool in acute pancreatitis severity assessment?

BACKGROUND Many scores have been suggested to assess the severity of acute pancreatitis upon onset.The extrapancreatic necrosis volume is a novel,promising score that appears to be superior to other scores investigated so far.AIM To evaluate the discriminatory power of extrapancreatic necrosis volume to identify severe cases of acute pancreatitis.METHODS A total of 123 patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis at Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,St Spiridon Hospital between January 1,2017 and December 31,2019 were analyzed retrospectively.Pancreatitis was classified according to the revised Atlanta classification(rAC)as mild,moderate,or severe.Severity was also evaluated by computed tomography and classified according to the computed tomography severity index(CTSI)and the modified CTSI(mCTSI).The results were compared with the extrapancreatic volume necrosis to establish the sensitivity and specificity of each method.RESULTS The CTSI and mCTSI imaging scores and the extrapancreatic necrosis volume were highly correlated with the severity of pancreatitis estimated by the rAC(r=0.926,P<0.001 and r=0.950,P<0.001;r=0.784,P<0.001,respectively).The correlation of C-reactive protein with severity was positive but not as strong,and was not significant(r=0.133,P=0.154).The best predictor for the assessment of severe pancreatitis was the extrapancreatic necrosis volume[area under the curve(AUC)=0.993;95%confidence interval(CI):0.981-1.005],with a 99.5%sensitivity and 99.0%specificity at a cutoff value of 167 mL,followed by the mCTSI 2007 score(AUC=0.972;95%CI:0.946-0.999),with a 98.0%sensitivity and 96.5%specificity,and the CTSI 1990 score(AUC=0.969;95%CI:0.941-0.998),with a 97.0%sensitivity and 95.0%specificity.CONCLUSION Radiological severity scores correlate strongly and positively with disease activity.Extrapancreatic necrosis volume shows the best diagnostic accuracy for severe cases.

BISAP评分、白细胞介素-6、降钙素原与重症急性胰腺炎预后的相关性研究

目的 分析急性胰腺炎严重程度床边指数(BISAP)评分、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、降钙素原(PCT)与重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)预后的相关性。方法 选取2020年1月-2023年9月我院收治的86例SAP患者,根据预后情况分为死亡组(27例)、生存组(59例)。所有患者入院后均予以胃肠减压、禁食、抗感染等对症治疗及预防并发症治疗,并检测患者入院时的BISAP评分、血清IL-6、PCT水平。比较生存组、死亡组的BISAP评分、IL-6及PCT水平,分析SAP患者预后不良的危险因素,采用Pearson直线相关分析IL-6、PCT水平及BISAP评分与SAP预后的相关性。结果 死亡组的BISAP评分、血清IL-6、PCT水平高于生存组(P<0.05)。经Logistic回归分析显示,BISAP评分及血清IL-6、PCT水平较高是SAP患者预后不良的危险因素(OR>1,P<0.05)。Pearson直线相关分析显示,BISAP评分及血清IL-6、PCT水平与SAP患者预后不良呈正相关(r>0,P<0.05)。结论 SAP患者的BISAP评分及血清IL-6、PCT水平较高与预后不良密切相关。

Evaluation of diagnostic findings and scoring systems in outcome prediction in acute pancreatitis

AIM: To determine factors related to disease severity, mortality and morbidity in acute pancreatitis. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-nine consecutive patients were admitted with the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (AP) in a 5-year period (1998-2002). In a prospective design, demographic data, etiology, mean hospital admission time, clinical, radiological, biochemical findings, treatment modalities, mortality and morbidity were recorded. Endocrine insuffi ciency was investigated with oral glucose tolerance test. The relations between these parameters, scoring systems (Ranson, Imrie and APACHE Ⅱ) and patients' outcome were determined by using invariable tests and the receiver operating characteristics curve. RESULTS: One hundred patients were men and 99 were women; the mean age was 55 years. Biliary pancreatitis was the most common form, followed by idiopathic pancreatitis (53/ and 26/, respectively). Sixty-three patients had severe pancreatitis and 136 had mild disease. Respiratory rate > 20/min, pulse rate > 90/min, increased C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels, organ necrosis > 30/ on computed tomography (CT) and leukocytosis were associated with severe disease. The rate of glucose intolerance, morbidity and mortality were 24.1/, 24.8/ and 13.6/, respectively. CRP > 142 mg/L, BUN > 22 mg/dL, LDH > 667 U/L, base excess > -5, CT severity index > 3 and APACHE score > 8 were related to morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSION: APACHE Ⅱ score, LDH, base excess and CT severity index have prognostic value and CRP is a reliable marker for predicting both mortality and morbidity.

丙氨酰谷氨酰胺联合奥曲肽+乌司他丁对重症急性胰腺炎患者BISAP评分、YKL-40和炎症因子的影响

目的 评价予以重症急性胰腺炎患者丙氨酰谷氨酰胺+奥曲肽+乌司他丁对血清甲壳质酶蛋白(YKL-40)、急性胰腺炎严重程度指数评分(BISAP)和炎症因子的影响。方法 以奇偶法将本院在2020年9月~2022年9月期间收治的64例重症急性胰腺炎患者分成观察组和对照组,每组各32例。观察组患者采取丙氨酰谷氨酰胺+奥曲肽+乌司他丁治疗,对照组患者采取奥曲肽+乌司他丁治疗,比较两组间临床疗效、炎症因子水平、BISAP评分及YKL-40水平、微循环、氧化应激、不良反应。结果 (1)观察组临床总有效率较对照组高(P<0.05);(2)观察组C反应蛋白(CRP)、白介素-6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)、白介素-8(IL-8)水平较对照组显著降低(P<0.05);(3)观察组治疗后BISAP评分、YKL-40水平较对照组低(P<0.05);(4)观察组灌注血管密度(PVD)、灌注血管比例(PPV)、微血管流动指数(MFI)水平均较对照组高(P<0.05);(5)观察组超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)水平较对照组高,丙二醛(MDA)、活性氧(ROS)水平较对照组低(P<0.05);(6)两组不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 在重症急性胰腺炎的治疗中,丙氨酰谷氨酰胺+奥曲肽+乌司他丁疗效及安全性均较为理想,可促进患者微循环及氧化应激指标改善,对减轻疾病损害具有重要意义,值得推广。

Role of oxygen free radicals in patients with acute pancreatitis

The generation of oxygen free radicals has been implicated in the pathogenesis of experimental pancreatitis.The aim of this study was to determine the role of oxygen free radicals in patients with acute pancreatitis.METHODS: The plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP),lipid peroxide (LPO), myeloperoxidase (MPO) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were measured in 13 patients with acute pancreatitis and 14 healthy volunteers.RESULTS: Among the patients with acute pancreatitis, there were higher plasma levels of LPO and MPO and lower SOD activity in patients with severe pancreatitis than in those with mild pancreatitis. However, there was no significant difference in the serum marker of oxidative stress no matter what the etiology was. The LPO level was especially correlated with the concentration of serum CRP and CT severity index.CONCLUSION: The oxygen free radicals may be closely associated with inflammatory process and the severity of acute pancreatitis. Especially, the concentration of plasma LPO is a meaningful index for determining the severity of the disease.

BISAP评分、NIR、HCT及钙离子评估急性胰腺炎严重程度及预后的临床价值

目的:探讨急性胰腺严重床旁指数(BISAP)评分、中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞比(NLR)、红细胞比容(HCT)、血清钙离子(Ca^(2+))与急性胰腺炎(AP)严重程度和预后的关系。方法:选取371例AP患者为研究对象,根据病情分为轻症AP组(MAP组,n=220)、中度重症AP组(MSAP组,n=111)及重症AP组(SAP组,n=40);根据患者预后分为死亡组(n=15)和生存组(n=356)。比较不同病情患者临床资料(性别、年龄、住院时间、住院费用)及不同病情和预后患者实验室检查指标[中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、红细胞比容(HCT)、Ca^(2+)、AP严重程度床旁指数(BISAP)评分],分析实验室检查指标与AP严重程度和预后的关系。结果:不同病情患者NLR、HCT、Ca^(2+)、BISAP评分均有统计学差异(P<0.05),且随病情加重,NLR、HCT、BISAP评分均增加(P<0.05),Ca^(2+)水平均降低(P<0.05)。生存组患者NLR、HCT水平及BISAP评分均低于死亡组(P<0.05),Ca^(2+)水平高于死亡组(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,NLR、HCT、Ca^(2+)水平与BISAP评分预测AP患者预后死亡的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.857(95%CI:0.817~0.891)、0.842(95%CI:0.801~0.878)、0.806(95%CI:0.762~0.845)、0.870(95%CI:0.831~0.902);灵敏度分别为80.00%、66.67%、73.33%、93.33%,特异度分别为92.70%、93.26%、80.06%、76.40%,均对AP患者预后死亡有较好的预测价值(P<0.05)。结论:NLR、HCT及血清钙离子水平及BISAP评分指标均可辅助评估AP病情严重程度,并对患者预后有一定的预测价值。

TyG指数、GLR联合BISAP评分对高甘油三酯血症性急性胰腺炎严重程度的早期预测价值分析

目的分析甘油三酯-葡萄糖(TyG)指数、葡萄糖与淋巴细胞比值(GLR)联合急性胰腺炎严重程度床边指数(BISAP)评分对高甘油三酯血症性急性胰腺炎(HTG-AP)严重程度的早期预测价值。方法回顾性分析2018年5月至2023年5月武汉市第三医院收治的166例HTG-AP患者的临床资料,其中非重症组113例,重症组53例。比较两组入院24 h内采集的临床资料,采用多因素logistic回归分析重症HTG-AP发生的独立影响因素,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析TyG指数、GLR、BISAP评分预测重症HTG-AP的效能。结果重症组高血压病、糖尿病人数比例大于非重症组,住院时间长于非重症组,淋巴细胞(LYM)、钙(Ca^(2+))水平低于非重症组,红细胞体积分布宽度(RDW)、D-二聚体(DDI)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、空腹血糖(FPG)、总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、TyG指数、GLR水平及BISAP评分高于非重症组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,较高水平的TyG指数、GLR、BISAP评分均是促进重症HTG-AP发生的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析结果显示,TyG指数、GLR、BISAP评分均具有预测重症HTG-AP发生的应用价值(P<0.05),且BISAP评分联合TyG指数或GLR的预测效能较单一指标更优。结论TyG指数、GLR及BISAP评分与HTG-AP严重程度相关,TyG指数或GLR联合BISAP评分对HTG-AP严重程度有较高的早期预测价值。

基于 BISAP 评分系统的护理干预对重症胰腺炎 患者自我护理能力、生活质量的影响分析

目的探讨基于床旁严重度指数(Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis,BISAP)评分系统的护理干预对重症胰腺炎患者自我护理能力、生活质量的影响。方法方便选取2022年1月-2023年5月福建医科大学附属协和医院收治的88例重症胰腺炎患者为研究对象,接随机数表法分为对照组和BISAP评分组,各44例。对照组接受临床重症胰腺炎患者的常规护理,BISAP评分组接受基于BISAP评分系统的护理干预。对比两组患者的护理1周、护理2周后自我护理能力、生活质量及护理满意度。结果护理1周、护理2周时,BISAP评分组的自我护理能力评估量表中对健康知识掌握、自我认同、自我责任感、自我护理能力等维度评分值均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05);BISAP评分组的生活质量综合评估量表中躯体功能、心理功能、社会功能、物质生活状态等维度评分值均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。出院当日,BISAP评分组的平均护理满意度评分(94.76±5.43)分高于对照组(84.93±8.05)分,差异有统计学意义(t=6.715,P<0.05)。结论基于BISAP评分系统的护理干预应用于重症胰腺炎患者中,可积极提升其自我护理能力及生活质量,同时有助于护理满意度的优化。

Organ dysfunction as a risk factor for early severe acute pancreatitis

We read with interest the review paper by Tao et al. on thetopic of early severe acute pancreatifis (EASP, defined as severeacute pancreatitis according to the Altanta criteria, with organdysfunction within 72 h after the start of symptoms) in a recentissue of the World Journal of Gastroenterology. It addressesan important problem in patients with severe acute pancreatitis,namely early organ dysfunction and its effect on outcomes.

红细胞分布宽度与血钙比值结合BISAP评分对急性胰腺炎严重程度的预测价值

目的探讨红细胞分布宽度(RDW)与血钙比值(RCR)结合急性胰腺炎严重程度床边指数(BISAP)评分对急性胰腺炎(AP)严重程度的预测价值。方法回顾性分析我院2018年6月~2019年6月诊断为急性胰腺炎的患者132例,按疾病严重程度分为重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)组和轻、中度急性胰腺炎(非SAP)组,收集两组患者的基线资料进行统计分析。结果SAP组患者RDW、RCR、BISAP评分在入院后第1、3、7 d均明显高于非SAP组,SAP组患者Ca^(2+)在入院后第1、3、7 d均明显低于非SAP组(P<0.05)。两组患者RDW、RCR、BISAP评分均随住院时间延长呈下降趋势,Ca^(2+)住院时间延长呈上升趋势(P<0.05)。非SAP组、SAP组的RCR均在第1 d处于最高水平,随后随着住院时间的推移逐渐降低(均P<0.05);ROC曲线结果显示:BISAP评分的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.848,RCR为0.744,高于RDW(ROC:0.695)、Ca^(2+)(ROC:0.650)(P<0.05),而RCR联合BISAP评分的AUC(0.883)最高,灵敏度为79.31%,特异度为91.26%。结论RCR可以作为预测AP严重程度的指标,结合BISAP评分,可较准确的预测AP严重程度。

BISAP评分联合血清sRAGE评估急性高脂血症性胰腺炎严重程度和短期预后的价值

目的探讨急性胰腺炎严重程度床旁指数(BISAP)评分联合血清可溶性晚期糖基化终产物受体(sRAGE)对急性高脂血症性胰腺炎(HLAP)严重程度和预后评估的价值。方法选取2017年3月—2022年8月安徽医科大学第二附属医院HLAP患者142例。对所有患者行急性生理与慢性健康评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)、序贯器官衰竭估计(SOFA)评分和BISAP评分。收集所有患者的临床资料和实验室检测结果,并检测血清sRAGE水平。根据BISAP评分结果将患者分为重症HLAP(重症组,54例)和非重症HLAP(非重症组,88例)。根据患者入院30 d的生存状态分为死亡组(42例)和非死亡组(100例)。采用Logistic回归分析评估HLAP患者入院30 d死亡的危险因素。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价各项指标鉴别诊断重症HLAP和判断HLAP患者入院30 d死亡的效能。结果与非重症组比较,重症组APACHEⅡ评分、SOFA评分和sRAGE水平均显著升高(P<0.05)。与非死亡组比较,死亡组C反应蛋白(CRP)、sRAGE水平和BISAP评分≥3分所占比例、APACHEⅡ评分、SOFA评分均显著升高(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,APACHEⅡ评分升高和sRAGE水平升高均是重症HLAP的危险因素[比值比(OR)值分别为1.17和1.01,95%可信区间(CI)分别为1.03~1.34和1.00~1.01]。BISAP评分≥3分和血清sRAGE水平是HLAP患者入院30 d死亡的危险因素(OR值分别为1.99和1.01,95%CI分别为1.53~2.98和1.00~1.03)。sRAGE鉴别诊断重症HLAP的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.73。BISAP评分、sRAGE单项和联合检测判断HLAP患者入院30 d死亡的AUC分别为0.81、0.67、0.86。CRP、SOFA评分、APACHEⅡ评分和sRAGE联合检测鉴别诊断重症HLAP的AUC为0.77。CRP、SOFA评分、APACHEⅡ评分、sRAGE和BISAP评分联合检测判断HLAP患者入院30 d死亡的AUC为0.89。结论sRAGE对HLAP患者病情严重程度的判断有一定意义。联合应用sRAGE和BISAP评分有助于提高对患者短期预后的评估效能。

BISAPG评分对急性胰腺炎严重程度的预测价值

目的探讨急性胰腺炎严重程度床边指数(BISAP)评分联合空腹血糖(fasting blood glucose,FBG)水平(BISAPG)对急性胰腺炎(AP)严重程度的预测价值。方法回顾性分析2020年8月至2022年8月在武汉大学人民医院确诊为AP的患者264例,其中诊断为重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)的患者96例,非重症急性胰腺炎(NSAP)168例。收集患者临床相关数据、实验室数据、BISAP评分和入院24小时内FBG。采用多因素Logistic回归模型分析SAP发生的危险因素。用Spearman相关分析法分析BISAP评分和FBG之间的关系。采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)评估BISAP评分、FBG及BISAPG评分对AP严重程度的预测价值。用校准曲线以及决策曲线分析分别评估BISAPG评分拟合度和临床实用性。结果SAP组Alb、A/G、RBC值均小于NSAP组,FBG、WBC、AMY、LIPA、PCT、CRP及BISAP评分均大于NSAP组(P<0.05),两组在TG、BMI指数、性别间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。多因素分析显示,BISAP评分及入院24小时内FBG是SAP发生的独立危险因子(P<0.05)。Spearman相关分析显示,FBG值与BISAP评分呈正相关关系(r=0.409,P<0.01)。BISAP评分、FBG预测SAP的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.832、0.810。BISAPG预测SAP发生的AUC为0.882,高于二者的独立评价,并且具有较高的临床实用性。结论BISAP评分和FBG对急性胰腺炎严重程度均具有一定预测价值,二者联合应用时预测价值更高。

基于BISAP-HDL预警模型联合集束化护理在急性胰腺炎患者中的应用效果

目的探讨床旁指数-高密度脂蛋白(BISAP-HDL)预警模型联合集束化护理在急性胰腺炎(AP)中的应用效果。方法前瞻性选取2021年2月至2022年2月中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇四医院治疗的80例AP患者为研究对象,通过随机数字表法将患者分为对照组(n=42)和观察组(n=38)。对照组给予集束化护理,观察组给予基于BISAP-HDL预警模型联合集束化护理。比较治疗前24 h、治疗后1周两组急性生理与慢性健康评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)、BISAP-HDL评分,两组住院时间、腹痛缓解时间和淀粉酶恢复时间、治疗前后免疫功能、炎症因子水平,两组入院28 d病死率情况。结果治疗后1周,两组APACHEⅡ、BISAP-HDL评分均低于治疗前24 h,且观察组低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组住院时间,腹痛缓解时间和血、尿淀粉酶恢复正常时间均短于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组CD4^(+)高于治疗前,且观察组高于对照组(P<0.05),而两组CD8^(+)、免疫球蛋白G、白细胞介素-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α和C反应蛋白低于治疗前,且观察组低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组和对照组入院28 d病死率分别为7.89%(3/38)和16.67%(7/42),比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论BISAP-HDL预警模型联合集束化护理有利于AP患者恢复,改善其免疫功能和炎症因子水平。

基于BISAP评分系统的护理干预在急性重症胰腺炎患者中的应用效果

目的探讨基于急性胰腺炎严重程度床边指数(BISAP)评分系统的护理干预在急性重症胰腺炎(SAP)患者中的应用效果。方法选取2019年12月至2020年4月我院收治的58例SAP患者为研究对象,按照护理干预方式的不同将其分为对照组(29例,常规护理)与观察组(29例,常规护理+基于BISAP评分系统的护理干预)。比较两组的护理效果。结果观察组的白细胞计数、血淀粉酶、尿淀粉酶及血脂肪酶恢复正常时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组均未发生并发症,对照组的并发症总发生率为20.69%,组间比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。护理后,观察组的急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)及BISAP评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。护理后,两组的汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分均降低,纽卡斯尔护理服务满意度量表(NSNS)评分均升高,且观察组优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论基于BISAP评分系统的护理干预可促进SAP患者恢复,降低并发症发生率,改善预后,提高心理健康状态及护理满意度。